You can actually multitask on an iPad now and it's the best new feature in 15 years
The first public beta for iPadOS 26 dropped today. You can download and install it yourself on most recent iPads — just know it might be buggy until the final release this fall. Still, I've been using the beta for most work tasks for the better part of a week, and aside from a few pain points, it's what I've always wanted from an iPad. It just took Apple 15 years to get here.
iPadOS 26 finally gives us real windows, not Split View or Slide Over or Stage Manager or whatever other multitasking attempts Apple has tried to 'differentiate the iPad from the Mac' or make it a 'touch first' experience. I have Slack open in one window and Safari open in another, and this Google Doc that I'm writing right now in another. Spotify is somewhere in the background. I could launch YouTube TV if I want to be naughty about it. I opened about 10 apps before I stopped trying to open more. (Sometimes they open in another space, but this feels like a bug.)
This is real multitasking and, for the most part, it's like how I work on a MacBook Air or a Surface Pro. Apps can be placed on top of one another or moved around the screen and dropped exactly where I want them. There's even a real arrow for a cursor! No more moving a silly little dot around the screen.
When you open an app, each launches into a full-sized window. The familiar red, yellow, and green buttons to close, minimize, or maximize the window are there in the top left corner. I drag the corner in or out to resize the window. Each app also has a brand new menu bar along the top, so you can view or change all the app's settings. In its simplest sense, it allows you to select File > Print, for example, if you're in a document. In Apple Music, you can choose File > New Playlist, or manage your controls and create new stations. It's very much like using apps on a Mac.
There's also a new Files app that makes it easier to access all the files saved on your iPad, or in iCloud, so you can quickly open documents you have saved on other computers. And you can add files or folders to your dock. It's not perfect; I wish I could see drives or save to the desktop like on a Mac, but it's fine.
This all works so well that Apple has wiped out any remaining excuses for not bringing a touchscreen to the Mac. Those little red, yellow and green buttons get larger whenever I go to tap them, so I can use the cursor or my finger to minimize windows, or resize them or move things around. If I touch the bottom of the screen, all the apps slide away and I can see the icons and widgets on my desktop.
There are still reasons I turn to my MacBook Air, though. Unless I'm connected to a monitor, the 11-inch screen on my iPad Pro is a little tiny if I need to dig around in a big spreadsheet or if I really want to keep a bunch of apps open at full size. Resizing works most of the time, but I can't always see all the chats that I want in Slack unless I make it bigger, and even then it ends up mostly hidden behind other apps because of the limited screen real estate. I don't have a 13-inch iPad Pro or iPad Air to test on, but I imagine that helps a bit.
Also, while I love having all the apps I use available here — X, Bluesky, Safari, Chrome, Slack, Spotify, whatever — the desktop versions can still be better and easier to use than the iPad versions. Take Google Docs for example: it's bad on the iPad. For whatever reason I can't use my cursor to select a bunch of text properly, and instead have to touch the screen. There's also a bug where I can control the mouse but can't type for a little bit. I use the Grammarly plugin to catch silly mistakes in my writing, but it works through a keyboard plugin on the iPad that isn't as effective as the browser extension on a Mac or PC. My grammar is be damned.
The iPad still won't cut it for everyone. There are a lot of professional apps for Macs that just aren't built for the iPad. And some people need Macs for the additional horsepower you can get from the more powerful chips. But for folks who can mostly work in a bunch of windows? This is what's up.
There's this little test I like to do when I think about whether or not a new gadget will work for me. I think to myself whether, over a long weekend or on a trip somewhere, I'll be able to jump on and do a work task if I have to. Most of the time I'll bring my MacBook Air or Surface Pro along just in case it's something I can't do from my phone. (The Galaxy Z Fold and Pixel Fold have passed this test, for what it's worth.) I'll usually bring my iPad along, too, because I bring my iPad everywhere. With iPadOS 26, I don't need to carry my MacBook Air anymore.
Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All by Todd Haselton
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Apple
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Hands-on
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All iOS
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All iPad
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Reviews
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
See All Tech
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
26 minutes ago
- CNET
We Love This Garmin Instinct 2 Solar Smartwatch and It's Now a Massive $136 Off at Walmart
It's back-to-school season and for many, this is a great time to reset and refocus on academic and personal goals. If you're into fitness and want to keep better track of your step count, then you know that Apple and Samsung dominate the smartwatch sector. Though these tech companies make great wearable pieces, Garmin is also behind some pretty neat smartwatches. Right now we've spotted the Garmin Instinct 2 Solar smartwatch for just $264 at Walmart, which saves you a massive $136. If you prefer Amazon, you an score the same watch for $264 with Amazon Prime. Though there's no set deadline for either of these deals, we suggest acting fast if you're interested. The Garmin Instinct 2 Solar smartwatch has a 45mm case and its watch band adjusts from 5.3 inches to up to 9.1 inches. The watch features multiple apps that track your step count, VO2 max and other sports activities so you can get an accurate picture of your progress. The Garmin Instinct 2 smartwatch includes a 3-axis compass and navigation programs, such as GPS, GLONASS and Galileo, which offer advanced readings that let you confidently trek in challenging environments. You can also sync this watch with a compatible smartphone and get notifications. Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money. The Garmin Instinct 2 is renowned for its solar charging capacity and long battery life of up to 54 hours. Keep in mind that you need a clear sky for at least 3 hours for a solar charge, but this is still a great watch for days-long hiking or outdoor adventures. Its power manager helps you track battery life, and your purchase includes a charging cable for when solar charging is unavailable. Looking for more wearable tech but not sure if this deal is for you? Check out our list of the best smartwatch so you can find one that works for you. Why this deal matters The Garmin Instinct 2 Solar smartwatch offers a battery life of 54 hours, solar charging capacity and loads of apps that will help you track your fitness statistics. It's a massive $136 off at Walmart for a limited time and makes a great alternative to Apple or Samsung smartwatches if you've been looking for one. Now is also a great time to save on this smartwatch and potentially avoid price hikes due to tariffs.
Forbes
28 minutes ago
- Forbes
Office Hellscapes And AI Process Mapping
Why are human workplaces so disorganized? In some ways, it's a question people have been asking themselves ever since the first cubicle dwellers rose up from the primordial swamp - whenever that was. We know that larger systems tend to be disordered, especially if they're administrated by humans. Just go read Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, and it might remind you of the modern office – people and products and materials strewn about a gigantic footprint, with very little centralized control. You get the same kind of idea reading the most recent piece by Ethan Mollick on the site where he posts his essays, One Useful Thing. I always follow his posts, interested in his emerging take on the technologies that are so new to all of us. Mollick has MIT ties, and an excellent track record looking at the AI revolution from a fresh perspective. The Office Dilemma Human wothis most recent piece, he talks about process mapping and how AI can help people to sort through the disorganization of a business. Think of a company with 100 or more employees, and probably a dozen locations. The first thing you tend to find is that sense of disorder. Mollick talks about a 'Garbage Can' principle, which posits that most businesses are a collection of disparate processes thrown into a large, disorganized bin. To me, you could use the analogy of what programmers used to call 'DLL hell' in the earlier days of the Internet. DLLs are digital libraries. Their application was often chaotic and disordered. There were dependencies that would flummox even the most seasoned engineers, because things were complicated and chaotic. That's what a large company is often like. Everyone for Themselves Mollick also pointed to some numbers that I've seen in various studies, and presented at conferences where we've talked about AI over the past year. His number was 43% – the number of employees who are using AI in the workplace. But as Mollick points out, and as I've heard before, most of them are using AI in personal ways. The use of the tools is not ordered across an organization – it's piecemeal. It's people using an AI tool like you would use a hammer, or a saw, or a drill, or a lathe --- largely in an unsupervised way. However, in general, it seems AI is largely catching on, especially when it comes to product development. You have resources like this one from the Texas Workforce Commission, referencing thousands of AI jobs. So even if there's not much centralized AI in the boardroom, there is abundant AI in business processes. It's just that those processes may or may not be unified. The Bitter Lesson Then Mollick references something called the 'Bitter lesson' that's attributed to Robert Sutton in 2019. It's the idea that AI will prove to be cognitively superior to humans without a lot of poking and prodding – but given enough time and compute, the system will find its own way to solve problems. That phrase, problem solving, is what people have been saying is the unique province of humans. It's the idea that AI can do the data-crunching, but people are still doing the creative problem-solving. Well, that bastion of human ingenuity doesn't seem that safe anymore. Mollick references the early days of chess machine evolution, where eventually Deep Blue beat Kasparov. He notes that there are two ways to go about this – you can program in innumerable chess rules, and have the system sort through them and apply them, or you can just show the system thousands of chess games, and it will make those connections on its own. Back to Machine Learning Principles Reading through this, I was reminded of the early days of machine learning, where people talked a good bit about supervised versus unsupervised learning. We often used the analogy of fruit in a digital software program enhanced with machine learning properties. Supervised learning would be labeling each fruit with its own tag – banana – apple - or grapes. The program would then learn to correlate between its training data and new real-world data. That comparison would be its main method. And that comparison isn't hugely cognitive. It follows the tradition of deterministic programming. The unsupervised version would be simply to tell the program that bananas are yellow and long, that grapes are purple or green and have clusters, and the apples are red or green and round. Then the system goes out, looks at the pictures and applies that logic. The interesting thing here is taking that analogy to the bitter lesson. Is AI more powerful if it simply analyzes reams of training data without applied logic? Or is it more powerful if it can actually distinguish between various kinds of outcomes based on requested logical processes? Which came first: the chicken or the egg? The theory of the bitter lesson seems to be that the system can actually do better through supervised learning. But that supervision doesn't necessarily have to be human oversight. The machine gets a practically infinite set of training data, and makes all of its own conclusions. That's contrasted to an approach where people tell the machine what to do, and it learns based on those suggestions. Back in the era of supervised versus unsupervised learning, the unsupervised learning seemed more powerful. It seemed more resource-intensive. But AI might finally show us up just by doing things in a more efficient way – if I can use one more analogy, it's the traditional idea of the Laplace demon, an invention of the physicist Pierre-Simon Laplace who suggested that if you know enough data points, you can predict the future. In other words, brute force programming is king. We learned a lot of this in the big data age, before we learned to use LLMs, and now we're seeing the big data age on steroids. In Conclusion I also found a very interesting take at the end of Mollick's essay where he talks about businesses going down one or the other avenue of progress. Sure enough, he suggested that these companies are playing chess with each other – that one of these chess teams consists of companies using AI to be logical, and that another chess team consists of businesses using it for brute force programming and classification. If all of this is a little hard to follow, it's because we're pretty securely in the realm of AI philosophy here. It makes you think about not just whether AI is going to win out over human workers, but how it's going to do it. I forgot to mention the exponential graph that Mollick includes showing that we're closer to AGI then most people would imagine. Let's look back at the end of this year and see how this plays out.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
iPhone Fold leaker just spilled the beans on screen sizes — and it's worse than we thought
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. If rumors are to be believed, Apple will finally dive into the foldable phone market in 2026 with the much-rumored iPhone Fold. Rumors have been all over the place when it comes to the the screen size of this unreleased device, but seemed to have settled on around 7.7 inches for the interior panel. That claim was backed up today (July 25) by regular leaker Digital Chat Station, who posted on Weibo that the iPhone Fold would feature a 7.7-inch unfolded screen and a cover display of 5.49-inches. This isn't the first time Digital Chat Station has made that claim, previously saying it came from an iPhone Fold prototype. "The screen size of the first foldable iPhone has been revealed," DCS said in this most recent machine-translated post. "5.5-inch outer screen + 7.7-inch inner screen." They added that the current prototype has shrunk a bit from the February version. It's an iota smaller than recent rumors that had the device featuring a 7.8-inch internal display, similar to numbers from Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo who reported the same measurements back in March. Kuo also believes the phone will measure between 9 and 9.5mm thick when folded and 4 and 4.5mm when opened. Small screen compared to rivals While thin, the iPhone Fold would be thicker than the Galaxy Z Fold 7 which measures 4.2mm when unfolded and 8.9mm closed. If those numbers are true it would additionally make Apple's device smaller than a number of the best foldable phones available including Samsung's newly released Fold, which features an 8-inch unfolded screen and a 6.5-inch exterior display. The upcoming Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold — which we're expecting to see at Google's August 20 event — is supposed to feature a 6.4-inch exterior display while retaining the same 8-inch inner screen as the Pixel 9 Pro Fold. The Oppo Find N5 features a huge 8.12-inch inner display alongside a 6.62-inch front screen. iPad-esque The iPhone Fold's smaller screen may not be a deal breaker, as rumors hint that Apple is looking for customized display ratio of 4:3, similar to the iPad. This would make the foldable iPhone more familiar to Apple fans who have used iPads before. Plus, Apple is reportedly developing iOS 27 for foldable phones which takes inspiration from the latest version of iPadOS. Apple is years behind its rivals when it comes to foldable phones, but the company is allegedly obsessed with only releasing one once a creaseless display was possible. Reportedly, that finally became possible thanks to a partnership with Samsung Display. More from Tom's Guide iOS 26 preview — I've been testing Apple's biggest update in over a decade Apple glasses patent reveals a new feature to improve comfort — but it looks bizarre Apple rumored to release 6 new iPhone models starting next year — including iPhone Fold
