Luton Airport boss says environment fears 'being taken seriously'
Environmental concerns over London Luton Airport's approved expansion plans are being taken "very seriously", the airport's boss has said.On Thursday, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander approved the plans that would see a new terminal, new taxiways and an increase in annual passengers up to 32 million by 2043.However, environmental campaigners said "70,000 more aircraft a year" was the "last thing" the environment needed.Alberto Martin, chief executive of the airport, said the plans had a "legally binding framework" that put limits on noise and carbon emissions.
"Already we do have the highest proportion of any airport in Europe of the most modern aircraft," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme."We're talking about the quietest aircraft up there in the skies, the most fuel efficient... sustainability remains at the centre of these plans and they come with the most far reaching and robust environmental commitments of any UK airport."It comes with a very innovative scheme. It's called Green Control Growth, and it's actually a legally binding framework with limits... on noise, limits on carbon emissions, limits on air quality and surface access."Those limits will need to be met in order for the airport to be allowed to grow."
But countryside charity CPRE said the expansion made "a mockery" of the government's "commitment to reaching net zero by 2030".Local campaign group LADACAN said the "increasing cost of damage caused by climate change" outweighed any benefits.Mr Martin said the airport worked closely with the airlines to ensure they used the most modern and efficient aircraft."It's important to know that aviation is twice as efficient as it was 30 years ago and technology continues evolving," he added."Believe me when I tell you we are extremely conscious of those impacts."
The plans were approved by the government despite the Planning Inspectorate recommending they be rejected over the environmental concerns.After the approval, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: "This decision will help us deliver growth as part of our plan for change."Luton was the UK's fifth busiest airport last year, with 16.9 million people travelling on 132,000 flights.
Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Calls for 'lifeline' bus cap to remain in place
Calls are being made for a "lifeline" cap on bus fares to remain, as the government prepares to announce its spending Farron, MP for Westmorland and Lonsdale in Cumbria, asked transport minister Heidi Alexander to commit to keeping the £3 cap to ensure people could "actually afford to get to work".The minister said any plans for bus fares would be announced on Wednesday, but she was "fully aware" of the importance of an affordable bus Nesbitt, 40, who lives in Kendal and works at Grasmere Gingerbread, said he noticed his bus to work had been much busier since the cap was introduced. The sales and merchandising manager said: "You definitely see more people on the buses now than you used to before the price cap came into play."It's quite a remote place to work in, Grasmere."It's not that far in mileage, but just in terms of day-to-day travel, anything that makes it as easy as possible and isn't causing a financial strain is something that should be welcomed."Farron told the transport minister that, before the price cap came in, the bus journey from Kendal to Ambleside was the second highest in the said with many people on low income working in Cumbria, high bus fares meant they could spend up to a quarter of their salaries on transport. 'Ease congestion' Mr Nesbitt said if the bus cap was to be removed his bus journey to work would be unaffordable."Going back to what it used to be - about £7 a journey or £50 a week for a pass - I just don't think I'd be able to sustain that long term," he said."Salaries do vary, but at least [the bus] is a lifeline that people can use to actually get here. "It's a job - you've got to take the job where you can get it."The Conservative government first introduced a cap on bus fares in 2023, meaning people would never pay more than £2 per single Labour came to power last year the new government chose to continue to fund it for 2025, capped at £3. Farron, a LibDem MP, said he would like to see the cap lowered to £2 again, to make transport "even more accessible."He said: "By making the bus fare cap permanent, we can help people with the cost of living, ease congestion on our busy roads, support struggling local businesses, and reduce our carbon emissions."Alexander said the £3 cap currently only applied to one in six journeys because people who used buses regularly to go to work used weekly or monthly passes, rather than buying single added: "I am fully aware of how important it is that people have an affordable bus network, that they have access to buses."That is something that I have been discussing a lot over recent weeks with the chancellor and we will be making making our announcement in due course."Government plans on the bus fare cap are expected to be announced on Wednesday. Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Powys County Times
2 days ago
- Powys County Times
Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year
The Home Office plans to spend about £2.2 billion of foreign aid to support asylum seekers this financial year, according to new figures. The amount of overseas development assistance (ODA) budgeted by the Home Office – which is largely used to cover accommodation costs such as hotels for asylum seekers – is slightly less than the £2.3 billion it spent in 2024/25. International rules allow countries to count first-year costs of supporting refugees as overseas development assistance (ODA). The figures, first reported by the BBC, were published in recent days on the Home Office website. The Home Office said it is 'urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs' which will cut the amount spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. It also said it was expected to have saved £500 million in asylum support costs in the last financial year, and that this had saved £200 million in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. A total of 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March this year. This figure is down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time', adding that under the previous Conservative government at one stage 'more than 400 hotels were in use and almost £9 million per day was being spent'. Jo White, chairwoman of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. I don't think anything's off the table … including looking at new options such as processing abroad. 'So, we have to be open to see how we can move move that backlog as quickly as possible. I'm getting impatient. 'I know my colleagues in parliament are getting impatient and we're pressing the Government as hard as we can on this.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs. 'This will ultimately reduce the amount of official development assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026. 'The Rwanda scheme also wasted £700 million to remove just four volunteers – instead, we have surged removals to nearly 30,000 since the election, are giving law enforcement new counter-terror style powers, and increasing intelligence sharing through our Border Security Command to tackle the heart of the issue, vile people-smuggling gangs.'
South Wales Argus
2 days ago
- South Wales Argus
Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year
The amount of overseas development assistance (ODA) budgeted by the Home Office – which is largely used to cover accommodation costs such as hotels for asylum seekers – is slightly less than the £2.3 billion it spent in 2024/25. International rules allow countries to count first-year costs of supporting refugees as overseas development assistance (ODA). The figures, first reported by the BBC, were published in recent days on the Home Office website. The Home Office said it is 'urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs' which will cut the amount spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. It also said it was expected to have saved £500 million in asylum support costs in the last financial year, and that this had saved £200 million in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. A total of 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March this year. This figure is down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time', adding that under the previous Conservative government at one stage 'more than 400 hotels were in use and almost £9 million per day was being spent'. Jo White, chairwoman of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. I don't think anything's off the table … including looking at new options such as processing abroad. 'So, we have to be open to see how we can move move that backlog as quickly as possible. I'm getting impatient. 'I know my colleagues in parliament are getting impatient and we're pressing the Government as hard as we can on this.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs. 'This will ultimately reduce the amount of official development assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026. 'The Rwanda scheme also wasted £700 million to remove just four volunteers – instead, we have surged removals to nearly 30,000 since the election, are giving law enforcement new counter-terror style powers, and increasing intelligence sharing through our Border Security Command to tackle the heart of the issue, vile people-smuggling gangs.'
