Newly Published Health Economics Study Demonstrates In-Office Ear Tube Procedures with Hummingbird TTS Significantly Reduce Healthcare Costs
"This analysis demonstrates that payers can also realize meaningful cost savings, even when accounting for the additional resources required to treat children in-office." Dr. Gene Liu, Study Co-Author
Key findings from the study include 1:
Current costs of ear tube surgeries are estimated to be $3.5 billion annually for the US Healthcare System:
Ear tube surgeries in a Hospital Outpatient Department (HOPD) on average cost over $5,700 for a commercial plan and $2,100 for a Medicaid plan
Higher costs of OR-based surgeries are driven by the costs of the operating room, anesthesia, pre- and post-surgery care, and additional pre-operative testing
Shifting ear tube procedures from the OR to the Office could save:
Up to $3,743 per patient (65% cost savings) for a Commercial health plan
Up to $519 per patient (24% cost savings) for a Medicaid health plan
The procedural cost savings were significant even after accounting for the increased costs of pediatric in-office ear tube procedures, including the costs of the Hummingbird ® TTS
Pediatric ear tube surgeries historically have been performed in the operating room (OR) under general anesthesia. However, the procedure can be safely and effectively performed in an office setting by using the Hummingbird ® TTS, helping pediatric patients avoid risks associated with operating room surgeries and general anesthesia exposure 2. This analysis demonstrates that in addition to the important clinical and safety benefits, Payers may also experience significant cost savings.
'Shifting ear tube placement into the office with the Hummingbird ® Device has improved patient access and offered families an important alternative to OR-based surgeries,' said Dr. Gene Liu, Pediatric Otolaryngologist at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. 'This analysis demonstrates that payers can also realize meaningful cost savings, even when accounting for the additional resources required to treat children in-office. My hope is that these findings encourage payers to establish sustainable reimbursement rates that expand access to this safe and cost-effective option.'
To support patient access to pediatric in-office ear tube procedures with tympanostomy tube delivery devices, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) established add-on HCPCS Code (+G0561) in the 2025 Physician Fee Schedule 3. CMS stated in the 2025 PFS, 'These minimally invasive, in-office procedures can offer significant benefits, including reduced risks associated with general anesthesia, quicker recovery, fewer infections, and improved access to care.' The new add-on G code facilitates fair reimbursement to providers for the incremental work and practice expenses (including device costs) involved in performing pediatric ear tube procedures in-office. This is the first economic study to evaluate the economic impact of utilizing the add-on code +G0561.
'This study reinforces what we have seen in our Health System, where we have been offering in-office ear tube procedures with the Hummingbird Device since 2021,' shared Dr. Mark Gerber, Pediatric Otolaryngologist at Phoenix Children's Hospital. 'Providing a mechanism for reimbursement for the incremental costs of the pediatric procedure will remove a significant barrier to utilization and save healthcare dollars.'
About Preceptis Medical
Founded in 2011, Preceptis Medical is an innovative medical technology company dedicated to providing less invasive ear tube procedure options for pediatric patients. The FDA-cleared Hummingbird ® Tympanostomy Tube System (TTS) streamlines ear tube placement, which enables the procedure to be performed with only a topical anesthetic. The Hummingbird, indicated for use in patients 6 months of age and older, provides a simple and efficient option for ENTs and parents while reducing healthcare costs. For more information, please visit https://www.hummingbirdeartubes.com/
Moynihan, M., Ross, R., Delgado, J., Gerber, M., & Liu, G. (2025). Economic impact of in-office pediatric tympanostomy tube placement using a tympanostomy tube delivery device in a commercially- and Medicaid-insured US population. Journal of Medical Economics, 28 (1), 899–909
Truitt MD, Theodore O., et al. 'In-office insertion tympanostomy tubes in children using single-pass device' Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology. 2021;6:325-331.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
13 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Why young Americans dread turning 26: health insurance chaos
But for years, Republicans have whittled away at the infrastructure of the original law. Long gone is the requirement to buy insurance. Plans sold in the online insurance marketplaces have no stringent quality standards. Costs keep rising, and eligibility requirements and subsidies are a moving target. Advertisement The erosion of the law has now created an 'insurance cliff' for Americans who are turning 26 and don't have a job that provides medical coverage. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Some, scared off by the complexity of picking a policy and by the price tags, tumble over the edge and go without insurance, in a health system where the rate for an emergency room visit can be thousands, if not tens of thousands, of dollars. Today, an estimated 15% of 26-year-olds go uninsured, which, according to an analysis by health research group KFF, is the highest rate among Americans of any age. If they qualify, young adults can sign up for Medicaid, the federal and state program for low-income Americans, in most but not all states. Advertisement But many buy cheap subpar insurance that leaves them with insurmountable debt following a medical crisis. Others choose plans with extremely limited networks, losing access to their longtime doctors and medicines. Often they find those policies online, in what has become a dizzyingly complicated system of government-regulated insurance marketplaces. They vary in quality from state to state; some are far better than others. But they generally offer few easily identifiable, affordable and workable choices. 'The good news is that the ACA gave young people more options,' said Karen Pollitz, who directed consumer information and insurance oversight at the Department of Health and Human Services during the Obama administration. 'The bad news is the good stuff is hidden in a minefield of really bad options that'll leave you broke if you get sick.' Publicly funded counselors called 'navigators' or 'assisters' can help insurance seekers choose a plan. But those programs vary by state, and often customers don't realize that the help is available. The Trump administration has cut funding to publicize and operate those navigator programs. In addition, changes to Medicaid eligibility in the policy bill passed by Congress in July could mean that millions more enrollees lose their insurance, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Those changes threaten the very viability of the online marketplaces, which currently provide insurance to 24 million Americans. In dozens of interviews, young adults described the unsettling and devastating consequences of having inadequate insurance, or no insurance at all. Damien Phillips, 26, a reporter at a West Virginia newspaper, considered joining the Navy to get insurance as his 26th birthday approached. Instead, he felt he 'didn't make enough to justify having health insurance' and has reluctantly gone without it. Advertisement When Ethan Evans, a 27-year-old aspiring actor in Chicago who works in retail, fell off his parents' plan and temporarily signed up for Medicaid, diminished mental health coverage meant cutting back on visits to his longtime therapist. Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla., the first Generation Z member of Congress, was able to quit his job and run for office at 25 only because he could stay on his mother's plan until he turned 26, he said. Now 28, he is insured through his federal job. 'The ACA was groundbreaking legislation, including the idea that every American needs health care,' he said. 'But there are pitfalls, and one of them is that when young adults turn 26, they fall into this abyss.' Back in 2010, the decision to make 26 the cutoff age for staying on a parent's insurance was 'kind of arbitrary,' recalled Nancy-Ann DeParle, deputy chief of staff for policy in the Obama White House. 'My kids were young, and I was trying to imagine when my child would be an adult,' she said. Before that time, children were often kicked off family plans at much younger ages, typically 18. The Obama administration's idea was that by 26, young adults were most likely settling into careers and jobs with insurance. But if they still didn't have access to job-based insurance, Medicaid and the online marketplaces would offer alternatives, the thinking went. But over the years, the courts, Congress and the first Trump administration eviscerated provisions of the ACA. By 2022, a shopper on the marketplace run by the federal government had more than 100 choices, many of which included expensive trade-offs, presented in a way that made comparisons difficult without spreadsheets. Advertisement Young Invincibles, an advocacy group representing young adults, runs its own 'navigator' program to help young people choose health insurance plans. 'We hear the frustration,' said Martha Sanchez, who was until recently the group's director of health policy and advocacy. 'Twenty-six-year-olds have had negative experiences in a process that's become really complex. Many throw up their hands.' The ACA was supposed to help consumers find affordable, high-quality plans online. The legislation also tried to expand Medicaid programs, which are administered by states, as a way to provide health insurance to low-income Americans. But the Supreme Court ruled in 2012 that states could not be forced to expand Medicaid. Ten states, led mostly by Republicans, have not done so, leaving up to 1.5 million Americans, who could have qualified for coverage, without insurance. Even where Medicaid is available to 26-year-olds, the transition has often proved precarious. Madeline Nelkin of New Jersey, who was studying social work, applied for Medicaid coverage before her 26th birthday in April 2024 because her university's insurance premiums were more than $5,000 annually. But it was September before her Medicaid coverage kicked in, leaving her uninsured while she fought a chest infection over the summer. 'People tell you to think ahead, but I didn't think that meant six months,' she said. When Megan Hughes, 27, of Hartland, Maine, hit the cliff, she went without. An aide for children with developmental delays, she has a thyroid condition and polycystic ovary syndrome. She looked for a health care plan but found it hard to understand the marketplace. (She didn't know there were navigators who could help.) Now she can't afford her medicine or see her endocrinologist. Advertisement 'I'm tired all the time,' Hughes said. 'My cycles are not regular anymore at all. When I do get one, it's debilitating.' She is hoping a new job will provide insurance later this year. Traditionally, most Americans with private health insurance got it through their jobs. But the job market has changed dramatically since 2010, particularly in the wake of the pandemic, with the rise of the gig economy. Over 30% of people ages 18 to 29 said in recent surveys that they were working or have worked in short-term, part-time or irregular jobs. The ACA requires organizations with 50 or more employees to offer insurance to people working 30 hours per week. This has led to a growing number of contract employees who work up to, but not past, the hourly limit. In Oklahoma, Daisy Creager, 29, has had three employers over the last three years. Insurance was important to her, not least because her former husband had Type 1 diabetes. As she left the first of those jobs, her husband's endocrinologist helped the couple stockpile less expensive insulin from Canada, since they would be uninsured. After a few months, they bought a marketplace plan, but it was expensive and 'didn't cover a lot,' she said. When she found a new job, she dropped that plan, only to discover that her new insurance coverage didn't start until the end of her first month of employment. The couple would be uninsured for a few weeks. A few days later, she came home to find her husband unconscious on the floor, in a diabetic coma. After hovering near death in an intensive care unit for four days, he woke up and began to recover. Advertisement 'I think I've done everything right,' Creager said. 'So why am I in a position where the health insurance available to me doesn't cover what I need, or I can barely afford my premiums, or worse, at times I don't even have it?' Experts agree that the marketplaces need stronger regulation. In 2023, the federal government defined clearer standards for what plans in each tier of insurance should offer, such as better prescription drug benefits, defined co-pays for X-rays, or coverage for emergency room visits. Certain types of basic care, such as primary care, should require just a small co-pay for at least a small number of initial visits. Each insurer must offer at least one plan that complies with these new standards at every tier of coverage -- an 'Easy Pricing' option or 'standard plan.' Most plans on the marketplaces don't meet these criteria. Federal and state regulators had long planned to cull such 'noncompliant' plans, but gradually, fearing that doing so too quickly would scare insurers away from participating. But with the priorities of the new Trump administration now in focus, and a Republican majority in Congress, it's far from clear what course President Donald Trump, who sought to repeal the ACA outright in his first term, will take. There are hints: Subsidies to help Americans buy insurance, adopted during the Biden administration, are set to expire at the end of 2025 if the Republican-led Congress doesn't extend them. If subsidies expire, premiums are likely to rise sharply for plans sold on the marketplaces, leaving insurance out of reach for many more young adults. This article originally appeared in
New York Post
14 hours ago
- New York Post
Newborn dies after using home-birthing pool promoted by Instagram influencer
A newborn baby died after her mother delivered her using a home-birthing pool hired from 'freebirth' Instagram influencer Emily Lal, a coroner has found. The findings made in the Coroners Court of Victoria say it is 'unlikely' the baby girl would have died had she been born in a hospital setting, or if the home birth had occurred with appropriate midwife support. The mother, referred to as Ms. E, gave birth to her child in December 2022. A newborn died after a home-birthing pool hired from 'freebirth' Instagram influencer Emily Lal. ink drop – Prior to the birth, Ms. E contacted Lal – who operates as The Authentic Birthkeeper on Instagram – to rent a birthing pool to help deliver her baby. 'We aren't sure if she's breathing' The Melbourne-based influencer described herself as being 'disillusioned with the medical system', and held the 'philosophy' that registered midwives were 'complicit in, and contributing to, the harm of women'. The coronial inquest found Ms. E contacted the influencer to hire a birthing pool. According to the findings, Ms. E said she kept in contact with Lal 'socially' but did not seek any service or advice from the influencer. However, Ms. E said she requested to keep in contact with the influencer after the birth to 'conduct a post-partum visit'. Half an hour after Ms. E gave birth to her child, she sent a message to Lal saying 'I did it'. She was unable to deliver the placenta until the next morning. The morning following the birth, Ms. E realized something was wrong with her baby. Ms. E sent a message to Lal at about 8am saying, 'We can't wake her, we aren't sure if she's breathing,' with a picture of the baby, whose face had turned blue. Lal didn't see the message for 25 minutes, according to the inquest findings. The child was born in 2022 to her mother, who has been referred to as Ms. E. IdeaBug, Inc. – 'She was a healthy baby' Upon seeing the message, Lal made a Facetime call and saw the baby girl. Believing her to be dead, she told Ms. E and Mr. E to call for an ambulance. Paramedics noted the baby's heartbeat was flatlining and attempted CPR for 30 minutes, but were unable to revive her. Ms. E was transported to the Mercy Women's Hospital for treatment. Forensic pathologist Yeliena Baber said had Ms. E given birth in the hospital, preventive measures would have been put in place. Dr. Baber concluded: 'If Baby E was born in hospital and Ms. E had received appropriate antenatal care, it is highly unlikely that Baby E would have died, as she was a healthy baby and her death was caused by the prolonged delivery in a home birthing pool'. She further noted if a trained midwife had been present during the homebirth and prolonged labor, it would be expected they would escalate care to a hospital if 'it was clear that the baby was in distress'. Coroner Catherine Fitzgerald found Baby E's death was preventable. In her findings, she said the baby's death was 'unlikely to have occurred if the birth occurred in a hospital setting' and may have been avoided if the 'birth was a planned homebirth with appropriate midwife support'. 'A homebirth is distinguished from a 'freebirth', which is when someone chooses to birth their baby without medical or midwifery assistance,' she said. 'The publicly available information regarding water birth … are not directed at women intending to birth at home with no medical assistance or antenatal medical management.' 'The single consultation with (Ms. E's GP) late in the pregnancy provided no real opportunity for education to be given regarding birth options.' Fitzgerald did not make any adverse findings against the baby's parents or Lal.
Miami Herald
a day ago
- Miami Herald
In letter, US senators admonish UnitedHealth after second major cyberattack in a year
Another major computer breach involving UnitedHealth Group has prompted two U.S. senators this week to query the health care giant about the adequacy of its cyber defenses. Episource, a UnitedHealth subsidiary, had its systems hacked last winter, exposing the data of 5.4 million people. The cyberattack appears to be the second-largest U.S. health care hack this year and follows a record-breaking breach in February 2024 of another United subsidiary, Change Healthcare. The Change cyberattack is regarded as the largest ever U.S. health care hack. It affected the data of 190 million people - about half the country's population. "The recently reported hack of Episource, a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group (UHG), raises significant questions about UHG's efforts to safeguard patient information," Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., and Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., wrote Monday to UnitedHealth CEO Stephen Hemsley. "We have seen the recent threat that hostile actors, including Iran may pose on health care entities and UHG's repeated failures to protect against such attacks jeopardizes patient health." The senators asked UnitedHealth to respond by Aug. 18. In a statement, the company said: "We are in receipt of the senators' letter and look forward to providing them the information they requested." Eden Prairie-based UnitedHealth is one the nation's largest companies and the biggest U.S. health insurer. Episource, like Change Healthcare, is part of the company's Optum group, which runs clinics, manages pharmacy benefits and provides other services to health care companies. California-based Episource specializes in health care technology and data services. Its customers include medical providers and health care plans. Episource said in a statement that it found "unusual activity in its computer systems" on Feb. 6. An investigation found that a "cybercriminal was able to see and take copies of some data" between Jan. 27 and Feb. 6. The breach didn't affect all of Episource's customers. Data that may have been compromised included contact information - names, addresses, phone numbers - and health insurance information such as "Medicaid-Medicare government payor ID numbers." Hackers also accessed health data – diagnoses, test results, medicines, treatment records – and to a limited extent, Social Security numbers, according to Episource. After completing its investigation, the company said it started notifying customers about the breach on April 23. Episource reported the hack to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service on June 6, saying it affected 5.4 million people, according to the department's website. At the time, Episource said it was unaware of any misuse of the exposed data. In their letter to Hemsley, Hassan and Cassidy asked UnitedHealth for more information about the Episource hack and for updates on the company's handling of the Change Healthcare breach. Change Healthcare shut down its computer systems in February 2024 to contain the cyber debacle, throwing a wrench into the nation's health care system. When the hack hit, Change Healthcare processed a large share of all health care claims and payments in the U.S. - roughly 15 billion transactions annually. UnitedHealth's then-CEO Andrew Witty was compelled to testify before Congress in May 2024 about the breach. The hack has produced a storm of litigation, too, as heath care companies seek compensation from UnitedHealth for millions of dollars of alleged losses. More than 70 separate lawsuits against Change Healthcare have been consolidated in a multidistrict litigation case in federal court in Minnesota. Such cases are used in the federal court system for complex legal matters involving many separate but similar claims. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
