Tom Barrack meets Lebanese leaders as US-Lebanon talks stall on Hezbollah arms
There is no agreement between Lebanon and the United States regarding the approach to addressing Hezbollah's weapons.
Washington, through its presidential envoy Tom Barrack, reiterated the urgent need to implement the state's commitment to disarmament, regardless of the developments in Lebanon and the region.
Lebanon, which previously linked disarmament to Israel fulfilling its obligations—such as withdrawing from occupied areas, halting violations, and releasing detainees—tied the issue during Thursday's talks to the ongoing regional situation.
According to a statement posted on the Presidency's official X account, President Joseph Aoun told Barrack that communications to achieve the principle of exclusive weapons control on both Lebanese and Palestinian levels are ongoing and will intensify once the regional situation stabilizes amid the escalating Israeli-Iranian conflict.
Aoun also noted that the army's mission in southern Litani to implement U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701 and the ceasefire agreement has been hindered by Israel's continued occupation of the Shebaa Farms and its surroundings.
In this context, Aoun reportedly reiterated the 'step-for-step' approach, meaning Israel must take steps on issues such as withdrawal, violations, and detainees, which would be met by corresponding Lebanese steps related to Hezbollah's weapons.
The U.S. envoy also heard from President Aoun that Lebanon does not wish to be drawn into the ongoing war between Israel and Iran.
Barrack urged Lebanese authorities to intensify cooperation with the new Syrian regime, particularly regarding border control and demarcation between the two countries.
From Ain al-Tineh, the headquarters of the Parliament Speaker, Barrack said in response to a question that Hezbollah's involvement in the current war would be a very bad decision.
Reports indicate that the message Barrack received from Speaker Nabih Berri was similar to that conveyed by President Aoun in Baabda.
Berri emphasized that Lebanon has fulfilled its responsibilities, while the problem lies with Israel, which continues to violate U.N. Resolution 1701 and the ceasefire agreement, and maintains occupation, attacks, and assassinations.
At the Grand Serail, Tom Barrack continued talks with Prime Minister Nawaf Salam. They agreed on keeping Lebanon out of the war and on continuing state efforts to assert sovereignty, address Hezbollah's weapons, and resolve issues with Israel.
They also agreed to pursue reforms and strengthen communication with Syria.
Barrack, who has officially and temporarily taken charge of Lebanon affairs following his work on Syria, is expected to return to Beirut soon after briefing President Donald Trump on the results of his initial visit.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Mayadeen
8 hours ago
- Al Mayadeen
Larijani arrives in Beirut, meets Lebanese officials
The Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Ali Larijani, arrived in Beirut on Wednesday morning, reaffirming the Islamic Republic's unwavering support for Lebanon and its people in all circumstances. Upon his arrival, Larijani stated, "Whenever Lebanon faces any kind of suffering, we feel it in Iran as well, and be assured that we will stand by the dear people of Lebanon under all circumstances," adding added that Iran is always committed "to serve Lebanon's higher interests." Additionally, he praised the deep-rooted ties between the two nations, saying, "Iran and Lebanon both have ancient civilizations, and for many centuries, the two countries have enjoyed strong relations and connections. There is solid solidarity between their peoples and cultures." Larijani noted that his visit includes meetings with senior Lebanese leaders, including the president of the republic, the prime minister, and the speaker of parliament, to discuss bilateral relations and regional developments. هكذا عبّرت الحشود الشعبية المتجمّعة في محيط مطار بيروت الدولي لاستقبالِ أمين المجلس الأعلى للأمنِ القوميّ في إيران، علي لاريجاني👇#الميادين_لبنان#لبنان During his meeting with Dr. Ali Larijani, President Joseph Aoun reaffirmed Lebanon's commitment to fostering cooperation with Iran on the basis of sovereignty, friendship, and mutual respect. He noted, however, that some recent remarks by certain Iranian officials had not been constructive. Aoun stressed that the friendship Lebanon seeks with Iran should not pass through a single sect or political faction, but should embrace all Lebanese. He underscored that Lebanon is a final homeland for all its citizens, Christians and Muslims alike, and that it is the responsibility of the state, through its constitutional institutions and security forces, to safeguard all communities. He firmly rejected any interference in Lebanon's internal affairs from any side, calling for the Lebanese arena to remain safe and stable in the interest of all citizens without discrimination. Aoun warned that Lebanon has paid a high price whenever one group has sought foreign support against another. The lesson, he said, is that no party or faction, without exception, should bear arms or rely on outside powers. The state and its armed forces alone are responsible for the security of all Lebanese. Any threats, whether from 'Israel' or elsewhere, are challenges for the entire nation, not just for one group, and the strongest weapon in confronting them is unity. الرئيس عون خلال لقائه الدكتور لاريجاني: - لبنان راغب في التعاون مع ايران ضمن حدود السيادة والصداقة القائمين على الاحترام المتبادل.- اللغة التي سمعها لبنان في الفترة الأخيرة من بعض المسؤولين الإيرانيين، غير مساعدة.- الصداقة التي نريد ان تجمع بين لبنان وايران لا يجب ان تكون من… his part, Dr. Larijani conveyed the greetings of Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, renewed his invitation for President Aoun to visit Tehran, and expressed Iran's willingness to help Lebanon in its reconstruction efforts. He affirmed Iran's desire to strengthen its relations with the Lebanese state and people in all fields, praising President Aoun's role in bolstering national unity and fostering cohesion among all Lebanese sects and communities. Larijani stressed that Iran does not interfere in Lebanon's internal affairs, adding that his remarks upon arrival in Beirut reflected the official position of the Islamic Republic. Speaking at a press conference in Ain al-Tineh after meeting Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, Larijani expressed deep joy for visiting Lebanon, a country he described as enjoying 'excellent relations' with Iran at this stage. He praised the Lebanese people as 'a shining example' in their steadfast resistance to Israeli occupation, adding that Lebanon's unity and success are of great importance to Tehran. 'Our policy is built on the principle that countries in the region must be independent and strong,' Larijani said. 'Lebanon is capable of making sound decisions, and we wish it prosperity.' He noted that Iran's own strength stems from the cohesion of its people and the enduring power of the Iranian Revolution. Larijani stressed that Iran does not view its friends as instruments, but as partners in a shared strategic vision. 'The Resistance embodies deep conviction and strong strategic thinking,' he said, underscoring that no country outside Lebanon should dictate orders to it. 'The Lebanese people are proud and courageous, fully capable of making their own decisions. We will fully respect whatever choices they make, and believe that through consultation with the Resistance, Lebanon can reach the best outcomes.' Reiterating a consistent Iranian message, Larijani emphasized that the nations of the region must be 'strong and independent, not taking orders from across the oceans.' He urged the Lebanese to distinguish between friend and foe, describing the Resistance as 'an asset for the entire Islamic world.' Reflecting on Lebanon's modern history, Larijani pointed out that when 'Israel' invaded Lebanon, Hezbollah did not yet exist, but arose in response, confronting the occupation through resistance. He praised both Hezbollah and the Lebanese government for their deep understanding of the current situation, expressing optimism for Lebanon's future. 'The Resistance Front did not emerge on orders from foreign powers,' Larijani said. 'Its history shows it was created to confront foreign intervention, as in Lebanon and Iraq. Lebanon should value the role of the Resistance and of Hezbollah. Those who interfere in Lebanon's affairs are the ones who impose plans and deadlines. Foreign states should not issue orders to Lebanon, and Tehran does not interfere in its decision-making process.' Beirut is the second stop in Larijani's first regional tour since his appointment as Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council on August 5, 2025. His tour began in Baghdad, where Iran and Iraq signed a joint security memorandum of understanding on border coordination, under the auspices of Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani. Larijani stressed the need to strengthen political, economic, and social ties between Tehran and Baghdad, noting that the security agreement offers a framework for deeper cooperation. Larijani's visit comes amid heightened tensions in Lebanon over the government's recent US-backed decision to disarm Hezbollah by the end of 2025, a move rejected by Hezbollah and Amal ministers, who walked out of a cabinet session in protest. Iranian officials have strongly opposed the plan to disarm the Resistance. Ali Akbar Velayati, advisor to the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, described it as compliance 'to the will of the United States and Israel.' While Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reiterated Tehran's rejection of the proposal and affirmed Lebanon's right to defend itself. In his visit to Baghdad, Larijani asserted that the Resistance Front, of which Hezbollah is an integral part, is "part of the heart of the region's peoples," explaining that "each of its components strives to achieve the aspirations of its own people." He added that the Resistance Front represents "part of the wealth of the peoples in the region, who are well aware of the current circumstances and fully understand their options," stressing that the front "must be preserved.
Al Mayadeen
8 hours ago
- Al Mayadeen
'We will not leave Gaza City': Palestinians vow to resist, stay put
After 22 months of war, approximately 1 million Palestinians, already displaced, living in tents or ruins, and suffering from hunger and lack of medical care, face another crisis as "Israel's" security cabinet plans to seize control of Gaza City, forcing them to flee southward toward an uncertain future. Umm Ibrahim Banat, a 55-year-old mother displaced four times from northern Gaza, expressed her fear and anxiety to The Guardian after hearing about the evacuation order for Gaza City, "Where will we go with the children and the elderly? I swear we are exhausted from displacement, starvation, and being driven from one place to another." 'Now,' she said, 'we are the walking dead.' Following a 10-hour overnight meeting on Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office announced that his security cabinet had approved a plan to seize control of Gaza City, further escalating "Israel's" war on Gaza, which has already claimed the lives of at least 61,000 Palestinians, the majority of them civilians. "Israel's" Channel 12 reported that the plan, involving the deployment of ground troops into the territory, could displace tens of thousands of people, worsen the already strained aid delivery efforts, and push around 1 million Palestinians in Gaza City and surrounding areas toward evacuation zones in the southern part of the strip. Heartbroken after losing her daughter's entire family, Banat denounced Gaza's unbearable conditions, the disease-ridden tent camps, undrinkable water, collapsed hospitals, and endless suffering, demanding to know what more could be taken from a people who've lost everything. Abu Nasser Mushtaha, a 35-year-old father of four from Gaza's Rimal neighborhood, expressed his fear for his family's safety, stating, "If we are ordered to evacuate, I will leave everything and go, fearing for my family and children. The cost of staying would be too high. I have already lost enough; my mother was killed at the beginning of the war when the Israeli occupation bombed a neighbouring house." Mushtaha revealed he had begun financial preparations to cut costs while planning to take only essential belongings, grimly predicting that this impending crisis would undoubtedly mark the final destruction of Gaza's population. With over 90% of Palestinians already displaced at least once during the war and nearly 10% suffering injuries from Israeli attacks, the population now faces even greater suffering as the decimated healthcare system collapses further and "Israel" blocks most aid agencies like the UN from delivering critical assistance. Hossam al-Saqa, a 46-year-old father of two from Gaza City, told The Guardian he couldn't comprehend how authorities expected to relocate Gaza's entire population to the already overwhelmed south, declaring his family's determination to remain on their land despite the mortal dangers, vowing he would stay even at gunpoint. 'I see Netanyahu's and Israel's propaganda as nothing more than media fireworks meant to intimidate and spread fear among the people,' al-Saqa said, adding, 'This will not scare us, for God is with us, and He is stronger than everyone.' Al-Saqa, echoing sentiments widespread across Gaza City, interpreted the occupation plan as a coercive tactic to force Hamas into surrender following the collapse of last month's US, Egyptian, and Qatari-mediated negotiations. Ibrahim Abu al-Husni, a 47-year-old man who lost his 23-year-old son in the war, defiantly declared his attachment to his homeland, stating, "This is our land where we grew up since childhood, and we will not give it up easily. I will not leave this city." 'I will live here, and I will die here," he assertively stated.
LBCI
9 hours ago
- LBCI
In Beirut, US envoys push for answers on arms control and UNIFIL mandate
Report by Toni Mrad, English adaptation by Mariella Succar Two American envoys visited Lebanon this week to discuss two pressing issues: U.S. envoy Thomas Barrack focused on strengthening state control over weapons, while Morgan Ortagus emphasized the renewal of the U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) mandate. According to LBCI, the main purpose of the visit was to review the latest developments regarding the government's commitment to the American paper on arms control, which had been approved by the Lebanese government. The Lebanese side asked the U.S. delegation about the positions of other parties involved in the American proposal, namely Israel and Syria. According to LBCI, Barrack did not carry any Israeli response to the proposal, though reports suggest he may travel to Tel Aviv to obtain one. During meetings with Lebanese officials, Barrack heard from President Michel Aoun Lebanon's position on the importance of all parties adhering to the joint declaration, as well as support for the Lebanese Army and accelerated international steps to launch reconstruction efforts. Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri emphasized that Israel's commitment to the ceasefire agreement and its withdrawal to internationally recognized borders is essential to achieving stability in Lebanon. Barrack's position was reported to be aligned with Lebanon regarding the expectation that Israel undertake similar measures. The issue of arms control was also discussed during a meeting with Army Commander General Rodolph Haykal, focusing on the army's plan to ensure weapons remain under state authority. Another key topic, the renewal of the UNIFIL mandate, was highlighted by Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, who stressed its importance in maintaining stability and supporting the army in extending state authority in southern Lebanon. According to LBCI, consultations at the United Nations are ongoing, with the United States reportedly favoring a gradual and responsible reduction in UNIFIL personnel. The two U.S. envoys are expected to return to Lebanon at the end of the month. It remains unclear whether they will bring an Israeli response and Syria's position on the American proposal, or whether the UNIFIL renewal process will be finalized by that time.
