
Michigan drops charges against pro-Palestinian campus protesters
'In the deepest recesses of their mind, when they start the conclave, everyone will walk in there with a name in their head,' said Natalia Imperatori-Lee, chair of religious studies at Manhattan University.
History of papal names For most of the Catholic Church's first millennium, popes used their given names. The first exception was the 6th century Roman Mercurius, who had been named for a pagan god and chose the more appropriate name of John II. The practice of adopting a new name became ingrained during the 11th century, a period of German popes who chose names of early church bishops out of 'a desire to signify continuity,' said the Rev. Roberto Regoli, a historian at Rome's Pontifical Gregorian University. For many centuries, new popes tended to choose the name of the pope who had elevated them to cardinal. John was the most popular, chosen by 23 popes, followed by Benedict and Gregory, each with 16. Only starting in the mid-20th century did new popes begin to choose names signaling the aim of their papacy, Regoli said. 'Even now, as we are waiting for the new pope, the name with which he will present himself will help us to understand the horizon toward which he wants to proceed,' Regoli said. Some names have been out of use for centuries, like Urban or Innocent.
'I don't think anyone will pick Innocent,″ Imperatori-Lee said, given the abuse and other scandals that have rocked the church. 'I don't think that would be the right choice.'
Recent names
FRANCIS: Pope Francis, elected in 2013, took the name of St. Francis of Assisi, known for his humility, life of poverty and love of all creatures. With it, Francis signaled a papacy focused on those who are often seen as outsiders, including the poor, prisoners and the LGBTQ+ community, while promoting peace, brotherhood and care of the environment.
BENEDICT: Last chosen by German Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, elected in 2005. Pope Benedict XVI said he wanted to pay homage to Benedict XV, who led the church during World War I and dedicated himself to healing the rifts of war, and to the 6th century St. Benedict, founder of Western monasticism, who helped spread Christianity throughout Europe. One of Benedict XVI's priorities was trying to revive the faith in Europe. 'If we get a Benedict, then we will know that the cardinals chose to see Francis as an anomaly,' Imperatori-Lee said.
JOHN PAUL: The papacy's first composite name was chosen by Cardinal Albino Luciani in 1978 to honor Pope John XXIII, who opened the Vatican Council II process that reformed the Catholic Church, and Paul VI, who closed it. The name signaled a commitment to reforms, including sidelining the Latin Mass in favor of local languages and opening to other faiths, most significantly Judaism. John Paul I's papacy lasted just 33 days. Polish Cardinal Karol Wojtyla, who succeeded him, chose the name John Paul II.
JOHN: Chosen 23 times by popes, most recently in 1958 by Pope John XXIII. John can refer to St. John the Apostle, one of Jesus' 12 apostles and the author of one of the Gospels, or St. John the Baptist, the prophet who baptized Jesus. 'John the XXIII was a pope that no one expected a lot from, but had a colossal impact on the church,' Imperatori-Lee said. 'So that could be a sign of what they want their pontificate to be like.'
PAUL: Chosen six times, most recently in 1963 by Paul VI. St. Paul the Apostle spread the teachings of Jesus in the 1st century.
PIUS: It is associated with popes known for their traditionalist, anti-reform bent. Pius IX ordered the kidnapping of the Jewish boy Edgardo Mortara in 1858 and raised him Catholic in the Vatican after learning he had been secretly baptized by a housekeeper; Pius X was the early 20th century anti-modernizt who inspired the anti-Vatican II schismatic group, the Society of St. Pius X; Pius XII was the World War II-era pope criticized for not speaking out sufficiently about the Holocaust. 'It is now a name that is hostage to some Catholic groups that can be considered traditionalists,' Regoli said.
New directions A new pope is free to choose a name never used before, as Francis did. 'This would open a new season and could mean that his program is not in line with any of his predecessors, so an even more personalized program,' Regoli said. Imperatori-Lee suggested another name that might signal a continuation of Francis' legacy: Ignatius, for the founder of Francis' Jesuit order.
'It would be interesting,' she said. 'We've never had one of those.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Arabiya
31-07-2025
- Al Arabiya
Timeline: Grim history of Ireland's mother and baby homes
Exhumation of a mass grave has begun in Tuam, Ireland, at the site of a former mother and baby home–one of several that once operated across the country. The burial site, which could hold the remains of nearly 800 infants and young children, has forced the country and the Catholic Church to contend with its decades-long legacy of shunning unmarried mothers and separating them from their children, left at the mercy of a cruel system. Extensive maltreatment that contributed to the deaths of thousands of children has been gradually revealed over time. Here is a timeline of developments related to Ireland's network of mother and baby homes. 1800s 1846–The Tuam workhouse opens on six acres to house 800 inmates who were destitute. 1900s 1921–County Galway opens a mother and baby home in a former workhouse in Glenamaddy that is run by Bon Secours Sisters, a Catholic religious order. 1922-23–The home is occupied by British troops during the Irish Civil War. Six members of an Irish Republican Army faction that opposed the treaty ending the war were executed there in 1923. 1925–The Children's Home in Glenamaddy closes and reopens in the converted Tuam workhouse as a home for. 1961–The Tuam home closes. 1970s–Two boys discover bones in an underground chamber on the grounds of the derelict home. Locals believe the grave includes victims of the Irish famine and create a memorial garden. 2000s 2012–Local historian Catherine Corless publishes an article in the Journal of the Old Tuam Society that reveals many children died in the home. She later finds records of 796 deaths with no burial records. She reveals that the bones found in the 1970s were in the location of a defunct septic tank. May 2014–The Irish Mail publishes a story about nearly 800 unaccounted dead babies at the home and the possibility some are buried in the sewage tank. International news coverage leads to a public outcry. June 2014–The Irish government announces it will investigate mother and baby homes across Ireland, including Tuam. February 2015–The Commission of Investigation into Mother and Baby Homes is formally established. March 2017–A test excavation by the commission confirms significant quantities of human remains of infants in underground chambers at the Tuam site. Tests show they ranged from 35 weeks to three years old. 2018–The Irish government pledges to carry out a full forensic excavation and enact legislation to allow for the recovery and potential identification of remains. October 2018–Government officially approves a full forensic excavation of the Tuam site. The cost is estimated at 6–13 million (7-15 million) euros. January 2021–The Commission's final report finds that about 9000 children died in 18 institutions including Tuam from 1922 to 1998. Prime Minister Micheál Martin issues a state apology. 2022–Ireland passes the Institutional Burials Act giving legal authority to excavate, recover, and identify remains from sites such as Tuam. 2023–The Director of Authorised Intervention is established to oversee the Tuam excavation. June 11 2025–The site is secured and pre-excavation work begins. July 14 2025–The excavation team begins its dig to recover remains.


Saudi Gazette
25-07-2025
- Saudi Gazette
Russia probes air safety violations after fatal An-24 crash in Amur region
MOSCOW — Russian authorities have launched a criminal investigation into possible violations of air safety regulations following the fatal crash of an An-24 passenger aircraft in the remote Amur region on Thursday, which claimed the lives of all those on board. The Russian Investigative Committee said Friday that it is exploring several scenarios, including technical failure and pilot error. Flight recorders recovered from the crash site were found intact and are being transferred to Moscow for analysis. The Soviet-era aircraft, operated by Angara Airlines, was on a domestic route from Khabarovsk to Tynda when it disappeared from radar just kilometers from its destination. The plane reportedly failed to issue any distress signals and vanished while attempting a second landing approach. According to aviation rescue services, the aircraft was flying under challenging conditions, with low cloud cover and mountainous terrain in the aviation authorities had earlier described the weather near Tynda as "suitable for receiving flights."Conflicting reports emerged regarding the number of people on region Governor Vasily Orlov said the plane carried 43 passengers, including five children, while other operational sources reported 40 passengers, including two were also six crew members aboard, and no survivors have been the victims were foreign nationals, including one citizen each from China and Belarus, according to their respective foreign operations were hampered by the region's dense taiga forests and swampy terrain, forcing responders to rely heavily on aerial was ultimately located on a mountainside 16 kilometers from 50-year-old aircraft had a troubled maintenance record. Since 2018, it had been involved in at least four reported incidents, including wing damage during this, its airworthiness certificate had been extended until officials confirmed that the plane underwent routine preflight inspections before response to the tragedy, the Interstate Aviation Committee has launched a parallel investigation, while the Russian government has established a special commission to oversee the aftermath. A local crisis center has also been activated to coordinate response efforts. — Agencies

Al Arabiya
25-07-2025
- Al Arabiya
Serious safety violations found at Russian airline one month before deadly crash
A spot check on Angara Airlines, which operated the Antonov An-24 plane which crashed in Russia's far east on Thursday killing all 48 on board, had uncovered serious safety violations a month beforehand, the Izvestia news outlet reported on Friday. The plane, which was 49 years old, crashed as it prepared to land, in an incident that highlighted the use of old, Soviet-era aircraft and raised questions about their viability, with Western sanctions limiting access to investment and spare parts. Russia's transport ministry said on Friday that aviation and transport regulators would investigate the privately-owned Angara's activities to check if it is complying with federal aviation rules before taking a decision about its future. Vasily Orlov, the governor of the Amur region where the plane came down, said on Friday that investigators were working on the crash site and that there were two main theories about what had caused it: technical failure and pilot error. The plane's black boxes had been recovered and were being sent to Moscow to be studied, he said. Citing documents it had seen from Russia's airline and transport regulators, Izvestia said that transport safety inspectors had carried out a spot check on Angara in June which had uncovered concerns related to the servicing of its planes. Eight of Angara's planes had been temporarily grounded due to the inspection, it said, and four of its technical staff temporarily banned from carrying out technical inspections. Angara and Rostransnadzor, the transport regulator, did not immediately respond to requests for comment, and Reuters could not independently verify the details of the inspection. Izvestia said that inspectors had drawn attention to the fact that the company's documents had shown that planes had sometimes purportedly been serviced by staff who other documents showed were not working on the relevant days. The standard rules and methods of servicing were also not being followed by staff, some of whom did not have the necessary qualifications for such work, Izvestia said. In one instance, documents showed that a special piece of testing equipment needed to check a plane's control panel had not been physically issued even though other documents showed someone had signed off that the test had been done. 'I ask you to present a plan to fix the violations identified, a report about the reasons for them, and measures being taken to ensure they do not occur,' a letter from Rostransnadzor, the transport regulator, to Angara sent after the inspection said, according to Izvestia.