How small shareholders can actively shape corporate direction
'Boards have to start paying attention because they have to look after all stakeholders,' explains Anthonyrajah. 'This increased focus on that means that there is potential that someone who only has one share could have a voice.'
Although selling your shares in a mismanaged company is an option, Makete suggests that it may not be as effective if you want your voice to be heard, particularly if it's a company you believe in. The Barloworld AGM held earlier this year serves as a good example of shareholders making a difference in corporate governance. The majority of shareholders rejected a buyout offer and voted against a remuneration policy for independent directors.
Ways to have an impact, as a small shareholder: Connect with other shareholders: Build rapport with fellow shareholders to discuss recent updates, whether they involve policy changes, strategic announcements, or management appointments. Cultivating a network of shareholders can be a valuable asset when voting on corporate decisions.
Build rapport with fellow shareholders to discuss recent updates, whether they involve policy changes, strategic announcements, or management appointments. Cultivating a network of shareholders can be a valuable asset when voting on corporate decisions. Find the right setting to ask questions : Anthonyrajah advises that having your concerns heard by the higher-ups may depend on the setting. Scheduling a small meeting could prove to be more effective than waiting for the AGM to ask all of your questions.
: Anthonyrajah advises that having your concerns heard by the higher-ups may depend on the setting. Scheduling a small meeting could prove to be more effective than waiting for the AGM to ask all of your questions. Milestone funding: A financing method where the investor releases funds in stages, contingent upon reaching clear milestones. If feasible, milestone funding serves as an excellent strategy to mitigate risk and retain control as an investor.
To stay updated on the ever-changing world of investing, tune in to Investment School, brought to you by CFI, every Thursday on The Money Show with Stephen Grootes (6pm-8pm).
CFI, a global leader in online trading with over 25 years of experience, is now in South Africa! Get access to world-class trading services with powerful tools, Advanced TradingView-powered charting, 24/7 support, and over 15,000 instruments to choose from! T&Cs apply.
Empower yourself with CFI and start trading today. Visit cfi.trade!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
3 days ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell: Who's afraid of losing Agoa?
One of the great risks of the debate around Agoa is that it gives us something else to blame, when we should blame ourselves for our poor economy. And we must remember that it is not true that there is no cost to us from Agoa. One of the most boring discussions I've heard around our economy over the past five years has been posed as 'will we keep Agoa?' I hear it everywhere, even now, when US President Donald Trump has made it clear that he wants to tear up the entire trade rule book. I can understand why we keep hearing about it. There are certain sections of our economy that really benefit from it. Because of Agoa (the African Growth and Opportunity Act), they have been able to grow and employ people. And some of the arguments they can make about why Agoa matters to us are important. Free market access to the US is great for the car industry, and for our farmers. It means they are exporting goods produced here, earning dollars in return and basically importing jobs. People are employed, their kids are kept in good schools. You could argue that the entire community around Daily Maverick journalist Estelle Ellis and the rest of the Baywatch team will be badly hit if it all comes to an end. And that would be true. Farmers, too, had a bumper season exporting to the US in the first quarter of the year. They were able to increase the amount of goods they sent there dramatically in that quarter. When I first heard that, I thought, perhaps, like the Chinese (and I'm sure others), they had been rushing goods into US ports before new tariffs could come into effect. But that amazing agricultural economics guru Wandile Sihlobo told me on The Money Show on Monday night that this is not the case. It happened because our farmers have created a strong demand for their goods. And, like our car industry, we are basically importing jobs. But we should be aware that, despite these very loud and important voices in our national debate, this is not the end of the story. The Brookings Institute estimated nearly 18 months ago that 'In total, a loss of Agoa benefits would lead to a GDP decline of just 0.06%'. To put that into context, our GDP grew by just 0.1% in the first quarter of this year. At the same time, the South African Reserve Bank has generally said that load shedding was costing our GDP 2% every year. So it may matter, but only in the context of our complete inability to take action to grow our own economy. One of the great risks of this debate around Agoa is that it gives us something else to blame, when we should blame ourselves for our poor economy. And we must remember that it is not true that there is no cost to us from Agoa. In fact, a few weeks ago I was almost taken aback when an American investor (one of those wonderful people who travels the world, and is hugely interested and fascinated by it) asked me point-blank: 'Why do you all care so much about Agoa?' He even suggested that actually it went against our interests. This is because of some of the small print. If you look at the text of the Act that passed through the US Congress, the conditions of eligibility are designed to literally create African economies in the US mould. Of course, as we were so often reminded during the Lady R saga, it says that you must 'not engage in activities that undermine United States national security or foreign policy interests'. This is a wonderful stick for the US to beat us with. If it wants, it could define our opposition to Israel's genocidal war on the people of Gaza as 'undermining' US 'foreign policy interests'. To be clear, there is much in Agoa that is good. It mentions that workers must be protected, that there should be political freedom and things like that. But it is still a tool of foreign policy. Yes, Agoa is helping African countries to develop. But it is also a useful instrument of control. Agoa looks finished anyway. In reality, the US system of government appears to be giving Trump whatever he wants. So far, very few Republicans have spoken against his tariff policies. But the markets are speaking. And the fact that the bond markets have forced Trump to basically chicken out has given us the wonderful phrase Taco (Trump always chickens out). So, I do think we need to be less afraid of him. He is slowly being revealed as all bark and very little bite. What we really need to do is to find Americans who lose out if we cannot export to the US. The US citrus industry, for example, needs our oranges to keep the market interested in oranges during their non-growing season. And we should not forget those strange people who drive BMW X3s. The models sold in the US are only made here. And even if they are rubbish cars (who can forget Jeremy Clarkson having to throw the sound guy out of the car to go and push, even now it's still worth watching), there is still a lobby for them in the US. I think we need to stop worrying so much about Agoa.
Daily Maverick
29-05-2025
- Daily Maverick
Young South Africans school the market — JSE Investment Challenge April winners announced
Every year, the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Investment Challenge puts South Africa's sharpest young minds to the test – and every year, a crop of winners rises to the top. The April 2025 results are in and the future of finance is looking bright and, in most cases, still in school uniform. With four risk-flavoured categories to choose from – income, equity, speculator and ETF/ETN (exchange traded notes/exchange traded funds) – each month brings new winners, while the race for the annual crown keeps everyone on their toes. It's the ultimate financial boot camp, minus the push-ups, but with plenty of number crunching. From rural roots to repeat victories Mpumelelo Secondary School, renowned for sweeping all five top positions in the schools' income category last year and repeated victories over the past several years, has once again proven its mettle in 2025. For the month of April, the Mpumelelo team, The Brave Ones, secured first place in the income category with an impressive portfolio growth of R10,139.73. Grade 11 learner, Mthombeni Nokubonga Naomi expressed her excitement: 'I felt ecstatic after winning, but I couldn't have done it without the support of my mentors.' The journey was far from easy. The team faced numerous challenges, including coordinating meeting times and locations. 'Sometimes it was difficult to decide where to gather,' Naomi said. However, the biggest obstacle was limited internet access and data shortages. 'We supported each other by sharing devices, and Mr Mtsweni, our teacher, helped by providing devices and assisting us with logging into the JSE platform,' she added. When selecting shares, the team adopted a careful strategy. 'We first checked the news – whether company-specific or external factors – and analysed charts of different companies to evaluate their growth potential,' explained Mfundo Mahlangu, a Grade nine learner from The Brave Ones. Equity experts in action Grey College's team, the profit predators, clinched the top spot in the equity category with a 3.92% gain. Their strategy – a laser focus on mining and banking sector companies, backed by diligent research and a few helpful hints from The Money Show with Stephen Grootes. 'Luckily, the market turned in our favour and we managed a good gain in profits,' the team said. Sometimes, fortune really does favour the bold and well-prepared. Speculating for success In the university speculator category, the UP Capital team from the University of Pretoria – Brett Thomson and Joshua McKay – secured victory with a portfolio growth of 12.65%. Thomson, already a veteran of the challenge, credited his win to careful risk management and a flexible strategy. The same team (plus one extra team member) won the overall ETF/ETN category in the JSE Investment Challenge 2024, walking away with R30,000. 'With all the risk in the market, it has been important to be both long and short to outperform the market. What I learnt is how to position the size of different sectors of the market according to current market risk,' Thomson explained. Catch up April's honour roll Schools The Jade Hustlers of Stellenberg High School in the Western Cape won the speculator category, with growth of 7.19%. The BGC – Skillies of Hoërskool Stellenbosch in Western Cape won the ETF/ETN category with 5.65% growth. The Brave Ones of Mpumelelo Secondary School in Mpumalanga won the income category, with a growth of R10,139,73. The Profit Predators of Grey College in the Free State won the equity category, with 3.92% growth. Universities UP Assegai of the University of Pretoria in Gauteng won the ETF/ETN category with 12.13% growth. UP Capital of the University of Pretoria in Gauteng won the speculator category with 12.65% growth. for schools and for universities. Keep in mind, applying late means you'll be eligible only for the September monthly results – not the annual finals – so it pays to sign up early and get a head start on the competition. The next champion could be you. DM
Daily Maverick
28-05-2025
- Daily Maverick
Industry sees red after Mantashe says no BEE for mining exploration, contradicting draft Bill
A new mist of uncertainty has shrouded mining policy just as progress is being made on other fronts such as the looming rollout of the long-awaited mining cadastre to address the applications backlog for mining and prospecting rights and permits. The draft Mineral Resources Development Bill (MRDP) has stirred a hornet's nest in the mining industry and with the ANC's GNU political partner the DA, and its ill-conceived nature was on full display on Wednesday when Minister Gwede Mantashe confusingly said the BEE requirements for exploration were not there and would be removed if they were. 'Now, and in the future, there's no provision for BEE on exploration,' Mantashe, the Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources (MPR), said during a media briefing at the conclusion of the AGM for the Minerals Council SA, the main body representing the country's mining industry. That's neither the Minerals Council's reading of the draft Bill nor Daily Maverick's interpretation of it. 'We raised this point over and over in our engagements with the department that the amendments must specifically exclude prospecting companies from empowerment requirements … Yet in this draft Bill, none of that is included,' Minerals Council CEO Mzila Mthenjane said in a statement on Tuesday. The thing about prospecting – or exploration – is that it is an extremely high-risk activity that onerous BEE rules will severely curtail. And without exploration, the South African mining industry has no viable long-term future. Daily Maverick asked Mantashe to clarify this afterwards and he responded by saying: 'If there is a BEE requirement in the Bill for prospecting, it must be removed.' So, the industry's complaints on this front are not falling on deaf ears, though it has raised concerns that its inputs were not included in the draft. And a new mist of uncertainty has shrouded policy just as progress is being made on other fronts such as the looming rollout of the long-awaited mining cadastre to address the applications backlog of mining and prospecting rights and permits. Overall, the industry is not happy with the Bill, which once again moves the goal posts at a time when investors are crying for certainty for a sector that remains crucial for South Africa's low-growth and high-unemployment economy. 'When we ask ourselves this question, does this Bill promote investment and create jobs, we see it has some serious short-comings,' said Paul Dunne, the CEO of Northam Platinum, who was re-elected as president of the Minerals Council SA. 'They are both substantive in nature and technical … Council is a very considered, professional advocacy group. We represent at least 99% of the mining industry in this country and our submission [on the draft Bill] will be made public when the right time comes, and we will engage very, very robustly with the department and the minister on this issue,' he said. The good-natured Dunne added: 'The minister knows us very well. We are very tough. And minister, we are coming.' That raised a chuckle from the audience and Mantashe, but it is no laughing matter – except for lawyers, who are going to giggle all the way to the bank. The draft Bill raises the almost certain prospect of arduous and time-consuming legal and court battles – another obstacle to the investment that the mining sector and wider South African economy desperately need to reach faster levels of growth and job creation. It has also raised hackles in the GNU, which is supposed to be the ANC's main governing partner. One bone of contention is embedding the Mining Charter into the legal framework, which could once again unleash the 'once empowered, always empowered' debate which the industry has already won in court. But fresh legal scraps could loom on this front. This played out in the courts when Gupta stooge Mosebenzi Zwane was the minister in charge of mining, and the term refers to the industry's contention that once a company reached a required BEE ownership threshold that should be set in stone even if black shareholders decided to sell their stakes – which is the point of owning shares. The government at the time held that mining companies needed to endlessly keep topping up BEE stakes, a state of affairs that would dilute value and repel foreign as well as domestic investment. 'By expressly including the Mining Charter as law and not simply policy, the Bill allows for the rapid overturning of t'once empowered, always empowered', opening the door to the need for constant injections of new BEE investors, a feature which would on its own make investing a lossmaking prospect,' MP James Lorimer, the DA spokesperson on Minerals and Petroleum Resources, said in a statement. 'The Bill is poorly thought out. It is contradictory and unclear in several places. It grants new powers to the Minister to rule the industry according to his own whim.' What this means More policy confusion and uncertainty at a time when South Africa needs both to extract wealth, investment and job creation from its rich minerals endowment. It will also test the GNU and likely trigger a tsunami of legal challenges for South Africa's already stretched court system. The ANC is acting like it has a two-thirds majority in Parliament on this front and has yet to be pulled back to Earth by the laws of political gravity. Mantashe on Wednesday reminded the industry of its racist past, and that is no bad thing – in an age when US President Donald Trump is parroting fascist-inspired lies about 'white genocide', hard historical truths need to be confronted head-on. The South African mining industry was the economic bedrock of apartheid, subjecting an overwhelmingly black migrant labour force to ruthless exploitation. But the times are changing and the industry – partly in response to government regulation and union demands but also wider concerns among investors foreign and domestic – has made strides from the indignities of the apartheid past on a range of fronts, including ownership, wages, communities, health and safety. BEE as a mantra has not delivered a utopia while enriching a relatively small elite, and it is also starting to look like a fossilised relic in an age when – despite the Trump administration's efforts to turn the tide – capital is largely looking for kinder, gentler returns. The Bill, for now, is not law and open to public comment. Break out the popcorn for the fireworks. DM
