logo
Why some Canadians are alarmed by Mark Carney's pledge to act with urgency

Why some Canadians are alarmed by Mark Carney's pledge to act with urgency

Canadians elected Prime Minister Mark Carney's Liberal government based on its pledge to act with urgency and fix things — the country's economy, its security and its standing on the world stage.
But with the unveiling of a
bill to supercharge the economy
and early efforts to improve the country's adversarial relations with India and China, there's growing concern that Carney's plans to boost Canada could involve unsavoury trade offs.
Ask Indigenous leaders who were left out of 'nation-building' meetings or were given just a week to comment on legislation that will fast track infrastructure projects reasonably expected to pass through their treaty-protected territories.
Ask Sikh-Canadian leaders who have seen their members targeted for death or violence, allegedly on orders from Indian government agents. Last Friday, they listened as Carney defended his G7 invitation to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as one that 'makes sense' based on India's economic power, population and key role in international 'supply chains.'
Ask foreign aid organizations, perhaps, if Canada commits to radically increasing defence spending along with NATO allies at a leaders' summit planned for later this month.
Carney is not alone in his apparent willingness to step on toes if it means he can move further and faster in responding to the sense of emergency at hand.
It's part of a global movement with governments invoking looming threats and emerging risks to push through all sorts of questionable — and sometimes contestable — priorities.
The most blatant example is the one that has sparked the economic emergency in Canada.
U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs on imports have been pushed through not with legislation that can be studied, debated and voted upon, but through presidential executive orders invoking real or imagined national emergencies at the Canada-U. S. border.
They are premised upon risks from America-bound migrants, fentanyl, steel and cars and, despite initial court rulings that tranches of the tariffs are illegal under U.S. law, they remain in effect.
Likewise, the generalized panic that Russia's three-years-and-counting war against Ukraine has instilled in Europe.
There is legitimate reason to worry about the longer-term intentions of Russian President Vladimir Putin, a leader who has been unwilling to agree to a ceasefire despite sanctions, despite diplomatic isolation, despite the more recent appeals, threats and exhortations of the Trump administration.
But preparations for a potentially wider conflict on the European continent now have German officials talking about rehabilitating long-abandoned bunkers, Poland
vowing
to build up 'the strongest army in the region,' and Swedish households receiving an alarming 32-page pamphlet from their government entitled: 'In case of crisis or war.'
'To all residents of Sweden: we live in uncertain times,' the booklet begins ominously. It goes on to cover everything from securing one's home to digital safety to instructions on how to stop bleeding to advice about handling pets and talking to children.
This is the political and emotional backdrop against which Canada and other NATO member states later this month are expected to back an agreement to steeply increase in their national defence budgets, moving to five per cent of GDP from two per cent.
If agreed to, it will result in many billions of dollars going to weapons, tanks, planes and soldiers' salaries. But before those purchases can go ahead, there will be many difficult choices made about how to come up with the funds.
Governments always talk about finding budget efficiencies for unexpected priorities, though saving is not a specialty for which politicians are well suited. Even Donald Trump and Elon Musk came up spectacularly short of their savings pledges through the Department of Government Efficiency.
More frequently, governments end up robbing Peter in order to pay Paul, as the saying goes — cutting spending in on domain to increase it in another.
That is exactly what the United Kingdom did with blunt effect when it
announced earlier this year
that it would slash foreign aid spending drastically in order to increase the defence budget.
'Few countries have articulated such a direct, one-to-one trade off before between those two areas of public spending,' noted
a report from ODI Global
, a think tank, that criticized the British government for thinking of defence and foreign-aid spending as an either-or choice.
Similar potential trade offs are cause for concern in Canada.
Will the urgency to build oil pipelines and assert the country as an 'energy superpower' in new markets come at the cost of Canada's fight against global warming?
Carney's reputation as a climate-change warrior is well-established, but his use of the oil-and-gas industry's '
marketing speak
' at a recent meeting first ministers' meeting with provincial premiers has some worried about the economy taking priority over the environment.
Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, the national association representing Canadian Inuit, wasn't even invited to the first ministers' meeting, which concluded with a
statement
about the need to 'unlock the North's economic potential.'
'It is troubling that in 2025, the Government of Canada is so comfortable with empty rhetoric in place of rightful participation,' the Inuit association said in a
news release
.
The legislation to get Carney's economic fast-track transformation under way — one that the Liberal government wants to pass into law by Canada Day — was decried by the Assembly of First Nations, which had just seven days to provide any concerns about the bill,
APTN News reported
.
There are those who will defend a go-fast approach to governing in extraordinary times. They will warn that there is a greater risk in being sunk by the status quo — the never-ending consultations, the delays, red-tape entanglements.
'The advantage of a wartime mentality lies in the sense of urgency it introduces, and the readiness it encourages to push aside unnecessary bureaucratic barriers,' wrote Lawrence Freedman, an emeritus professor of War Studies at King's College London, in
a piece
about Russia, Ukraine and Europe.
It's a line that can be applied as equally to Ottawa as to Moscow, Kyiv, Paris, Brussels or London.
But one person's bureaucratic barrier is the next person's guard rail — a measure ensuring confidence, protecting against damaging errors, saving lives.
Moving at high speeds, it can be difficult to spot the difference.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The NY State Education Department's self-damning war on the Massapequa Chiefs
The NY State Education Department's self-damning war on the Massapequa Chiefs

New York Post

time25 minutes ago

  • New York Post

The NY State Education Department's self-damning war on the Massapequa Chiefs

Policing speech is so important to the State Education Department that's it's launched a two-front war on the Massapequa Chiefs mascot name — fighting not just the school district, but also the feds. SED years ago ordered all New York public schools to abandon anything resembling an Indian mascot, because progressives think they're all evil, even if plenty of regular folks (including many Native Americans) see them as honoring a heritage. Massapequa resisted on those grounds ('Massapequa' itself is a Native name, after all); now SED threatens to withhold funds if the district won't fold. That's even as SED is rejecting federal orders for a cease-fire in its mascot wars — orders that come with their own implicit threat to withhold funds from the state. Instead, SED offers a 'compromise' that's worse than the disease: It suggests banning any mascot based on any 'ethnic group' — Vikings, Fighting Irish, Cowboys, etc. We know: 'Cowboy' is an occupation, not an ethnicity, but that was SED's example. Which suggests why SED is bothering with stupid battles such as these, rather than focusing on New York's failing public schools: These 'educators' are themselves mired in ignorance.

Journey Energy Inc. Reviews Its Current Intiatives with Water Tower Research
Journey Energy Inc. Reviews Its Current Intiatives with Water Tower Research

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Journey Energy Inc. Reviews Its Current Intiatives with Water Tower Research

Calgary, Alberta--(Newsfile Corp. - June 10, 2025) - Journey Energy Inc. (TSX: JOY) (OTCQX: JRNGF) ("Journey", or the "Company") announces its participation in a fireside chat with Water Tower Research ("WTR") on Wednesday, June 11 2025 at 9:00 AM Mountain Time / 11:00 AM Eastern Time. As part of WTR's ongoing Fireside Chat Series, Jeff Robertson, Managing Director at WTR, will lead an in-depth conversation with Alex Verge, President and Chief Executive Officer of Journey Energy Inc. Included in the discussion will be the strategic outlook for Journey with particular focus on its unconventional Duvernay shale play and the balance of the discussion on its conventional and power assets. Topics will include: Duvernay shale development plans and growth scenarios Review of core assets in Medicine Hat and key conventional and enhanced oil recovery developments Development of the power business Potential shifts in regulatory environment following recent elections To access the live discussion please use the link below: For further information, contact: Alex G. VergePresident and Chief Executive or Gerry GilewiczChief Financial Journey Energy Inc.700, 517 - 10th Avenue SWCalgary, AB T2R No securities regulatory authority has either approved or disapproved of the contents of this press release. To view the source version of this press release, please visit Sign in to access your portfolio

Summa Silver Provides Quarterly ATM Program Update
Summa Silver Provides Quarterly ATM Program Update

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Summa Silver Provides Quarterly ATM Program Update

Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - June 10, 2025) - Summa Silver Corp. (TSXV: SSVR) (OTCQX: SSVRF) (FSE: 48X) ("Summa" or the "Company") announced today a quarterly update with respect to the Company's previously announced "at-the-market" equity program (the "ATM Program") launched on October 4, 2024. The ATM Program allows the Company to issue and sell, from time to time, up to $5,000,000 of its common shares ("Common Shares") from treasury to the public, at the Company's discretion, pursuant to an equity distribution agreement (the "Equity Distribution Agreement") between the Company and Research Capital Corporation (the "Agent"). During the quarterly period ended May 31, 2025, the Company issued a total of 389,000 Common Shares on the TSX Venture Exchange at an average price of $0.3708 per share, providing gross proceeds of $144,245.85. Commissions of $3,606.15 were paid to the Agent in relation to these distributions. For further details on the ATM Program, see the Company's news release dated October 4, 2024. About Summa Silver Corp Summa Silver Corp is a junior mineral exploration company. The Company owns a 100% interest in the Hughes project located in central Nevada and in the Mogollon project located in southwestern New Mexico. The high-grade past-producing Belmont Mine, one of the most prolific silver producers in the United States between 1903 and 1929, is located on the Hughes project. The Mogollon project is the largest historic silver producer in New Mexico. Both projects have remained inactive since commercial production ceased and neither have seen modern exploration prior to the Company's involvement. Follow Summa Silver on Twitter: @summasilverLinkedIn: ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS "Galen McNamara"Galen McNamara, Chief Executive Officerinfo@ Investor Relations Contact:Giordy BelfioreCorporate Development and Investor Relations604-288-8004giordy@ Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. Cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements The information contained herein contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. "Forward-looking information" includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect to the activities, events or developments that the Company expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future. Generally, but not always, forward-looking information and statements can be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates", or "believes" or the negative connotation thereof or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved" or the negative connotation thereof. Forward‐looking statements and forward‐looking information relating to any future mineral production, liquidity, enhanced value and capital markets profile of the Company, future growth potential for the Company and its business, and future exploration plans are based on management's reasonable assumptions, estimates, expectations, analyses and opinions, which are based on management's experience and perception of trends, current conditions and expected developments, and other factors that management believes are relevant and reasonable in the circumstances, but which may prove to be incorrect. Assumptions have been made regarding, among other things, the price of silver, gold, and other metals; no escalation in the severity of public health crises; costs of exploration and development; the estimated costs of development of exploration projects; the Company's ability to operate in a safe and effective manner and its ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms. These statements reflect the Company's respective current views with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon a number of other assumptions and estimates that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties and contingencies. Many factors, both known and unknown, could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance or achievements that are or may be expressed or implied by such forward‐looking statements or forward-looking information and the Company has made assumptions and estimates based on or related to many of these factors. Such factors include, without limitation: the Company's dependence on one mineral project; precious metals price volatility; risks associated with the conduct of the Company's mining activities in Mexico; regulatory, consent or permitting delays; risks relating to reliance on the Company's management team and outside contractors; risks regarding mineral resources and reserves; the Company's inability to obtain insurance to cover all risks, on a commercially reasonable basis or at all; currency fluctuations; risks regarding the failure to generate sufficient cash flow from operations; risks relating to project financing and equity issuances; risks and unknowns inherent in all mining projects, including the inaccuracy of reserves and resources, metallurgical recoveries and capital and operating costs of such projects; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties; laws and regulations governing the environment, health and safety; the ability of the communities in which the Company operates to manage and cope with the implications of public health crises; the economic and financial implications of public health crises to the Company; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities; employee relations, labour unrest or unavailability; the Company's interactions with surrounding communities and artisanal miners; the Company's ability to successfully integrate acquired assets; the speculative nature of exploration and development, including the risks of diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; stock market volatility; conflicts of interest among certain directors and officers; lack of liquidity for shareholders of the Company; litigation risk; ongoing military conflicts around the world; general economic factors; and the factors identified under the caption "Risk Factors" in the Company's annual information form and other public disclosure documents. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking information or implied by forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking information and statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated, estimated or intended. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or reissue forward-looking information as a result of new information or events except as required by applicable securities laws. To view the source version of this press release, please visit Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store