logo
Gerry Adams case against BBC branded 'a cynical attempt to launder his reputation'

Gerry Adams case against BBC branded 'a cynical attempt to launder his reputation'

Extra.ie​23-05-2025

Gerry Adams sued the BBC in a 'cynical attempt… to launder his reputation', the High Court has been told.
The jury heard closing speeches in Mr Adams's defamation case against the BBC, which he says wrongly alleged that he sanctioned the killing by the IRA of Sinn Féin official and informant Denis Donaldson.
Mr Adams claims the 2016 Spotlight documentary Spy In The IRA damaged his reputation as a peacemaker. Gerry Adams. Pic: Collins Courts
Paul Gallagher, the BBC's barrister, said the case was important as it involved 'the right to free speech, the right to ask questions, the right to give information to the public'.
He said: 'This case is very much about Gerry Adams's reputation. Not just is he entitled to damages… but also whether this was a reasonable and fair publication.
'We say this is, in truth, a cynical attempt by Mr Adams to launder his reputation, to say that his reputation is something different than what he in effect acknowledged under questioning – that people out there repeatedly said, that he was a member of the IRA, of the army council. That is his reputation.' Paul Gallagher. Pic: Brian Lawless/PA Wire
He continued: 'The IRA was a terrorist organisation which held this country, and the North, hostage for three decades.
'To have a reputation of being a member of that organisation and being on the army council is something that is very significant and goes to the heart of the case.'
Mr Gallagher said it was important that the atrocities that the IRA had committed were borne in mind by the jury.
'Are we to say nothing about that? Mr Adams would like us to say nothing,' he said.
'To put himself forward as the peacemaker, with no hint in his evidence in chief of this dimension of his reputation.'
He said the producers of the programme had the courage to believe they had learned something which should be shared with the public, regardless of the consequences to them. Gerry Adams. Pic: Collins Courts
The programme had covered the alleged sanctioning of the killing of an informer, he said.
He noted a 'universality' of newspaper reports from the 1970s on, stating Mr Adams was reputed to be a member of the IRA, and Mr Adams's consistent refusal to condemn the actions of the IRA. He cited Mr Adams's comment at a press conference in 1978 that 'everybody in West Belfast knows the consequence of informing is death'.
Mr Gallagher also noted evidence of Mr Adams carrying the coffins of bombers.
Mr Gallagher said the media had an essential role to play in allowing the country to face up to the past, adjust to it, and ensure such things did not happen again.
This was why the media had a defence to defamation claims, to allow for a fair and reasonable report to be made on a matter of public interest, he contended.
Mr Gallagher said Mr Adams's case wrongly claimed the allegation was based on just one anonymous source – when it fact it was corroborated by six other people.
Responding, Declan Doyle, barrister for Mr Adams, said the damages which the jury should award should be 'very substantial indeed'. Declan Doyle. Pic: Brian Lawless/PA Wire
He said: 'This is widespread circulation by a national broadcaster of an allegation of coldblooded, cynical murder.'
He said the right to free speech must be balanced against a person's right to their good name.
The BBC, he said, had 'nailed their colours to the mast' in saying that Mr Adams had no reputation to damage.
However, he accused them of 'cheek beyond belief' in accusing Mr Adams of ignoring a significant part of his own reputation.
'It is they who have deliberately and cynically chosen to ignore Mr Adams's reputation for peace and reconciliation,' he said.
Mr Doyle accused the BBC of taking a 'reductive, narrow and prejudiced' view of Mr Adams, a repeatedly elected politician. He also said the BBC had failed to verify the allegation through An Garda Síochána – instead relying on 'shadowy sources'.
Judge Alexander Owens has now begun his charge to the jury, which continues today.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tommy Robinson to appear in court charged with harassing two journalists
Tommy Robinson to appear in court charged with harassing two journalists

Sunday World

time2 hours ago

  • Sunday World

Tommy Robinson to appear in court charged with harassing two journalists

The 42-year-old will appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday, facing charges over his alleged conduct towards two Daily Mail reporters Tommy Robinson was jailed at Woolwich Crown Court last October after admitting 10 breaches of a High Court order made in 2021 (Jordan Pettitt/PA) Political activist Tommy Robinson is due to appear in court charged with harassing two journalists. The 42-year-old, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, is set to appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday to face charges over his alleged conduct towards two Daily Mail reporters. He is accused of two counts of harassment causing fear of violence between August 5 and 7 2024. Robinson, from Luton, Bedfordshire, was released from prison on May 27 after serving a jail term for the civil offence of contempt of court. He was jailed in October after admitting multiple breaches of an injunction made in 2021, which barred him from repeating false allegations against a Syrian refugee who successfully sued him for libel. The activist left HMP Woodhill after his 18-month sentence was reduced by four months at the High Court. He was filmed speaking on his X social media channel for around 20 minutes with longer hair and a bushy beard, and wearing a rosary around his neck, as he left the prison. Robinson is facing a separate trial in October next year over an accusation that he failed to provide the Pin for his mobile phone when stopped by Kent Police in Folkestone in July 2024. Tommy Robinson was jailed at Woolwich Crown Court last October after admitting 10 breaches of a High Court order made in 2021 (Jordan Pettitt/PA) News in 90 Seconds - 5th June 2025

Gerry Adams defamation verdict won't have a chilling effect on journalism - and here's why
Gerry Adams defamation verdict won't have a chilling effect on journalism - and here's why

Irish Times

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Gerry Adams defamation verdict won't have a chilling effect on journalism - and here's why

The defamation case between Gerry Adams and the BBC has many points of interest, legally and politically, but its implications for journalism have been vastly overstated. The former Sinn Féin president won in Dublin's High Court last week because the BBC broadcast a serious allegation against him in a programme that cited only one anonymous source, with no corroboration. Every news organisation would aspire to do better than this under almost all circumstances. Part of the BBC's defence is that it should still have been able to broadcast the claim, aired by its Northern Ireland investigation strand Spotlight in 2016, as a matter of public interest. There are often cases where it is impossible to name sources or publish corroborating evidence. To do so might place people in danger, expose them to prosecution or breach essential promises of confidentiality. READ MORE Irish defamation law allows for a public-interest defence, but this has yet to be used successfully. The BBC is not alone in fearing the law is not working as intended. [ If Gerry Adams wanted to put manners on the BBC, why not do it in Belfast? Opens in new window ] Even in a matter of public interest, however, a news organisation should still demonstrate a serious allegation is more than one person's claim. The BBC said in court it had corroboration from five other confidential sources, but it had not mentioned this in programme, to be fair to Adams. The court was unimpressed by this argument, and little wonder. The BBC's final defence was that there must be freedom to report on figures of historical importance and losing to Adams could create a chill factor over investigations into the Troubles. It asked the jury to make no award of damages, even if it found Spotlight's claim to be untrue. The best insight into how the BBC handles a mistake comes not from the insinuations of Gerry Adams but from Terry Wogan, a truly great Irishman, who after every crisis would quip: 'Deputy heads must head roll' Yet the judge had been clear throughout that the case was not about the Troubles. The jury was instructed to decide if Adams had rehabilitated his reputation sufficiently as a 'peacemaker' after the Belfast Agreement for a 2016 allegation about a 2006 murder to damage his reputation. The jury found it had, although its €100,000 award was on the lower end of what might have been expected. Many Troubles victims will be dismayed to hear Adams described as a peacemaker, but his Troubles reputation remains where it belongs. Speaking outside court after the verdict, Adams said taking the case was 'about putting manners on the British Broadcasting Corporation'. Seamus Dooley, secretary of the National Union of Journalists , condemned this comment as 'chilling', as well as 'unfair and unreasonable', given Spotlight's 40-year record of 'amazing investigative journalism'. An Amnesty report this week found Northern Ireland is the most dangerous place in the UK to be a journalist. Public figures have a responsibility not to make matters worse. However, Adams's remark will not have made much difference to anyone: it was a familiar sort of jibe, to be enjoyed by a harmless republican audience. Only loyalists and dissident republicans pose a physical threat to the media. Adams added he suspected the BBC had come under 'direct political interference' to continue a case it could have settled years earlier with an apology. It is only slightly facetious to suggest that Sinn Féin has already benefited enough from murky British dealings. What political motivation could there be to press on with a plainly weak case that was almost certain to work out in Adams's favour? The obvious explanation is by far the most likely: the BBC pressed on because it is an intractable bureaucracy with no respect for public money. Adams might be familiar with the concept of an organisation that struggles to back down. There has been a recent, relevant demonstration of this culture within BBC Northern Ireland. In 2023, it reached a confidential settlement in an alleged bullying case with a Spotlight producer, Lena Ferguson. She received an award and costs with no admission of liability. The BBC then issued a statement congratulating itself. 'We didn't want to be in a lengthy dispute with Lena and are happy that we can all now move forward,' it said. Yet the case had dragged out for four years, involving allegations dating back 20 years from Ferguson and others. The problem became serious enough to be raised in the House of Commons. Many people in the media in Belfast feared Spotlight had become dysfunctional, with implications for the quality of its journalism. They were appalled by the BBC's legal obstinacy towards Ferguson but hardly surprised. The best insight into how the BBC handles a mistake comes not from the insinuations of Gerry Adams but from Terry Wogan, a truly great Irishman, who after every crisis would quip: 'Deputy heads must roll.' We may be years away from even that stage of this fiasco.

Letters: No matter the provocation from Hamas, the response from Israel is inhumane
Letters: No matter the provocation from Hamas, the response from Israel is inhumane

Irish Independent

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Letters: No matter the provocation from Hamas, the response from Israel is inhumane

One can argue that Israel had the right to use the standard military doctrine of overwhelming force to prosecute its military response and not seek or accept proportionality of casualties. One can argue that given the urban character and high population density of Gaza, collateral damage and high civilian casualties were inevitable. One can argue that Hamas's well-documented tactic of using schools and hospitals for command and control posts, ammunition dumps and firing points – effectively using children and the sick as human shields – could lead to these people being targeted. One can argue that the group's tactic of firing from buildings to lure Israeli infantry before detonating mines could lead to a corresponding Israeli tactic of wholesale destruction of these buildings, rather than the normal practice of clearing house-by-house. One can also argue that Hamas's strategy of retaining the hostages in the face of this onslaught has allowed Israel to retain the semblance of moral rectitude and given cover for its heavy-handedness. But the deliberate collective punishment and starvation of 2.2 million people and the expulsion from one area to another within the Gaza Strip in forced evacuations is inhumane and dehumanising. R Healy, Mullagh, Co Cavan US should look at itself before it lectures other nations about free speech Ian O'Doherty tells us that the United States has taken it upon itself to warn Ireland over the dangers of our proposed hate-speech legislation ('Free speech, America and the EU: we know which way our leaders will lean' – June 4). It was a 'friendly chat', apparently, though such chats from Washington often come with a raised eyebrow and a wagging finger. This is from a country whose president has already vowed to prosecute journalists he dislikes, has banned sections of the press from the White House briefing room and routinely refers to unfavourable coverage as 'treason', all while border agents inspect travellers' social media accounts for impure thoughts. The First Amendment is a fine principle, but its most ardent defenders often appear oddly selective in their defence of it, especially when abroad. Before advising sovereign nations on freedom of expression, the US might take a moment to recall the old maxim: physician, heal thyself. Enda Cullen, Tullysaran Road, Armagh If Adams runs for the Áras, we can't blame the electorate if he doesn't get elected Senan Molony suggests that if former Sinn Féin leader Gerry Adams becomes our next president it will be the fault of the BBC ('If Adams becomes next president, it would be ironic the BBC paved the way' – June 4). I wonder if Mr Adams does decide to run for the Áras and is not successful, will it then be the fault of the electorate? I would ultimately give the electorate the respect they deserve no matter what the outcome. Aidan Roddy, Cabinteely, Dublin 18 If you value love, not hate, stand with us at Pride marches across Ireland I am in my 30s and have been protest­ing since I was six years of age. I remember going with all of the kids in my class to the local government building to campaign for them to fund our secondary school. That school opened when I was 16. I have marched for marriage equality, for Repeal; I've protested alongside Trans and Intersex Pride; for Irish language rights; in solidarity with Palestine and much more. Marching together for a common cause is empowering to those affected and for those who love us. Pride is no different. This year, Dublin alone has a 'Dyke March' (June 27), Pride (June 28) and Trans & Intersex Pride (July 12). Then there are all the Pride parades around the country. All of these marches are moments of unity for us, when we stand together proudly against a world that is telling us to be quiet, to be grateful for what we have, to expect less for ourselves and for other oppressed peoples. If you want to stand on the sidelines and support us, bring your kids, bring your grandparents. If you want to march with us, find a group or make a group and march with us in solidarity. The rise of hatred towards minority groups in this country terrifies me. The changes in the wider world are almost incomprehensible. Take a stand, with us, for us, together against those who would oppress us. Jess Connor, Glasnevin, Dublin 9 Times have changed, but you still can't beat having a newspaper in your hands On Thursday, May 25, 1995, the final editions of the Irish Press and Evening Press were published. I remember at that time fearing it might well be the tip of the iceberg and that many other papers were likely to follow. Some did, but thankfully many are still available to accompany the pint of milk back to the breakfast table. Despite technology and the advent of various media, the 'real' news­paper is still number one in our house, as it was in the house in which I grew up in the 1950s and 60s. With regard to this canonical matter, Flann O'Brien's assertion on the 'pint of plain' could wittingly be applied, 'the paper is your only man'. Michael Gannon, St Thomas Square, Kilkenny Time to draw a line under the use of pen and paper by students in State exams That students still put pen to paper in the Leaving and Junior Certificate in our computerised world is a joke. They should leave school equipped with software development skills. Liam Doran, Clondalkin, Dublin 22 Forget 'Winkgate' – Reds can still hold their heads high in spite of defeat I'm sorry to see such a massive match was soured by a cynical wink from Sharks scrum-half Jaden Hendrikse in his side's win over Munster in the URC quarter-final last Saturday. But to his credit, Jack Crowley never blinked. The Reds can still walk tall.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store