
Appeal success for Nazi salutes outside Jewish museum
Anthony Raymond Mitchell, 33, performed a Nazi salute and goose-step with two co-workers near the Sydney Jewish Museum in October 2023.
The salute, seen on the museum's CCTV by a security guard, came days after Hamas militants killed 1200 Israelis and took hundreds more hostage in southern Israel, sparking the latest outbreak of war in Gaza.
At the time, the construction workers were on their lunch break and walking back to their van.
When interviewed by police, Mitchell said he was mimicking a Netflix performance and realised "those who were not familiar with the Ricky Gervais skit could take the actions in a certain way".
Mitchell and his co-workers each argued the gestures were a joke but were found guilty of offensive behaviour and knowingly displaying Nazi symbols without excuse by a magistrate in October.
The case tested laws prohibiting the display of Nazi symbols, introduced by the NSW parliament in 2022 and carrying a maximum penalty of 12 months' jail, an $11,000 fine or both.
Re-running the case in the District Court on appeal, the trio's lawyers argued that the gestures should not fall within the definition of displaying a Nazi symbol.
But that was rejected by Judge Craig Smith on Friday.
"They are immediately recognised as being associated with that regime and period of history," he said in the Downing Centre court.
There was no reasonable excuse for the trio's actions to be performed outside the museum, he said.
While the new law allowed the Nazi symbol to be displayed for academic, educational, artistic or other public interest purposes, the tradies' actions were "nothing of the sort," Judge Smith said.
Lawyer Bryan Wrench, representing one of Mitchell's co-workers Daniel Muston, told the court that the actions occurred within a split second, and were not planned.
"There is no Nazi ideology behind this," he said.
Muston, 42, had completed a tour of the museum since his conviction in an attempt to educate himself on Jewish culture and history, Mr Wrench said.
Judge Smith accepted Mitchell, Muston and the third man - Ryan Peter Marshall, 31 - did not have any connection with the hateful ideologies underlying the Nazi party.
But he upheld a magistrate's guilty findings against all three men and the decision to record a conviction against Marshall and Muston.
Mitchell's conviction was however scrubbed from his record with the judge accepting he did not know he was outside the Jewish museum, unlike his co-workers.
"I've been persuaded to a different position for Mr Mitchell," Judge Smith said.
Mitchell was handed a nine-month good behaviour bond in place of the conviction.
The judge also reduced Muston's fine from $1000 to $500, labelling it as "excessive".
The original $1500 fine for Marshall, the instigator of the salutes, was kept in place.
The judgment follows the arrest of two men in February for unfurling a Nazi flag at a pub near the Sydney Jewish museum, and the jailing in November of a far-right extremist and self-proclaimed "Hitler soldier" in Melbourne.
A man who performed a Nazi salute near a Jewish museum and then claimed he was copying comedian Ricky Gervais has had his conviction and fine wiped away.
Anthony Raymond Mitchell, 33, performed a Nazi salute and goose-step with two co-workers near the Sydney Jewish Museum in October 2023.
The salute, seen on the museum's CCTV by a security guard, came days after Hamas militants killed 1200 Israelis and took hundreds more hostage in southern Israel, sparking the latest outbreak of war in Gaza.
At the time, the construction workers were on their lunch break and walking back to their van.
When interviewed by police, Mitchell said he was mimicking a Netflix performance and realised "those who were not familiar with the Ricky Gervais skit could take the actions in a certain way".
Mitchell and his co-workers each argued the gestures were a joke but were found guilty of offensive behaviour and knowingly displaying Nazi symbols without excuse by a magistrate in October.
The case tested laws prohibiting the display of Nazi symbols, introduced by the NSW parliament in 2022 and carrying a maximum penalty of 12 months' jail, an $11,000 fine or both.
Re-running the case in the District Court on appeal, the trio's lawyers argued that the gestures should not fall within the definition of displaying a Nazi symbol.
But that was rejected by Judge Craig Smith on Friday.
"They are immediately recognised as being associated with that regime and period of history," he said in the Downing Centre court.
There was no reasonable excuse for the trio's actions to be performed outside the museum, he said.
While the new law allowed the Nazi symbol to be displayed for academic, educational, artistic or other public interest purposes, the tradies' actions were "nothing of the sort," Judge Smith said.
Lawyer Bryan Wrench, representing one of Mitchell's co-workers Daniel Muston, told the court that the actions occurred within a split second, and were not planned.
"There is no Nazi ideology behind this," he said.
Muston, 42, had completed a tour of the museum since his conviction in an attempt to educate himself on Jewish culture and history, Mr Wrench said.
Judge Smith accepted Mitchell, Muston and the third man - Ryan Peter Marshall, 31 - did not have any connection with the hateful ideologies underlying the Nazi party.
But he upheld a magistrate's guilty findings against all three men and the decision to record a conviction against Marshall and Muston.
Mitchell's conviction was however scrubbed from his record with the judge accepting he did not know he was outside the Jewish museum, unlike his co-workers.
"I've been persuaded to a different position for Mr Mitchell," Judge Smith said.
Mitchell was handed a nine-month good behaviour bond in place of the conviction.
The judge also reduced Muston's fine from $1000 to $500, labelling it as "excessive".
The original $1500 fine for Marshall, the instigator of the salutes, was kept in place.
The judgment follows the arrest of two men in February for unfurling a Nazi flag at a pub near the Sydney Jewish museum, and the jailing in November of a far-right extremist and self-proclaimed "Hitler soldier" in Melbourne.
A man who performed a Nazi salute near a Jewish museum and then claimed he was copying comedian Ricky Gervais has had his conviction and fine wiped away.
Anthony Raymond Mitchell, 33, performed a Nazi salute and goose-step with two co-workers near the Sydney Jewish Museum in October 2023.
The salute, seen on the museum's CCTV by a security guard, came days after Hamas militants killed 1200 Israelis and took hundreds more hostage in southern Israel, sparking the latest outbreak of war in Gaza.
At the time, the construction workers were on their lunch break and walking back to their van.
When interviewed by police, Mitchell said he was mimicking a Netflix performance and realised "those who were not familiar with the Ricky Gervais skit could take the actions in a certain way".
Mitchell and his co-workers each argued the gestures were a joke but were found guilty of offensive behaviour and knowingly displaying Nazi symbols without excuse by a magistrate in October.
The case tested laws prohibiting the display of Nazi symbols, introduced by the NSW parliament in 2022 and carrying a maximum penalty of 12 months' jail, an $11,000 fine or both.
Re-running the case in the District Court on appeal, the trio's lawyers argued that the gestures should not fall within the definition of displaying a Nazi symbol.
But that was rejected by Judge Craig Smith on Friday.
"They are immediately recognised as being associated with that regime and period of history," he said in the Downing Centre court.
There was no reasonable excuse for the trio's actions to be performed outside the museum, he said.
While the new law allowed the Nazi symbol to be displayed for academic, educational, artistic or other public interest purposes, the tradies' actions were "nothing of the sort," Judge Smith said.
Lawyer Bryan Wrench, representing one of Mitchell's co-workers Daniel Muston, told the court that the actions occurred within a split second, and were not planned.
"There is no Nazi ideology behind this," he said.
Muston, 42, had completed a tour of the museum since his conviction in an attempt to educate himself on Jewish culture and history, Mr Wrench said.
Judge Smith accepted Mitchell, Muston and the third man - Ryan Peter Marshall, 31 - did not have any connection with the hateful ideologies underlying the Nazi party.
But he upheld a magistrate's guilty findings against all three men and the decision to record a conviction against Marshall and Muston.
Mitchell's conviction was however scrubbed from his record with the judge accepting he did not know he was outside the Jewish museum, unlike his co-workers.
"I've been persuaded to a different position for Mr Mitchell," Judge Smith said.
Mitchell was handed a nine-month good behaviour bond in place of the conviction.
The judge also reduced Muston's fine from $1000 to $500, labelling it as "excessive".
The original $1500 fine for Marshall, the instigator of the salutes, was kept in place.
The judgment follows the arrest of two men in February for unfurling a Nazi flag at a pub near the Sydney Jewish museum, and the jailing in November of a far-right extremist and self-proclaimed "Hitler soldier" in Melbourne.
A man who performed a Nazi salute near a Jewish museum and then claimed he was copying comedian Ricky Gervais has had his conviction and fine wiped away.
Anthony Raymond Mitchell, 33, performed a Nazi salute and goose-step with two co-workers near the Sydney Jewish Museum in October 2023.
The salute, seen on the museum's CCTV by a security guard, came days after Hamas militants killed 1200 Israelis and took hundreds more hostage in southern Israel, sparking the latest outbreak of war in Gaza.
At the time, the construction workers were on their lunch break and walking back to their van.
When interviewed by police, Mitchell said he was mimicking a Netflix performance and realised "those who were not familiar with the Ricky Gervais skit could take the actions in a certain way".
Mitchell and his co-workers each argued the gestures were a joke but were found guilty of offensive behaviour and knowingly displaying Nazi symbols without excuse by a magistrate in October.
The case tested laws prohibiting the display of Nazi symbols, introduced by the NSW parliament in 2022 and carrying a maximum penalty of 12 months' jail, an $11,000 fine or both.
Re-running the case in the District Court on appeal, the trio's lawyers argued that the gestures should not fall within the definition of displaying a Nazi symbol.
But that was rejected by Judge Craig Smith on Friday.
"They are immediately recognised as being associated with that regime and period of history," he said in the Downing Centre court.
There was no reasonable excuse for the trio's actions to be performed outside the museum, he said.
While the new law allowed the Nazi symbol to be displayed for academic, educational, artistic or other public interest purposes, the tradies' actions were "nothing of the sort," Judge Smith said.
Lawyer Bryan Wrench, representing one of Mitchell's co-workers Daniel Muston, told the court that the actions occurred within a split second, and were not planned.
"There is no Nazi ideology behind this," he said.
Muston, 42, had completed a tour of the museum since his conviction in an attempt to educate himself on Jewish culture and history, Mr Wrench said.
Judge Smith accepted Mitchell, Muston and the third man - Ryan Peter Marshall, 31 - did not have any connection with the hateful ideologies underlying the Nazi party.
But he upheld a magistrate's guilty findings against all three men and the decision to record a conviction against Marshall and Muston.
Mitchell's conviction was however scrubbed from his record with the judge accepting he did not know he was outside the Jewish museum, unlike his co-workers.
"I've been persuaded to a different position for Mr Mitchell," Judge Smith said.
Mitchell was handed a nine-month good behaviour bond in place of the conviction.
The judge also reduced Muston's fine from $1000 to $500, labelling it as "excessive".
The original $1500 fine for Marshall, the instigator of the salutes, was kept in place.
The judgment follows the arrest of two men in February for unfurling a Nazi flag at a pub near the Sydney Jewish museum, and the jailing in November of a far-right extremist and self-proclaimed "Hitler soldier" in Melbourne.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Megyn Kelly blasts Meghan Markle's ‘stupid attempts' to become Martha Stewart
'The Megyn Kelly Show' host Megyn Kelly has roasted the Duchess of Sussex for her 'stupid attempts' to become Martha Stewart with her Netflix productions. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have signed a new multi-year film and TV deal with Netflix. Their new output will include a second season of 'With Love, Meghan' and a documentary about orphaned children in Uganda.


Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
New Addams Family animated feature film being developed
Wednesday creators Alfred Gough and Miles Millar are creating a new animated Addams Family feature film. The two showrunners of the Netflix series are developing an Addams Family reboot for Amazon MGM Studios which will be unconnected to Wednesday - which stars Jenna Ortega as Wednesday Addams - and the previous two animated films released in 2019 and 2021. Gough says his and Millar's inspiration is to honour the characters created by late American cartoonist Charles Addams, which were turned into a popular TV series in the mid-60s. Speaking on Deadline's Crew Call podcast, Gough said: "We're working on it with Amazon MGM and with Kevin Miserocchi who runs the Addams Foundation, he knew Charles Addams and the keeper of the Addams flame, and with Gail Berman and John Glickman. We're rebooting the animated film franchise. So it won't have anything to do with the two films before it, nor is it connected with this show. It will be a brand new Addams feature. There's not really much we can say about it, because it's in the very early stages.' The 1960s series about the macabre family - who first appeared in a cartoon strip in The New Yorker magazine - starred John Astin as patriarch Gomez Addams, Carolyn Jones as Gomez's wife Morticia Addams, Jackie Coogan as Uncle Fester, Ted Cassidy as Lurch, Lisa Loring as Wednesday Addams and Ken Weatherwax as Pugsley Addams. The Addams Family has also appeared in a 1973 animated series, a remake series which ran from 1992 to 1993 as well as several feature films, including Barry Sonnenfeld's 1991 live action movie.

Sydney Morning Herald
6 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Pop has a new clown princess. And she's made the most fun album of the year
One day you're watching in awe as your roommate becomes a sudden pop sensation, the next you've found yourself hitched along for the ride. No, this is not the plot of Netflix's latest teen rom-com; this is Audrey Hobert's life. Last year, Hobert burst onto pop fans' radars after co-writing seven tracks on Gracie Abrams' hit album The Secret of Us, including the smash That's So True. Abrams, her bestie since fifth grade, made sure the world knew Hobert's contributions: the two shared stage time, interviews and social media posts. Suddenly Hobert, who'd never had any aspirations for making music, was on her own trajectory to pop stardom. 'I had never written music before. Gracie and I were just living together at the time and, one day, started writing music. That was my intro to writing music, period,' says Hobert, sprawled on a couch in her Los Angeles home as though this was a therapy session or I'm Bella Freud. 'When she went on to promote it and tour it and be the busy person that she is, I just felt I wasn't done songwriting and that's when I took a stab at it by myself and wrote this album.' As a stab, Hobert's debut album, Who's the Clown?, is a fatality. Led by throbbing single Sue Me – a guilt-free track about hooking up with your Bacardi-drinking ex, built around Hobert's detail-heavy, delightfully wordy syntax – and other sly tales from the frontlines of 20-something situationships, it might be the most relatable pop album this year (no matter how far removed you might be from its target group). 'I was never shocked by Gracie's success because I've known her for so long and that girl works so hard and it makes complete sense that she's getting this insane attention. But I don't think I ever had the thought of 'break me off a piece of that',' says Hobert. 'I just ultimately feel like I don't know how this all happened. I just know that for eight months last year, I wrote viciously, and here we are.' Hobert was Born and raised in Los Angeles. Her father was a writer and producer for TV comedies including Scrubs, Community and The Middle, while her mother worked in the theatre. Her younger brother Malcolm Todd is also a musician. Initially, Hobert had aspirations of being a professional dancer. 'I danced 10 hours a week from the time I was eight till the end of high school. But the older you get, the more you realise it's cutthroat and it's probably not gonna work out. I think I gave up on those dreams around 13.' Writing came naturally, though. She studied screenwriting at the New York University's Tisch School of the Arts, and had plans to follow in the family business. After graduating, she spent two seasons on the writing team of Nickelodeon's The Really Loud House (a show her father produced). 'That job came in handy when I ended up meeting record labels to sign a deal,' says Hobert. 'On that show, you were in a room where you were valuable if you had a good idea and knew how to get it across. It helped me in those big boardrooms with music people because I knew how to pitch myself as an artist.' Growing up, Hobert was aware her family was tangentially involved in showbiz, but it's all relative. 'I went to this private middle school, and I was surrounded by kids who had much more powerful parents in the industry. So I knew that my dad was involved, but it was small potatoes,' says Hobert. 'It didn't feel like I was livin' la vida loca, Hollywood style, or anything.' It perhaps explains the aloof outsider perspective that pervades her music. Chateau is a song about going to a Grammys party, microdosing mushrooms, and hating on shallow celebrities. On Thirst Trap, she's frustrated that her feelings for a fun new crush are making her deeply boring and predictable. 'The term 'outsider' resonates with me. In the books I read or the movies I watch, I'm always drawn to the outsider character and I've also felt on the outside often times in my life,' she says. 'When it comes to the songs I've written, my goal is just to be brutally honest about how I feel about a situation or a person or whatever.' Comedy is central to Hobert's songwriting appeal. If her musical keystones – Kim Petras, Olivia Rodrigo, Taylor Swift's 1989, slacker-poet MJ Lenderman – are part of the equation, so are her comic ones: Lena Dunham, Conner O'Malley, Dan Licata, Nathan Fielder, and her dad's favourites, Steve Martin and Brian Regan. 'I love funny people, and I love being funny. It's, like, my favourite thing to be,' she says. In her songs, Hobert plays the stand-up comic's trick of making her imperfections and insecurities empowering. On the moving Phoebe, a song about identifying with Lisa Kudrow's character on the TV sitcom Friends, she casually sings about her struggles with body image and finding solace in the show's wacky outcast. 'I just found it funny that none of the three guys on the show are ever with Phoebe. Like, they'll be with Rachel or with Monica but never with her, just because she's the quirky girl. I really identified with her, just as an idea of something,' says Hobert. 'I've felt a lot in my life this struggle to feel physically beautiful, but I've always known my worth on the inside. And the older you get, the less that feeling of physical unworthiness serves you, so obviously you want to reach that point as early as possible, like in your 20s, where you're just like, 'F— it, I'm entirely beautiful.' I'm proud of that song, and I'm glad I got to talk about that feeling I've had for a lot of my life.' Hobert's very specific approach to songwriting comes at an opportune time. The pop industry is flailing, the powers that be seem to understand that whatever formula they might've once had for producing hits is no longer working. I'm reminded of the debate that emerged after Sabrina Carpenter's Espresso went big, and people suddenly remembered that pop music can be weird and fun and break rules. Loading For four months last year, Hobert tried the industry's approach. 'I was in sessions, trying to write for other artists, and I knew immediately it wasn't for me,' she says. 'I find that setting to be not conducive to the kind of writing I like to do for songs because there's a beat looping in the background, and the producer has dinner at six, and you're sitting across from someone whose head you're supposed to be in but you've only just met them. I really respect songwriters who can be in that setting and successfully write a big, amazing song, but I'm not one of those people.' The experience only cemented her faith in her own idiosyncratic process. 'In the writing camp world and sessions world, it's a normal thing to have a concept or a title and then to build a song around that, but I never do that. 'I usually start at the first line and write all the way through. I find a second verse to be the hardest thing to write in a song, and a bridge to be the most fun. I'm not really someone who sits down and writes a song in an hour. It takes me weeks, usually, and many, many hours. I do say a lot of words in each song, and I go pretty fast, but I think there's as much importance paid to understanding pop structures and formulas as there is to breaking those rules.'