
An import duty hike promised to support Indian farmers. Instead, prices crashed
APMC
(
mandi
) in the open market to traders, earning Rs 2,500 per quintal for one batch and Rs 1,900 for the other—much lower than the minimum support price (
MSP
) of 4,892 per quintal.
Soybean farmers in Madhya Pradesh are facing challenges due to erratic monsoon patterns, which have significantly impacted the region's soybean cultivation, a major source of income for many farmers. Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra are the two largest soybean-producing states in the country, contributing 54% and 30%, respectively, to India's total production.
Adding to the woes, 'rising input costs have severely impacted our profitability,' says Baghel. 'With seed, fertiliser, and labour prices doubling, farmers are struggling, as their returns have remained stagnant—unchanged for over a decade,' he says.
'If farmers don't get fair prices for their produce, they will be discouraged from sowing the same crop in the future. This season,
soybean prices
fell Rs 500-1,000 short of the MSP, highlighting the challenges farmers face, says Anil Ghanwat, President, Shetkari Sanghatana, a Maharashtra-based farmers' union. He claims that farmers sell their produce in the open market throughout the year, often at unfavourable prices.
ET Online
This isn't a challenge exclusive to soybeans; it exists in other
edible oil
crops, such as groundnut and mustard, too. To help local farmers secure better prices for their kharif oilseeds, the government hiked the duty on vegetable oil imports in September 2024; the basic
customs duty
on crude palm, soybean and sunflower oils was raised from 5.5% to 27.5%, while the duty on refined grades was set at 35.75%, thereby making imports more expensive.
Live Events
However, the increase in import duty did not yield the desired outcome. The prices stayed not only below the MSP but also lower than the levels seen during the period of duty-free imports, suggesting that the duty hike has not reversed the downward price trend. For example, soybean prices dropped from Rs 4,184 per quintal in October 2024 to Rs 3,962-4,080 in the first week of April 2025 in Madhya Pradesh and from Rs 4,145 to Rs 3,944 during the same period in Maharashtra, against an MSP of Rs 4,892. For groundnut, prices remained in the range of Rs 5,975 and Rs 6,080 per quintal, below the MSP of Rs 6,783.
'For soybean, the mandi prices in Madhya Pradesh mostly operated 15-17% below MSP during the harvest time (November-December 2024) despite the government procurement. The all-India average groundnut price stood also much below MSP during harvest,' says S.P. Kamrah, Secretary General of the Indian Vegetable Oil Producers' Association (IVPA).
Industry stakeholders and experts attribute this to various factors, including global market influences, crushing margin challenges and trade loopholes. They believe that a more pragmatic approach is required to address these issues.
Crushed at the root
India's per capita consumption of edible oil has increased sharply over the past decades, reaching 19.7 kg per year, according to a report by NITI Aayog last August. The increase in demand has significantly surpassed domestic production, resulting in a heavy dependence on imports to meet both domestic and industrial requirements.
In FY24, India produced a total of 39.7 million tonnes (MT) of oilseeds, compared to 41.4 MT in FY23, 38 MT in FY22, 35.9 MT in FY21 and 33.2 MT in FY20, according to the data by the Directorate of Oilseeds Development.
iStock
For soybean, the mandi prices in Madhya Pradesh mostly operated 15-17% below MSP during the harvest time (November-December 2024) despite the government procurement.
Despite the government's several initiatives to achieve self-sufficiency, production has not grown at the same pace as consumption. India's still 15-16 million tonnes annually, spending billions of dollars to meet domestic demand.
India is a major importer of edible oils, relying on imports to meet around 60% of its total needs.
Palm oil
accounts for a significant portion of these imports, nearly 60%, followed by soft oils like soybean and sunflower.
'India's edible oil consumption is 26 million tonnes per year, while domestic production meets only 16 million tonnes. Increasing import duty on vegetable oil could help in supporting local farmers,' says Pasha Patel, Chairman, Maharashtra State Agricultural Price Commission. 'While the government increased the import duty by 20% in September, we had requested a 35% increase. An increased duty might have pushed oilseed prices above the MSP,' Patel adds.
Despite India's heavy reliance on imports, farmers like Baghel are struggling to get fair prices for their produce. Some are even having difficulty finding buyers, forcing them to hold onto it for more days. This delay could potentially impact the quality of oilseeds, making it even more challenging for them to sell.
Experts could not provide the total volume figure or percentage range of edible oil crops currently held by farmers, processors and traders; however, they believe it is substantial, which has crushed their hopes for better returns.
Oil, toil and trouble
For the uninitiated, oilseeds consist of two main components: oil and meal. The ratio of oil to meal differs by type; for instance, soybeans contain 18% oil and 82% meal, while mustard and sunflower have 40% oil and 60% meal. After harvest, farmers sell oilseeds to traders and processors. Millers or processors crush the oilseeds and subsequently sell the oil and meal separately. Margins vary based on the crop and its quality. For instance, soybean meal (SBM) generates most of the revenue for soybean processors, accounting for over 80% of the raw material's value.
However, the domestic demand for soybean meal has decreased over the past two years, primarily due to the heavy availability of rice and maize Distiller's Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS), a by-product of ethanol production. According to experts, the poultry sector, the major buyer of SBM, is shifting towards DDGS, a cheaper alternative to SBM. This has reduced demand for soybean meals, which led to reduced crushing, resulting in decreased buying and subsequently lower soybean prices. Rahul Chauhan, Director, IGrain India, says, 'Due to the high usage of DDGS, the overall demand of oilmeals within India reduced drastically. This decrease in prices has reduced the profitability of crushers,' says Chauhan.
'The situation is further exacerbated by the overall high availability of SBM in global markets at lower prices versus Indian SBM, leading to lower exports of Indian SBM, Kamrah explains.
Higher import duties may not benefit domestic oilseed farmers if crushing economics aren't favourable, according to experts. They say idle mills resulting from unprofitable meal exports will restrict farmgate demand, thereby making crushing economics more crucial than import volumes.
The negative crushing margins are attributed to weak global meal prices, which are a result of South America's oversupply and capped oil premiums due to competitive imports.
Kamrah states that weak global meal prices have pushed margins into negative territory. So, even after the government hiked import duties, many crushers have reduced processing volumes due to losses, leading to limited demand for domestic oilseeds, leaving farmers like Baghel in the lurch. The profitability of the mills hinges on the difference between revenues generated from edible oil and oil meal sales and the input costs.
iStock
The negative crushing margins are attributed to weak global meal prices, which are a result of South America's oversupply and capped oil premiums due to competitive imports.
Additionally, excessive imports of palm oil, often blended with other oils, put local farmers at a disadvantage due to unfair competition, resulting in low prices for their produce, says Shetkari Sanghatana's Ghanwat. Blending palm oil with other oils, typically in the 30% to 40% range, is a common practice to achieve desired food properties. This blending ratio is often used to balance the characteristics of the final product. He suggests that regulating imports and enforcing stringent blending limits could benefit farmers as well as consumers.
Trade loopholes
While the profitability of mills and global demand dynamics are important aspects of this discussion, it is essential to consider trade loopholes. According to agriculture economist Deepak Pareek, imported edible oils are being rerouted through countries like Nepal, using bilateral trade agreements to bypass duties. He says, 'This duty avoidance dilutes the effectiveness of the tariff increase.'
Kamrah notes that the Indian duty hike has triggered zero import duties under the South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA). Trade expects about 1 million tonnes of zero-duty imports from SAFTA countries, especially from Nepal. 'While this is bad for the domestic industry, it also dampened domestic sentiment, and hence, oilseed prices also came under pressure,' adds Kamrah.
All this emphasises the pressing need to tackle production and supply chain issues. On February 10, 2025, the Solvent Extractors' Association of India (SEA) wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi highlighting concerns over duty-free imports under SAFTA, which they said were causing a 'massive influx' of refined soybean and palm oils from Nepal and other South Asian countries. Under SAFTA, Nepalese refiners have been exploiting a duty advantage by importing crude oil and exporting refined oil to India at discounted prices, taking advantage of the trade agreement's preferential tariffs, SEA says.
Between October 15, 2024, and January 15, 2025, Nepal imported 194,974 tonnes of edible oil, mainly crude soybean and sunflower oil, and exported 107,425 tonnes to India, according to the trade data. Nepal's import volume exceeded its monthly requirement of 35,000 tonnes, indicating significant refining and re-export activity. Notably, Nepal's exports of soybean oil to India have surged, despite the country producing little soybean oil itself.
Global tariff war: Pain ahead
The reciprocal tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump, which are set to expire on July 9, have resulted in increased volatility in vegetable oil prices. According to trade data, the tariff announcements have led to a 7-8% drop in crude oil benchmarks, impacting related vegetable oil contracts.
Additionally, China's recent announcement of a further 10% tariff on US soybeans has significantly reduced US exports. Experts say that this move has led to a decline in global edible oil prices, with US soybean oil futures dropping over 2% and palm oil and sunflower oil prices falling 3-4% in early April 2025. They anticipate a period of softer global edible oil prices, which could limit price gains for oilseed farmers in India.
iStock
For the duty hike to result in sustained price increases in domestic prices that benefit farmers, concurrent support is necessary to improve yields, processing efficiencies, and overall value chain integration.
'These tariffs create a shift in trade flows, with countries looking for alternative suppliers, which may impact the availability and pricing of these oils globally. As a result, India could face higher prices for palm, sunflower, and soybean oils, which are key imports. In response, India should focus on enhancing domestic production through targeted policies, such as those included in the National Mission on Edible Oils-Oilseeds,' says Nilachal Mishra, Partner and Head of Government & Public Services at KPMG India.
The Path Forward
The current oilseed situation in India poses a multifaceted challenge. 'Firstly, there is no quick fix. Reducing import dependency requires a calibrated, multi-year strategy that balances farmer incentives, consumer affordability and market stability,' says Kamrah.
He suggests adopting a dynamic duty slab system wherein duties on crude and refined edible oils would automatically adjust within pre-defined bands tied to global price benchmarks. Secondly, he requests maintaining a duty gap of 15-20% compared to the current 7.5% to incentivise domestic refining and value addition. Kamrah also urges the implementation of rules that allow duties to adjust monthly based on a rolling average of global prices. This approach, he says, will minimise policy lag, ensuring protection for farmers without causing abrupt shocks for consumers.
According to experts and stakeholders, India should also prioritise strengthening its oilseed value chains, boosting productivity, and making the MSP system more functional and profitable for farmers. They highlight the high-cost structure of domestic oilseeds, which makes them uncompetitive with imports, especially during global price fluctuations. Additionally, supply chain issues like low productivity and inadequate processing infrastructure prevent domestic oilseeds from fully benefiting from import duty increases, they add.
For the duty hike to result in sustained price increases in domestic prices that benefit farmers, concurrent support is necessary to improve yields, processing efficiencies, and overall value chain integration. 'Such structural improvements, along with tariffs, can significantly boost domestic prices in the short term,' says Mishra.
According to Pareek, India should provide farmers with high-yielding, disease-resistant seed varieties to boost productivity. Currently, India ranks fourth globally in soybean acreage but fifth in productivity. He also emphasises the need to strengthen government procurement at the MSP level by ensuring timely purchases and payments. While some states procure soybeans through price stabilisation schemes, improvements are needed in coverage, timing, and execution. 'Increase buffer stocks or subsidise processors to buy at MSP when market prices fall, stabilising farmer incomes,' says Pareek.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
a few seconds ago
- India.com
What will be price of petrol, diesel if India stops importing oil from Russia? Prices of petrol, diesel will reach…,Indian customers will have to pay…
India-Russia relations- File image New Delhi: In a significant update amid the trade talks between India and the US and Donald Trump imposing an additional 25% tariff on India, taking the total tariff to 50% due to India's continued crude oil purchase from Russia, reports are now talking about the inflationary impact if India stops buying oil from Russia. Notably, Russia become India's largest oil supplier since the Russia-Ukraine war and is currently supplying 35% to 40% of India's oil needs. Why Donald Trump imposed tariffs on India? In a massive action against India, the United States, under the leadership of Donald Trump imposed tariffs on India as India continued to purchase crude oil from Russia. In response to the move, India clarified its stand and said that it buys Russian oil because Europe stopped sourcing from Moscow. How much loss will India face if Russia cuts imports? As per experts, if India cuts Russian import of crude oil to India, India will have to rely more on costlier oil from West Asia, Africa, the US, and Latin America, which will pose technical, economic, and strategic challenges. More notably, the shifting could raise annual costs by Rs 25,000–40,000 crore for Indian refiners, which would ultimately hit the budgets of Indian consumers. Earlier, a SBI report has also indicated that the fuel bill might increase by USD 9 billion in FY26 and USD 11.7 billion in FY27 if Russia cuts its crude oil imports to India. US President Trump on whether US will impose additional 25 pc tariffs on India? In a significant statement and a matter of good news for India, US President Trump said the US may not impose secondary tariffs on countries continuing to buying Russian crude oil. Speaking to Fox News aboard Air Force One en route to Alaska, he said that, 'Well, he (Vladimir Putin) lost an oil client, so to speak, which is India, which was doing about 40 per cent of the oil. China, as you know, is doing a lot…'. (With inputs from agencies)

Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Centre working on framework to help panchayats become financially-autonomous
New Delhi: The government is working on a framework to help village councils (panchayats) generate their own revenue and become financially autonomous, carrying out development works without relying on funds from the Centre or states. The Union Panchayati Raj ministry has set up a panel, consisting of senior officials from various state governments, which is tasked with formulating a blueprint that can act as a guide for states and Union territories (UTs) in creating and amending their model OSR (Own Source of Revenue) rules. "We have constituted a committee comprising senior officials from various state governments, to prepare a model OSR framework of panchayats, which can serve as a benchmark for the states in formulating and amending their OSR rules," Vivek Bharadwaj, secretary, ministry of panchayati raj, said. The template, to be shared with states and UTs, aims to plug the gaps in existing regulations and guide local bodies in mobilising revenue, which mainly comes from taxes, fees and other charges. The development assumes significance, as nearly a dozen states and UTs don't have OSR rules. The 22 states and UTs that have already formulated the rules need to update them, said Bharadwaj. Own Source Revenue (OSR) refers to the revenues that panchayats generate on their own, from sources such as property tax, water charges, market fees, trade licence fees and building permit fees. OSR rules help regulate, standardize, and empower panchayats to collect and manage the revenues efficiently. The OSR rules are crucial to panchayat as they empower them to function independently and also reduce over-dependence on central and state grants. Additionally, they support local development projects with locally-generated funds. According to Bharadwaj, there are 11 states and UTs that have not yet framed OSR rules. These include Arunachal Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Manipur, Nagaland, Sikkim, Uttar Pradesh, Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu, Ladakh and Lakshadweep. Twenty two states and UTs have already developed and implemented OSR-based regulations, allowing panchayats to levy and collect taxes, fees, tolls, or other local sources of revenue. Among these states are Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Chhattisgarh, Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Kerala, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka. Some States have detailed guidelines on fixing OSR rates. In many instances across the states, it has been observed that much more efforts need to be made towards fulfilment of these requirements. "Financial rules related to OSR generation were prepared long ago in states, and hence have been suffering from various deficiencies like use of incomprehensible legal jargons and lack of updating," Bharadwaj added. Panchayats, which act as grassroots-level bodies to implement government programmes and for achieving the sustainable development goals, get grants from the Centre, state governments, as well as raise their own revenue in a limited way through internal sources like local-tax revenues and user charges. "Self-sufficiency is an ideal state for gram panchayats as they can have more funds to carry out developmental works. However revenue collection is conditional as it depends on economic activities in a particular area," said Sri Hari Nayudu, economist, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP), New Delhi. "Most of the time we are dependent on state government grants for developmental works, since most of us doen't know how to increase revenue. The proposed rules can guide us in that direction," said Gurcharan Singh, Panch-Charik Patti Sarkar, a rural local body in Moga district of Punjab. In 2021-22, the average per capita OSR collected by panchayats at all-India level was ₹ 100. Also, the average OSR for gram panchayat was ₹ 230,000 per year, with 42% of gram panchayats having less than ₹ 100,000 revenue per year. "The key reasons behind low revenue collection are over-dependence on grants, underutilization of tax powers, weak administrative systems and trust deficit with citizens which limit the revenue," said an economist who requested not to identified.


The Hindu
30 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Tamil Nadu prepares the ground to grab a major share in semiconductor landscape
Building on its position as the frontrunner in India's electronics and semiconductor landscape, Tamil Nadu has sanctioned the Semiconductor Design Promotion Scheme under its ₹500-crore Tamil Nadu Semiconductor Mission 2030 (TNSM 2030). Announced in the Tamil Nadu Budget 2025, the scheme is aimed at turbocharging the State's fabless design ecosystem by offering targeted subsidies and prototyping grants, positioning the State as the future nerve centre of chip innovation. According to a Government Order, financial incentives and facilitation support will be extended to Tamil Nadu-based entities engaged in semiconductor design for Integrated Circuits (ICs), chipsets, system on chips (SoCs), IP cores, and semiconductor-linked design. For instance, for firms whose products are commercially deployed, a payroll subsidy will be offered for Tamil Nadu residents. It will be 30% in the initial year, 25% in the second year, and 20% in the third year. This subsidy will be capped at ₹20,000 per employee per month. Payroll subsidy Companies whose products are yet to be commercially deployed, a payroll subsidy covering 50% of the payroll cost (basic wages) of the employees for three years will be given, subject to a ceiling of ₹5 crore per company. The company should demonstrate the proposed product's technical viability to an expert committee. The government will also negotiate with national and international semiconductor fabs to get concessional rates for fabricating the chips designed by the local companies. The government will encourage the use of Tamil Nadu-designed semiconductor products in public procurement within the framework of the Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act. Industries Minister T.R.B. Rajaa said, 'We are unfazed by major semiconductor investments being dragged to other States, despite our unmatched talent pool and mature electronics ecosystem with global players. While we continue to attract investments in manufacturing, we will focus on semiconductor design and research and development. Our Chief Minister has made it clear that nothing shall stop our ambitions in the sector.' Infra support The State is also betting big on establishing Centres of Excellence (CoEs) to provide infrastructure required for chip design, testing, and validation. Tamilnadu Industrial Development Corporation Limited (TIDCO) will promote these centres by attracting private sector investment on commercial terms. It will be a 'for-profit' company (a special purpose vehicle) established as a joint venture between a private player or an academic institution partner and TIDCO. And TIDCO will be permitted to offer up to 40% of the project cost as grant to the SPV, not exceeding ₹75 crore per project. The government will reimburse the grant. According to a government order, TIDCO may be given a 20% equity in each of the financially assisted SPVs, irrespective of the quantum of the grant. And the TIDCO Board has been authorised to dilute the stake to 5% for accommodating future investors in the project. The government will facilitate the training of 1,000 students from engineering colleges in the State under the India Semiconductor Workforce Development Program (ISWDP). TNSM focuses on four major aspects – promotion of fabless companies undertaking design, testing and packaging in the State; promotion of semiconductor machinery manufacturing; promotion of research and innovation in the semiconductor sector; and creation of skilled workforce for the global and domestic semiconductor industry.