logo
Prince Harry cut off from charity he co-founded after governance fallout

Prince Harry cut off from charity he co-founded after governance fallout

Arab Times06-08-2025
LONDON, Aug 6: The Duke of Sussex has lost control of Sentebale, the charity he co-founded in 2006 in memory of his mother, after a governance dispute prompted intervention from the Charity Commission. The regulator criticised all parties involved in the conflict, which it said had played out damagingly in public, and concluded that the current chair, Dr Sophie Chandauka, and the board may remain in place.
The commission launched a compliance investigation in March following allegations of harassment and misogyny made by Dr Chandauka, which triggered the resignation of Prince Harry as patron, along with co-founder Prince Seeiso of Lesotho and several trustees. While the commission found no evidence of widespread or systemic misconduct, it did identify governance failures and issued a regulatory action plan to address them.
The investigation stopped short of escalating to a statutory inquiry, a move that might have forced changes in leadership and created a pathway for Prince Harry's return. Instead, the decision to allow Dr Chandauka to stay signals a definitive break between the Duke and the charity he helped establish to support children living with HIV in Lesotho and Botswana.
A spokesperson for Prince Harry described the charity as a 'deeply personal and transformative mission,' adding that the Prince would now explore new ways to support vulnerable children in the region. A friend of the Duke said he sees no path back to Sentebale following the outcome.
The conflict reportedly began over disagreements regarding fundraising strategy, including allegations that Dr Chandauka authorised spending £500,000 on consultants to attract U.S. donors, a claim she denies. Following her refusal to resign, she pursued legal action against the charity and filed complaints with the Charity Commission, citing bullying, harassment, misogyny, and "misogynoir"—a specific form of bias against Black women.
Although the watchdog did not find evidence supporting those claims, it acknowledged that several individuals involved felt mistreated and said the situation had a personal impact. The Commission criticised all parties for failing to resolve their disputes internally and for allowing the charity's reputation to suffer in the public eye.
The report also noted that governance structures within the organisation were unclear and allowed misunderstandings to escalate. Delegation of authority to the chair was described as 'confusing, convoluted and poorly governed.' Additionally, the trustees at the time were found to lack proper internal policies, including a formal complaints procedure.
The commission further criticised public comments made during television interviews and in the media, stating they were not conducted in a manner that served Sentebale's best interests.
In one such interview, Dr Chandauka referenced a widely shared incident during a charity polo match in Miami, where the Duchess of Sussex appeared to ask her to change positions during the prize-giving ceremony. The moment drew media scrutiny and contributed to rising tensions. Dr Chandauka later said she declined a request from the Duke to issue a statement supporting the Duchess, arguing that the charity should not be seen as an extension of the Sussexes.
She also claimed that fundraising efforts became increasingly difficult amid growing tensions between the Sussexes and the Royal Family, adding that she felt targeted by what she called the 'Sussex machine.'
The commission found no evidence of overreach by Prince Harry in his role as patron, but it did fault the charity's lack of clarity regarding his responsibilities and the overall delegation of roles.
Following its investigation, the regulator issued a regulatory action plan to the current board, which includes newly appointed trustees whom it deemed 'validly appointed.' Sentebale was also advised to clarify the patron role in writing and improve its internal processes to ensure disputes are managed effectively.
David Holdsworth, Chief Executive of the Charity Commission, said the situation represented a failure of governance that ultimately harmed the charity's reputation and its ability to serve beneficiaries. 'This case highlights what can happen when there are gaps in governance and policies critical to charities' ability to deliver for their cause,' he said.
Holdsworth emphasised that passion for a cause can become counterproductive when not supported by strong governance, urging all involved to refocus on the needs of the children the charity was created to support.
Sentebale's latest financial report for the year ending August 31, 2023, shows an income of £3.4 million against expenditures of £3.78 million. Prince Harry contributed £1.2 million to the charity from the proceeds of his memoir, Spare, published in 2023.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prince Harry cut off from charity he co-founded after governance fallout
Prince Harry cut off from charity he co-founded after governance fallout

Arab Times

time06-08-2025

  • Arab Times

Prince Harry cut off from charity he co-founded after governance fallout

LONDON, Aug 6: The Duke of Sussex has lost control of Sentebale, the charity he co-founded in 2006 in memory of his mother, after a governance dispute prompted intervention from the Charity Commission. The regulator criticised all parties involved in the conflict, which it said had played out damagingly in public, and concluded that the current chair, Dr Sophie Chandauka, and the board may remain in place. The commission launched a compliance investigation in March following allegations of harassment and misogyny made by Dr Chandauka, which triggered the resignation of Prince Harry as patron, along with co-founder Prince Seeiso of Lesotho and several trustees. While the commission found no evidence of widespread or systemic misconduct, it did identify governance failures and issued a regulatory action plan to address them. The investigation stopped short of escalating to a statutory inquiry, a move that might have forced changes in leadership and created a pathway for Prince Harry's return. Instead, the decision to allow Dr Chandauka to stay signals a definitive break between the Duke and the charity he helped establish to support children living with HIV in Lesotho and Botswana. A spokesperson for Prince Harry described the charity as a 'deeply personal and transformative mission,' adding that the Prince would now explore new ways to support vulnerable children in the region. A friend of the Duke said he sees no path back to Sentebale following the outcome. The conflict reportedly began over disagreements regarding fundraising strategy, including allegations that Dr Chandauka authorised spending £500,000 on consultants to attract U.S. donors, a claim she denies. Following her refusal to resign, she pursued legal action against the charity and filed complaints with the Charity Commission, citing bullying, harassment, misogyny, and "misogynoir"—a specific form of bias against Black women. Although the watchdog did not find evidence supporting those claims, it acknowledged that several individuals involved felt mistreated and said the situation had a personal impact. The Commission criticised all parties for failing to resolve their disputes internally and for allowing the charity's reputation to suffer in the public eye. The report also noted that governance structures within the organisation were unclear and allowed misunderstandings to escalate. Delegation of authority to the chair was described as 'confusing, convoluted and poorly governed.' Additionally, the trustees at the time were found to lack proper internal policies, including a formal complaints procedure. The commission further criticised public comments made during television interviews and in the media, stating they were not conducted in a manner that served Sentebale's best interests. In one such interview, Dr Chandauka referenced a widely shared incident during a charity polo match in Miami, where the Duchess of Sussex appeared to ask her to change positions during the prize-giving ceremony. The moment drew media scrutiny and contributed to rising tensions. Dr Chandauka later said she declined a request from the Duke to issue a statement supporting the Duchess, arguing that the charity should not be seen as an extension of the Sussexes. She also claimed that fundraising efforts became increasingly difficult amid growing tensions between the Sussexes and the Royal Family, adding that she felt targeted by what she called the 'Sussex machine.' The commission found no evidence of overreach by Prince Harry in his role as patron, but it did fault the charity's lack of clarity regarding his responsibilities and the overall delegation of roles. Following its investigation, the regulator issued a regulatory action plan to the current board, which includes newly appointed trustees whom it deemed 'validly appointed.' Sentebale was also advised to clarify the patron role in writing and improve its internal processes to ensure disputes are managed effectively. David Holdsworth, Chief Executive of the Charity Commission, said the situation represented a failure of governance that ultimately harmed the charity's reputation and its ability to serve beneficiaries. 'This case highlights what can happen when there are gaps in governance and policies critical to charities' ability to deliver for their cause,' he said. Holdsworth emphasised that passion for a cause can become counterproductive when not supported by strong governance, urging all involved to refocus on the needs of the children the charity was created to support. Sentebale's latest financial report for the year ending August 31, 2023, shows an income of £3.4 million against expenditures of £3.78 million. Prince Harry contributed £1.2 million to the charity from the proceeds of his memoir, Spare, published in 2023.

New study finds 60% of liver cancer cases are preventable
New study finds 60% of liver cancer cases are preventable

Arab Times

time29-07-2025

  • Arab Times

New study finds 60% of liver cancer cases are preventable

LONDON, July 29: Liver cancer is poised to become a significantly larger global health challenge, particularly affecting younger adults, with cases expected to double by 2050, experts warn. Previously viewed mainly as a disease impacting older individuals with hepatitis infections or alcohol dependency, liver cancer is increasingly being diagnosed in people in their 30s and 40s. A major new analysis published in The Lancet attributes this shift to the rise in obesity and related liver conditions such as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). The report predicts new liver cancer cases worldwide will increase from 870,000 in 2022 to 1.52 million by 2050, with annual deaths rising from 760,000 to 1.37 million during the same period. One of the fastest-growing causes is metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), a severe form of fatty liver disease linked to obesity and metabolic dysfunction. The proportion of liver cancers connected to MASH is expected to more than double — from 5% in 2022 to 11% in 2050. Cases caused by the most common causes of liver cancer — the hepatitis B and C viruses—are predicted to decline. However, cases related to obesity and alcohol consumption are expected to increase. By 2050, over a fifth of liver cancer cases will be attributed to alcohol, while one in ten will be caused by severe MASLD, formerly known as fatty liver disease. This condition occurs when fat accumulates in the liver and is closely associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes. Researchers from Hong Kong emphasized that 60% of liver cancer cases are preventable. Their findings underscore the urgent need for preventative measures against liver cancer, also called hepatocellular carcinoma. The primary treatment for MASLD involves maintaining a balanced diet, engaging in physical activity, and potentially losing weight. "Liver cancer is a growing health issue worldwide," said Professor Jian Zhou, chairman of the Commission from Fudan University in China. "It is one of the most challenging cancers to treat, with five-year survival rates ranging from about 5% to 30%. Without urgent action, we risk nearly doubling the number of cases and deaths over the next 25 years." Professor Stephen Chan, lead author of the study from the Chinese University of Hong Kong, added: "There is a significant opportunity for countries to target these risk factors, prevent liver cancer cases, and save lives." Pamela Healy, chief executive of the British Liver Trust, commented on the study: "Liver cancer is the fastest-rising cause of cancer death in the UK, with only 13% of people diagnosed surviving for five years or more. The main risk factors are pre-existing liver cirrhosis or viral hepatitis, and this analysis highlights that MASLD, also known as fatty liver disease, is linked to an increasing number of cases." Liver cirrhosis is a progressive condition that can lead to liver failure if untreated, characterized by permanent scarring due to long-term damage. "Along with improving early detection through monitoring those with cirrhosis, it is vital to address the underlying causes and prioritize public health efforts," Healy said. "By helping people maintain a healthy weight, reduce alcohol intake, and get tested and treated for hepatitis, many liver cancer cases can be prevented." In the UK, there is growing urgency to tackle the obesity crisis to ease pressure on the National Health Service. Recent data shows nearly two-thirds of adults in England are overweight, with an additional 260,000 people joining this group last year. Meanwhile, more than a quarter (26.5%)—about 14 million people—are classified as obese. Last month, GPs were authorized to prescribe weight loss injections, known as GLP-1s, for the first time to address the crisis. Approximately 1.5 million people are currently using these injections through the NHS or private clinics, with millions more eligible. However, pharmacists have warned that the rising demand may become unsustainable.

PAAET requires medical exam for health majors
PAAET requires medical exam for health majors

Arab Times

time15-07-2025

  • Arab Times

PAAET requires medical exam for health majors

KUWAIT CITY, July 15: Acting Dean of Admissions and Registration at the Public Authority for Applied Education and Training (PAAET) Dr. Fawzi Al-Doukhi announced the adoption of new health requirements for admission to certain medical and health specializations for the 2025/2026 academic year. These new requirements were laid down after the identification of infectious disease cases that prevented graduates from being appointed to health agencies despite meeting the academic requirements. Al-Doukhi revealed that students accepted into the aforementioned specializations must submit a recent medical examination certificate, proving they are free of HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis (TB), and hepatitis B and C. He indicated that the new procedures apply to all programs in the College of Nursing, in addition to several courses in the College of Health Sciences, as follows: Respiratory Therapist, Anesthesia Technician, Medical Laboratory Technology, and Emergency Medical Technician. He confirmed that the basic admissions plan for the 2025/2026 academic year started as scheduled, and that applications this year will be limited to Kuwaiti students only, as per the directive of the Higher Admissions Committee. He disclosed that the application period will be from Aug 8-18, with a comprehensive media and advisory campaign in the admissions halls, official social media platforms and Kuwait TV. He added that a pavilion will be established at the Avenues Mall from Aug 2-7 to respond to the queries of students and parents. He said the new specializations being offered for the first time include Fire Engineering Technology in cooperation with the Kuwait Fire Force (KFF). He added that the program is for four years and the students will graduate directly as firefighting officers. Requirements for this specialization: Applicants must be male (only this year) A minimum GPA of 85 percent Must hold a recent certificate (issued within the last three years) Pass the interview and medical examination Meet the requirements of KFF Other majors offered last year include: Respiratory Therapist at the College of Health Sciences Energy Efficiency at the College of Technological Studies Applied Statistics, Marketing, Logistics Management, and Human Resources Management at the College of Business Studies Al-Doukhi pointed out that the increasing demand for medical majors reflects a growing awareness among students of the importance of these specializations and the labor market's need for them. He called on all Kuwaiti students to follow the authority's official platforms and benefit from the available support and guidance, emphasizing the authority's commitment to facilitating admission and achieving fairness in educational and employment opportunities. He revealed that this year's admissions plan includes several categories of Kuwaitis as follows: 1. New students (high school graduates who are not enrolled or employed) 2. Students on study leave from accredited official bodies 3. Employees with a 'no conflict' certificate (limited to institutes) 4. Employees wishing to combine work and study (providing a certificate proving the combination) Basic Admission Requirements: The student must not be enrolled in another university or academic institution. The high school diploma must be accredited or officially certified and equivalent. A proper academic sequence for the secondary stage must be present. For holders of Saudi certificates: A test of academic ability and achievement is required; otherwise, the certificate will not be valid. Applications are submitted via: - The authority's official website - The Sahel government application Some categories(students on study leave, combining work and study, and no conflict) are required to appear in person at the admissions halls. After the admission results are announced, the students will receive a message confirming their acceptance into a specific major and will be asked to approve or reject their acceptance electronically. The deadline for approval is Sept 6, 2025; after which admission will be automatically revoked for any student who has not approved the admission. Al-Doukhi pointed out the difference between the application percentage and the acceptance percentage, explaining that the application percentage is the minimum percentage allowed for admission, while the acceptance percentage is the lowest percentage accepted after the competition. In health specializations

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store