Vatican Hardens Tone On Israel After Gaza Parish Strike
The strike killed three people in the Holy Family Church in the centre of Gaza City -- prompting condemnation by politicians and by religious leaders of various denominations.
Pope Leo XIV on Sunday slammed the "barbarity" of the war and the blind "use of force", denouncing "the attack by the Israeli army".
It was a change of language after two years of tireless, repetitive calls for peace by the Vatican under former Pope Francis, who died in April.
Francois Mabille, an analyst at France's Geopolitical Observatory of Religion, said the statements represent an increasingly critical view of Israel in the Catholic world.
Beyond growing anger worldwide at the human cost of the Gaza war, he cited "the fact that it's happening on holy ground."
It is leading to "at least a temporary shift in Catholic opinion in general," he told AFP.
On Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called Pope Leo -- who became pontiff in May -- and said his country "deeply regrets" the strike, blaming a "stray missile" and vowing an investigation.
Netanyahu's spokesman said the conversation was "friendly" and that the two men agreed to meet soon.
But on the same day, in an interview with Italian broadcaster Rai 2, the Vatican's second-in-command -- Cardinal Pietro Parolin -- implied the strike may have been intentional.
He called on Israel to publicise the findings of its investigation to find out "if it really was an error, which we can legitimately doubt, or if there was a will to directly attack a Christian church."
The Vatican also sent the cardinal of Jerusalem, Pierbattista Pizzaballa, on a rare visit to Gaza Friday, where he visited the wounded and conducted a mass at the Holy Family Church.
The visit was meant to show that Catholic authorities were determined to stay in Gaza.
"We are not a target. They say it was a mistake, even if everyone here does not believe that is the case," the cardinal told Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera.
Mabille, the analyst, said the Holy See is now also using "more precise vocabulary based on legal categories."
On Sunday, the American-born pope called for the international community to "observe humanitarian law and respect the obligation to protect civilians, as well as the prohibition of collective punishment, the indiscriminate use of force, and the forced displacement of populations."
Mabille said that constituted four fundamental rights under humanitarian law that are being violated by Netanyahu's government.
Some Catholic officials are going much further.
In an interview to Italy's La Stampa newspaper, Cardinal Augusto Paolo Lojudice -- who also serves as a judge at a Vatican tribunal -- said Netanyahu is "not stopping because he is a tyrant pursuing a dark and bloodthirsty plan for power".
Lojudice -- who worked with Leo for several years before was made pope -- accused Israel of "evil without logic" in Gaza.
The Vatican, which since 2015 has recognised the state of Palestine, supports a two-state solution in Israel.
It has also called for a special international status for Jerusalem, with free and safe access to religious sites there.
Already strained ties with Israel degraded further after Israel launched its assault following Hamas's deadly October 7, 2023 attack.
Diverging from the Vatican's official line, Pope Francis questioned whether Israel's heavy handed military response amounted to "genocide" in Gaza.
The current tense diplomatic exchanges also come after a small Christian village in the central occupied West Bank was burnt down in early July and during heightened criticism of Israeli settler attacks. The Cardinal of Jerusalem, Pierbattista Pizzaballa, speaks to a victim of Israeli strikes during a visit to Gaza AFP The damaged facade of the Holy Family Church in Gaza after it was hit by an Israeli strike AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Trump's EPA to roll back cornerstone of climate action – DW – 07/31/2025
The US Environmental Protection Agency under President Donald Trump is pushing to reverse a 2009 landmark declaration that deemed CO2 and other greenhouse gases harmful to people's health. What's at stake? US President Donald Trump's administration is forging ahead with a plan to revoke a scientific finding that's long been the cornerstone of US climate action. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin unveiled the move at a car dealership in the US state of Indiana, hailing it as "the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States" and the "death of the Green New Scam." At the heart of the rollback is the Obama-era 2009 endangerment finding, grounded in the landmark Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. EPA. That ruling established the EPA has authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases as air pollutants — a legal foundation for US efforts to curb emissions. If the endangerment finding is thrown out, the EPA would lose its ability to use the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases, a move experts warn would represent a "radical pivot in American climate and energy policy." "It represents a complete US step away from renewable energy and energy efficiency in favor of full embrace of expanded production and use of fossil fuels, including coal, oil, and natural gas," Barry Rabe, environmental and public policy professor at the University of Michigan, told DW. The second Trump administration is acting more aggressively in just about everything than the first, Michael Gerrard, professor at Columbia Law School, told DW. It is closely following the blueprint of Project 2025, a roadmap developed by conservative think tank, The Heritage Foundation. The 900-page document suggested an "update" of the endangerment finding. The finding is the basis for rules regulating climate pollution established under the Obama and Biden administrations. Rules on power plants, vehicles, airplanes, and landfills could now be repealed, said Jason Rylander, legal director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute. At the same time, climate change continues to intensify across the US, fueling extreme heat, wildfires, floods, and billion-dollar weather disasters. "Climate change isn't going away. We are rapidly accelerating past 1.5 degrees. There will be additional public health and environmental harms that will result from that," Rylander said. The EPA has formally drawn up a proposal, which is now open for public comment until September. The agency will then review and respond to the feedback before issuing a final ruling, expected by the end of the year. There will then likely be lawsuits. "Groups like mine will certainly sue," Rylander said. The cases will first go to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and could then be appealed to the US Supreme Court. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video It could take years for the case to reach the Supreme Court. But once the EPA issues its final decision, the endangerment finding will be revoked, Gerrard explained. "It stays revoked unless a court overturns it." The endangerment finding is based on decades of scientific conclusions from credible global sources about the impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on climate change and public health. Rylander said the EPA was "slicing and dicing the statute to try to come up with some sort of loopholes," and that none of the arguments brought forward "really passed the laugh test." Still, with a six-to-three conservative majority, the US Supreme Court has repeatedly chipped away at federal climate regulations in recent years. "So, it is possible that the Supreme Court will uphold this," said Gerrard, who is also director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video One argument the agency is using to reverse the finding is that its economic and political significance is so great that it requires explicit authorization from Congress. And while the EPA under Obama and Biden assumed it was enough to show that greenhouse gas emissions caused by humans endanger the climate, the Trump administration wants to evaluate each gas individually and by sector. "And they are saying each chunk, like carbon dioxide from US power plants alone, has to endanger the climate," Gerrard said, adding that this is much harder to establish. "So, a court that is hostile to climate regulation might follow that approach and agree with the Trump EPA and say that the endangerment finding is not valid." The EPA proposal also argues the 2009 finding failed to consider the benefits of CO2 emissions alongside their costs. Rylander called this "a fallacious argument," comparing it to deciding whether a species is endangered under the Endangered Species Act. "That's not an economic decision. It's a question of science," he said, adding that it's the same with pollutants, like CO2. "Do they cause public health harm or do they not?" Rabe said a reversal would cause "a chilling effect on many existing federal policies for greenhouse gas emissions." Still, the EPA would retain authority to regulate other pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, mercury, and coal ash from coal-fired power plants. "And many states are working to address pollution from cars and power plants, and they would do that under state law," said Rylander, adding that "US efforts to decarbonize will still continue." However, Gerrard said, "the best tool they have would be gone."
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Fact check: Aid groups contradict Israeli Gaza claims – DW – 07/31/2025
Netanyahu denies starvation in Gaza — but aid groups, doctors, and UN data point to a deepening hunger crisis. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu denies that Gazan are starving. "There is no starvation in Gaza, no policy of starvation in Gaza," Netanyahu saidon Sunday, during an event with Daystar, an evangelical TV network, held in Jerusalem. His remarks stand in stark contrast to mounting evidence from aid agencies, humanitarian organizations, and eyewitnesses who describe an escalating food crisis, particularly in the north of the enclave. A DW Fact check takes a closer look. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a global hunger monitoring body, has warnedthat famine thresholds have been surpassed in parts of Gaza — particularly in Gaza City — calling the crisis a "worst-case scenario" now unfolding. According to the World Health Organization, 63 of the 74 malnutrition-related deaths recorded in Gaza this year occurred in July alone — including 24 children under the age of five and 38 adults. Meanwhile, aid workers on the ground reportthat they themselves are going hungry and Gaza's Health Ministry says dozens of people have died from starvation-related causes over the past three weeks. With international pressure rising, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that he would officially recognize a State of Palestine at the UN General Assembly in September unless Israel takes "substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Israeli officials, however, including Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Oren Marmorstein, have rejectedthe malnutrition and starvation figures released by Gaza's health authorities and UN bodies, calling them exaggerated and unreliable. They argue that the numbers, some provided by Hamas,a group designated as a terrorist organization by Israel, the EU, and others, lack credibility. However, a new independent study says they are actually too low. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is not alone in denying that Gaza is facing starvation. His comments have been echoed across social media by numerous online personalities and accounts that either downplay the severity of the crisis or claim reports of widespread hunger are fabricated. Israel imposed a complete blockade of food, fuel and other supplies in March and numerous politicians — including Netanyahu — have repeatedly said that no food would enter Gaza. Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said in August 2024 that "it might be justified and moral" to let Israel "cause 2 million civilians to die of hunger" until the "hostages are returned." "This is the official line repeated by the Prime Minister, his cabinet, and the far-right media," Oren Persico of the Israeli independent outlet told DW. "They either deny that starvation is happening, blame Hamas for not surrendering, or even claim it's a good thing—because it supposedly helps pave the way for building Jewish settlements in Gaza." Several accounts challenge widely shared photos of severely emaciated children in Gaza, claiming they're misleading or lack context. One image — of Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq — featured in reports by several international news outletshas also circulated widely on social media alongside posts condemning the humanitarian crisis. Pro-Israel commentators, along with Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, later claimed the boy had a rare genetic muscular disorder and alleged that omitting this detail was an attempt to defame Israel. While some posts and reports did lack that context, outlets like CNNacknowledged his condition and noted that he had been living a healthier life before the war, thanks to therapy and adequate nutrition, writing: "He has a muscle disorder that requires physical therapy and specialized nutrition, and he faces life-threatening malnutrition as the humanitarian situation worsens due to ongoing Israeli attacks and the blockade." also confirmedhe suffered from malnutrition in addition to a pre-existing illness. Still, a large number of accounts continued to circulate the claim that such photos were being misused to falsely suggest starvation—something they insist does not exist. One widely shared post (see screenshot below) reads: "A boy from Gaza with a rare muscular disease is being exploited to promote the fake campaign of starvation in Gaza." DW Fact check identified dozens of nearly identical posts circulating the same image and text. Our team showed the picture shared by these posts to several pediatricians in Germany to verify the claims about the child's muscular disorder. They noted that the exact condition cannot be diagnosed from photos and videos alone. However, they emphasized that a pre-existing medical condition does not rule out malnutrition, and attributing all signs of emaciation solely to genetic disorders overlooks the broader impact of prolonged nutritional deficiency. For Oren Persico from the accusations from the Israeli government are part of a political strategy. "One tactic being used is to highlight non-representative examples and present them as proof that human suffering in Gaza isn't happening," he explained. "It's like conspiracy theories who fix on irrelevant details to distort the overall picture. In that sense, I would call it a disinformation campaign — one that cherry-picks fringe facts to deny the overwhelming body of evidence, including eyewitness accounts, data, and reports." A similar narrative surfaced around a piece of video published by outlets including the Jerusalem Post which shows a close-up of a vegetable stall in a Gaza market. The footage quickly spread across social media, where it was used by accounts seeking to challenge reports of famine in the territory. "…This is footage from today at Al-Sahaba market in Gaza City, completely packed with food. So much for starvation. The average Gazan eats better than you!", writes one account. DW Fact check spoke with Majdi Fathi, the journalist accredited for the video. He confirmed that the footage is authentic and shows a market inside Gaza, but added that it does not mean food is available for all. "These vegetables and fruits are very expensive," Fathi said. "The majority of people in Gaza cannot afford them. What Gaza lacks are other food items such as meat, milk, rice and eggs. I did not find anything else to film in the market."Other media reports support his view. A BBC investigation found that food packages delivered by local aid groups in Gaza often lack the nutritional variety needed for a healthy diet, leading to deficiencies and long-term health issues even when quantities are adequate. "Until now, meat, eggs, milk, and other essentials have not entered," Fathi said. "The problem is also the high prices. Since the beginning of the war, many families haven't been able to work and have no income to buy food." On his Instagram account, he shared another video showing Gazansat the market complaining about the soaring cost of basic goods. Israel's recent move to allow more aid deliveries has slightly eased prices in some areas, but the impact remains limited. While the aid is meant for free distribution, some supplies are being stored, diverted, or resold. With no clear oversight by aid groups, local authorities, or Israeli forces, the extent of diversion is unclear. Israeli officials have repeatedly claimed that Hamas is responsible for stealing this aid. However, The New York Times reports that Israeli military officials have confirmed there is no evidence that Hamas systematically looted UN humanitarian aid, including from UN convoys—it instead alleges sporadic theft from smaller actors, not organized diversion by Hamas. Between 120 and 200 aid trucks entered Gaza on Sunday, according to UN estimates, with an additional 260 trucks reportedly awaiting clearance as of Monday. But aid officials have described those efforts as inadequate and, in some cases, dangerous for civilians on the ground to collect them. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Local Germany
4 hours ago
- Local Germany
Germany says Israel 'increasingly in the minority' on Palestine issue
Johann Wadephul said in a statement before heading to Israel that the recent UN conference on a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict -- boycotted by the US and Israel -- showed that "Israel is finding itself increasingly in the minority". Germany is one of Israel's staunchest diplomatic allies but Wadephul noted that "in view of the open threats of annexation by some in the Israeli government, a growing number of European countries are ready to recognise a state of Palestine without previous negotiations". Last week more than 70 Israeli lawmakers, including some in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's right-wing coalition, passed a motion urging the government to impose sovereignty over the occupied West Bank. Wadephul repeated Berlin's position that "the recognition of a Palestinian state should come at the end of the process" of negotiations. He did however sharpen his tone slightly by insisting that "this process must begin now" and that "Germany will also be forced to react to unilateral moves". Advertisement On Gaza, whose two-million-plus inhabitants now face an unfolding famine, Wadephul demanded that Israel enable more aid into the territory "immediately, comprehensively and in a lasting way" to alleviate the "dramatic" situation there. He said that airlifts -- which Germany will take part in in coming days -- were one way of delivering aid but that they "cannot replace" deliveries by land. "Only overland can aid reach the population in the necessary quantities," he said, adding that Germany was working to re-establish the land route "urgently". Wadephul is expected to meet his Israeli counterpart Gideon Saar and President Isaac Herzog on the trip to Israel, as well as Netanyahu. He will also travel to the West Bank to meet Palestinian Authority president Mahmud Abbas. READ ALSO: Police hurt and dozens arrested at Berlin pro-Palestinian demonstration
