US strikes in Iran: 'In the past, the use of force in the name of nuclear counter-proliferation has proven counterproductive'
First, a reminder: In the Middle East, Israel has possessed a nuclear arsenal since 1967, but to date, Iran does not have one. This is significant because the official, expert and media framings of the nuclear issue as one of "proliferation" have introduced confusion. In France, claims of an imminent Iranian bomb have been circulating since at least 2006.
A survey conducted by Nuclear Knowledges/IFOP on a representative sample of the French population in October 2019, and repeated in October 2024, revealed that over 40% of respondents mistakenly believed Iran already possessed nuclear weapons (42% in 2024). Only 40% of respondents identified Israel as a nuclear-armed state from a list of countries we provided (43% in 2024).
A breach of international law
Second, the use of force in the name of counter-proliferation is not new, even though it constitutes a violation of international law. The US was already considering such actions against the Soviet program in the late 1940s. Three countries – the US, Israel and the United Kingdom – have engaged in such operations, and the Middle East has been their primary target, including in Iraq (1991, 1993, 1998 and 2003), Syria (2007) and Iran, notably through the assassination of nuclear scientists since the 2010s. It is also important to recall that such assassinations are not new: In 1980, Yahia el-Meshad, who was in charge of Iraq's nuclear program, was murdered in Paris.
First correction: The US is commonly portrayed as a major actor in non-proliferation, but independent research has shown that it is by far the leading "proliferating" agent of the nuclear age. Not only did the US develop nuclear weapons first and produce more than 30,000 warheads, but it has also helped the largest number of other nations develop nuclear weapons programs (the United Kingdom, France, Pakistan, India, South Africa and Israel).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
28 minutes ago
- Euronews
A year after riots, France hosts summit on future of New Caledonia
More than a year after deadly unrest hit the French overseas territory of New Caledonia, France's President Emmanuel Macron is bringing together the leaders of the Pacific archipelago for a summit in Paris from Wednesday. The event will focus on the future of New Caledonia, and is being attended by lawmakers, economic figures and civil society representatives from the archipelago. It follows stalled negotiations between pro-independence and anti-independence politicians which were held in May, when French Minister for Overseas Territories, Manuel Valls, hosted an inconclusive three-day meeting. The minister's' 'sovereignty with France' project, which included a provision for introducing dual French and New Caledonian nationality, sparked a backlash from anti-independence backers. At the other end of the spectrum, pro-independence politicians favour full independence, while many others want increased autonomy. This time around, Macron has announced that discussions would last "as long as necessary", in order to ensure that key issues were addressed "with all the seriousness they deserve". As it stands, talks are set to run until the weekend, with no fixed deadline. However, the content and schedule of this latest summit remains unclear. A number of discussions will be devoted to the economy and the future of nickel, as New Caledonia holds between 20% and 30% of global nickel resources. New Caledonia was hit by mass riots in May 2024, triggered by French government plans to give thousands of non-indigenous long-term residents voting rights. The unrest resulted in the death of 14 people and caused billions of euros worth of damage. As it stands, only Kanaks — New Caledonia's indigenous population — and those who arrived from France before 1998 can cast their ballots in elections. However, since 1998 a further 40,000 French citizens have moved to the overseas territory of New Caledonia. France held three referendums in New Caledonia on independence between 2018 and 2021 as part of an agreement known as the Noumea Accords that followed a 1988 peace deal that ended violence between rival factions. A majority of voters chose to remain part of France instead of backing independence. The pro-independence Kanak people rejected the results of the latest referendum in 2021, which they boycotted because it was held at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic that severely affected the Kanak community. According to the 2019 census, 32.5% of Indigenous Kanaks — who make up 41% of the region's total population — live in poverty.
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
US administration to pause arms supplies to Ukraine
01:35 02/07/2025 Macron urges Ukraine ceasefire in first Putin talks since 2022 02/07/2025 French PM Bayrou survives latest no-confidence motion 02/07/2025 Dalai Lama pledges he won't be the final leader of Tibetan Buddhism 02/07/2025 France protects vulnerable populations amid extreme heat 02/07/2025 US President seeking truce ahead of Netanyahu visit 02/07/2025 Trump says Israel agreed to 60-day Gaza ceasefire, but Israel has not confirmed Middle East 02/07/2025 'Society totally collapsing': Civilians in war-torn Gaza 'desperate, they feel alone and abandoned' Middle East 02/07/2025 US weapons: 'Ukraine is turning towards its other allies' Europe 02/07/2025 'Horrific': Ailing author Sansal 'caught up' in ever-escalating Franco-Algerian diplomatic fallout Africa
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
EU and US aim towards agreement to avoid 50% tariffs by 9 July
The EU and the US are moving toward an agreement that would take the form of a headline 'political understanding' to resolve their tariff dispute before the 9 July deadline, rather than a comprehensive deal, according to several diplomats and an EU official. 'If there is to be an agreement, the most realistic outcome would likely be a general framework or a 'principle agreement' — something that, due to time constraints, would resemble the kind of understanding the US has reached with the UK or even with China,' a senior EU diplomat said. 'This would not be a detailed, comprehensive trade deal, but rather a political understanding laying the groundwork for more concrete arrangements," they added. The potential agreement was discussed at a behind-closed-doors meeting in Brussels on Monday, with European Commission officials briefing EU ambassadors about the ongoing negotiations between the EU and the US. Ambassadors were also informed of a new US counterproposal, which offered 'nothing very concrete', one of the diplomats said. Both sides under pressure The EU and the US are under pressure from the looming 9 July deadline, after which US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose 50% tariffs on EU imports if negotiations fail. Since mid-March, Washington has implemented a new policy that calls into question its trade relations with partners across the globe. The US currently imposes tariffs of 50% on EU steel and aluminium, 25% on cars, and 10% on all EU imports. After weeks of fruitless discussions, negotiations between the European Commission — which holds the mandate to negotiate on behalf of the 27 member states in trade matters — and the Trump administration began in mid-June, but their outcome remains in doubt. The Commission initially proposed a zero-tariff agreement on industrial products and an offer to purchase strategic goods such as US liquefied natural gas. But it now appears to be coming to terms with a deal that would maintain a baseline 10% tariff on EU imports. Lower tariffs might then be negotiated for strategic sectors such as aircraft, for which transatlantic production lines are interdependent. However, member states are divided over a potential deal with a baseline 10% tariff. Germany and Italy are reportedly in favour, while countries like Ireland and France remain more sceptical. 'If the US maintain 10% tariffs, there will have to be compensation on goods and products imported from the US,' French president Emmanuel Macron stated on 26 June after an EU summit, adding: 'The levy must be the same — 10% for 10%, or the equivalent of 10%.' A second EU diplomat told Euronews that the agreement could be deliberately short for the two parties to reach further and more detailed agreements in different sectors. "It is not excluded that some sectors could be addressed while others are not," an EU official said. 'Asymmetrical agreement' possible European Commission officials also asked ambassadors to consider several scenarios, including the possibility of an 'asymmetrical agreement' in which the EU would make more concessions than the US, the prospect of no deal, and the option of the EU triggering retaliatory measures. During the same meeting with the member states, the Commission indicated that a second list of countermeasures proposed on 8 May was still under development, according to a third EU diplomat. This list was subject to feedback from industry over several weeks, and member states will still need to adopt it formally. The proposed list targets €95 billion in US products. It would come on top of a first list of retaliation, which covers €21 billion worth of US products and was suspended until July 14 after Donald Trump announced a 90-day truce in the trade dispute. A team of Commission experts is in Washington this week to advance the negotiation. The EU's trade commissioner, Maroš Šefčovič, is set to travel there on Wednesday for a meeting on Thursday with his American counterparts, US Secretary of Commerce Howard William Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Lee Greer. On Monday, Šefčovič confirmed that the bloc had received 'the first draft of the (US) proposals for the eventual agreement in principle.'
