logo
Texas Legislature approves $338 billion two-year spending plan with a focus on property tax relief

Texas Legislature approves $338 billion two-year spending plan with a focus on property tax relief

Yahoo2 days ago

Texas lawmakers signed off Saturday on a $338 billion two-year spending plan that directs billions toward hiking teacher pay, cutting property taxes and shoring up the state's water infrastructure, after House and Senate budget writers ironed out their differences and won approval from both chambers on their final draft.
The budget now heads to Comptroller Glenn Hegar, who is expected to verify there is enough revenue to cover the Legislature's planned spending — the last step before the 1,056-page bill reaches Gov. Greg Abbott's desk.
The spending plan doles out the money to run the state's business for the next two years, from September through the end of August 2027. It includes the underlying funding for some of the biggest bills passed this session, much of it paid for with general revenue, Texas' main source of taxpayer funds used to cover core services.
Lawmakers approved $149 billion in general revenue spending, with the rest drawn from federal funds and other state revenue earmarked for specific uses.
The budget's $338 billion price tag is nearly $17 billion more than what lawmakers budgeted two years ago, about a 5% increase. However, the Legislature is expected to approve additional spending for the current cycle — which runs through the end of August — in what is known as the supplemental budget, lessening the year-to-year increase.
A large chunk of the budget — more than one out of every seven dollars — is devoted to maintaining and providing new property tax cuts, a tab that has grown to $51 billion. For the last several years, lawmakers have tried to rein in Texans' property tax bills by sending billions of dollars to school districts to reduce how much in property taxes they collect from homeowners and businesses.
The state does not collect property taxes; its coffers are filled through a combination of sources that include sales tax, taxes on oil and gas production, and franchise taxes on businesses.
With the help of a projected $24 billion budget surplus, the Legislature is spending some $45 billion to maintain existing cuts lawmakers have enacted since 2019, with the rest going toward a mix of 'compression' — sending money to school districts to replace funds they otherwise would have collected in property taxes, thus lowering tax rates — and raising the state's homestead exemption, or the amount of a home's value that can't be taxed to pay for public schools. A chunk of the money will also go toward tax cuts for businesses.
About $3 billion of the property tax relief will come from money lawmakers had originally planned to spend on border security. The team of five senators and five House members who hammered out the final budget draft diverted nearly half of the $6.5 billion set aside for the state's border clampdown in earlier versions, marking one of the biggest eleventh-hour budget changes.
It was a reflection of a monthslong decrease in illegal border crossings and the billions that could be coming to Texas under a tentative federal plan to reimburse states for their immigration enforcement efforts under the Biden administration.
Sen. Joan Huffman, a Houston Republican who chairs the Senate Finance Committee, said the spending plan is a 'responsible, balanced budget that falls within all constitutional and statutory spending limits and meets the needs of our rapidly growing state.'
'The Texas economy is the envy of the nation, and the budget will secure our state's prosperity for generations to come,' Huffman, the Senate's lead budget writer, said on the floor Saturday. 'We have leveraged our state surplus over several sessions to make targeted, one-time investments without burdening future budgets.'
Rep. Greg Bonnen, R-Friendswood and Huffman's counterpart in the House, said the budget 'prioritizes public education, tax relief, public safety, infrastructure and improving taxpayer services for individuals and businesses.'
The House and Senate have been largely aligned on budget matters this session. Each chamber approved plans earlier this year that spent similar amounts overall and lined up on big-ticket items including how much money to put toward school vouchers, property tax cuts and water infrastructure. Much of the fine print — outlining how that money would be used — was worked out in separate bills.
Among the marquee items is an $8.5 billion boost for Texas' public schools, the product of weeks of negotiations between the chambers. The funding package, known as House Bill 2, provides extra money for teacher and staff pay raises, educator preparation, special education, safety requirements and early childhood learning.
Another $1 billion in the budget is set aside for a school voucher program that will allow families to use public money to fund their children's private school tuition or pay for a range of school-related expenses. Abbott has already signed the voucher bill into law and has said he will approve the school funding bill.
'We passed historic policies for the nearly 6 million students across Texas, but this is where we bring those policies to life,' Sen. Brandon Creighton, R-Conroe and chair of the Senate Education Committee, said of the state budget, known as Senate Bill 1. 'Without SB 1, those reforms are just words on paper. This budget turns our promises into action and gives lasting weight to our priorities.'
Shannon Halbrook, a fiscal policy expert at the left-leaning think tank Every Texan, said the budget contains 'some things that we consider wins with an asterisk.'
'We're definitely happy that they're investing more into public education,' Halbrook said. 'It's not quite the way we would have preferred for them to do it. For example, we've consistently advocated for increasing the basic allotment, because it's a really simple way to provide additional funding for schools across the board. Instead, HB 2 chooses to kind of do it in a much more complicated, convoluted way.'
More than 70% of the budget is reserved for education and health and human services, the latter of which includes Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program, which provides health coverage for children from low-income households that make too much to qualify for Medicaid.
One lingering uncertainty was how much the state would hike pay for personal care 'community attendants,' who are paid through the Medicaid program to help patients with tasks such as laundry, errands, grooming, eating and medication. The House had proposed increasing their base wage to more than $14 an hour, nearly $2 more than the Senate's proposal.
Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, a Brenham Republican and the chamber's lead health care budget writer, said the issue amounted to 'one of the most contentious parts' of her section of the budget. In the end, the chambers agreed to meet in the middle, spending nearly $1 billion in general revenue to hike the attendants' base pay to $13 an hour.
Rep. Donna Howard, D-Austin, said the attendants fulfill a critical function caring for vulnerable Texans, and even with the pay raises, 'we have not gotten anywhere near where we need to be.' But, she acknowledged, 'we did get something.'
'This is the Legislature's budget. It doesn't have everything in it we want,' said Howard, a longtime member of the House Appropriations Committee. 'That's the whole point of why we're here. It's a compromise with the Senate … And any compromise doesn't include everything we fought for in the House.'
The budget also puts some $10 billion toward the state's energy, water and broadband infrastructure. That includes $5 billion to double the Texas Energy Fund, a low-interest taxpayer-funded loan program meant to incentivize the development of gas-fueled power plants.
Lawmakers are also putting $2.5 billion into the Texas Water Fund as part of the supplemental budget for the current spending cycle. The fund is used to pay for new water supply projects — such as desalination — repairing old water infrastructure, conservation and flood mitigation projects.
In November, voters will be asked to approve a proposal to allot $1 billion a year starting in 2027— $20 billion in total — until 2047 to secure the state's water supply.
Disclosure: Every Texan has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The household auto fleet is a money pit
The household auto fleet is a money pit

Fast Company

time31 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

The household auto fleet is a money pit

There's a financial crisis hiding in plain sight: the American household vehicle fleet. Families are hemorrhaging money through car payments, insurance, fuel, maintenance, depreciation, parking, and registration. In many cases, this adds up to more than a family's annual savings—or the cost of sending a child to college every four years. Car ownership is nearly universal in the U.S., with 92% of households owning at least one vehicle. About 37% own two cars, and 22% own three or more. In 2023, the average annual cost to own and operate a new vehicle climbed to $12,182. For households with two cars, that's nearly $25,000 per year—a recurring expense that too often escapes scrutiny. Now consider how those vehicles are used. In 2021, more than half of all daily trips in the U.S. were under three miles. Nearly 30% were less than one mile. We're paying a fortune to go nowhere. The rise of remote and hybrid work has amplified the mismatch between cost and use. As of 2023, more than a third of U.S. employees worked remotely full time, with another 41% following hybrid work models. Pew Research Center reported that almost half of remote workers would look for a new job if their employer took this option off the table. Cars are parked roughly 95% of the time, depreciating as they collect pollen and bird droppings. And yet they demand monthly payments, insurance, fuel, and maintenance. The long-distance commute has been the primary reason for every working member of the family needing their own vehicle, but our travel habits have changed. What if owning fewer cars was a sign of more success? A growing number of families are experimenting with a car-lite lifestyle—ditching the second or third car and rediscovering local travel through bikes, transit, or walking. They're not doing it to make a statement. They're doing it to make ends meet—and to take back their time. At the center of this quiet shift: the e-bike. Part appliance and part liberation machine, e-bikes are redefining what a 'vehicle' can be. School drop-offs, grocery runs, commutes, and social visits—trips once assumed to require a car—are increasingly accomplished with battery-assisted pedaling. Terrain and distance fade as barriers. In 2022, more than 1.1 million e-bikes were sold in the U.S., nearly quadruple the number from 2019. E-bikes now account for over 20% of total bicycle sales in the U.S., and they represented 63% of revenue growth in the bike industry between 2019 and 2023. Bikes have become robust enough to handle everything from kid pickups to bulk grocery runs, and more cities are creating rebate programs to accelerate adoption. Replacing a car with an e-bike can save a household $120,000 over a decade—enough to wipe out debt, fund a college account, or boost retirement savings. And as infrastructure improves with more protected lanes, slower streets, and secure parking, the e-bike can graduate from practical to preferable. What if you spent less on movement and more on meaning? What if streets worked as well for bikes as they do for cars? What if getting around town felt like a lifestyle upgrade? For too long, success was measured by how many vehicles fit in your driveway. But those cars aren't status symbols—they're financial sinkholes. Remember, more than half of America's car trips are under a few miles. If you're going broke to go nowhere, the journey needs a new map.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store