
The French duo selling Italian food to the British (and smashing it)
The restaurant is packed, full of noise, laughter and loud chatter. Italian voices punctuate the air as diners dive into big bowls of pasta, pizzas and tables loaded with antipasti. I could be in Rome, Naples, Milan or any Italian city. Except I'm not. I'm in Paris – at one of Big Mamma's 29 restaurants that span seven countries.
While it may ooze all things Italian, Big Mamma is actually the brainchild of two Frenchmen and started its life in Paris. Since its first trattoria, East Mamma, opened in the 11th arrondissement in 2015, the restaurant group has gone on to expand across Europe, including to the UK, where its five London restaurants attract lengthy queues and get rave reviews.
At the end of 2024 it added La Bellezza in Birmingham to the list (its first British location outside the capital) and on June 6 Circolo Popolare will launch in Manchester – both delivering the brand's trademark wow-factor interiors (evoking a Sardinian festa, complete with twinkling festoon lights, in the case of the Deansgate venue) and Willy Wonka-esque dishes such as carbonara or creamy truffle pasta served in giant cheese wheels, and towering slabs of lemon meringue pie.
On paper, it's hard to follow the logic. An Italian brand, conceived in Paris, using ingredients from Italy, and somehow garnering success everywhere from Munich to Monaco. Against a backdrop of what is undoubtedly a torrid time for hospitality, with big-name UK restaurant closures being announced almost every month (notably TV chef Gary Usher's Burnt Truffle in January, and Tom Kerridge 's Chelsea-based Butcher's Tap & Grill in May).
So what is Big Mamma's secret?
There's the age-old ethos that quality ingredients are key. Then there's the recent trend of creating restaurant interiors to impress those of us who post on Instagram before their first mouthful. But for Big Mamma's co-founder Tigrane Seydoux, the main thing is ensuring the price is right.
That doesn't necessarily mean rolling out the same-priced dish in every location (unlike big chains, prices can vary between Big Mamma venues), but rather for customers to feel that, whatever the price point, they've enjoyed food at the top end of the scale for what they're paying – with the bonus of devouring it in a gorgeous space with authentic Italian service.
'It's quite difficult to identify Big Mamma in the [traditional framework] of the restaurant landscape,' Seydoux tells me. 'We're not a chain; we don't think about taking a recipe that has worked for one site and just copy-pasting that to other locations.' Instead, he says, they take a bespoke approach at each site – from the design and menu to the price point.
'Affordable,' Seydoux explains, has a different meaning for different clientele. 'We run restaurants with a 25-euro average spend up to a 90-euro average spend. We might not have the best product that exists on the market,' he admits, 'but at the price we are doing it, it is the best, and I think people value that a lot.'
Seydoux stresses that he didn't set out with his co-founder, Victor Lugger, to 'revolutionise the restaurant industry'. Instead, he argues, 'what you're seeing is pretty much what any restaurant should be – offering something good on the plate, somewhere you are welcomed in the right way,' and for the right price.
While each restaurant may feel unique, Seydoux admits they share a 'common DNA and common culture' – something he sums up as a 'happy mess', in which 'there is imperfection, but that gives soul and authenticity to a place'. Even the former Sunday Times restaurant critic, Marina O'Loughlin, while classing the food 'a bit crap' on her visit in 2019, hailed London's Circo Popolare as 'the restaurant where you will have the time of your life.'
Seydoux and Lugger, who graduated from business school in Paris together (Seydoux to work for a luxury hotel brand, Lugger in the music industry), drew upon their shared passion for Italian cuisine when founding Big Mamma, but they weren't ignorant to its popularity and potential in the French market – nor to the power of social media.
In their Paris restaurants I take in everything – from flower-adorned entrances to Rod Stewart-inspired toilets, while at Carlotta in London a statue of the Virgin Mary in boxing gloves watches over the bathroom wash basins. In Birmingham, La Bellezza boasts seven-metre-long tapestry curtains and handmade Murano glass chandeliers for its Perugia-inspired setting. Customers will get to dine in jasmine-draped courtyards in Manchester. This is 'doing it for the 'gram', and then some.
Then there's the staffing. It's not my imagination that I can hear Italian accents; 80 per cent of Big Mamma's staff are recruited directly from Italy, as it's the founders' belief that the 'Italianity' they want to peddle must be delivered by Italian people.
And we Britons – as well as the French – are lapping it up. The company's turnover was over £44m in 2024. When private equity firm McWin took on a majority stake in 2023, the deal valued the business at £233m (even though Lugger admitted that interest from investors ahead of the purchase 'was less' than he had expected).
Big Mamma's combination of 'brash, eye-catching decor and theatrical food presentation is highly appealing to the Instagram-driven millennial generation, encouraging social media sharing and viral marketing,' says Zoe Adjey, senior lecturer in hospitality and events management at the University of East London's Institute of Hospitality and Tourism. On top of this, their dishes come with 'an added element of theatre in the service' (cue silken pasta strands being tossed in that truckle of pecorino).
By expanding into six European countries outside of the UK, the company has diversified its market and reduced its exposure to challenges faced by UK hospitality, Adjey believes.
Isabelle Shepherd, partner at accountancy firm HaysMac, attributes Big Mamma's success to a combination of elements, including the novelty factor of some of its dishes. 'Generally people these days want more than a typical casual dining concept, and they provide that.'
Add to that the use of social media to record those experiences and you've got the perfect marketing tool for a generation that looks to Instagram and TikTok for inspiration about where to eat out. The same platforms can, of course, quickly turn sour, as Big Mamma discovered in 2024 when the group was criticised by disgruntled diners for applying a 'checkout fee' on its optional payment app, Sunday, on top of a service charge – a fee that still remains when paying via the app, though bills can be paid by card or cash without incurring a fee).
Seydoux admits it isn't easy when your business is growing exponentially. Certain aspects of growth work in their favour, such as when sourcing direct from Italy, with volume helping them to work with smaller suppliers. But when growth starts to impact Big Mamma's ability to do what it does best, he acknowledges that could be the sign to slow down. Somehow, as another carbonara is captured by a sea of smartphone cameras, that doesn't seem likely any time soon…
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Labour can't preach about hard choices while spending billions on migrant hotels… tax hikes will see Reform surge higher
EVERY single day, every single penny paid in tax by enough workers to fill a city the size of Manchester goes toward just one thing. Some 582,000 folk, including nurses, teachers, builders, drivers and shop workers, all striving and contributing their fair share for one goal . . . 2 Their entire income tax and National Insurance contributions hoovered up by the same mind-boggling government bill. They are paying to keep migrants in hotels, often rather nice ones. The National Audit Office puts the bill for asylum accommodation and support last year at an eye-watering £4.7billion. And that's before healthcare costs and the price of the thousands of officials processing claims are factored in. Now, new analysis by former Office for National Statistics numbers man Jamie Jenkins reveals who is picking up the tab. 'Deeply concerned' The mean average salary across all UK workers was £38,224 last year, generating an estimated £8,081 in tax per head. Divide the hotel and support bill by that and you get 582,000 workers — almost exactly the population of the City of Manchester. Or just over the size of Liverpool. Or bigger than Leicester or Leeds. Last Tuesday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told MPs she was 'deeply concerned about the level of money' being spent on hotels, adding: 'We need to end asylum hotels altogether.' But by the end of the week, her own department quietly admitted they are diverting another £2.2billion of money earmarked for overseas development assistance cash for hotels this year. Fury as hotel firm housing asylum seekers in 'all-inclusive resorts' paid £700M a year of YOUR money That's basically the same amount as last year, despite shameless ministers sent out to insist on the airwaves that hotel use is falling and this Government has got a grip. And the numbers blow away claims from politicians of all hues that we need a period of belt-tightening, with hard choices to be made. Fair-minded voters — who believe in so-called sound money, restraint, spending within our means or whatever you want to call it — have every right to look upon this aghast. And where the public might have had some sympathy over tough choices needing to be addressed, that argument is holed below the waterline by the seemingly endless magic money tree available for new arrivals to be housed while our veterans sleep on the streets. The screeching U-turn on slashing Winter Fuel Payments is a case in point, after Labour MPs were hammered on the doorstep while campaigning in last month's local elections. Voters who were sympathetic towards the two-child benefit cap a few years ago are now looking — through the prism of asylum hotels — at a state that is willing to pay such sums towards foreign arrivals, rather than on hungry British kids. Billions to spend And why can't we spend more on our defence sooner rather than later, when we clearly have billions to spend on this? Which puts a deeply unpopular and struggling Government in something of a bind. How can Rachel Reeves preach fiscal responsibility while chucking such vast amounts of cash out the door? As the Chancellor's negotiations with Cabinet ministers ahead of Wednesday's Spending Review go to the wire, it's going to be a very hard sell that police and crime budgets need to be cut in the same department that is bleeding out cash on migrant hotels. But the Home Office will see a reduction in their share of the pie, with Reeves playing hardball. And while she will heavily play up this week that there will be no return to 'austerity', with some eye-catching investment announcements across the country in a bid to buy off angry voters eyeing up Reform, her fundamental problems have not changed. The Chancellor has Labour MPs on one side demanding more cash in their areas, alongside furious Cabinet colleagues fighting cuts to their departments, while on the other side, the international bond markets, which keep the spending merry-go-around going, are looking at the numbers with deep suspicion. Looking wobbly Reeves' attempts to cut the benefits bill are being met with fierce opposition from Labour MPs, armed with this very argument: Why should disabled constituents see their support cut while billions are handed to young men who have come here after passing through numerous safe countries? The self-proclaimed Iron Chancellor was looking wobbly already after a series of U-turns, but if she is agreeing to billions more for the NHS and our Armed Forces, cuts are going to have to come from somewhere . . . and soon. Her allies insist there will be some iron on Wednesday, yet until the Government fixes the hotels mess, I'm not sure they will receive much sympathy or praise from a furious public that sees the current priorities as completely bonkers. And heaven knows how high Reform's polling lead will be if the Chancellor decides tax hikes in the autumn to pay for this crazy spending are the right way forward. THE row over trans people using women's loos rumbles on after the Supreme Court ruling of the bleedin' obvious: that there are only two sexes and women's spaces need protecting. That argument can be found in depth elsewhere, but more and more public places are making all their toilets gender-neutral. Without going full Alan Partridge, that is having a major side-effect . . . queues. Unlike the ladies, I can't remember having to queue for the gents in a cafe, bar, club or theatre ever. Now it's endless. WE have all sent an angry message then regretted it the next morning – well, I certainly have. But fair cop to Reform's former chairman Zia Yusuf, who spectacularly stormed out of Nigel Farage's party on Thursday night after furious backroom bust-ups. He's now back in a different role, having made up his differences behind the scenes. Cue much social media mockery and crowing from Reform's online enemies that the rag-tag bunch of surging upstarts couldn't run a bath, let alone a country. But I can't help thinking there's actually something quite grown up about throwing your hands up in the cold light of day and admitting you overcooked it and got it wrong. I wonder if it might be more wishful thinking from Reform's panicking opponents that any of this will really change the price of fish. It's hardly like either rival party – especially the Tories – have a leg to stand on when having a pop at others for squabbling.


The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
Football team who top league for replica shirt sales revealed as retro kits also make a comeback
MANCHESTER United may have had one of their worst seasons — but they topped the league for shirt sales at airports. More fans bought Red Devils jerseys than those from the likes of Man City and Liverpool during the Prem season, figures show. 1 Liverpool may have clinched the title but among shoppers at JD Sports outlets at London Stansted and East Midlands, as well as, unsurprisingly, Manchester, their tops were popular enough only for fourth place. United's local rivals Man City ranked second, with England shirts third. Retro also appears to be making a revival, with 1990s England shirts in the top 20. While the Red Devils tops of Bruno Fernandes and Co took top spot overall, there were regional variations. Arsenal kit was the best-seller at Stansted and the Gunners appeared in the top five across all three airports, owned by Manchester Airport Group. Prem strugglers Tottenham were only eighth at Stansted, their nearest airport. They were the fourth-placed London team, also behind Chelsea and West Ham, and were even beaten by Paris Saint-Germain and AC Milan across all airports. At East Midlands, the England shirt was No1. MAG communications director Adam Jupp said: 'Airports are always places where people love to show their football allegiances — whether that's fans travelling to fixtures at home or abroad, or international visitors coming to watch world famous teams here in the UK. 'Despite a dismal season, Man United's appeal, across the UK and with inbound tourists, appears to be as strong as ever.'


The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
UK's ‘outrageous' migrant hotel bill revealed & it takes every penny in tax from all people in city as big as MANCHESTER
BRITAIN'S £4.7billion annual bill to keep migrants in hotels and look after them takes every penny of tax from 582,000 workers. The shocking new statistic is equivalent to every grafter in Manchester stumping up for asylum seekers through their pay packet. 4 4 4 Jamie Jenkins, who did the research, said: 'This isn't just unsustainable. It's outrageous. " A government that borrows billions each year, can't control borders, and taxes its citizens to pay for hotel rooms and housing for people who've just arrived is not working for the British public. 'It's time for a system that protects the people who pay in. That rewards contribution. That puts citizens first." Latest figures show there were 32,345 asylum seekers staying in up to 220 hotel. It costs £41,000 a year to house each, up from £17,000 in 2020. Ex-Office for National Statistics analyst Mr Jenkins found the average UK salary was £38,224. Each worker pays income tax and National Insurance contributions of £8,081. So 582,000's entire tax bills go on housing migrants — equal to the working population of Manchester. And it is significantly larger than the employed populations of Nottingham, Sheffield and Leeds. The total is also higher than the tax contributions of every UK mechanic and HGV driver combined. A total £4.7billion went on asylum support in 2023-24 — £3.1billion on accomodation. 13 migrants jumped from the back of a lorry at a Sainsbury's distribution centre in South East London The rest went on grants to local authorities, running sites like the disused Bibby Stockholm barge in Dorset, plus £49-a-week subsistence allowance. The £4.7billion total was up from 2022-23's £3.6bn. Nearly 15,000 people have crossed to Dover in 2025, up 42 per cent on this time year. French cops, given £480million of UK taxpayer cash, are failing to intercept them. 4