Map Shows Best—and Worst—States To Retire in
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A new study by financial services firm Bankrate has ranked every U.S. state on how good—or bad—it is for retirees.
Why It Matters
Choosing the right place to retire is essential for ensuring a comfortable, fulfilling, and financially stable life after work. A good retirement location can stretch your savings further through lower taxes and living costs, while offering access to quality health care—something that becomes increasingly important with age. The right climate can boost physical and mental well-being, and living in a safe, welcoming community helps prevent loneliness and isolation.
Ultimately, where you retire plays a major role in shaping your lifestyle, health, and peace of mind throughout your later years.
What To Know
To determine which state is the best to spend those post-work years, Bankrate compared all 50 states across spanning eight categories, including affordability, safety, health care, taxes, arts and entertainment, and people of a similar age.
The Best Places To Retire
New England takes three of the top spots in the best five, but Western states also get a look-in. The top five best places are:
New Hampshire is at number one, offering a good blend of affordability and quality of life. Though it scores poorly on weather (40th), the state excels in neighborhood safety (1st), health care (5th), local taxes (6th), and senior population (7th).
Maine follows closely, with strong marks in safety (2nd), health care (3rd), and arts (4th), though it too scores low for weather (41st).
Wyoming ranks highest for taxes and is 4th in affordability, but its health care ranking (39th) is a notable weakness.
Vermont wins in arts (1st) and health care (1st) and already boasts a high senior population (2nd), but is weighed down by affordability (12th) and poor weather (43rd).
Idaho closes out the top five, scoring well in safety (3rd), affordability (9th), and taxes (11th), but ranks low in arts (37th) and senior population (35th).
The Worst Places To Retire
At the other end of the spectrum:
Louisiana ranks last overall. It falls short in nearly every category, including affordability (43rd), safety (48th), and health care (37th), with high crime rates and a weather rank of just 39th, despite ample sunshine.
Texas ranks 49th, excelling only in taxes (7th), while scoring last in health care and near-bottom in affordability (42nd) and weather (47th).
Oklahoma offers strong weather (13th), but ranks poorly in affordability (45th) and health care (41st).
Arkansas does well in weather (9th), but underperforms in safety, arts, and health care.
Finally, Nebraska lands 46th due to its extremely high homeowners insurance costs, ranking 49th in affordability, despite average scores in most other categories.
What People Are Saying
Stephen Kates, Bankrate's financial analyst, said in the report: "Retirees and pre-retirees should take notice of these rankings because we looked beyond the typical categories to look closely at important lifestyle and risk factors for residents of various states. There is more to being a resident than just the number of sunny days and taxes. Categories like public safety, walkability, access to health care, air quality, recreational opportunities, and more add up to the daily quality of life retirees want."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Kevin O'Leary Rips Donald Trump for 'Whacking' Labor Bureau Chief
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Shark Tank investor Kevin O'Leary ripped President Donald Trump over his firing of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Commissioner Dr. Erika McEntarfer on Friday after a disappointing jobs report. Newsweek reached out to an economic analyst via email for additional comment. Why It Matters Trump's decision to oust McEntarfer has triggered widespread concern among economists, business leaders and former government officials about the independence of U.S. economic data reporting. The abrupt dismissal followed the release of lackluster job numbers and marked a rare direct intervention by a president in the work of a nonpartisan federal agency responsible for compiling critical economic statistics. The number of new jobs for July dipped well below even modest expectations, with only 73,000 positions added, compared to the Dow Jones estimate of 100,000. This move has now fueled debate over the politicization of federal agencies, the integrity of government data and potential impact on market and public trust in official economic indicators. What To Know Trump announced McEntarfer's firing on Truth Social Friday, also accusing her of manipulating data to benefit former Vice President Kamala Harris around the 2024 presidential election "to try and boost Kamala's chances of Victory." While speaking on CNN after Trump's announcement, O'Leary was asked about Trump's economic policies impacting him as an investor. "I don't look at one day's trading and decide I'm going to change my strategy," O'Leary said. "I want markets to correct. I want them to go up and down. We're used to volatility. We had a bad print on jobs. I did not agree on whacking the commissioner. I don't like that." O'Leary continued: "Whacking statisticians makes no sense whatsoever. You don't shoot the messenger. They used to do that in Ancient Rome. Bad news. They'd kill a guy off the horse. You don't need to do that now. It doesn't matter. This is a job where you just print data. So, I didn't like that story." "I think the market is a little concerned about major trading partners not getting deals yet that make sense. It's not a good idea to have 35 percent tariffs on Canada, we know that that's coming into place at midnight right now, unless something magic happens," O'Leary added. McEntarfer's firing coincided with a significant drop in U.S. stock markets on Friday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 542 points (1.2 percent), the S&P 500 fell 1.6 percent and the Nasdaq composite dropped 2.2 percent. This downward movement was attributed to both weak job figures and a new round of U.S. tariffs announced by Trump. Kevin O'Leary, chairman of O'Leary Ventures, is poised to speak before a Senate joint hearing on April 9 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) Kevin O'Leary, chairman of O'Leary Ventures, is poised to speak before a Senate joint hearing on April 9 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) What People Are Saying JB Pritzker, Democratic governor of Illinois, posted to X on Friday: "Donald Trump just fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics because she stated the facts. And the facts show his policies are a disaster for the American economy. Trump said he'd be a dictator on day one and that's just what he's acting like." Trump, in an interview with Newsmax's Rob Finnerty on Friday: "We had some difficulties with her, and there had been a lot of questions and we fired her because we didn't believe the numbers today." What Happens Next It remains uncertain who will be nominated as the next permanent BLS commissioner. Trump announced on Truth Social that McEntarfer "will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified." Former BLS chief William Beach and other Friends of BLS Co-Chairs called for an investigation of Trump's firing of McEntarfer.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Semtech, Teradyne, Western Digital, Allegro MicroSystems, and Intel Shares Are Falling, What You Need To Know
What Happened? A number of stocks fell in the morning session after the U.S. jobs report for July came in significantly weaker than expected while new widespread import tariffs were announced, sparking fears of a potential economic slowdown. The U.S. economy added only 73,000 jobs, far below estimates, and massive downward revisions to the prior two months painted a much weaker picture of the labor market. This has stoked recession fears, which would directly impact demand for chips used in countless products. Compounding these worries, the White House announced new tariffs, including a 20% levy on imports from Taiwan, a global hub for chip manufacturing. This dual shock of slowing domestic growth and renewed trade friction creates a challenging outlook for the highly cyclical and globally connected semiconductor industry, leading to a broad-based sell-off. The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Among others, the following stocks were impacted: Semiconductor Manufacturing company Semtech (NASDAQ:SMTC) fell 3.2%. Is now the time to buy Semtech? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Semiconductor Manufacturing company Teradyne (NASDAQ:TER) fell 4%. Is now the time to buy Teradyne? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Memory Semiconductors company Western Digital (NASDAQ:WDC) fell 3.4%. Is now the time to buy Western Digital? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Processors and Graphics Chips company Allegro MicroSystems (NASDAQ:ALGM) fell 3.4%. Is now the time to buy Allegro MicroSystems? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Processors and Graphics Chips company Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) fell 3.1%. Is now the time to buy Intel? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Zooming In On Teradyne (TER) Teradyne's shares are very volatile and have had 23 moves greater than 5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business. The previous big move we wrote about was 2 days ago when the stock gained 21.1% on the news that the company reported better-than-expected second-quarter financial results and provided a strong third-quarter forecast, driven by robust demand for its artificial intelligence (AI) chip testing equipment. The semiconductor test equipment manufacturer posted revenue of $651.8 million and adjusted earnings of 57 cents per share, both of which topped analyst expectations. Growth was primarily fueled by its core chip testing division, as demand for System-on-a-Chip (SoC) components for AI applications surged. This strength in AI was significant enough to offset weakness in the automotive and industrial sectors. Looking ahead, Teradyne's management provided an optimistic outlook, forecasting third-quarter revenue between $710 million and $770 million, which suggested continued momentum. Teradyne is down 18.6% since the beginning of the year, and at $103.06 per share, it is trading 26.4% below its 52-week high of $140 from January 2025. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of Teradyne's shares 5 years ago would now be looking at an investment worth $1,142. Today's young investors likely haven't read the timeless lessons in Gorilla Game: Picking Winners In High Technology because it was written more than 20 years ago when Microsoft and Apple were first establishing their supremacy. But if we apply the same principles, then enterprise software stocks leveraging their own generative AI capabilities may well be the Gorillas of the future. So, in that spirit, we are excited to present our Special Free Report on a profitable, fast-growing enterprise software stock that is already riding the automation wave and looking to catch the generative AI next. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
San Francisco Chronicle
7 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump orders US nuclear subs repositioned over statements from ex-Russian leader Medvedev
WASHINGTON (AP) — In a warning to Russia, President Donald Trump said Friday he's ordering the repositioning of two U.S. nuclear submarines 'based on the highly provocative statements' of the country's former president, Dmitry Medvedev, who has raised the prospect of war online. Trump posted on his social media site that, based on the 'highly provocative statements' from Medvedev, he had 'ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.' The president added, 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' It wasn't clear what impact Trump's order would have on U.S. nuclear subs, which are routinely on patrol in the world's hotspots, but it comes at a delicate moment in the Trump administration's relations with Moscow. Trump has said that special envoy Steve Witkoff is heading to Russia to push Moscow to agree to a ceasefire in its war with Ukraine and has threatened new economic sanctions if progress is not made. He cut his 50-day deadline for action to 10 days, with that window set to expire next week. The post about the sub repositioning came after Trump, in the wee hours of Thursday morning, had posted that Medvedev was a 'failed former President of Russia' and warned him to 'watch his words.' Medvedev responded hours later by writing, 'Russia is right on everything and will continue to go its own way.' And that back-and-forth followed earlier this week, when Medvedev wrote, 'Trump's playing the ultimatum game with Russia: 50 days or 10' and added, 'He should remember 2 things: 1. Russia isn't Israel or even Iran. 2. Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country.' Asked as he was leaving the White House on Friday evening for a weekend at his estate in New Jersey, about where he was repositioning the subs, Trump didn't offer any specifics. 'We had to do that. We just have to be careful,' the president said. 'A threat was made, and we didn't think it was appropriate, so I have to be very careful.' Trump also said, 'I do that on the basis of safety for our people' and 'we're gonna protect our people' and later added of Medvedev, 'He was talking about nuclear.' 'When you talk about nuclear, we have to be prepared,' Trump said. 'And we're totally prepared.' Medvedev was Russia's president from 2008 to 2012, while Putin was barred from seeking a second consecutive term, but stepped aside to let him run again. Now deputy chairman of Russia's National Security Council, which Putin chairs, Medvedev has been known for his provocative and inflammatory statements since the start of the war in 2022. That's a U-turn from his presidency, when he was seen as liberal and progressive. Medvedev has frequently wielded nuclear threats and lobbed insults at Western leaders on social media. Some observers have argued that with his extravagant rhetoric, Medvedev is seeking to score political points with Putin and Russian military hawks. One such example before the latest spat with Trump came on July 15, after Trump announced plans to supply Ukraine with more weapons via its NATO allies and threatened additional tariffs against Moscow. Medvedev posted then, 'Trump issued a theatrical ultimatum to the Kremlin. The world shuddered, expecting the consequences. Belligerent Europe was disappointed. Russia didn't care.'
