‘Nations who aid terror will pay a price': How India's SCO diplomacy sends a message beyond Beijing
At the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation meeting in Tianjin, India's Foreign Minister S Jaishankar called for an unflinching fight against terrorism, highlighting the Pahalgam attack as proof of old threats taking new forms. He warned SCO nations against complacency, reminded them of their founding mission, and urged practical cooperation rooted in respect and sovereignty. Amid diplomatic back-and-forth with China and criticism at home, Jaishankar argued that real stability demands courage, clarity and collective resolve.
IANS New Delhi, July 13 (IANS) External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar will embark on a three-day visit to China starting Sunday to attend the Foreign Ministers' Meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) member states being held in Tianjin. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar didn't mince words in Tianjin. Facing his counterparts from China, Pakistan and other SCO members, he reminded them why the organisation exists. 'The three evils that SCO was founded to combat were terrorism, separatism and extremism. Not surprisingly, they often occur together,' he said. The recent terror attack in Pahalgam on 22 April was his example — a deliberate strike aimed at tearing apart Kashmir's tourism lifeline and stoking a religious fault line.
The UN Security Council echoed India's anger, condemning the attack and urging that 'perpetrators, organisers, financiers and sponsors of this reprehensible act of terrorism' must be held accountable. Jaishankar's message to the SCO was clear: stick to your founding principles or risk irrelevance.
Jaishankar stressed that India has already acted and will keep acting. The country's response — Operation Sindoor — crossed into Pakistani territory and hit terror bases in PoK, targeting Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammad and Hizbul Mujahideen camps. It was a stark signal to the region: India won't sit idle while terror factories flourish next door.His warning wasn't limited to bombs and bullets. Jaishankar pointed to a world drifting into chaos — more conflicts, more coercion, more economic uncertainty. 'In the last few years, we have seen more conflicts, competition and coercion. Economic instability is also visibly on the rise,' he said. His prescription? Countries must stabilise the global order and 'de-risk various dimensions' together.Of course, not everything he said landed smoothly. Back home, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi mocked him for meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping. 'I guess the Chinese foreign minister will come and apprise Modi about recent developments in China-India ties. The EAM is now running a full blown circus aimed at destroying India's foreign policy,' Rahul fired on X.
For Jaishankar, though, the optics mattered less than the substance. 'Called on President Xi Jinping this morning in Beijing along with my fellow SCO Foreign Ministers. Conveyed the greetings of President Droupadi Murmu & Prime Minister @narendramodi. Apprised President Xi of the recent development of our bilateral ties,' he wrote.He also held talks with his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi. Their discussion touched on the border standoff, people-to-people ties, trade blockades — all the friction points that can't be brushed under the carpet. 'Held detailed talks… Spoke about the need for a far-seeing approach… Confident that on the foundation of mutual respect, mutual interest and mutual sensitivity, ties can develop along a positive trajectory,' Jaishankar posted.Beyond the drama, Jaishankar laid out India's approach to keep the SCO meaningful. First, respect each other's borders and sovereignty. 'It is essential that such cooperation is based on mutual respect, sovereign equality and in accordance with territorial integrity and sovereignty of member states,' he said.Second, deepen ties in concrete ways. India's recent push ranges from startup innovation to traditional medicine and digital public infrastructure. These are practical bridges that can outlast politics.Jaishankar knows talk of cooperation rings hollow without real connections. The lack of assured transit within the SCO region, he argued, stifles trade. He pressed members to get behind the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), a 7,200 km freight corridor linking India with Iran, Afghanistan, Russia and Europe. If it gains steam, it can change how the region trades with itself and the world.The final piece of Jaishankar's message focused on Afghanistan. For years, the country has been a permanent item on SCO agendas. 'The compulsions of regional stability are buttressed by our longstanding concern for the well-being of the Afghan people,' he said. He urged other members to step up development assistance. India, he promised, will do its bit.On the sidelines, Jaishankar met Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov — 'Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Minister of External Affairs of India @DrSJaishankar hold a meeting on the sidelines of the #SCO Council of Foreign Ministers meeting,' Russia's Foreign Ministry posted. He caught up with Iran's Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi too: 'Good to catch up with FM @araghchi of Iran, this time on the sidelines of the SCO Foreign Ministers Meeting in Tianjin,' Jaishankar wrote.At its core, Jaishankar's message to the SCO was blunt: you can't cherry-pick what threats to ignore. Old problems — terrorism, separatism, extremism — won't fade if you keep turning a blind eye for convenience. The choice for the SCO is simple: stand firm, act together, or watch your relevance drain away one crisis at a time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
13 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Daunted by trade war, US firms in China report record-low investment plans
American companies in China are reporting record-low new investment plans for this year and declining confidence in their profitability, with uncertainty in US-China relations and President Donald Trump's tariffs their top concerns, according to a new survey. The companies are also challenged by China's slowing economy, where weak domestic demand and overcapacity in local industries are eroding profitability for the Americans. Businesses in China are less profitable now than they were years ago, but risks, including reputational risk, regulatory risk, and political risk, are increasing, said Sean Stein, the president of the US-China Business Council, a Washington-based group that represents American companies doing business in China, including major multinationals. The survey, conducted between March and May and drawing from 130 member companies, was released Wednesday. It came as the two countries clash over tariffs and non-tariff measures, including export controls on critical products such as rare-earth magnets and advanced computer chips. Following high-level talks in Geneva and London, US and Chinese officials agreed to pull back from sky-high tariffs and restrictions on exports, but uncertainty persists as the two sides are yet to hammer out a more permanent trade deal. Kyle Sullivan, vice president of business advisory services at the USCBC, said more than half of the companies in the survey indicated they do not have new investment plans in China at all this year. "That's a record high, Sullivan said, noting that it is a new development that we have not observed in previous surveys. Around 40 per cent of companies reported negative effects from US export control measures, with many experiencing lost sales, severed customer relationships, and reputational damage from being unreliable suppliers, according to the survey. Citing national security, the US government has banned exports to China of high-tech products, such as the most advanced chips, which could help boost China's military capabilities. Stein argued that export controls must be very carefully targeted, because businesses from Europe or Japan, or local businesses in China would immediately fill the void left by American companies. Silicon Valley chipmaker Nvidia won approval from the Trump administration to resume sales to China of its advanced H20 chips used to develop artificial intelligence, its CEO Jensen Huang announced on Monday, though the company's most powerful chips remain under US export control rules. While 82% of US companies reported profits in 2024, fewer than half are optimistic about the future in China, reflecting concerns over tariffs, deflation, and policy uncertainty, according to the survey. Also, a record high number of American businesses plan to relocate their business operations outside of China, Sullivan said, as 27% of the members indicated so, up from 19 per cent the year before. In a departure from past surveys, concerns over China's regulatory environment, including risks of intellectual property misuse and lack of market access, didn't make it to the top five concerns this year. That's likely a first, and not for a good reason, Stein said. It is not because things got dramatically better on the Chinese side, but the new challenges, often coming from the US, are now posing as much of a challenge, Stein said. Almost all the American companies said they cannot remain globally competitive without their Chinese operations. A survey from the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China in May found that European companies were cutting costs and scaling back investment plans in China as its economy slows and fierce competition drives down prices.
Hans India
13 minutes ago
- Hans India
BrahMos Missile Demand Surges As Lucknow Facility Begins Advanced Materials Production
Following Operation Sindoor's successful strikes against terror and military installations in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir, international interest in India's BrahMos supersonic missile has intensified significantly. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh has announced that over 14 nations have expressed procurement interest in the Indo-Russian joint venture missile system. The heightened global demand has coincided with the establishment of a new BrahMos production facility in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, launched shortly after Operation Sindoor concluded. This development has been further strengthened by PTC Industries Limited's emergence as India's pioneering private sector manufacturer of titanium and superalloy components—materials essential for missile systems, naval vessels, and aircraft manufacturing. This manufacturing capability positions India as the sixth global producer of these sophisticated materials, alongside the United States, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, and China. The facility operates within the Uttar Pradesh Defence Industrial Corridor framework, where over seven defence manufacturing units have commenced operations. PTC's Lucknow facility now provides titanium raw materials and precision-engineered components specifically for BrahMos production. Titanium's exceptional strength-to-weight characteristics and heat resistance properties make it invaluable for aerospace and defence manufacturing applications. Sachin Agarwal, Chairman and Managing Director of PTC Industries, emphasized India's previous import dependency for these critical materials. "Previously, we relied on international suppliers for essential aircraft and submarine components. Now, India maintains domestic production capabilities. This eliminates a significant vulnerability and prevents any nation from leveraging supply restrictions against us during critical periods," Agarwal explained. Beyond BrahMos components, PTC manufactures specialized alloys for international aerospace manufacturers, including Dassault Aviation's Rafale fighter aircraft program. The drive toward indigenous defence manufacturing has gained critical importance as India seeks to minimize foreign supplier dependence—a priority highlighted by supply chain disruptions during the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Indian military leadership has consistently emphasized that future conflicts will rely on domestically produced weapons and equipment. Operation Sindoor represented not only BrahMos's first combat deployment but also showcased India's indigenous defence manufacturing capabilities to the international community. To address increasing demand, a comprehensive strategic materials complex featuring four specialized production units was inaugurated last month alongside the BrahMos manufacturing line in Lucknow. The integrated facility encompasses a primary metals unit for titanium and superalloy ingot production, a large-scale casting facility, a forging plant for critical components, and a precision machining center dedicated to aerospace parts including jet engine components and missile systems.
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Jaishankar in China: A cooperative Beijing is desirable, but a less uncooperative one is India's best bet
Written by Udayan Das For the first time in five years, since the 2020 standoff along the Line of Actual Control, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar travelled to China and met President Xi Jinping, his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi and Vice President Han Zheng, before heading off to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation's Council of Foreign Ministers (SCO-CFM) meet. The meeting is consistent with the steps taken by New Delhi and Beijing since late last year to restore some normalcy to bilateral ties. This started with the Modi-Xi meeting on the sidelines of the BRICS Summit in Kazan in October 2024, followed by a flurry of high-level meetings, including trips to China by National Security Advisor Ajit Doval in December 2024 and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh in June 2025. Evidently, we are witnessing the renegotiation of a new order on partly new foundations. The earlier order was facilitated through the Border Peace and Tranquillity Agreement in 1993, which agreed to incrementally resolve the boundary question through the maintenance of peace and status quo on the borders. As the treaty brought India and China to the table, it built a modicum of trust and transparency that allowed other avenues like trade to develop. This order, however, was broken with the skirmishes in Galwan five years ago. Compared to the presence of a bulwark of institutional commitments and operational trade, the new order possesses an unpredictability of conflict and weaponisation of trade. The road to a new arrangement, like most diplomatic formulations, would not be easy, quick or foolproof. The visit is one of the many steps necessary to create a positive foundation. The meeting indicates India's strategy of simultaneously cooperating and competing with China. There has always been a consensus that New Delhi and Beijing need not agree and cooperate on every issue. The optimal outcome for India would be to cooperate with China wherever possible and evade conflict entirely. Therefore, a sub-optimal outcome is more plausible for India, where they initiate piecemeal cooperation on immediate issues and simultaneously develop instruments that would restrict the chances of conflict. This would also allow both parties to find passages to de-escalate, in case a conflict breaks out. New Delhi has taken this route, evident from Jaishankar stating to his Chinese counterpart that the emerging foundation should be on the principle that 'differences should not become disputes, nor should competition ever become conflict'. There is a clear division of impending issues that need to be resolved rather quickly, while the rest are put on a slow burner. For India, there is a third kind as well: Issues that have a bearing on the relations but are extremely difficult to resolve, and as a result, remain undiscussed. The border question, in this context, remains the most significant and vexed. It is likely to be put aside for a while, again, as there are no immediate resolutions in sight. For India, the answer remains elusive to the question: How do you deal with a militarily superior power in a border conflict? India has initiated internal strengthening, but that is not going to provide results overnight. External intervention remains unreliable as this is strictly a bilateral issue where third parties would not invest or engage without interests. The plausible ways are to simultaneously keep closing the gap and engage with the rival via diplomatic mechanisms. As disengagement is underway at crucial junctures of Eastern Ladakh, the onus is now to arrange a modus vivendi. The issues that can be resolved quickly are in the domain of trade. China's curbs on exporting rare earth magnets are hurting India's automobile sector badly. The Indian government has rightly initiated incentives for home-grown solutions, but developing an alternative supply chain would take time and not immediately compensate for the Chinese withdrawals. EAM Jaishankar specifically brought up the issue of 'restrictive trade measures and roadblocks' that need to be discussed ahead. Finally, there are issues that are undiscussed, like the case of the China-Pakistan relationship and the issue of the Dalai Lama's succession. India's consistent stand on terrorism is commendable, but that is unlikely to have any effect on Beijing's relations with Islamabad. Irrespective of India's symbolic measures, influence or pressure, China and Pakistan would continue to work according to their realist calculations. It is unlikely that India would bring up the Dalai Lama in official discussions. While China has asserted its role in choosing the successor, India has stated that this remains an issue of cultural conventions and not the state. Despite this, China continues to be irked by the Dalai Lama being housed in Dharamsala, acknowledged as a spiritual leader by many in India. In the months to come, India and China are likely to engage further in the making of this new bilateral order. It will not be easy for New Delhi: It has to hold its ground on many issues, continuously strengthen itself internally, and find ways to engage with Beijing for mutual goals. A cooperative China is desirable, but a less uncooperative one is India's best bet to preserve its core interests. The writer teaches at the Department of Political Science, St. Xavier's College, Kolkata and is a Visiting Fellow with Asian Confluence, Shillong
