logo
An import duty hike promised to support Indian farmers. Instead, prices crashed

An import duty hike promised to support Indian farmers. Instead, prices crashed

Time of India27-05-2025

For many years, Anand Kumar Baghel, a 54-year-old farmer from Hatod Tehsil in Indore,has been growing maize and pulses on his 1.5 acres of land. However, the potential for higher profits enticed him to switch to soybean farming last year. Now he wishes he hadn't made that choice. He sold his 10 quintals of soybean harvest in two quality-based batches at Indore's Lakshmi Bai Nagar
APMC
(
mandi
) in the open market to traders, earning Rs 2,500 per quintal for one batch and Rs 1,900 for the other—much lower than the minimum support price (
MSP
) of 4,892 per quintal.
Soybean farmers in Madhya Pradesh are facing challenges due to erratic monsoon patterns, which have significantly impacted the region's soybean cultivation, a major source of income for many farmers. Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra are the two largest soybean-producing states in the country, contributing 54% and 30%, respectively, to India's total production.
Adding to the woes, 'rising input costs have severely impacted our profitability,' says Baghel. 'With seed, fertiliser, and labour prices doubling, farmers are struggling, as their returns have remained stagnant—unchanged for over a decade,' he says.
'If farmers don't get fair prices for their produce, they will be discouraged from sowing the same crop in the future. This season,
soybean prices
fell Rs 500-1,000 short of the MSP, highlighting the challenges farmers face, says Anil Ghanwat, President, Shetkari Sanghatana, a Maharashtra-based farmers' union. He claims that farmers sell their produce in the open market throughout the year, often at unfavourable prices.
ET Online
This isn't a challenge exclusive to soybeans; it exists in other
edible oil
crops, such as groundnut and mustard, too. To help local farmers secure better prices for their kharif oilseeds, the government hiked the duty on vegetable oil imports in September 2024; the basic
customs duty
on crude palm, soybean and sunflower oils was raised from 5.5% to 27.5%, while the duty on refined grades was set at 35.75%, thereby making imports more expensive.
Live Events
However, the increase in import duty did not yield the desired outcome. The prices stayed not only below the MSP but also lower than the levels seen during the period of duty-free imports, suggesting that the duty hike has not reversed the downward price trend. For example, soybean prices dropped from Rs 4,184 per quintal in October 2024 to Rs 3,962-4,080 in the first week of April 2025 in Madhya Pradesh and from Rs 4,145 to Rs 3,944 during the same period in Maharashtra, against an MSP of Rs 4,892. For groundnut, prices remained in the range of Rs 5,975 and Rs 6,080 per quintal, below the MSP of Rs 6,783.
'For soybean, the mandi prices in Madhya Pradesh mostly operated 15-17% below MSP during the harvest time (November-December 2024) despite the government procurement. The all-India average groundnut price stood also much below MSP during harvest,' says S.P. Kamrah, Secretary General of the Indian Vegetable Oil Producers' Association (IVPA).
Industry stakeholders and experts attribute this to various factors, including global market influences, crushing margin challenges and trade loopholes. They believe that a more pragmatic approach is required to address these issues.
Crushed at the root
India's per capita consumption of edible oil has increased sharply over the past decades, reaching 19.7 kg per year, according to a report by NITI Aayog last August. The increase in demand has significantly surpassed domestic production, resulting in a heavy dependence on imports to meet both domestic and industrial requirements.
In FY24, India produced a total of 39.7 million tonnes (MT) of oilseeds, compared to 41.4 MT in FY23, 38 MT in FY22, 35.9 MT in FY21 and 33.2 MT in FY20, according to the data by the Directorate of Oilseeds Development.
iStock
For soybean, the mandi prices in Madhya Pradesh mostly operated 15-17% below MSP during the harvest time (November-December 2024) despite the government procurement.
Despite the government's several initiatives to achieve self-sufficiency, production has not grown at the same pace as consumption. India's still 15-16 million tonnes annually, spending billions of dollars to meet domestic demand.
India is a major importer of edible oils, relying on imports to meet around 60% of its total needs.
Palm oil
accounts for a significant portion of these imports, nearly 60%, followed by soft oils like soybean and sunflower.
'India's edible oil consumption is 26 million tonnes per year, while domestic production meets only 16 million tonnes. Increasing import duty on vegetable oil could help in supporting local farmers,' says Pasha Patel, Chairman, Maharashtra State Agricultural Price Commission. 'While the government increased the import duty by 20% in September, we had requested a 35% increase. An increased duty might have pushed oilseed prices above the MSP,' Patel adds.
Despite India's heavy reliance on imports, farmers like Baghel are struggling to get fair prices for their produce. Some are even having difficulty finding buyers, forcing them to hold onto it for more days. This delay could potentially impact the quality of oilseeds, making it even more challenging for them to sell.
Experts could not provide the total volume figure or percentage range of edible oil crops currently held by farmers, processors and traders; however, they believe it is substantial, which has crushed their hopes for better returns.
Oil, toil and trouble
For the uninitiated, oilseeds consist of two main components: oil and meal. The ratio of oil to meal differs by type; for instance, soybeans contain 18% oil and 82% meal, while mustard and sunflower have 40% oil and 60% meal. After harvest, farmers sell oilseeds to traders and processors. Millers or processors crush the oilseeds and subsequently sell the oil and meal separately. Margins vary based on the crop and its quality. For instance, soybean meal (SBM) generates most of the revenue for soybean processors, accounting for over 80% of the raw material's value.
However, the domestic demand for soybean meal has decreased over the past two years, primarily due to the heavy availability of rice and maize Distiller's Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS), a by-product of ethanol production. According to experts, the poultry sector, the major buyer of SBM, is shifting towards DDGS, a cheaper alternative to SBM. This has reduced demand for soybean meals, which led to reduced crushing, resulting in decreased buying and subsequently lower soybean prices. Rahul Chauhan, Director, IGrain India, says, 'Due to the high usage of DDGS, the overall demand of oilmeals within India reduced drastically. This decrease in prices has reduced the profitability of crushers,' says Chauhan.
'The situation is further exacerbated by the overall high availability of SBM in global markets at lower prices versus Indian SBM, leading to lower exports of Indian SBM, Kamrah explains.
Higher import duties may not benefit domestic oilseed farmers if crushing economics aren't favourable, according to experts. They say idle mills resulting from unprofitable meal exports will restrict farmgate demand, thereby making crushing economics more crucial than import volumes.
The negative crushing margins are attributed to weak global meal prices, which are a result of South America's oversupply and capped oil premiums due to competitive imports.
Kamrah states that weak global meal prices have pushed margins into negative territory. So, even after the government hiked import duties, many crushers have reduced processing volumes due to losses, leading to limited demand for domestic oilseeds, leaving farmers like Baghel in the lurch. The profitability of the mills hinges on the difference between revenues generated from edible oil and oil meal sales and the input costs.
iStock
The negative crushing margins are attributed to weak global meal prices, which are a result of South America's oversupply and capped oil premiums due to competitive imports.
Additionally, excessive imports of palm oil, often blended with other oils, put local farmers at a disadvantage due to unfair competition, resulting in low prices for their produce, says Shetkari Sanghatana's Ghanwat. Blending palm oil with other oils, typically in the 30% to 40% range, is a common practice to achieve desired food properties. This blending ratio is often used to balance the characteristics of the final product. He suggests that regulating imports and enforcing stringent blending limits could benefit farmers as well as consumers.
Trade loopholes
While the profitability of mills and global demand dynamics are important aspects of this discussion, it is essential to consider trade loopholes. According to agriculture economist Deepak Pareek, imported edible oils are being rerouted through countries like Nepal, using bilateral trade agreements to bypass duties. He says, 'This duty avoidance dilutes the effectiveness of the tariff increase.'
Kamrah notes that the Indian duty hike has triggered zero import duties under the South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA). Trade expects about 1 million tonnes of zero-duty imports from SAFTA countries, especially from Nepal. 'While this is bad for the domestic industry, it also dampened domestic sentiment, and hence, oilseed prices also came under pressure,' adds Kamrah.
All this emphasises the pressing need to tackle production and supply chain issues. On February 10, 2025, the Solvent Extractors' Association of India (SEA) wrote to Prime Minister Narendra Modi highlighting concerns over duty-free imports under SAFTA, which they said were causing a 'massive influx' of refined soybean and palm oils from Nepal and other South Asian countries. Under SAFTA, Nepalese refiners have been exploiting a duty advantage by importing crude oil and exporting refined oil to India at discounted prices, taking advantage of the trade agreement's preferential tariffs, SEA says.
Between October 15, 2024, and January 15, 2025, Nepal imported 194,974 tonnes of edible oil, mainly crude soybean and sunflower oil, and exported 107,425 tonnes to India, according to the trade data. Nepal's import volume exceeded its monthly requirement of 35,000 tonnes, indicating significant refining and re-export activity. Notably, Nepal's exports of soybean oil to India have surged, despite the country producing little soybean oil itself.
Global tariff war: Pain ahead
The reciprocal tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump, which are set to expire on July 9, have resulted in increased volatility in vegetable oil prices. According to trade data, the tariff announcements have led to a 7-8% drop in crude oil benchmarks, impacting related vegetable oil contracts.
Additionally, China's recent announcement of a further 10% tariff on US soybeans has significantly reduced US exports. Experts say that this move has led to a decline in global edible oil prices, with US soybean oil futures dropping over 2% and palm oil and sunflower oil prices falling 3-4% in early April 2025. They anticipate a period of softer global edible oil prices, which could limit price gains for oilseed farmers in India.
iStock
For the duty hike to result in sustained price increases in domestic prices that benefit farmers, concurrent support is necessary to improve yields, processing efficiencies, and overall value chain integration.
'These tariffs create a shift in trade flows, with countries looking for alternative suppliers, which may impact the availability and pricing of these oils globally. As a result, India could face higher prices for palm, sunflower, and soybean oils, which are key imports. In response, India should focus on enhancing domestic production through targeted policies, such as those included in the National Mission on Edible Oils-Oilseeds,' says Nilachal Mishra, Partner and Head of Government & Public Services at KPMG India.
The Path Forward
The current oilseed situation in India poses a multifaceted challenge. 'Firstly, there is no quick fix. Reducing import dependency requires a calibrated, multi-year strategy that balances farmer incentives, consumer affordability and market stability,' says Kamrah.
He suggests adopting a dynamic duty slab system wherein duties on crude and refined edible oils would automatically adjust within pre-defined bands tied to global price benchmarks. Secondly, he requests maintaining a duty gap of 15-20% compared to the current 7.5% to incentivise domestic refining and value addition. Kamrah also urges the implementation of rules that allow duties to adjust monthly based on a rolling average of global prices. This approach, he says, will minimise policy lag, ensuring protection for farmers without causing abrupt shocks for consumers.
According to experts and stakeholders, India should also prioritise strengthening its oilseed value chains, boosting productivity, and making the MSP system more functional and profitable for farmers. They highlight the high-cost structure of domestic oilseeds, which makes them uncompetitive with imports, especially during global price fluctuations. Additionally, supply chain issues like low productivity and inadequate processing infrastructure prevent domestic oilseeds from fully benefiting from import duty increases, they add.
For the duty hike to result in sustained price increases in domestic prices that benefit farmers, concurrent support is necessary to improve yields, processing efficiencies, and overall value chain integration. 'Such structural improvements, along with tariffs, can significantly boost domestic prices in the short term,' says Mishra.
According to Pareek, India should provide farmers with high-yielding, disease-resistant seed varieties to boost productivity. Currently, India ranks fourth globally in soybean acreage but fifth in productivity. He also emphasises the need to strengthen government procurement at the MSP level by ensuring timely purchases and payments. While some states procure soybeans through price stabilisation schemes, improvements are needed in coverage, timing, and execution. 'Increase buffer stocks or subsidise processors to buy at MSP when market prices fall, stabilising farmer incomes,' says Pareek.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Viral Post Claims Mumbai Auto Driver Earns Rs 5-8 Lakh A Month Without Even Driving, Stuns Internet
Viral Post Claims Mumbai Auto Driver Earns Rs 5-8 Lakh A Month Without Even Driving, Stuns Internet

NDTV

time26 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Viral Post Claims Mumbai Auto Driver Earns Rs 5-8 Lakh A Month Without Even Driving, Stuns Internet

A Mumbai auto-rickshaw driver's extraordinary business venture has gone viral on LinkedIn, leaving many in awe. By leveraging his strategic location outside the US Consulate, he's reportedly earning Rs 5-8 lakh per month, outpacing many high-earning professionals like IT directors and chartered accountants, all without driving his auto. Rahul Rupani, a product leader at Lenskart, highlighted the story of the autorickshaw driver who's built a thriving business without driving his vehicle. Notably, hundreds of visa applicants visit the US Consulate daily, only to find out that bags aren't allowed inside. With no official storage options nearby, they often face uncertainty and anxiety about where to leave their belongings. Seizing this opportunity, the autorickshaw driver started a paid bag storage service. He caters to around 20-30 customers daily, earning Rs 20,000-30,000, which translates to a monthly income comparable to that of high-level corporate professionals. In a post on LinkedIn, Mr Rupai explained the auto driver's business model: "I was outside the US Consulate this week for my visa appointment, when security told me I couldn't carry my bag inside. No lockers. No suggestions. Just: "Figure it out." While I stood clueless on the footpath, an auto driver waved at me: "Sir, bag de do. Safe rakhunga, mera roz ka hai. ₹1,000 charge hai." I hesitated. Then gave in. And that's when I discovered this guy's brilliant business." See the post here: To accommodate the volume of bags, the autorickshaw driver has partnered with a local police officer who owns a nearby locker facility. The officer provides secure storage space, allowing the driver to safely store the bags, as his autorickshaw isn't equipped to hold them all. "And while most people are sweating over US visa interviews, this guy is running a zero-mile, hyper-profitable, bootstrapped operation. No MBA. No startup jargon. Just pure hustle and street-smart product-market fit," Mr Rupani wrote. He further called it "a masterclass in solving a hyper-specific pain point," admiring the driver's ability to build trust, ensure security, and charge a premium without relying on apps, funding, or formal business education. He praised the driver's resourcefulness, saying, "Real entrepreneurship doesn't always need a pitch deck. Sometimes it just needs a parking spot." NDTV is unable to confirm the authenticity of the post and the claims presented. While some users were impressed, others raised doubts and questions, seeking more information or clarification about the driver's business venture. One user wrote, "That's not his income alone. He has to share with multiple people, including the police. Otherwise, what stops other autowallahs from doing the same at a lower price? Also, I guess they don't know that there is s locker facility inside the consulate at a charge of 500."

Piyush Goyal calls Italian business enclaves in India to boost investment
Piyush Goyal calls Italian business enclaves in India to boost investment

Business Standard

time26 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Piyush Goyal calls Italian business enclaves in India to boost investment

Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal on Thursday proposed to develop an industrial conclave for Italian businesses in India to promote investments. Speaking here at India-Italy Business Forum meeting, he said Italian companies can consider setting up manufacturing units and offices in those enclaves. "I have a proposition for you. We can set up Italian enclaves where Italian businesses can set up shops... we can set up hotels, restaurants, healthcare for Italian people who would come to work there. It will be home away from home for them," Goyal said. These industrial parks can be set up in the proposed industrail corridors in different parts of the country. The minister is here on a two-day visit. He is meeting leaders and businesses to boost trade and investments between the two countries. India would invite Italian companies to certain locations in India such as Dighi near Mumbai and Sambhaji Nagar (Aurangabad) in Maharashtra to showcase potential locations for these enclaves. The government has announced to invest about Rs 28,000 crore to set up 12 industrial nodes, and build 100 industrial parks in the country. These industrial areas will be located at Khurpia in Uttarakhand, Rajpura-Patiala in Punjab, Dighi in Maharashtra, Palakkad in Kerala, Agra and Prayagraj in UP, Gaya in Bihar, Zaheerabad in Telangana, Orvakal and Kopparthy in Andhra Pradesh, and Jodhpur-Pali in Rajasthan.

Google takes a gamble in class action jury trial over cell phone data use
Google takes a gamble in class action jury trial over cell phone data use

Time of India

time35 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Google takes a gamble in class action jury trial over cell phone data use

HighlightsGoogle is facing an $800 million lawsuit in Santa Clara County, California, from Android smartphone users who claim the company misappropriates their cellphone data, affecting an estimated 14 million Californians. The plaintiffs allege that Google secretly transmits data over cellular networks even when devices are turned off, which they argue improperly consumes purchased data from mobile carriers without user consent. Despite Google's history of settling class actions, the company is opting for a trial, disputing the plaintiffs' claims that they have a property interest in cellular data allowances and arguing that no actual losses were incurred. Class actions rarely go to trial, which is why a case against Google is proving to be an outlier. The tech giant is defending itself before a jury in Santa Clara County, California, superior court in an $800 million lawsuit by Android smartphone users who say Google misappropriates their cellphone data. A jury of eight women and four men was seated on Tuesday in what lawyers say is expected to be a three-to-four-week trial, with opening statements kicking off on Wednesday. The stakes are high, but the class, which includes an estimated 14 million Californians whose mobile devices use Google's Android operating system, is in some ways just an appetizer. The same plaintiffs lawyers from Korein Tillery; Bartlit Beck and McManis Faulkner are litigating a parallel case in San Jose federal court covering Android users in the other 49 states, with billions of dollars in alleged damages. The plaintiffs in court papers say that even when their phones are turned off, Google causes Android devices to surreptitiously send information over cellular networks "for Google's own purposes," including targeted digital advertising. These transfers improperly eat up data that users purchase from their mobile carriers, the plaintiffs allege. Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda said the claims "mischaracterize standard industry practices that help protect users and make phones more reliable," he told me. "We look forward to making our case in court." A unit of Mountain View, California-based Alphabet, Google has a well-used playbook for settling class actions. Earlier this week, for example, the company agreed to pay $500 million to resolve shareholder litigation - a move that comes on the heels of a $50 million deal in May to resolve class-wide allegations of racial bias against Black employees and a $100 million payout in March to a proposed class of advertisers who claimed they were overcharged for clicks on ads. So why is Google taking this case to trial? In court papers, Google's outside counsel from Cooley argue that Android users incurred no actual losses, and that consumers consented to Google's so-called "passive" data transfers via terms of service agreements and device settings. The lawyers also dispute the fundamental premise of the case: that cellular data allowances can be considered "property" under California law and subject to conversion, a civil cause of action that involves taking a person's property without permission. When the "rhetoric and hyperbole are set aside, Plaintiffs' theory is revealed as little more than a (misguided) product design claim - not wrongful conversion," defense counsel wrote. The Cooley team, which includes Whitty Somvichian, Michael Attanasio, Max Bernstein and Carrie Lebel, declined comment. The plaintiffs sued Google in Santa Clara County Superior Court in 2019, asserting that they have a property interest in their cellular plans' data allowances, and that each quantum they pay for has a market value. They don't object to data transmissions when they're actively engaged with Google's apps and properties, like checking email or playing a game. But they say Google never told them it would avail itself of their cellular data when they weren't using their phones to send and receive a range of information on their usage. "The upshot is that these phone users unknowingly subsidize the same Google advertising business that earns over $200 billion a year," plaintiffs lawyer George Zelcs of Korein Tillery said via email. In addition to injunctive relief, the plaintiffs want Google to reimburse them for the value of the cellular data the company consumed. Per person, the amount is modest - 1 to 1.5 megabytes of data each day, the plaintiffs estimate. To put that in context, Americans used just over 100 trillion megabytes of wireless data in 2023, my Reuters colleagues reported. But with a class period dating back to 2016, the totals add up quickly. In court papers, Google lawyers sound almost incredulous at the amount of the claimed nationwide damages, which they say runs in the tens of billions - more than the $7.4 billion Perdue Pharma settlement for the opioid crisis, they note. "Plaintiffs cannot show remotely commensurate harm to the class," they wrote. In denying Google's motion for summary judgment in May, Judge Charles Adams allowed the plaintiffs' claim for conversion to go forward, ruling there are triable issues of material fact for jurors to decide. While Adams said no direct state law precedent exists as to whether cell phone data is property, he pointed to a decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year in the parallel federal class action, Taylor v Google. In that case, U.S. Magistrate Judge Virginia DeMarchi in San Jose sided with Google and dismissed the complaint with prejudice in 2022, only to be reversed and remanded on appeal. The appellate panel in an unpublished decision ruled that the plaintiffs plausibly alleged they incurred damages when Google used their cellular data. Adams in a pre-trial order set some limits on what the lawyers will be allowed to argue to the jury. Plaintiffs may not suggest Google engages in "surveillance" of Android users, he wrote, or that the data transfers are a privacy violation. As for Google, Adams said, it "must not present evidence or argument suggesting that this case is 'lawyer driven' or was 'invented' by Plaintiffs' counsel."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store