Macron urges Putin to accept Ukraine ceasefire in first phone call since 2022
The pair, who had not spoken since September 2022, according to the Élysée presidential palace.
Macron "emphasised France's unwavering support for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity" and "called for the establishment, as soon as possible, of a ceasefire and the launch of negotiations between Ukraine and Russia for a solid and lasting settlement of the conflict", the French presidential office said.
Putin blamed the West for the Ukraine conflict in his telephone conversation and said any peace deal should be "long-term", said the Kremlin readout of the call.
"Vladimir Putin reminded [Macron] that the Ukrainian conflict is a direct consequence of the policy of Western states," the Kremlin said in a statement. Putin added that Western states had "for many years ignored Russia's security interests" and "created an anti-Russian bridgehead in Ukraine".
The Kremlin said Putin told the French president that any peace deal should be "comprehensive and long-term, provide for the elimination of the root causes of the Ukrainian crisis and be based on new territorial realities".
Putin has previously said Ukraine must accept Russia's annexation of swathes of its territory as part of any peace deal.
Macron seeks diplomatic solution to Iran's nuclear programme, missiles
Macron's office said the French president also stressed the need for Iran to comply with its obligations under the UN's Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and to cooperate fully with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The French president expressed his "determination" to seek a diplomatic solution that would allow for a lasting settlement of the nuclear issue, the question of Iran's missiles and its role in the region.
Putin told Macron that Iran has a "right" to develop a "peaceful" nuclear programme, said the Kremlin.
The two leaders agreed to coordinate their efforts and to speak again soon, the Élysée statement said.
Attempts at high-level contact between France and Russia
The French leader tried in a series of phone calls in 2022 to warn Putin against invading Ukraine and travelled to Moscow early that year.
He kept up phone contact with Putin after the invasion but talks then ceased, with the last call between the presidents dating back to September 2022.
Macron has over the last year toughened his line against Russia, saying its expansionism is a threat to all of Europe.
The French president has also refused to rule out putting troops on the ground in Ukraine.
In April 2024, Russia's then defence minister Sergei Shoigu and French counterpart Sebastien Lecornu, a close confidant of Macron, held talks focused on security in the run-up to the Olympic Games in Paris.
That was the last official high-level contact between the two countries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
US strikes in Iran: 'In the past, the use of force in the name of nuclear counter-proliferation has proven counterproductive'
A few days after US and Israeli strikes targeted the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan sites in Iran, what can be said about the effects − and effectiveness − of such actions? To provide clarity, I am offering two reminders and three corrections by drawing on the findings of independent research on military nuclear programs. First, a reminder: In the Middle East, Israel has possessed a nuclear arsenal since 1967, but to date, Iran does not have one. This is significant because the official, expert and media framings of the nuclear issue as one of "proliferation" have introduced confusion. In France, claims of an imminent Iranian bomb have been circulating since at least 2006. A survey conducted by Nuclear Knowledges/IFOP on a representative sample of the French population in October 2019, and repeated in October 2024, revealed that over 40% of respondents mistakenly believed Iran already possessed nuclear weapons (42% in 2024). Only 40% of respondents identified Israel as a nuclear-armed state from a list of countries we provided (43% in 2024). A breach of international law Second, the use of force in the name of counter-proliferation is not new, even though it constitutes a violation of international law. The US was already considering such actions against the Soviet program in the late 1940s. Three countries – the US, Israel and the United Kingdom – have engaged in such operations, and the Middle East has been their primary target, including in Iraq (1991, 1993, 1998 and 2003), Syria (2007) and Iran, notably through the assassination of nuclear scientists since the 2010s. It is also important to recall that such assassinations are not new: In 1980, Yahia el-Meshad, who was in charge of Iraq's nuclear program, was murdered in Paris. First correction: The US is commonly portrayed as a major actor in non-proliferation, but independent research has shown that it is by far the leading "proliferating" agent of the nuclear age. Not only did the US develop nuclear weapons first and produce more than 30,000 warheads, but it has also helped the largest number of other nations develop nuclear weapons programs (the United Kingdom, France, Pakistan, India, South Africa and Israel).
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
Pentagon pauses weapons shipment to Ukraine amid worries over US stockpiles
The US is halting some shipments of weapons to Ukraine amid concerns that its own stockpiles have declined too much, officials said Tuesday, a setback for the country as it tries to fend off escalating attacks from Russia. Certain munitions were previously promised to Ukraine under the Biden administration to aid its defenses during the more than three-year-old war. The pause reflects a new set of priorities under President Donald Trump and came after Defense Department officials scrutinised current US stockpiles and raised concerns. 'This decision was made to put America's interests first following a review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries across the globe,' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement. 'The strength of the United States Armed Forces remains unquestioned — just ask Iran.' That was a reference to Trump recently ordering US missile strikes against nuclear sites in Iran. The Pentagon review determined that stocks were too low on some weapons previously pledged, so pending shipments of some items won't be sent, according to a US official who spoke on condition of anonymity to provide information that has not yet been made public. The Defense Department did not provide details on what specific weapons were being held back. 'America's military has never been more ready and more capable,' spokesman Sean Parnell said, adding that the major tax cut and spending package moving through Congress 'ensures that our weapons and defense systems are modernized to protect against 21st century threats for generations to come." The halt of some weapons from the US is a blow to Ukraine as Russia has recently launched some of its biggest aerial attacks of the war, in an escalating bombing campaign that has further dashed hopes for a breakthrough in peace efforts championed by Trump. Talks between the sides have ground to a halt. The US stoppage was first reported by Politico. To date, the US has provided Ukraine more than $66 billion worth of weapons and military assistance since Russia invaded its neighbor in February 2022. Over the course of the war, the US has routinely pressed for allies to provide air defense systems to Ukraine. But many are reluctant to give up the high-tech systems, particularly countries in Eastern Europe that also feel threatened by Russia. Trump met with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the NATO summit last week and had left open the possibility of sending Kyiv more US-made Patriot air defense missile systems, acknowledging they would help the Ukrainian cause. 'They do want to have the antimissile missiles, OK, as they call them, the Patriots,' Trump said then. 'And we're going to see if we can make some available. We need them, too. We're supplying them to Israel, and they're very effective, 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective. They do want that more than any other thing.' Those comments reflect a change of thinking about providing weapons to Ukraine across the administration in recent months. In testimony before lawmakers in June, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said he has moved quickly to quash wasteful programs and redirect funding to Trump's top objectives. Hegseth said a negotiated peace between Russia and Ukraine, which has been promoted for months by Trump, makes America look strong, even though Moscow is the aggressor in the conflict. He also said the defense budget includes hard choices and 'reflects the reality that Europe needs to step up more for the defense of its own continent. And President Trump deserves the credit for that.' The defense secretary told lawmakers last month that some US security spending for Ukraine was still in the pipeline, without providing details. But he said such assistance — which has been robust for the past two years — would be reduced. 05:25 'This administration takes a very different view of that conflict,' Hegseth said. 'We believe that a negotiated peaceful settlement is in the best interest of both parties and our nation's interests.' The change comes after Hegseth skipped a meeting last month of an international group to coordinate military aid to Ukraine that the US created three years ago. Hegseth's predecessor, Lloyd Austin, formed the group after Russia attacked Ukraine, and Hegseth's absence was the first time the US defense secretary wasn't in attendance. Under Austin's leadership, the US served as chair of the group, and he and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff attended monthly meetings, which were both in person and by video. Hegseth had previously stepped away from a leadership role of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group — turning that over to Germany and the United Kingdom — before abandoning the gathering altogether.
Local France
8 hours ago
- Local France
French PM set to survive no-confidence motion
The motion of no-confidence against Bayrou's government was tabled by the Socialist Party (PS) after the collapse of talks on pension reforms. Bayrou does not have a majority in parliament's lower house, the National Assembly, and the vote – expected to take place on Tuesday evening – underscores the fragility of his position and the loss of the Socialists whose support he had until now relied on to stay in power. While centrist veteran Bayrou publicly dismissed the move as a 'joke', he has been fuming in private, said one minister. The French prime minister, 74, 'is pretty angry with the Socialist Party', said the minister on condition of anonymity. 'No more leniency towards Francois Bayrou,' PS leader Olivier Faure said on Sunday. 'We have been betrayed.' While the no-confidence motion has broad support across the left, it is set to fail as it will not receive the backing of the far-right National Rally (RN) under Marine Le Pen. 'Censuring the government today would not benefit the French people,' Le Pen told reporters on Tuesday. On the other hand, she added, the party will pay particular attention to the budget proposed by Bayrou's government. Advertisement The far-right party has not ruled out using its leverage in parliament to vote out Bayrou, as it did with his predecessor Michel Barnier, over the 2026 budget in the autumn. Putting together the 2026 budget will be 'a nightmare' given the extent of France's financial difficulties, government spokesperson Sophie Primas said in March. Bayrou was named prime minister by President Emmanuel Macron in December with a mission to bring stability following months of chaos in the wake of last summer's legislative elections. Were Bayrou to be ejected by parliament in a vote of no-confidence, it would leave Macron seeking his seventh prime minister and cast a heavy shadow over the remaining two years of his presidential mandate.
