logo
Filipino green card holder's detention in US sparks concerns about ‘scapegoating of migrants'

Filipino green card holder's detention in US sparks concerns about ‘scapegoating of migrants'

United States immigration officers have detained and are mulling over the deportation of a Filipino green card holder over an old drug charge for which he was already sentenced, amid a
worrying trend of American immigrants
targeted for the slightest infractions.
Sonny Lasquite was returning home from a holiday in the Bahamas on July 28 when US Customs and Border Protection detained him at Charlotte Douglas International Airport in North Carolina. He is now under the custody of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and is reportedly being held at an ICE detention centre in Georgia.
Lasquite held prior criminal charges in 2012 for distributing controlled substances, with court records reviewed by Newsweek indicating that the Filipino national had 'intentionally and knowingly' possessed with the intent to distribute Schedule IV narcotics, including diazepam, alprazolam, zolpidem and carisoprodol.
However, the court eventually sentenced Lasquite to time served after he cooperated with authorities in identifying conspirators in the distribution and promptly taking responsibility for his actions.
Yet it was the same conviction that had raised flags in the federal system and led to Lasquite's present fate.
ICE vehicles are parked at the US Capitol on Thursday. via AFP
A GoFundMe page set up by a friend of Lasquite's family to help pay for his legal fees and other urgent needs described him as a lawful permanent resident of the US since 2022, as well as a 'hardworking man, the sole breadwinner for his family, and a beloved friend and community member'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Filipino green card holder's detention in US sparks concerns about ‘scapegoating of migrants'
Filipino green card holder's detention in US sparks concerns about ‘scapegoating of migrants'

South China Morning Post

time2 days ago

  • South China Morning Post

Filipino green card holder's detention in US sparks concerns about ‘scapegoating of migrants'

United States immigration officers have detained and are mulling over the deportation of a Filipino green card holder over an old drug charge for which he was already sentenced, amid a worrying trend of American immigrants targeted for the slightest infractions. Sonny Lasquite was returning home from a holiday in the Bahamas on July 28 when US Customs and Border Protection detained him at Charlotte Douglas International Airport in North Carolina. He is now under the custody of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and is reportedly being held at an ICE detention centre in Georgia. Lasquite held prior criminal charges in 2012 for distributing controlled substances, with court records reviewed by Newsweek indicating that the Filipino national had 'intentionally and knowingly' possessed with the intent to distribute Schedule IV narcotics, including diazepam, alprazolam, zolpidem and carisoprodol. However, the court eventually sentenced Lasquite to time served after he cooperated with authorities in identifying conspirators in the distribution and promptly taking responsibility for his actions. Yet it was the same conviction that had raised flags in the federal system and led to Lasquite's present fate. ICE vehicles are parked at the US Capitol on Thursday. via AFP A GoFundMe page set up by a friend of Lasquite's family to help pay for his legal fees and other urgent needs described him as a lawful permanent resident of the US since 2022, as well as a 'hardworking man, the sole breadwinner for his family, and a beloved friend and community member'.

Why smear Hong Kong's prosecution of secession as political persecution?
Why smear Hong Kong's prosecution of secession as political persecution?

South China Morning Post

time4 days ago

  • South China Morning Post

Why smear Hong Kong's prosecution of secession as political persecution?

The Hong Kong government recently declared bounties against a number of former residents now in the United Kingdom and the United States for alleged offences against the Hong Kong national security law . This prompted a strong reaction from the UK government, which considered the move to be an example of ' transnational repression '. This week, The Guardian published an interview with Chloe Cheung Hei-ching , who faces a warrant for her arrest that was issued last year. Its article portrayed her as someone fleeing political persecution for daring to criticise the Hong Kong government and advocate for democratic reform. This framing is misleading. Cheung is being charged with incitement to secession and foreign collusion. Contrary to common misconceptions, the national security law does not criminalise political advocacy or criticism of the authorities. The Hong Kong Basic Law stipulates in Articles 45 and 68 that universal suffrage is a political ideal for the entire city. Moreover, according to the 2024 Safeguarding National Security Ordinance, defendants can argue against the statutory offence of sedition – inherited from British colonial times – in court if they were giving 'an opinion on the system or constitutional order … with a view to improving the system or constitutional order'. However, Hong Kong's national security laws do in fact criminalise acts of secession. According to Article 52 of the Chinese constitution, citizens have the obligation to safeguard national unity. Article 1 of the Basic Law stipulates that Hong Kong is an 'inalienable part of the People's Republic of China'. What is more, those in the UK, in particular, should not lose sight of Article 1 of the Sino-British Joint Declaration , which states that it is the 'common aspiration of the entire Chinese people' that China should resume sovereignty over Hong Kong.

Trial starts over Trump's deployment of National Guard to Los Angeles during protests
Trial starts over Trump's deployment of National Guard to Los Angeles during protests

South China Morning Post

time6 days ago

  • South China Morning Post

Trial starts over Trump's deployment of National Guard to Los Angeles during protests

A deputy commanding general testified on Monday that military forces called in to help with immigration raids in Los Angeles were allowed to take some police actions despite a federal law that prohibits the president from using the military as a domestic police force. Advertisement Major General Scott Sherman said military tapped to help with domestic operations can protect federal property and federal agents in their mission of carrying out federal operations. He said they could take certain police actions, such as setting up a security perimeter outside federal facilities, if a commander on the ground felt unsafe. Sherman testified at the start of a three-day trial over whether US President Donald Trump's administration violated the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act when it deployed National Guard soldiers and US Marines to Los Angeles following June protests over immigration raids. On Monday, Trump said he was deploying the National Guard across Washington and taking over the city's police department in the hopes of reducing crime, even as the mayor has noted that crime is falling in the nation's capital. Advertisement The trial in San Francisco could set a precedent for how Trump can deploy the guard in the future in California or other states.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store