logo
Group shows confidence in hospital plan

Group shows confidence in hospital plan

A privately owned public hospital for the Central Otago-Queenstown Lakes area is not quite a done deal — but one might be forgiven for thinking so after a show of confidence from southern leaders.
The Otago Central Lakes Health Services Project steering group issued a statement yesterday saying Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora (HNZ) was "prioritising" work on a clinical services plan for the region that would "clear the way" for a new hospital in the region.
"It could be New Zealand's first large privately owned and publicly operated hospital," the statement said.
HNZ did not respond to questions yesterday.
However, the steering group — comprising Queenstown Lakes District Mayor Glyn Lewers, Waitaki MP Miles Anderson, Act New Zealand MP Todd Stephenson, of Queenstown, Southland MP Joseph Mooney and Central Otago District Mayor Tamah Alley — said it had a "positive meeting" with Health Minister Simeon Brown recently.
Mr Mooney said the public-private partnership the steering group was pursuing was not yet a done deal — nor would a new hospital, in Queenstown, affect the status of the new Dunedin hospital as the region's tertiary hospital.
"I guess there are no done deals — a lot of work has been done to get to this point and a lot more needs to be done," the National Party MP said.
"It is arguably the farthest the region has got for a decade to getting a significant change to health services.
"It will improve Central Lakes health, and it is also going to improve health services across the entire region because of the pressure of this fast-growing population.
"Visitor numbers to Central Otago push a lot of people down to those base hospitals."
He said HNZ had agreed to use "more accurate" council-derived population projections for its planning, instead of Stats NZ figures.
Mr Mooney said the government statistics were off and "it would be silly" to model from inaccurate numbers.
Stats NZ suggested the population was growing at 1.5% a year, when council statistics were closer to 6%, he said.
Lakes District Hospital in Queenstown was built in 1988 to cater for 4500 people.
The current combined resident-only Queenstown Lakes and Central Otago districts' population is 78,400.
In 2024, Queenstown had a peak day population, including visitors, of 168,353.
Peak day population is projected to be 303,628 by 2054.
The update on the health project work came in the wake of a regional deal announcement for the area. At the start of the month, the Queenstown Lakes and Central Otago district councils, along with the Otago Regional Council, won the right to negotiate a new 10-year partnership with central government designed to progress shared priorities.
Yesterday's statement noted the regional deal proposal included health as a cornerstone.
It said a hospital in Queenstown — "built and financed by a private investor from which public services can be delivered by HNZ" — was in the planning stage.
It also touted private surgical hospitals for both Queenstown and Wanaka.
Mr Lewers said investing in health in the area was a long time coming.
"Until recently, despite our growth, Health NZ had no plans for expansion in our area.
"We're finally on their radar."
The hospital would work alongside current or planned private providers in Alexandra, Clyde, Cromwell, Wānaka and Queenstown, which, Mr Mooney said, would be co-ordinated.
"We would start mapping and talking to what services already exist across all those centres."
The statement from the steering group said decades of under-investment in health services and infrastructure in the Queenstown Lakes and Central Otago districts had led to problems when seeking speciality and emergency healthcare.
Many patients in Queenstown Lakes and Central Otago had to make a six-hour return drive for their healthcare.
Last year, there were 300 helicopter transfers from Lakes District Hospital costing $6.3 million, it said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Group shows confidence in hospital plan
Group shows confidence in hospital plan

Otago Daily Times

time8 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Group shows confidence in hospital plan

A privately owned public hospital for the Central Otago-Queenstown Lakes area is not quite a done deal — but one might be forgiven for thinking so after a show of confidence from southern leaders. The Otago Central Lakes Health Services Project steering group issued a statement yesterday saying Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora (HNZ) was "prioritising" work on a clinical services plan for the region that would "clear the way" for a new hospital in the region. "It could be New Zealand's first large privately owned and publicly operated hospital," the statement said. HNZ did not respond to questions yesterday. However, the steering group — comprising Queenstown Lakes District Mayor Glyn Lewers, Waitaki MP Miles Anderson, Act New Zealand MP Todd Stephenson, of Queenstown, Southland MP Joseph Mooney and Central Otago District Mayor Tamah Alley — said it had a "positive meeting" with Health Minister Simeon Brown recently. Mr Mooney said the public-private partnership the steering group was pursuing was not yet a done deal — nor would a new hospital, in Queenstown, affect the status of the new Dunedin hospital as the region's tertiary hospital. "I guess there are no done deals — a lot of work has been done to get to this point and a lot more needs to be done," the National Party MP said. "It is arguably the farthest the region has got for a decade to getting a significant change to health services. "It will improve Central Lakes health, and it is also going to improve health services across the entire region because of the pressure of this fast-growing population. "Visitor numbers to Central Otago push a lot of people down to those base hospitals." He said HNZ had agreed to use "more accurate" council-derived population projections for its planning, instead of Stats NZ figures. Mr Mooney said the government statistics were off and "it would be silly" to model from inaccurate numbers. Stats NZ suggested the population was growing at 1.5% a year, when council statistics were closer to 6%, he said. Lakes District Hospital in Queenstown was built in 1988 to cater for 4500 people. The current combined resident-only Queenstown Lakes and Central Otago districts' population is 78,400. In 2024, Queenstown had a peak day population, including visitors, of 168,353. Peak day population is projected to be 303,628 by 2054. The update on the health project work came in the wake of a regional deal announcement for the area. At the start of the month, the Queenstown Lakes and Central Otago district councils, along with the Otago Regional Council, won the right to negotiate a new 10-year partnership with central government designed to progress shared priorities. Yesterday's statement noted the regional deal proposal included health as a cornerstone. It said a hospital in Queenstown — "built and financed by a private investor from which public services can be delivered by HNZ" — was in the planning stage. It also touted private surgical hospitals for both Queenstown and Wanaka. Mr Lewers said investing in health in the area was a long time coming. "Until recently, despite our growth, Health NZ had no plans for expansion in our area. "We're finally on their radar." The hospital would work alongside current or planned private providers in Alexandra, Clyde, Cromwell, Wānaka and Queenstown, which, Mr Mooney said, would be co-ordinated. "We would start mapping and talking to what services already exist across all those centres." The statement from the steering group said decades of under-investment in health services and infrastructure in the Queenstown Lakes and Central Otago districts had led to problems when seeking speciality and emergency healthcare. Many patients in Queenstown Lakes and Central Otago had to make a six-hour return drive for their healthcare. Last year, there were 300 helicopter transfers from Lakes District Hospital costing $6.3 million, it said.

‘Marked improvement' in mental health shown
‘Marked improvement' in mental health shown

Otago Daily Times

time8 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

‘Marked improvement' in mental health shown

Matt Doocey. PHOTO: ODT FILES The South is showing "marked improvement" in most of its mental health targets, Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey says. But health officials are asking the minister to be careful with the data, and an opposition MP says it does not reflect the feeling of staff. Mr Doocey has set specific targets for mental health delivery, including faster access to primary mental health and addiction services, faster access to specialist mental health and addiction services and shorter mental-health related stays in the emergency department. The Southern district has improved its performance in all three targets, and was successful in faster access to primary mental health and addiction services (91.6%) and shorter mental health and addiction-related stays in EDs (86%), Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora's most recent quarterly data says. The Southern district was also a shade under the target for access to specialist mental healthcare (78%). Mr Doocey said this was a "marked improvement" from two quarters ago, where Southern was languishing near the bottom of the table. "This government believes when someone is making the brave step of reaching out for help whether it's you, your child, a friend or family member, we are committed to ensuring we have the right support in place to answer that call, no matter where you are in New Zealand. "It is promising to see the third quarter target data show Southern are exceeding two out of three access targets. I have recently been in the Southern region where I met some of our hard-working frontline workers who are on the ground making a real difference in helping those in the region have access to faster mental health support." However, officials have also advised there were still some caveats around the data — particularly in ED presentations, where it "does not account for the complexities of acute presentations, for example people presenting with combinations of physical and mental symptoms, or presentations where the actual problem is not immediately obvious" and "does not reliably identify any addiction-related events". A late January briefing paper, released under the Official Information Act, urged Mr Doocey to be cautious when looking at the quarterly results. "This is the first attempt at this level of reporting on data against the mental health and addiction targets. "Unlike the wider health system targets, the datasets and reporting processes are new and the infrastructure supporting the process is evolving. It is critical to appreciate the preliminary nature of the data as a picture of performance against the mental health addiction targets at this juncture of the implementation and design." Labour MP for Taieri Ingrid Leary said the results did not reflect what she was hearing from frontline workers, who were still under-resourced and stretched. Many young people were waiting several months for mental health assistance, she said. "The caveats in the document might explain the chasm between the reality on the ground and the supposedly good results. "When you have so many waiting for mental healthcare, the results aren't worth the paper they're printed on." Meanwhile, Mr Doocey said yesterday he was pressing ahead with the creation of a Digital Mental Health Hub, which was aimed at improving access to mental health services. "A key component of the hub will be improving digital navigation to connect people with existing mental health services. Unfortunately, many people are unaware of the services already available to them and these navigation systems could be a game changer. "The road map is currently in development, and I am hoping to have more to say over the coming months."

Alcohol guidelines 'outdated, understate health risks'
Alcohol guidelines 'outdated, understate health risks'

Otago Daily Times

timea day ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Alcohol guidelines 'outdated, understate health risks'

By Guyon Espiner of RNZ The country's official low-risk drinking guidelines are outdated and "understate the health risks" of alcohol, according to Health New Zealand documents. Efforts to update guidelines were halted after alcohol lobbyists complained to a Ministry of Health general manager Ross Bell. Bell, who works within its Public Health Agency, says he intervened to clear up confusion about whether HNZ or the Ministry of Health (MOH) should manage the guidelines. He said the MOH would manage them now but that work was on hold while it considered its priorities. Documents released to RNZ under the Official Information Act show why HNZ considered updating the safe drinking guidelines was crucial and that it saw "scrutiny from the alcohol industry" as a risk factor in the process. New Zealand's drinking guidelines say that to stay low-risk, men should have no more than 15 drinks per week and women 10. The maximum number of drinks recommended per week to stay low-risk (for men and women) is set at two in Canada, 10 in Australia and 14 in the United Kingdom. Canada, Australia and the UK all significantly reduced their safe drinking guidelines in recent years as evidence emerged about the health risks of alcohol, which is linked to seven types of cancer. A November 2024 memo from HNZ alcohol harm prevention manager Tom Devine said New Zealand's guidelines, written in 2011, were now out of date. "The evidence around alcohol and its risks to health has evolved since then and other countries like ours, such as the United Kingdom (in 2016), Australia (in 2020), and Canada (in 2023), have updated their Alcohol & Health Advice, resulting in much lower recommended drinking limits," Devine wrote. "The current advice is complex (and) out of step with other jurisdictions." Current guidelines also did not meet the needs of pregnant and breast-feeding women and young people, he said. "A review and update are necessary to ensure the advice is clear, inclusive and based on the most up-to-date evidence." Another HNZ document, written in January 2024, said: "The current advice does not reflect the latest scientific evidence meaning that it understates the health risks from alcohol." The documents show HNZ commissioned Massey University to work on the first phase of a review in February 2024 - at a cost of about $130,000 - but later that year MOH's Bell intervened. Emails obtained by RNZ show a lobbyist with the Brewer's Association emailed Bell in October 2024 asking why a HNZ website was reporting that the drinking guidelines were under review. He emailed again a month later complaining that references to the review were still on the website, run by HNZ, and also took issue with the fact the site linked to Canadian drinking guidelines. Bell emailed HNZ in December 2024: "All work on this project will now pause. You will update relevant Health NZ websites to remove references to the review and also to other jurisdictions' guidelines (including the Canadian one)." Bell has declined requests for an interview with RNZ, but in a previous statement said material was removed from the website to avoid confusion, as the drinking guidelines were now led by the Ministry of Health not HNZ, which runs the website. He said that was an internal decision by the MOH and that a review of the drinking guidelines was now on hold while the ministry considered its priorities. But the documents released to RNZ show HNZ believe it is crucial to update the guidance. A memo from HNZ alcohol harm prevention manager Tom Devine said health professionals relied on accurate guidelines, which were "foundational" for screening, interventions and referral for treatment. "This is where health professionals ask patients about their alcohol consumption using the advice as a baseline to assess risk, which informs the need for brief interventions or referral for counselling or treatment." Devine's memo said one of the risks in reviewing the guidelines was "scrutiny from the alcohol industry" and his mitigation strategy included "a strategic communications plan to articulate the evidence base and reasoning". Associate Professor Andy Towers, the co-director of the Mental Health & Addiction Programme at Massey University, worked on the initial stages of the review for HNZ and said current guidelines understated the risk. "There's more and more evidence now, especially with longitudinal health data, to show that even low levels of alcohol use over a long time can result in some significant alcohol related harms." He said sticking with the 2011 guidelines could lull drinkers into a false sense of security. "For us to set low risk advice thresholds that are quite high, much higher than other countries, means that we will continue to have serious alcohol related harms occurring across the country, in communities, and that will flow through into hospitals." Cancer Society evidence and insights lead Emma Shields said a review of the drinking guidelines was needed to bring them into line with the latest evidence and international guidance. She said alcohol caused seven different types of cancer including breast, bowel and oesophageal. "When it comes to cancer risk, there is no 'safe' level of alcohol use, and even small amounts of alcohol increase the risk of cancer."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store