
Appeal success for Nazi salutes outside Jewish museum
A man who performed a Nazi salute near a Jewish museum and then claimed he was copying comedian Ricky Gervais has had his conviction and fine wiped away.
Anthony Raymond Mitchell, 33, performed a Nazi salute and goose-step with two co-workers near the Sydney Jewish Museum in October 2023.
The salute, seen on the museum's CCTV by a security guard, came days after Hamas militants killed 1200 Israelis and took hundreds more hostage in southern Israel, sparking the latest outbreak of war in Gaza.
At the time, the construction workers were on their lunch break and walking back to their van.
When interviewed by police, Mitchell said he was mimicking a Netflix performance and realised "those who were not familiar with the Ricky Gervais skit could take the actions in a certain way".
Mitchell and his co-workers each argued the gestures were a joke but were found guilty of offensive behaviour and knowingly displaying Nazi symbols without excuse by a magistrate in October.
The case tested laws prohibiting the display of Nazi symbols, introduced by the NSW parliament in 2022 and carrying a maximum penalty of 12 months' jail, an $11,000 fine or both.
Re-running the case in the District Court on appeal, the trio's lawyers argued that the gestures should not fall within the definition of displaying a Nazi symbol.
But that was rejected by Judge Craig Smith on Friday.
"They are immediately recognised as being associated with that regime and period of history," he said in the Downing Centre court.
There was no reasonable excuse for the trio's actions to be performed outside the museum, he said.
While the new law allowed the Nazi symbol to be displayed for academic, educational, artistic or other public interest purposes, the tradies' actions were "nothing of the sort," Judge Smith said.
Lawyer Bryan Wrench, representing one of Mitchell's co-workers Daniel Muston, told the court that the actions occurred within a split second, and were not planned.
"There is no Nazi ideology behind this," he said.
Muston, 42, had completed a tour of the museum since his conviction in an attempt to educate himself on Jewish culture and history, Mr Wrench said.
Judge Smith accepted Mitchell, Muston and the third man - Ryan Peter Marshall, 31 - did not have any connection with the hateful ideologies underlying the Nazi party.
But he upheld a magistrate's guilty findings against all three men and the decision to record a conviction against Marshall and Muston.
Mitchell's conviction was however scrubbed from his record with the judge accepting he did not know he was outside the Jewish museum, unlike his co-workers.
"I've been persuaded to a different position for Mr Mitchell," Judge Smith said.
Mitchell was handed a nine-month good behaviour bond in place of the conviction.
The judge also reduced Muston's fine from $1000 to $500, labelling it as "excessive".
The original $1500 fine for Marshall, the instigator of the salutes, was kept in place.
The judgment follows the arrest of two men in February for unfurling a Nazi flag at a pub near the Sydney Jewish museum, and the jailing in November of a far-right extremist and self-proclaimed "Hitler soldier" in Melbourne.
A man who performed a Nazi salute near a Jewish museum and then claimed he was copying comedian Ricky Gervais has had his conviction and fine wiped away.
Anthony Raymond Mitchell, 33, performed a Nazi salute and goose-step with two co-workers near the Sydney Jewish Museum in October 2023.
The salute, seen on the museum's CCTV by a security guard, came days after Hamas militants killed 1200 Israelis and took hundreds more hostage in southern Israel, sparking the latest outbreak of war in Gaza.
At the time, the construction workers were on their lunch break and walking back to their van.
When interviewed by police, Mitchell said he was mimicking a Netflix performance and realised "those who were not familiar with the Ricky Gervais skit could take the actions in a certain way".
Mitchell and his co-workers each argued the gestures were a joke but were found guilty of offensive behaviour and knowingly displaying Nazi symbols without excuse by a magistrate in October.
The case tested laws prohibiting the display of Nazi symbols, introduced by the NSW parliament in 2022 and carrying a maximum penalty of 12 months' jail, an $11,000 fine or both.
Re-running the case in the District Court on appeal, the trio's lawyers argued that the gestures should not fall within the definition of displaying a Nazi symbol.
But that was rejected by Judge Craig Smith on Friday.
"They are immediately recognised as being associated with that regime and period of history," he said in the Downing Centre court.
There was no reasonable excuse for the trio's actions to be performed outside the museum, he said.
While the new law allowed the Nazi symbol to be displayed for academic, educational, artistic or other public interest purposes, the tradies' actions were "nothing of the sort," Judge Smith said.
Lawyer Bryan Wrench, representing one of Mitchell's co-workers Daniel Muston, told the court that the actions occurred within a split second, and were not planned.
"There is no Nazi ideology behind this," he said.
Muston, 42, had completed a tour of the museum since his conviction in an attempt to educate himself on Jewish culture and history, Mr Wrench said.
Judge Smith accepted Mitchell, Muston and the third man - Ryan Peter Marshall, 31 - did not have any connection with the hateful ideologies underlying the Nazi party.
But he upheld a magistrate's guilty findings against all three men and the decision to record a conviction against Marshall and Muston.
Mitchell's conviction was however scrubbed from his record with the judge accepting he did not know he was outside the Jewish museum, unlike his co-workers.
"I've been persuaded to a different position for Mr Mitchell," Judge Smith said.
Mitchell was handed a nine-month good behaviour bond in place of the conviction.
The judge also reduced Muston's fine from $1000 to $500, labelling it as "excessive".
The original $1500 fine for Marshall, the instigator of the salutes, was kept in place.
The judgment follows the arrest of two men in February for unfurling a Nazi flag at a pub near the Sydney Jewish museum, and the jailing in November of a far-right extremist and self-proclaimed "Hitler soldier" in Melbourne.
A man who performed a Nazi salute near a Jewish museum and then claimed he was copying comedian Ricky Gervais has had his conviction and fine wiped away.
Anthony Raymond Mitchell, 33, performed a Nazi salute and goose-step with two co-workers near the Sydney Jewish Museum in October 2023.
The salute, seen on the museum's CCTV by a security guard, came days after Hamas militants killed 1200 Israelis and took hundreds more hostage in southern Israel, sparking the latest outbreak of war in Gaza.
At the time, the construction workers were on their lunch break and walking back to their van.
When interviewed by police, Mitchell said he was mimicking a Netflix performance and realised "those who were not familiar with the Ricky Gervais skit could take the actions in a certain way".
Mitchell and his co-workers each argued the gestures were a joke but were found guilty of offensive behaviour and knowingly displaying Nazi symbols without excuse by a magistrate in October.
The case tested laws prohibiting the display of Nazi symbols, introduced by the NSW parliament in 2022 and carrying a maximum penalty of 12 months' jail, an $11,000 fine or both.
Re-running the case in the District Court on appeal, the trio's lawyers argued that the gestures should not fall within the definition of displaying a Nazi symbol.
But that was rejected by Judge Craig Smith on Friday.
"They are immediately recognised as being associated with that regime and period of history," he said in the Downing Centre court.
There was no reasonable excuse for the trio's actions to be performed outside the museum, he said.
While the new law allowed the Nazi symbol to be displayed for academic, educational, artistic or other public interest purposes, the tradies' actions were "nothing of the sort," Judge Smith said.
Lawyer Bryan Wrench, representing one of Mitchell's co-workers Daniel Muston, told the court that the actions occurred within a split second, and were not planned.
"There is no Nazi ideology behind this," he said.
Muston, 42, had completed a tour of the museum since his conviction in an attempt to educate himself on Jewish culture and history, Mr Wrench said.
Judge Smith accepted Mitchell, Muston and the third man - Ryan Peter Marshall, 31 - did not have any connection with the hateful ideologies underlying the Nazi party.
But he upheld a magistrate's guilty findings against all three men and the decision to record a conviction against Marshall and Muston.
Mitchell's conviction was however scrubbed from his record with the judge accepting he did not know he was outside the Jewish museum, unlike his co-workers.
"I've been persuaded to a different position for Mr Mitchell," Judge Smith said.
Mitchell was handed a nine-month good behaviour bond in place of the conviction.
The judge also reduced Muston's fine from $1000 to $500, labelling it as "excessive".
The original $1500 fine for Marshall, the instigator of the salutes, was kept in place.
The judgment follows the arrest of two men in February for unfurling a Nazi flag at a pub near the Sydney Jewish museum, and the jailing in November of a far-right extremist and self-proclaimed "Hitler soldier" in Melbourne.
A man who performed a Nazi salute near a Jewish museum and then claimed he was copying comedian Ricky Gervais has had his conviction and fine wiped away.
Anthony Raymond Mitchell, 33, performed a Nazi salute and goose-step with two co-workers near the Sydney Jewish Museum in October 2023.
The salute, seen on the museum's CCTV by a security guard, came days after Hamas militants killed 1200 Israelis and took hundreds more hostage in southern Israel, sparking the latest outbreak of war in Gaza.
At the time, the construction workers were on their lunch break and walking back to their van.
When interviewed by police, Mitchell said he was mimicking a Netflix performance and realised "those who were not familiar with the Ricky Gervais skit could take the actions in a certain way".
Mitchell and his co-workers each argued the gestures were a joke but were found guilty of offensive behaviour and knowingly displaying Nazi symbols without excuse by a magistrate in October.
The case tested laws prohibiting the display of Nazi symbols, introduced by the NSW parliament in 2022 and carrying a maximum penalty of 12 months' jail, an $11,000 fine or both.
Re-running the case in the District Court on appeal, the trio's lawyers argued that the gestures should not fall within the definition of displaying a Nazi symbol.
But that was rejected by Judge Craig Smith on Friday.
"They are immediately recognised as being associated with that regime and period of history," he said in the Downing Centre court.
There was no reasonable excuse for the trio's actions to be performed outside the museum, he said.
While the new law allowed the Nazi symbol to be displayed for academic, educational, artistic or other public interest purposes, the tradies' actions were "nothing of the sort," Judge Smith said.
Lawyer Bryan Wrench, representing one of Mitchell's co-workers Daniel Muston, told the court that the actions occurred within a split second, and were not planned.
"There is no Nazi ideology behind this," he said.
Muston, 42, had completed a tour of the museum since his conviction in an attempt to educate himself on Jewish culture and history, Mr Wrench said.
Judge Smith accepted Mitchell, Muston and the third man - Ryan Peter Marshall, 31 - did not have any connection with the hateful ideologies underlying the Nazi party.
But he upheld a magistrate's guilty findings against all three men and the decision to record a conviction against Marshall and Muston.
Mitchell's conviction was however scrubbed from his record with the judge accepting he did not know he was outside the Jewish museum, unlike his co-workers.
"I've been persuaded to a different position for Mr Mitchell," Judge Smith said.
Mitchell was handed a nine-month good behaviour bond in place of the conviction.
The judge also reduced Muston's fine from $1000 to $500, labelling it as "excessive".
The original $1500 fine for Marshall, the instigator of the salutes, was kept in place.
The judgment follows the arrest of two men in February for unfurling a Nazi flag at a pub near the Sydney Jewish museum, and the jailing in November of a far-right extremist and self-proclaimed "Hitler soldier" in Melbourne.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Perth Now
33 minutes ago
- Perth Now
US judge rejects release of pro-Palestinian activist
A US judge has denied Mahmoud Khalil's request to be released from detention after federal prosecutors changed their rationale for holding the Columbia graduate student as part of its crackdown on pro-Palestinian activists. Newark, New Jersey-based US District Judge Michael Farbiarz on Wednesday said the government could not use foreign policy interests to justify Khalil's detention. On Friday the government said it was also holding Khalil, a legal permanent resident of the United States, on a charge of immigration fraud. In response, Farbiarz said Khalil's lawyers had not successfully argued why it was unlawful for the government to hold him on the charge, which he has denied. The ruling marked the latest turn in Khalil's fight to be freed from a Louisiana detention centre after his March arrest for involvement in the pro-Palestinian protest movement, which President Donald Trump has called anti-Semitic. His detention was condemned by civil rights groups as an attack on protected political speech. Marc Van Der Hout, a lawyer for Khalil, said the government practically never detained people for immigration fraud and the Syrian-born student was being punished for opposing Israel's US-backed war in Gaza following Hamas' October 2023 attack. "Detaining someone on a charge like this is highly unusual and frankly outrageous," Van Der Hout said. "There continues to be no constitutional basis for his detention." Farbiarz had previously suggested legal residents like Khalil were rarely detained on the basis of immigration fraud. On Friday, he said Khalil should seek bail from the immigration lawyer in his case. As lawyers for the Syrian-born activist sought his release, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, another immigrant targeted by the Trump administration, pleaded not guilty to migrant smuggling charges after his wrongful deportation. Khalil, a graduate student at Columbia's School of International and Public Affairs, was arrested by immigration agents in the lobby of his university residence in Manhattan on March 8. His US citizen wife, Dr Noor Abdalla, gave birth to the couple's first child while Khalil was detained in April.

News.com.au
7 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘$5 billion': Meghan Markle's next career move
COMMENT They say there are no new ideas, a problem that equally affects royalty and Hollywood. There have been eight King Henrys, eight Edwards, six Georges, 11 Fast & The Furiouses, and seven missions, impossible. Really, what chance did Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex ever have? The duchess has, by most stretches of the imagination, nearly everything – a princely husband, her very own lemon grove, is on a text name basis with Beyoncé – but originality? Not according to a new report. Just call her the Vin Diesel of vino. Meghan, according to the Daily Mail, is taking the natural step of expanding her As Ever product range from twee afternoon tea territory, 'another flower sprinkled morsel vicar? Oh what, they are getting down your cassock?', to happy hour. Cin cin and all that. The duchess is reportedly getting wine business, starting with a rosé and then moving into the harder stuff. A 'source close to the Sussexes' told the Mail: 'The rosé wine is only the first product in what she and Netflix hope will be a substantial alcohol range, which will include ready-made cocktails and luxury items like flower-infused gin.' If this comes to pass, the duchess will join the roster of Hollywood names who boast their own booze brands, a procession which is already longer than the waiting list to get into Chez Margaux or to source an entry level Labubu. Beating out all the Edwards and Toms are the number of stars who have already gone the same path. Kylie Minogue, Drew Barrymore, Cameron Diaz, Sarah Jessica Parker, Jon Bon Jovi, Lisa Vanderpump, John Legend and at one time, Brad Pitt all have rosés; Ryan Reynolds, Emma Watson, Idris Elba, Margot Robbie, Snoop Dogg and Dr Dre, and Brad Pitt again all make gin. Also, Buckingham Palace sells a home brand. If Meghan ever added tequila and vodka to her offering, she would be joining George Clooney, The Rock, Kendall Jenner, a Jonas brother, Dan Aykroyd, Kate Hudson, and Pitbull. Illustrious company indeed. There are two obvious conclusions to draw here: Prince Harry, The Duke of Sussex's is going to have to learn how to correctly pronounce 'terroir' and Meghan has finally settled on a post-palace career. She's officially going the Full Kardashian. Over the last week, the duchess has made her direction of future career travel clear and seems to be throwing herself unashamedly, holus bolus, full-throttle into the influencing game. A video posted that is guaranteed to make a huge social media (and regular media) din? Sharing an oh-so-casual, wearing-Cartier-to-the-beach snap from what looks like a professional photo-shoot? Tagging a $300 billion corporate behemoth for no immediately clear reason? Let us review. A photo coming the closest yet to revealing her daughter Princess Lilibet's face. A video that no one can or will forget of the duchess, only hours away from giving birth, dropping it low. A shot of her frolicking in the surf with 'So excited for all the good to come! Running into the weekend like ��'. Sweety pie family moments that there is no obvious reason for putting out into the world. She's got the making of a natural-born Jenner yet. Take that twerking video, the only conceivable point of it being shared to do some light internet breaking. Meghan, the same source told the Mail, was 'very pleased' because it was 'a huge hit'. 'She and her team count it [the video] as a 'win', which can only be a boost for sales.' Then came a deluge from Disneyland, with Meghan posting a video of 14 stills and clips edited together of her and Harry and their kids on rides, meeting Elsa from Frozen and of a plate of corn dogs shockingly devoid of anything that might bring joy. Meghan appears to have chosen. Of all the paths and routes and avenues the Duchess of Sussex could have decided to take her life after hanging up (if not ritually burning) her royal-required nude hose, it looks like the 43-year-old has settled on one. Hashtag blessed. Looking back over the last few years, there were points when it looked like the duchess might take herself off on altogether other trajectory. For the first couple of years after the Sussexes' transplanted to the United States, there were regular claims that the duchess was considering getting into politics. It made perfect sense: She was a serious person with serious ideas, access to Oprah Winfrey's cheque book and living in a state given to electing former Hollywood names to office. But at some point came a fork in the road: Continuing resolutions and policy position papers on corn subsidies were out; flower sprinkle-making fortunes and baking biscuits for daytime TV appearances was in. There is a certain inevitability, really. We have truly come full circle. It was in 2014 that the Duchess of Sussex launched her blog (remember those?) The Tig, only closing it when her future seemed to be in drizzly London. Fate and all that and here we are, the LA native having gone back to her entrepreneurial, internet-y roots. Also, money. Isn't it nice? There is way more cash to be made commercialising her exceptional good taste than having to vote on school district gerrymandering or some bill banning public funding for any school that exposes students to the terrifying woke agenda of The Cat In The Ha t. Globally the rosé industry is worth more than $5 billion. For a bit of compare and contrast. In the same 24-hours, there was Harry on Instagram doing his best normie dad bit while on the Prince and Princess of Wales' account, there were photos of Prince William was levelling up his statesman game delivering a major environmental speech in Monte Carlo. So what next for Meghan? A lip kit? A shapewear range? Designer blender spon-con? We can but wait. Ditto when (or even if) the thirsty, aperitivo-needing world will get their hands on a bottle of Meg-é. And in the meantime if anyone is feeling particularly desperate for a titled tipple, there is King Charles' Highgrove Estate's sparkling English rosé, a snip at only $72 a bottle.


The Advertiser
7 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Ye briefly shows up to back Sean 'Diddy' Combs in trial
Ye has made a surprise appearance at Sean "Diddy" Combs' criminal trial, expressing support for his fellow rapper as he defends against sex trafficking charges. Dressed all in white, Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, arrived at the Manhattan federal courthouse in a Maybach car and entered through a public entrance. Ye nodded when asked by a reporter whether he was there to support Combs. He left the courthouse about 35 minutes later. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges, and if convicted could face life in prison. He has been held in a Brooklyn jail since his September arrest. Ye has also faced controversy for alleged anti-Semitic and pro-Nazi remarks, prompting businesses such as Adidas to sever ties. He appeared shortly after a Homeland Security special agent completed testimony about firearms and other items that law enforcement found in a March 2024 raid of Combs' Los Angeles home. Jonathan Perez, a former personal assistant to Combs, testified after the agent. During a trial break, outside the jury's presence, prosecutor Maurene Comey renewed her complaint about Combs' "nodding emphatically" at times about testimony he agreed with, on concern his gestures might influence jurors. Combs allegedly made similar gestures during testimony last week. Brian Steel, one of Combs' lawyers, denied that his client's in-court conduct was improper. US District Judge Arun Subramanian, who oversees the trial, said he would try to watch for inappropriate gestures but that it was normal to react to testimony and "impossible to police" everyone. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 Ye has made a surprise appearance at Sean "Diddy" Combs' criminal trial, expressing support for his fellow rapper as he defends against sex trafficking charges. Dressed all in white, Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, arrived at the Manhattan federal courthouse in a Maybach car and entered through a public entrance. Ye nodded when asked by a reporter whether he was there to support Combs. He left the courthouse about 35 minutes later. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges, and if convicted could face life in prison. He has been held in a Brooklyn jail since his September arrest. Ye has also faced controversy for alleged anti-Semitic and pro-Nazi remarks, prompting businesses such as Adidas to sever ties. He appeared shortly after a Homeland Security special agent completed testimony about firearms and other items that law enforcement found in a March 2024 raid of Combs' Los Angeles home. Jonathan Perez, a former personal assistant to Combs, testified after the agent. During a trial break, outside the jury's presence, prosecutor Maurene Comey renewed her complaint about Combs' "nodding emphatically" at times about testimony he agreed with, on concern his gestures might influence jurors. Combs allegedly made similar gestures during testimony last week. Brian Steel, one of Combs' lawyers, denied that his client's in-court conduct was improper. US District Judge Arun Subramanian, who oversees the trial, said he would try to watch for inappropriate gestures but that it was normal to react to testimony and "impossible to police" everyone. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 Ye has made a surprise appearance at Sean "Diddy" Combs' criminal trial, expressing support for his fellow rapper as he defends against sex trafficking charges. Dressed all in white, Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, arrived at the Manhattan federal courthouse in a Maybach car and entered through a public entrance. Ye nodded when asked by a reporter whether he was there to support Combs. He left the courthouse about 35 minutes later. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges, and if convicted could face life in prison. He has been held in a Brooklyn jail since his September arrest. Ye has also faced controversy for alleged anti-Semitic and pro-Nazi remarks, prompting businesses such as Adidas to sever ties. He appeared shortly after a Homeland Security special agent completed testimony about firearms and other items that law enforcement found in a March 2024 raid of Combs' Los Angeles home. Jonathan Perez, a former personal assistant to Combs, testified after the agent. During a trial break, outside the jury's presence, prosecutor Maurene Comey renewed her complaint about Combs' "nodding emphatically" at times about testimony he agreed with, on concern his gestures might influence jurors. Combs allegedly made similar gestures during testimony last week. Brian Steel, one of Combs' lawyers, denied that his client's in-court conduct was improper. US District Judge Arun Subramanian, who oversees the trial, said he would try to watch for inappropriate gestures but that it was normal to react to testimony and "impossible to police" everyone. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028 Ye has made a surprise appearance at Sean "Diddy" Combs' criminal trial, expressing support for his fellow rapper as he defends against sex trafficking charges. Dressed all in white, Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, arrived at the Manhattan federal courthouse in a Maybach car and entered through a public entrance. Ye nodded when asked by a reporter whether he was there to support Combs. He left the courthouse about 35 minutes later. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges, and if convicted could face life in prison. He has been held in a Brooklyn jail since his September arrest. Ye has also faced controversy for alleged anti-Semitic and pro-Nazi remarks, prompting businesses such as Adidas to sever ties. He appeared shortly after a Homeland Security special agent completed testimony about firearms and other items that law enforcement found in a March 2024 raid of Combs' Los Angeles home. Jonathan Perez, a former personal assistant to Combs, testified after the agent. During a trial break, outside the jury's presence, prosecutor Maurene Comey renewed her complaint about Combs' "nodding emphatically" at times about testimony he agreed with, on concern his gestures might influence jurors. Combs allegedly made similar gestures during testimony last week. Brian Steel, one of Combs' lawyers, denied that his client's in-court conduct was improper. US District Judge Arun Subramanian, who oversees the trial, said he would try to watch for inappropriate gestures but that it was normal to react to testimony and "impossible to police" everyone. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028