Luton Airport boss says environment fears 'being taken seriously'
"Already we do have the highest proportion of any airport in Europe of the most modern aircraft," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme."We're talking about the quietest aircraft up there in the skies, the most fuel efficient... sustainability remains at the centre of these plans and they come with the most far reaching and robust environmental commitments of any UK airport."It comes with a very innovative scheme. It's called Green Control Growth, and it's actually a legally binding framework with limits... on noise, limits on carbon emissions, limits on air quality and surface access."Those limits will need to be met in order for the airport to be allowed to grow."
But countryside charity CPRE said the expansion made "a mockery" of the government's "commitment to reaching net zero by 2030".Local campaign group LADACAN said the "increasing cost of damage caused by climate change" outweighed any benefits.Mr Martin said the airport worked closely with the airlines to ensure they used the most modern and efficient aircraft."It's important to know that aviation is twice as efficient as it was 30 years ago and technology continues evolving," he added."Believe me when I tell you we are extremely conscious of those impacts."
The plans were approved by the government despite the Planning Inspectorate recommending they be rejected over the environmental concerns.After the approval, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: "This decision will help us deliver growth as part of our plan for change."Luton was the UK's fifth busiest airport last year, with 16.9 million people travelling on 132,000 flights.
Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Over 70s face UK driving bans if they fail eye tests
The UK is one of only three European countries to rely on self-reporting of eyesight problems that affect driving, leading ministers to consider compulsory eye tests every three years for drivers aged over 70 and a driving ban for those who fail. The shake-up could also see the drink drive limit in England and Wales to be lowered in line with Scotland's laws. Under the plans being considered by Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, the drink-drive limit in England and Wales could be cut from 35 micrograms of alcohol per 100ml of breath to 22 micrograms. 🏠 Moved home? You must update your: ➡ driving licence ➡ vehicle log book (V5C) ➡ Direct Debit for vehicle tax ➡ private number plate documentshttps:// #DVLADigital — Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (@DVLAgovuk) August 8, 2025 This figure would be in line with Scotland, which cut its drink-drive limit in 2014, and the rest of Europe, where no other country has a limit as high as that in England and Wales. Ministers are also considering tougher penalties for uninsured drivers and failing to wear a seatbelt. Last year, 1,633 people were killed and almost 28,000 seriously injured in traffic incidents, and numbers have remained relatively constant following a large fall between 2000 and 2010. A Labour source said: 'At the end of the last Labour government, the number of people killed and seriously injured on our roads was at a record low, but numbers have remained stubbornly high under successive Conservative governments. 'In no other circumstance would we accept 1,600 people dying, with thousands more seriously injured, costing the NHS more than £2 billion per year.' Recommended Reading: Meanwhile, the number of people killed in drink-driving incidents has risen over the past decade, reaching a 13-year high in 2022 and prompting concern that existing road safety measures are no longer working. Other proposals are reported to include allowing the police to bring prosecutions for drug-driving on the basis of roadside saliva tests rather than blood tests as increasing numbers of drivers are being caught with drugs in their system. The Labour source added: 'This Labour Government will deliver the first road safety strategy in a decade, imposing tougher penalties on those breaking the law, protecting road users and restoring order to our roads.' The strategy is due to be published in the autumn, and all proposals will be subject to consultation.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Don't put expensive items at front of your shops, Labour tells shopkeepers
Labour has told shopkeepers not to place 'high value' items close to store entrances in an attempt to stop shoplifting. Dame Diana Johnson, the policing minister, said products such as bottles of alcohol should not be displayed at the front of stores because people will steal them. It comes amid growing pressure on the police to tackle a shoplifting epidemic, with a record high of nearly three thefts carried out every minute in the year to March. Retailers have accused police of failing to do enough to tackle the problem. Last week, it was revealed that a store owner in North Wales who put up a sign criticising 'scumbags shoplifting' was told by police to consider changing the wording because it was offensive. Speaking on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme, Dame Diana said: 'I think we need to have that neighbourhood police presence. I think stores need to play their part in making sure that items that are high value are not at the front of the store because that is an issue in some stores, that they put bottles of alcohol at the front of the store which obviously people will nick. 'If they are going to steal to resell they will nick items like that. So I think it is not just one thing here, it has to be an approach with the retailers, with the Government and with the police to work together.' Dame Diana also warned against members of the public stepping in to confront and tackle shop thieves as she said it was not 'appropriate'. Earlier this week, Matthew Barber, the Conservative Police and Crime Commissioner for Thames Valley, said the public had a duty to stand up to shoplifters rather than relying solely on police officers. But Dame Diana said: 'I would not advise people to tackle an individual who was stealing. I came across someone stealing in a store in Hull. 'I went straight to the assistant to tell them what was happening. I felt that was the best thing to do. 'Obviously it is a judgement for individuals to take but I am worried about people feeling they need to have a go. I don't think that is appropriate.' The issue of shoplifting has risen to prominence in recent days after The Telegraph disclosed that Rob Davies, a North Wales shopkeeper, had put up a handwritten note in his store following repeated thefts that read: 'Due to scumbags shoplifting, please ask for assistance to open cabinets.' But officers from North Wales Police attended his retro shop in Wrexham and told him to consider changing the wording because it was offensive. It has also emerged that the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has advised retailers that putting up images of thieves in a local area 'may not be appropriate' because it could violate suspects' data rights. The row prompted searching questions about what the Government was doing to stop shoplifting, the approach taken by police and what role, if any, members of the public should play. Retailers have accused police of failing to do enough to tackle the problem. Richard Walker, the executive chairman of the Iceland supermarket chain, said on Wednesday morning that every part of the country was now affected by serious crime in shops and it was getting worse because offenders appeared to be able to act with 'impunity'. He told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: 'We now have over 1,000 serious incidents a year, serious incidents being marauding gangs, violent assaults, needles, knives, hammers, you name it. 'I go through our weekly serious incidents report every Monday morning and it is clear that firstly there is now no area of the country unaffected by this issue, it happens everywhere from small market towns through to big inner cities. 'But secondly, and importantly, there is an impunity, an increasing level of violence that is caused by a lack of deterrent.' Mr Walker also criticised the ICO after it said putting up images of thieves in a local area, such as in shop windows, 'may not be appropriate' behaviour. He said: 'I have encouraged all of my colleagues to do so and I take the rap if anyone gets into trouble. I think it is completely ridiculous. 'And it gets more ridiculous. I saw a case this week of a shopkeeper in Wrexham being told off for insulting shoplifters in his window because he called them scumbags. 'Well, I will tell you: They are scumbags. I think we have reached the point where the law abiding feel like they are the ones on trial while the lawless get away with it.' Last September Dame Diana had her purse stolen while delivering a speech to senior officers about an 'epidemic' of theft. The Labour MP was giving a presentation at the Police Superintendents' Association (PSA) annual conference in Warwickshire when the theft took place.
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Why poverty in the UK now is worse than 50 years ago and its grip is tightening every day
We're dealing with a divided Britain. We're dealing with a social crisis,' Gordon Brown said last week. It was a stark warning, yes, of the realities of a country steeped in instability – but it was also a recognition of something unnerving: regression. 'I live in the constituency in which I grew up,' the former prime minister continued telling the host of BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Thursday. 'I still live here. I see every day this situation getting worse, and I did not think I would see the kind of poverty I saw when I was growing up; when we had slum housing, when we had travelling people coming to my school. 'This is a return to the kind of poverty of 60 years ago, and I think we've got to act now. And that's why it's urgent that we take action in this Budget,' he said. Brown's comments came as he backed reforms to gambling taxes in order to generate the £3.2bn needed to scrap the two-child benefit cap – a policy that is now estimated to affect the lives of more than 1.5 million children. And his admission carries with it an unsettling truth: that, in 2025, the UK is not only facing new forms of deprivation, but potentially circling back to old ones, too. Perhaps, half a century ago, it was easier to see. Back then, poverty appeared to live primarily in ghettoised estates – sprawling pillars of concrete; reeking stairwells, broken swings; kids playing outside in coats too small for them. In 1975, poverty had a physical presence in picket lines and soup kitchen queues, in a way that we'd like to imagine is now confined to sepia-tinged photos and 'gritty' ITV dramas or Ken Loach films. But the decades since have not only dramatically transformed wealth and living standards, but what poverty looks like, too. Things have, undoubtedly, improved – on the surface anyway. Average household incomes have doubled, moving the poverty line upwards. Lifespans have lengthened and rates of poverty among pensioners have seen considerable progress. Yet, the number of children living in relative poverty is not only slightly higher than it was in the 1970s, but double the rate at 31 per cent, or 4.5 million. An incredible 56 per cent of people living in poverty in the UK are in a working household, says the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF), and deep poverty – where families live on less than 40 per cent of the median income – is significantly more widespread than ever. Now, families face more invisible barriers: digital exclusion (approximately 6 per cent of UK homes have no access to the internet), gentrification, unstable zero-hours contracts (1.05 million people), and the mental load that comes with managing survival every single day. Mind and the Money and Mental Health Policy Institute found last year that people living in poverty are twice as likely to experience mental health problems, while Turn2Us found that 7 in 10 low-income parents experience anxiety or depression as a direct result of financial stress. The last few decades – burdened by austerity, cuts, Covid, war, inflation, the cost of living crisis, more cuts – have given rise to deprivation that crosses social class lines and postcode borders. Today, living below the breadline could even look like a semi-detached house with a car on the drive. But those more visible – unignorable – markers are now coming back into play. According to the JRF's extensive research, as many as one in four people are going without basic needs and one in five are living in absolute low income after housing costs. More than one in 10 people – 11 per cent of the population, or 7.5 million – are struggling to eat. 'We've got poverty data going back to 1961,' says Peter Matejic, a chief analyst for JRF, 'and what we've seen is that for working-age adults and children, poverty rates have increased quite a lot over the last 50 years. If you had a profile of people in poverty 50 years ago and now, you'd have a very different mix of people in the room [in terms of class and education]. I think there'd be some success stories – like the quality of housing would be a lot higher now than it was there. 'But, certainly in the last decade or so, the more visible forms of poverty and deeper forms of poverty have actually increased. For all the progress we've made, we're now looking at regression.' It's particularly true in schools where poverty is becoming impossible to miss. A recent report by the National Education Union (NEU) documented the reality of teaching today in horrors witnessed by teachers – one such example found that more than a third of teachers are personally providing essentials like toothpaste, sanitary products or warm clothing for their students. Back in January, The Independent reported from a primary school in Lincolnshire where young children are in such desperate situations that they are living in tents, and teachers are now 'first responders', rather than educators. 'We have to provide food, clothing, sometimes even pay for bus fares,' one teacher quoted in the findings explained. 'We're not just teaching any more – we're crisis managing.' In the mid-1970s, just 14 per cent of people fell below the relative poverty line – the official line drawn at 60 per cent of median household income after housing costs. Today it stands at 22 per cent in England. Essentially, says Matejic, much of the difference can be traced back to the 1980s – a pivotal decade defined by rising unemployment and significant tax reforms (particularly the reduction of higher tax rates for top earners). 'Higher rates of taxes were reduced for very high-income people, and there was quite a lot of growth of incomes at the very top of the income distribution as well,' continues Matejic. As a result, those on the bottom rungs of the ladder fell further behind into joblessness or because of benefit cuts, while those at the top surged ahead. The gap between the rich and the poor grew, as did that between lower- and middle-income households. There have been periods of reprise – noticeably at the dawn of New Labour in the years after Tony Blair's 1997 election – and of escalation. 'Destitution more than doubled between 2017 and 2022,' explains Matejic – by the end of 2022, 3.8 million people (including 1 million children) experienced it, largely due to inadequate social security, rising costs of essentials and high levels of debt. 'The deeper you go, the worse it gets. Destitution – what we define as going without two of seven essentials like food, toiletries or shelter, or having such a low income that you can't afford them – is rising faster than deep poverty.' Even record employment levels haven't been able to touch poverty, which has either flatlined or worsened for many. More than 8 million people are trapped in what is now routinely referred to as 'in-work' poverty, with 60 per cent of low-paid workers regularly skipping meals (according to a study by The Living Wage Foundation); half are falling behind on bills despite being employed. The country is teetering on breaking point: one in three low-income workers say they are 'one unexpected expense away' from being in crisis. Further cuts to the welfare system – particularly to those unable to work, like carers and the disabled – have left millions more below the poverty line. Between 2010 and 2020, the poorest tenth of households saw their income fall by over 11 per cent, while the richest tenth lost just 2 per cent. And when the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) compared cuts in the most and least deprived 10 local authorities just over five years ago, they found the poorest places were hit six times harder. The two-child cap is only exacerbating the entire situation for millions of children in the UK. The original justification for the policy, which denies financial support for third and subsequent children born after April 2017, was to promote 'responsibility' in family planning, cutting the benefit was short-sighted. In reality, the decision failed to acknowledge the reality of modern living: illness, separation, redundancy and other unexpected events that life throws at us all, and that render us vulnerable. Unsurprisingly, perhaps, it also disproportionately affects marginalised groups like single mothers and ethnic minority families. Worsening deprivation is in what happens next: right now, we're raising millions of children growing up with less opportunity, less security and, crucially, less hope than the generations before them. And this isn't simply rhetoric – it's a return to Dickensian levels of poverty, actively playing out in classrooms and kitchens across the country, and will be for years to come yet. Scrapping the policy, most experts agree, is an imperative to improve rates of poverty and lives in the UK right now: this single change would lift a quarter of a million children out of poverty, and reduce the path of hardship for many more. But it can't stop there, says Matejic. 'You have to invest in social security to lower poverty,' he explains: uprating benefits in line with inflation, for example, restoring lost disability payments, and making universal support systems work with – not against – the rhythms of working life. Investing in the labour market and in communities surviving on threadbare infrastructure, too, should be a priority: hollowed-out local authorities, oversubscribed schools, deteriorating hospitals and non-existent libraries. But, to make a difference long term, there needs to be a long-term plan in place. Social mobility is now at a standstill, workers' rights (especially those caught in the grift of exploitative zero-hours contracts) are worsening and a genuine living wage is still not in sight. As long as poverty is treated like a personal failing rather than a systemic outcome, that won't change. Until politicians stop weaponising hardship and, instead, start addressing it with honesty and urgency, things will only continue to worsen. The face of poverty may have changed in the last 60 years – sometimes we might not even recognise it. But the insecurity, powerlessness and injustice it brings only tightened its grip.
