logo
United States resumes foreign students' visa process but only if they unlock social media

United States resumes foreign students' visa process but only if they unlock social media

The United States will restart its student visa application process for foreigners, but all applicants will now be required to make their social media accounts public for government review, the State Department said Wednesday.
Consular officers will be on the lookout for posts and messages that could be deemed hostile to the United States, its government, culture, institutions or founding principles, the department said.
In a notice made public on Wednesday, the department confirmed it had revoked its May suspension of student visa processing.
However, it said new applicants who refuse to set their social media accounts to 'public' and allow them to be reviewed may be rejected. A refusal to do so could be a sign they are trying to evade the requirement or hide their online activity, the department said.
June 2025: Trump suspends new Chinese and other foreign student visas at Harvard
The Trump administration temporarily halted scheduling new visa interviews for foreign students hoping to study in the US last month while preparing to expand the screening of their social media activity, officials said.
Students around the world had been anxiously waiting for US consulates to reopen visa interview appointments as the window to book their travels and make housing arrangements narrowed ahead of the start of the school year.
On Wednesday afternoon, a 27-year-old PhD student in Toronto secured an appointment for a visa interview next week. The student, a Chinese national, hoped to travel to the United States for a research internship that would begin in late July.
Graduating students attend Columbia University's commencement ceremony. Foreign students make up more than 15 per cent of the total student body at nearly 200 US universities, according to an Associated Press report. Photo: Reuters
'I'm really relieved,' said the student, who spoke on condition of being identified only by his surname, Chen, because he was concerned about being targeted. 'I've been refreshing the website a couple of times every day.'
Students from China, India, Mexico, and the Philippines have posted on social media sites that they have been monitoring visa booking websites and closely watching State Department press briefings to get any indication of when appointment scheduling might resume.
In reopening the visa process, the State Department also told consulates to prioritise students hoping to enrol at colleges where foreigners make up less than 15 per cent of the student body, a US official familiar with the matter said. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to detail information that has not been made public.
May 2025: Trump administration removes Harvard's ability to enrol international students
Foreign students make up more than 15 per cent of the total student body at nearly 200 US universities, according to an Associated Press analysis of federal education data from 2023.
Most are private universities, including all eight Ivy League schools. But that criterion also includes 26 public universities, including the University of Illinois and Pennsylvania State University. Looking only at undergraduate students, foreign students make up more than 15 per cent of the population at about 100 universities, almost all of them private.
International students in the US have been facing increased scrutiny on several fronts. In the spring, the Trump administration revoked permission to study in the US for thousands of students, including some involved only in traffic offences, before abruptly reversing course.
The government also expanded the grounds on which the legal status of foreign students can be terminated.
More than 1,000 international students in the US have had their visas or legal status revoked
As part of a pressure campaign targeting Harvard University, the Trump administration has moved to block foreign students from attending the Ivy League school. International students account for a quarter of the university's enrolment, which relies on the group's tuition dollars.
Trump has said Harvard should cap its foreign enrolment at 15 per cent.
This latest move to vet students' social media, the State Department said Wednesday, 'will ensure we are properly screening every single person attempting to visit our country'.
In internal guidance sent to consular officers, the department said they should be looking for 'any indications of hostility toward the citizens, culture, government, institutions or founding principles of the United States'.
Trump has signed a proclamation banning individuals from 12 countries from entering the US, reinstating one of the most controversial measures from his first term. via AFP
Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, said the new policy evokes the ideological vetting of the Cold War when prominent artists and intellectuals were excluded from the United States.
'This policy makes a censor of every consular officer, and it will inevitably chill legitimate political speech both inside and outside the United States,' Jaffer said.
Trump signs US travel ban targeting 12 nations while limiting entry for 7 others
The Trump administration has also called on 36 countries to commit to improving the vetting of travellers or face a ban on their citizens visiting the United States. A weekend diplomatic cable sent by the State Department said the countries have 60 days to address US concerns or risk being added to a travel ban that now includes 12 nations.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran diplomacy as cover for decapitation
Iran diplomacy as cover for decapitation

Asia Times

timean hour ago

  • Asia Times

Iran diplomacy as cover for decapitation

Subscribe now with a one-month trial for only $1, then enjoy the first year at an exclusive rate of just $99. Trump's coercive turn risks disastrous war with Iran Nile Bowie analyzes the escalating Israel-Iran conflict, which threatens to drag Washington into another open-ended regime change war in the Middle East. Unless the US restrains Israel and reestablishes credible diplomacy, the conflict could spiral into a quagmire with global repercussions. Washington's Iran ultimatum bolsters Kremlin hardliners James Davis assesses how the Israel-Iran war is emboldening hardliners in Moscow and diverting global attention and weapons away from Kiev. Russian elites interpret recent US diplomacy as insincere and believe Trump is either unwilling or unable to negotiate a fair settlement. Nippon Steel acquires US Steel minus one 'Golden Share' Scott Foster evaluates Nippon Steel's $14.9 billion acquisition of US Steel, with unprecedented political oversight built into a 'Golden Share' agreement granting the US government veto power over key decisions. The acquisition offers mutual industrial benefits amid ongoing US-Japan tariff disputes.

China cuts US Treasury stockpiles to 16-year low amid Trump's trade war
China cuts US Treasury stockpiles to 16-year low amid Trump's trade war

South China Morning Post

time3 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

China cuts US Treasury stockpiles to 16-year low amid Trump's trade war

China reduced its stockpile of US Treasuries to a 16-year low in April, as an escalating trade war with Washington sparked concerns about the long-standing status of American government bonds as the world's safest asset. Beijing's holdings dropped to US$757 billion, down US$8.2 billion from March, according to the latest data released by the US Treasury Department. The figures for April marked the second consecutive month of decline and the lowest level since March 2009, according to data compiled by Wind. Having already slipped to the No. 3 position among foreign holders in March – behind Japan and the United Kingdom – China continued its steady retreat from US government debt, a trend that began during Trump's first term. On April 2, dubbed 'Liberation Day', Trump launched sweeping 'reciprocal tariffs' on allies and adversaries alike. The move sparked turmoil in global markets, sending US stocks tumbling and triggering sharp sell-offs in both Treasuries and the dollar. Tit-for-tat tariff exchanges between the US and China quickly escalated, with duties on both sides reaching over 100 per cent before a temporary ceasefire agreed in May rolled back most of the levies. There was concern that the trade war between the world's two largest economies would spill over into financial markets , with speculation that Beijing could dump its vast holdings of US Treasury securities and that Washington could delist Chinese companies from American stock exchanges. Given the rising tensions between the two superpowers, Chinese economists have cautioned against the weaponisation of the US dollar amid fears that Washington could one day seize Chinese overseas financial assets – similar to the actions taken against Russia following its invasion of Ukraine.

Hedging ways out of troubled waters in South China Sea
Hedging ways out of troubled waters in South China Sea

Asia Times

time5 hours ago

  • Asia Times

Hedging ways out of troubled waters in South China Sea

The South China Sea has long been a bubbling geopolitical hotspot. Recently, a series of moves by the various nations claiming a stake in the waters has stirred up yet more trouble. Malaysia has, of late, reaffirmed its commitment to oil and gas exploration in waters claimed by China while quietly building up its military on the islands off Borneo. Meanwhile, Chinese coast guard vessels have deployed water cannons against Filipino fishing boats. And the accidental grounding of a Chinese boat in shallow waters around the Philippines' Thitu Island on June 8, 2025, was enough to put Filipino forces on alert. Vietnam, too, has been active in the disputed waters. A Beijing-based think tank on June 7 flagged that Vietnamese engineers had been busy reclaiming land and installing military-related ports and airstrips around the Spratly Islands. What the three Southeast Asian nations of Vietnam, the Philippines and Malaysia have in common is that they, along with others in the region, are trying to navigate a more assertive China at a time when the US policy intentions under the second Trump administration are fluid and hard to read. And in lieu of a coordinated response from the regional body Association of Southeast Asian Nations, or ASEAN, each member nation has been busy charting its course in these choppy waters. Why is China trying to assert control in the South China Sea? In a 2023 speech, President Xi Jinping noted that 'Western countries led by the United States have implemented all-around containment, encirclement and suppression of China.' This fear has been long held in Beijing and was reinforced by a US Indo-Pacific policy announced in 2011 of rebalancing military forces away from Europe and toward Asia to confront China. In response, China has in recent years embarked on an ambitious policy of attempting to outmuscle US naval power in the South China Sea. China is now the world's leading builder of naval vessels and is estimated to have 440 battleships by 2030, compared with the United States' 300. And it comes at a time when US naval power is spread around the world. China's, meanwhile, is concentrated around the South China Sea, where, since 2013, Chinese vessels have pumped sand onto reefs, turning them into islands and then weaponizing them. Satellite imagery shows the Fiery Cross Reef in the South China Sea, part of the Spratly Islands group, being built by Chinese dredges. Image: Maxar via Getty Images / The Conversation Then there is the activity of China's maritime militia of approximately 300 nominally fishing boats equipped with water cannons and reinforced hulls for ramming. This so-called gray zone fleet is increasingly active in confronting Southeast Asia nations at sea. The US response to China's militarization in the sea has been through so-called 'freedom of navigation' exercises that often deploy carrier groups in a show of force. But these episodic displays are more performative than effective, doing little to deter China's claims. The US has also strengthened military alliances with Australia, India, Japan and the Philippines, and has increased coast guard cooperation with the Philippines and Japan. A fleet from the U.S. Navy patrolling the Pacific Ocean. Photo: Sean M. Castellano / US Navy via Getty Images / The Conversation Yet the battle over control of the South China Seas is more than just geopolitical posturing between the two superpowers. For adjoining countries, the sea is a valuable biological resource with rich fishing grounds that provide a staple of fish protein for close to 2 billion people. There are estimates of 190 trillion cubic feet of natural gas and 11 billion barrels of oil. The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, or UNCLOS, guarantees a nation an exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of 200 nautical miles from around its coastline. China is a signatory of the UNCLOS. Yet it views ownership of the South China Sea through the lens of its nine-dash line, a reference to the boundary line that Beijing has invoked since 1948. While the claim has no legal or historical basis, the delineation makes major incursions into waters around Vietnam, the Philippines and Malaysia and, to a lesser extent, Brunei and Indonesia as well. Despite China's expansive claim to the South China Sea being dismissed in 2016 by the international Permanent Court of Arbitration, Beijing continues to assert its claim. Screenshot Hedging positions As I explore in my recent book 'Hedging and Conflict in the South China Sea,' part of the problem Southeast Asian nations face is that they have failed to forge a unified position. ASEAN, the regional bloc representing 10 nations in Southeast Asia, has long been governed by the principle that major decisions need unanimous agreement. China is a major trading partner to ASEAN nations, so any regional country aligning too close to the US comes with the real risk of economic consequences. And two ASEAN members, Cambodia and Laos, are especially close to China, making it difficult to generate a unified ASEAN policy that confronts China's maritime claim. Instead, ASEAN has promoted a regional code of conduct that effectively legitimizes China's maritime claims, fails to mention the 2016 ruling and ignores the issue of conflicting claims. Further complicating a united front against China is the competing claims among ASEAN nations themselves to disputed islands in the South China Sea. In lieu of a coordinated response, Southeast Asian nations have instead turned to hedging — that is, maintaining good relationships with both China and the US without fully committing to one or other. Malaysia's approach sees its government partition off the South China Sea dispute from its overall bilateral ties with China while continuing to promote an ASEAN code of conduct. Until recently, Malaysia's oil and gas activities were well within Malaysia's EEZ and not far enough out to fall into China's nine-dash claim. But as these close-to-shore fields become exhausted, subsequent exploration will need to extend outward and into China's nine-dash claim, putting Malaysia's dealings with China under pressure. China's nine-dash line claims a significant amount of Vietnam's EEZ, and the contested maritime area is a source of friction between the two countries; China's maritime militia regularly harasses Vietnamese fishermen and disrupts drilling operations in Vietnam's EEZ. But Vietnam has to tread carefully. China plays a significant role in the Vietnamese economy as a major destination of exports and an important provider of foreign investment. China also has the ability to dam the Mekong River upstream of Vietnam — something that would disrupt agricultural production. As a result, Vietnam's hedging involves a careful calibration to avoid angering China. However, part of Vietnam's heavy hedging involves the promotion of the South China Sea dispute as a core issue for domestic public opinion, which limits the Vietnamese government's ability to offer concessions to China. A Philippine coast guard ship and fishing boats are seen in El Nido, Palawan, Philippines, on May 26, 2025. Photo: Daniel Ceng/Anadolu via Getty Images / The Conversation China's nine-dash claim also includes a wide swath of the Philippines' EEZ. The Philippines has zigzagged in its dealings with China. The presidencies of Gloria Macapagal Arroyo (2001–2010) and Rodrigo Duterte (2016-2022) pursued a pro-China tack that downplayed Filipino claims in the South China Sea. Presidents Benigno Aquino (2010-2016) and Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr (2022-present), in contrast, have given US forces greater access to their maritime bases and mobilized national and international opinion in favor of their claims. Since coming to power, Marcos has also pursued even closer naval ties with the US. But this has come at a cost: China now views the Philippines as a US ally. As such, Beijing sees little to be gained by pulling back from its assertive activity in and around its waters. In the shadow of two major powers battling for power in the South China Sea, Southeast Asian nations are making the best of their position along a geopolitical fracture line by advancing their claims and interests while not overly antagonizing a more assertive China or losing the support of the US. This may work to tamp down tensions in the South China Sea. But it is a fluid approach not without risk, and it could yet prove to be another source of instability in a geopolitically contested and dangerous region. John Rennie Short is professor emeritus of Public Policy, University of Maryland, Baltimore County This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store