Major rhino horn trafficking network dismantled after seven-year investigation
Image: Armand Hough/Independent Newspapers
After a meticulous seven-year investigation, the Wildlife Trafficking Section of the Serious Organised Crime Investigation Unit has successfully dismantled a significant transnational syndicate involved in rhino horn trafficking.
This crackdown is linked to a fraudulent scheme that facilitated the illicit handling of 964 rhino horns, collectively valued at millions of rands, which were intended for black markets across Southeast Asia.
Authorities have apprehended six suspects, aged between 49 and 84, who now face serious charges including fraud, theft, and violations of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA) of 2004.
The six individuals, comprised of five men and one woman, surrendered to the Hawks at Sunnyside Police Station and made their first court appearance at the Pretoria Magistrates' Court
Image: Supplied
In addition to these charges, investigators are also considering racketeering and money laundering allegations against the accused.
In a statement celebrating the arrests, South Africa's Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment, Dr Dion George, described the operation as a pivotal triumph in the nation's ongoing battle against international wildlife crime.
'This complex investigation, which was also supported by the Enforcement unit of the Department (the Green Scorpions) and the National Prosecuting Authority, is a powerful demonstration of South Africa's resolve to protect its natural heritage,' declared Minister George.
He further emphasised the significance of the Hawks' work, stating, 'Our enforcement agencies will not hesitate to pursue those who plunder our wildlife for criminal profit. The illegal trade in rhino horn not only destroys biodiversity but also undermines the rule of law and the foundations of environmental governance.'
The investigation revealed that the suspects allegedly perpetrated a fraud scheme against the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment by obtaining permits under false pretences to engage in the domestic buying and selling of rhino horns.
This domestic trade, although permissible under valid DFFE-issued permits following NEMBA, was exploited to funnel rhino horns into illegal international markets. Notably, the international commercial trade of rhino horn is strictly banned under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).
The six individuals, comprised of five men and one woman, surrendered to the Hawks at Sunnyside Police Station and made their first court appearance at the Pretoria Magistrates' Court on Tuesday.
Dr George concluded with a firm warning: 'Let there be no doubt: South Africa will bring the full force of its laws against those who plunder our wildlife. This arrest proves that syndicates cannot escape justice, no matter how complex their schemes.'
IOL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Immunity granted to key witness in Joshlin Smith kidnapping case sparks outrage
Lourentia Lombaard was granted full immunity from prosecution by the Western Cape High Court. Image: Armand Hough/Independent Newspapers Anti-gender-based violence activist June Dolley Major has called for prison time for Lourentia 'Renz' Lombaard, the woman who turned State witness in the case of missing Saldanha Bay girl Joshlin Smith. Major's remarks follow a decision by Western Cape High Court Judge Nathan Erasmus on Wednesday, which granted Lombaard full immunity from prosecution. Lombaard was arrested in March last year alongside Joshlin's mother, Racquel 'Kelly' Smith, Jacquen 'Boeta' Appollis, and Steveno van Rhyn, and she turned State witness. All three were convicted of kidnapping and human trafficking and are serving life sentences. Judge Erasmus found that Lombaard had provided 'key evidence' and testified 'honestly and frankly' in her Section 204 statement. But Dolley Major, speaking outside the court, said she believed any crime involving a child warranted some form of punishment. 'Lots of emotions are going on right now,' she said. 'I understand why she's indemnified, guilty after the fact, and not active at all. But as always, my concern is Joshlin. 'My personal opinion is no disrespect to Judge Erasmus in any way whatsoever, he handled it all so well. I feel any crime involving a child should serve some kind of time.' Lourentia Lombaard was granted full immunity from prosecution by the Western Cape High Court. Image: Armand Hough The defence has indicated it will approach the Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein to try to overturn the convictions and sentences. National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila said they were satisfied with both the convictions and Lombaard's indemnity. 'It's an outcome that we argued for. We believe there's no other court that could come to a different conclusion,' he said. 'We believe the decision to convict them for trafficking in persons for purposes of exploitation, as well as kidnapping, and handing down life sentences, was correct. There was no other suitable sentence. 'We are also happy with the outcome in terms of the Section 204 witness, Ms Lombaard, because we believe she testified frankly and honestly, which is a requirement of the Act. She did not try to take herself out of the crime, but told the court what happened and the role she played.' Ntabazalila confirmed Lombaard remains in the witness protection programme and will not be prosecuted. 'If they take us to the SCA, we will go there and oppose that application completely,' he said. 'She is indemnified entirely from prosecution, so she's free.' Meanwhile, Joshlin's paternal grandmother, Lauretta Yon, said she was relieved that the appeal failed had failed. "I was with Boeta and Kelly, and they said they didn't know anything about Joshlin, so they must rot in jail. You can't look somebody in the eye and lie." "Regarding the Renz issue, I think she spoke the truth. Steven Coetzee didn't know Renz, which means they could not have colluded to frame them. How did he know about the R20,000? They (Renz and Coetzee) were the main people in the trial.' Get your news on the go, click here to join the Cape Argus News WhatsApp channel. Cape Argus
IOL News
10 hours ago
- IOL News
PICS: R420 million worth of drugs and unregistered medicine destroyed in Gauteng
Drugs worth over R400million were destroyed in Gauteng today. Pictures: Timothy Bernard/ Independent Newspapers The South African Police Service destroyed drugs and unregistered medicines worth an astonishing R420 million on Thursday morning in Gauteng. The National Commissioner of the SAPS, General Fannie Masemola, said this destruction is not just symbolic. "It is a powerful demonstration of our ongoing efforts to dismantle the illicit drug trade and to safeguard the health, safety, and future of our nation. "The fight against drug-related crimes continues to be intensified in all provinces, in particular the gang-infested areas, with a strong focus on supply reduction, as outlined in the National Drug Master Plan." This is the second drug-destroying operation this year. In March, SAPS destroyed R340 million worth of drugs. General Masemola said that in three years, a total of R5.3billion worth of drugs have been destroyed. Among them are mandrax, cocaine, heroin, narcotics, and unregistered pharmaceutical products; the very substances that fuel addiction and empower criminal syndicates.
IOL News
10 hours ago
- IOL News
Citizens can record police: General Masemola clarifies the law
Members of the SA Police Service are not allowed to arrest ordinary people recording videos or taking photographs of their operations in public. Image: Supplied / SAPS National Police Commissioner General Fannie Masemola has informed SA Police Service (SAPS) members that there is no prohibition preventing any person from recording or photographing officers while on duty or executing their duties. Masemola noted that police officers seem uncertain about how to react when a member of the public photographs or records a police official in public. 'There is no prohibition that prevents a private person from recording a member while the member is on duty or exercising any power or duty as a police official in public,' he explained in a letter dated August 12, 2025, to acting Hawks head Lieutenant-General Siphesihle Nkosi, all deputy national, provincial, divisional, district commissioners, and all heads and section heads, among others. The top cop warned that arrest under these circumstances will be unlawful. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Masemola said cases of people arrested for recording a police officer or taking a photograph must be dealt with circumspection and unless an offence has been committed, justifying the registration of a case docket and the alleged offence is of a serious nature that requires detention, a case may not be registered and the person must be immediately released and an entry made in the occurrence book. He added that a commander must be satisfied that there is prima facie evidence that the elements of an offence are present before accepting an arrested person and processing him or her for detention in the SAPS's custody. In June, Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, Judge Mpostoli Twala ordered suspended Police Minister Senzo Mchunu and the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Police Department to each pay R100,000 and R150,000, respectively, for the unlawful arrest and detention of attorney Shaun Jacobs for taking a video of a roadblock on a public road in front of the driveway to his house in March 2019. Jacobs had complained about the unreasonableness and disturbance caused by the roadblock and approached the officers and asked them to relocate it to a vacant land not far from his house but was ignored. When Jacobs asked for their details, an officer identified as Koahela George became aggressive, pushed him with both his hands on his chest, and told him to get into his house, threatening him with arrest. He then fetched his cellphone from his house to record the roadblock to lay a complaint with the authorities on how it was set up in front of his house. Despite not being rude or aggressive towards the officers, when they saw him recording a video of the scene and especially the vehicle, George pounced on him and arrested him without explaining his rights and what he was arrested for. He was detained for 26 hours, which the court deemed unjustified and unlawful. To make matters worse, Jacobs and his attorney attended mediation where the prosecutor told them if there was a payment of R20,000, the matter will go as it is a serious matter similar to the infamous Vicky Momberg racism case and the resultant three-year imprisonment sentence. He refused and made representations, attaching the video and the prosecutor withdrew the charges. Masemola does not make reference to Jacobs' judgment but states that 'a person is not committing an offence, albeit interference with a member, defeating or obstructing the course of justice or any other offence, merely because he or she is recording the conduct of a police official'. He added that the device used by a person to make such recording or to take a photograph may not be seized, damaged or destroyed merely because a recording was made or a photograph was taken of an SAPS member. In addition, according to Masemola, recording or photographing SAPS members does not constitute a contravention of the Protection of Personal Information Act and police officers cannot rely on their right to privacy to protect their identities or conduct as SAPS members. Masemola said police officers must exercise proper control over crime scenes and protect the privacy of victims of crimes, including deceased persons. 'Where a person interferes with a crime scene or hinders a member in the execution of his or her duties at a crime scene, the person must, as far as possible, be warned to refrain from continuing with the conduct before arrest is considered,' he explained. If after the warning a person continues to interfere with the crime scene, arrest may be considered and a case docket be opened at a police station. However, Masemola states that the recording or taking of photographs while a person is outside the cordoned off area of a crime scene does not constitute defeating or obstructing the course of justice or interfering with a member in the execution of his or her duties. Persons recording or taking photographs at police stations may compromise the privacy of persons inside such as witnesses and victims of crime as well as security measures. 'Police stations are increasingly being targeted by criminals. A recording or photograph may compromise the security of a police station by exposing security measures and any shortcomings thereof, especially if shared on public platforms. 'This increases the risk of harm to every person at a (police) station, including members of the public. Persons who are making such recordings must be requested to refrain from doing so,' explained Masemola.
