
The US food bank keeping Gullah Geechee farming traditions alive: ‘Our local food is like no other'
The group provides food to seniors or others who, with the rising costs of living, are struggling to pay for food and groceries. The organization also works to feed children, either through schools, families or within communities.
'We meet the needs or try to support the provision of equitable access to food through a variety of different means,' said Nick Osborne, the president and CEO of the LCFB. But we're also looking at filling those gaps where there may be food deserts through other forms of access to food, whether that be through mobile distributions or other forms of partnerships as well.'
The Lowcountry is one of the historic homes of the Gullah Geechee people, descendants of Africans who were enslaved in the remote, coastal Sea Islands in the US. That remoteness allowed the Gullah Geechee to retain many culturally African elements and the creation of a new culture and language. Because of climate change and gentrification, Gullah Geechee are fighting to retain their lands – lands on which their families have lived for hundreds of years. Gullah food producers, including farmers, are essential partners for the LCFB.
'The model of food banking has really evolved in the past couple of decades,' said Margaret Burn, the vice-president of strategic initiatives at LCFB. 'It's gone from a place of really just providing emergency food assistance or charitable food assistance to a multi-pronged approach, recognizing that providing food assistance isn't going to solve food insecurity.'
The Lowcountry's food system is based on and built off of Gullah Geechee foodways. Much of the region's tourism industry – Charleston alone drew nearly 8 million visitors last year – is likewise based off of those foodways. From the early 1600s until the abolition of slavery, Gullah Geechee ancestors produced crops that were also prevalent in west Africa: sweet potatoes, okra, peas and other foods, according to Dr Emory Shaw Campbell, a Gullah Geechee community leader and educator. Today, many of those same foods and crops make up traditionally southern diets.
'The foodways that draw people here are the foodways that the Gullah people brought with them across the water,' Burn said. 'So it is important to preserve that for the economy, but also for the culture and the character of our communities.'
Much has been written about the overdevelopment and gentrification of Gullah Geechee lands, systemic exploitation that has pushed Gullah Geechee people from their homes and islands. But the LCFB and the Gullah farmers with whom the organization partners are working to ensure that people have access to their traditional foods, foods which are typically healthier and more nutritious.
'In order for us to keep the character of our community, we need to keep those farmers on that land and we need to keep that land in the agricultural section for economic reasons and environmental reasons and cultural preservation,' Burn said. 'It's a privilege for the food bank to be able to be part of preserving those foodways.'
The LCFB sources culturally relevant foods for people who use their services, people who Burn calls 'neighbors', providing them with familiar foods that their elders ate. 'When you're in a situation that you need to seek food assistance, there's usually a lot going on. There's a lot of pressure,' she said. 'Having something familiar and comforting is important. That's what local food really does for folks.'
In 2005, the LCFB launched the Growing Food Locally program, which aims to help grow farmers' businesses while making the local food system more resilient. Since then, they have worked with Jackie Frazier, of Barefoot Farms on St Helena Island, and his partner to help develop relationships with other farmers. Frazier has helped educate other farmers on information from the state department of agriculture and US Department of Agriculture.
They have also partnered with groups like the Coastal Conservation League to help grow farmers' business. In 2020, at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, they began thinking about sustainable food distribution in a different way – relying on food from thousands of miles away simply wasn't practical.
In partnership with the Gullah Farmers Cooperative Association, the LCFB is able to offer culturally relevant Gullah Geechee foods grown by Gullah Geechee farmers, such as okra, tomatoes, squash, corn, yams and rice.
Vernita Dore, general manager of the Gullah Farmers Cooperative, said that the partnership was also useful for helping the farmers stay in business and pass farming on to the next generation. Offering culturally relevant foods through the LCFB helps facilitate both passing on generational knowledge and culturally relevant foods.
'We all care about our children, and we want to make sure that they have good, healthy food choices, and we work together to ensure that happens,' she said. 'These are the types of food that we grew up on, like the dark green vegetables, greens with cabbage and our nice tomatoes and eggplant. These are really healthy food choices.
'Part of the history of the Gullah Farmers Cooperative is that we have some strong, healthy people in our communities that grew up on our local vegetables and produce that we were able to grow in the field. We feel like our children and all children deserve that same type of quality food that we enjoyed as children.'
Established in 2010 by a group of small farmers with the goal of ensuring that the Gullah farming tradition continues, the Gullah Farmers Cooperative wanted to figure out a way to pay farmers well for the produce they grow. The local school district was also looking for a way to provide more nutritious, locally grown food to children. The twofold mission still motivates the cooperative, which has grown to about 22 farmers, spread out across the Lowcountry, today. When they are fulfilling larger orders, sometimes the cooperative will reach out to farmers in the middle of the state, who are within a 400-mile radius.
'They're really proud, and we're proud, too,' Dore said. 'We're really grateful for the opportunity to have started this to honor them. In a lot of ways because our farmers, I think, are the bedrock of American society – what they do, what they bring to the table and what they bring to communities, the nation: good, homegrown nutritious food that you can track. We can track where our food comes from. From every farmer, we can tell you what and exactly where that food comes from. We're very proud of that, and they're very proud of that. Our local food is like no other. It's absolutely delicious.'
In working with the LCFB, the Gullah Farmers Cooperative is helping to alleviate food insecurity while providing access to high-quality foods.
'We just want to uplift the communities by providing nutritious, farm-fresh produce, because that indeed, in turn, promotes healthier lifestyles for everyone,' Dore said. 'That's our goal here at the Gullah Farmers Cooperative. Along with that, to honor our farmers, the legacy of farming, and to hopefully pay them a decent pay for the work and the toil that they do to bring us this food because there's none like it.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
a few seconds ago
- Reuters
Lesotho textiles to struggle even with lower 15% Trump tariff, minister says
JOHANNESBURG, Aug 1 (Reuters) - Lesotho's modified tariff rate of 15% may still not be enough to save its textiles industry, its trade minister said on Friday, a day after U.S. President Donald Trump lowered it from a devastating 50% rate he had threatened to implement earlier. In an executive order, Trump modified reciprocal tariff rates for dozens of countries, including Lesotho, which had been under threat of a 50% rate since April, the highest of any U.S. trading partner. "It's a mixed feeling," Lesotho Trade Minister Mokhethi Shelile told Reuters by telephone. "The sad part is that it is still not good enough ... this will lead to job losses." Lesotho's textiles sector is its leading export industry, and it was heavily dependent upon the Africa Growth and Opportunities Act (AGOA), a U.S. trade initiative that offers qualifying African nations duty-free access to the U.S. market. On the back of that preferential tariff, textiles were the tiny mountain kingdom's biggest private employer, with some 40,000 jobs and accounted for roughly 90% of manufacturing exports, according to Oxford Economics. Under the tariff threat, many U.S. importers canceled orders of Lesotho-produced textiles, leading to mass layoffs. Shelile indicated that the new tariff would be unlikely to reverse the carnage. "Fifteen percent for the textile industry is as good as 50%, because there's still no chance that our textiles will compete with Kenya or Eswatini, who have 10%," he said. "Those are our direct competition". The Trump administration has defended its tariffs, stating that Lesotho charged 99% tariffs on U.S. goods. Lesotho officials say they have no idea how the White House arrived at that figure. After firing off a salvo of tariffs in April, the administration paused implementation to give countries time to negotiate. Textiles factories have in recent months indicated they were searching for new markets. Shelile said his government would continue to engage with U.S. counterparts in hope of having the rate lowered.


Spectator
6 hours ago
- Spectator
Trump hasn't won the trade war
Maybe Trump doesn't always chicken out after all. Rapid trade deals with the UK, Japan, the EU and others in recent weeks may have given the impression that the trade war was essentially over. Today, though, comes Trump's Ardennes offensive, with immediate tariffs of 35 per cent announced for Canada. Other countries have been given a week to prepare for steep increases: India will be subject to 25 per cent tariffs, Taiwan 20 per cent and Switzerland – far from neutral in this particular conflict – 39 per cent. According to Trump, Canada has been singled out for harsh treatment because it has failed to cooperate on the flow of fentanyl across the border. Trump also hinted that he was punishing Canada for recognising Palestine, but then he has just done a trade deal with the EU in spite of France taking the same action, and didn't make any trade threats to Britain in spite of Keir Starmer saying this week that the UK will recognise Palestine in September if Israel does not meet certain conditions. It seems rather more likely that Trump is saying: look, other countries have yielded and agreed to one-sided trade deals with the US – I'm going to carry on beating you about the head until you agree to do the same. But will they? So far, the countries which have agreed to Trump's rather rough and ready trade deals have acted as if the benefits of a trading relationship with the US are one-way – they have more to lose than the US if a deal cannot be struck. But of course that is not always true. Taiwan, for example, produces over 90 per cent of the world's high-end microchips, which are implanted in just about every device manufactured in the US. What benefit does it bring America if those chips are in future taxed at 20 per cent? There is a strange dislocation in attitudes towards Trump's tariffs. Those who insist he has a very clever strategy and is winning tend also to be people who, in any other context, are in favour of low taxes. But a tariff is just a tax like any other – it adds costs to business and so suppresses economic activity. If tariffs are set at modest levels, it may be worth putting up with tariffs' depressing effect in return for the revenue they raise. Raise them above a certain level, however, and revenue will start to decline as business activity is discouraged – the classic Laffer effect. US growth may have proved more resilient than many feared it would be after Liberation Day, but it is certain that tariffs on raw materials and components are a negative influence on US manufacturing industry. A country does not 'win' by taxing its imports more than other countries tax its exports – if it did, the US would be one of the poorest countries in the world while many African countries would be startlingly rich. The US has done brilliantly well out of a regime of low import tariffs – as has Singapore, one of the few countries which, prior to Liberation Day, imposed even lower tariffs than did the US. But even if you do think that imposing higher tariffs than your trading partners amounts to 'victory', it is far from clear that Trump will emerge the eventual winner. Some countries may have yielded to him, but others are clearly holding out, and may well make the calculation that the US has more to lose from a trade war than they do. This war has a long way to run yet.

Rhyl Journal
8 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Trump signs order imposing new tariffs on a number of trading partners
The move is the next step in his trade agenda that will test the global economy and sturdiness of American alliances built up over decades. The order was issued shortly after 7pm on Thursday. It came after a flurry of tariff-related activity in the last several days, as the White House announced agreements with various nations and blocs ahead of the president's self-imposed Friday deadline. The tariffs are being implemented at a later date in order for the rates schedule to be harmonised, according to a senior administration official who spoke to reporters on a call on the condition of anonymity. After initially threatening the African nation of Lesotho with a 50% tariff, the country's goods will now be taxed at 15%. Taiwan will have tariffs set at 20%, Pakistan at 19% and Israel, Iceland, Norway, Fiji, Ghana, Guyana and Ecuador among the countries with imported goods taxed at 15%. Switzerland would be tariffed at 39%. Mr Trump had announced a 50% tariff on goods from Brazil, but the order was only 10% as the other 40% were part of a separate measure approved on Wednesday. The order capped off a hectic Thursday as nations sought to continue negotiating with Mr Trump. It set the rates for 68 countries and the 27-member European Union, with a baseline 10% rate to be charged on countries not listed in the order. The senior administration official said the rates were based on trade imbalance with the US and regional economic profiles. On Thursday morning, Mr Trump engaged in a phone conversation with Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum on trade. As a result of the conversation, the US president said he would enter into a 90-day negotiating period with Mexico, one of the nation's largest trading partners. The current 25% tariff rates are staying in place, down from the 30% he had threatened earlier. 'We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow and we got 90 days to build a long-term agreement through dialogue,' Ms Sheinbaum wrote on X after a call with Mr Trump that he referred to as 'very successful' in terms of the leaders getting to know each other better. The unknowns created a sense of drama that has defined Mr Trump's rollout of tariffs over several months. However, the one consistency is his desire to levy the import taxes that most economists say will ultimately be borne to some degree by US consumers and businesses. 'We have made a few deals today that are excellent deals for the country,' Mr Trump told reporters on Thursday afternoon, without detailing the terms of those agreements or the nations involved. The senior administration official declined to reveal the nations that have new deals during the call with reporters. Mr Trump said that Canadian prime minister Mark Carney had called ahead of 35% tariffs being imposed on many of his nation's goods, but 'we haven't spoken to Canada today'. Mr Trump separately on Thursday amended a previous order to raise the fentanyl-related tariff on Canada from 25% to 35%. My statement on Canada-U.S. trade: — Mark Carney (@MarkJCarney) August 1, 2025 Mr Trump had imposed the Friday deadline after his previous 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April resulted in a stock market panic. His unusually high tariff rates, unveiled in April, led to recession fears — prompting Mr Trump to impose a 90-day negotiating period. When he was unable to create enough trade deals with other countries, he extended the timeline and sent out letters to world leaders that simply listed rates, prompting a slew of hasty deals. Mr Trump reached a deal with South Korea on Wednesday, and earlier with the European Union, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines. His commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said on Fox News Channel's Hannity that there were agreements with Cambodia and Thailand after they had agreed to a ceasefire to their border conflict. Going into Thursday, wealthy Switzerland and Norway were still uncertain about their tariff rates. EU officials were waiting to complete a crucial document outlining how the framework to tax imported cars and other goods from the 27-member state bloc would operate. Mr Trump had announced a deal on Sunday while he was in Scotland. Mr Trump said as part of the agreement with Mexico that goods imported into the US would continue to face a 25% tariff that he has ostensibly linked to fentanyl trafficking. He said cars would face a 25% tariff, while copper, aluminium and steel would be taxed at 50% during the negotiating period.