Chinese Hacker, Wanted By US For Stealing COVID-19 Data, Arrested In Italy
Italian authorities have arrested a Chinese citizen, accused by the United States of being part of a state-sponsored hacking group that stole COVID-19 vaccine secrets from the US on behalf of Chinese intelligence at the height of the pandemic in early 2020. Xu Zewei was arrested at Milan's Malpensa airport on July 3, after the US issued an international warrant against him, according to Italian authorities.
A nine-count US indictment accused 33-year-old Zewei of working at the behest of China's Ministry of State Security to target US-based universities, immunologists, and virologists conducting research into COVID-19 vaccines, treatment, and testing. The indictment also accuses another person, Zhang Yu, who is believed to be in China, of participating in the activity.
Zewei was presented at a Milan court on Tuesday as the US Justice Department begins the process to extradite him to America's Texas, where he faces charges related to wire fraud, identity theft and hacking.
Italy's Justice Ministry confirmed that the US has formally sent an extradition request to Rome for request for Zewei, while he was being held in the country "at the request of US authorities for suspected IT crimes aimed at industrial espionage."
The US believes the Chinese national was linked to a state-sponsored hacking group known as Hafnium that was accused of penetrating Microsoft email software in 2021 in a mass espionage campaign.
Awkward Moment For Meloni?
The arrest of the Chinese citizen, who claimed he was an IT specialist at the Milan court, could put pressure on Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's government in Italy, which has sought to court US President Donald Trump while also maintaining good relations with China.
Over the years, the right-wing Meloni has forged a solid personal bond with Trump, even as the European Union remain at odds with Washington.
But the Italian premier has also maintained friendly diplomatic relations with Beijing, an important trading partner. Rome and Beijing have been on friendly terms even after Meloni decided to withdraw from Chinese President Xi Jinping's flagship Belt and Road Initiative. Italy's deputy prime minister, Matteo Salvini, was due for an official visit to Beijing later this week.
China's Reaction
Chinese Embassy in Washington, DC, said it was unaware of Zewei's case but said that "similar rumours have surfaced multiple times in the past, and China has already stated its position on the matter."
Chinese vaccine research and development is amongst "the most advanced in the world. China has neither the need nor the intention to acquire vaccines through so-called theft," Embassy spokesperson Liu Pengyu said in a statement to CNN.
China's Espionage Record
When the pandemic was at its peak in 2020, intelligence services across the globe scrambled to gather more and more information on the impacts of the virus. At the time, the FBI and the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency repeatedly accused China of trying to steal vital research by hacking the systems of US groups studying the virus.
In mid-2020, the US Department of Justice even indicted two other Chinese nationals for allegedly trying to access US research as part of Beijing's decade-long scheme to steal US trade secrets.
At the time, Chinese state media said Washington had no evidence to support the allegations, adding: "It seems that some US politicians have totally lost their minds."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
17 minutes ago
- Economic Times
‘It's just unbelievable': Jimmy Kimmel to leave US? Comedian startling relocation hint shocks fans
Synopsis Jimmy Kimmel has obtained Italian citizenship and is considering relocating to Europe due to his concerns about Donald Trump's potential return to power. This comes after Trump publicly stated that Kimmel, along with Jimmy Fallon, would be the next late-night hosts to lose their jobs, following Stephen Colbert's show cancellation. Earlier this month, Trump doubled down on Jimmy Kimmel that would be 'next' to be canceled during a press conference Jimmy Kimmel has revealed he has got an Italian citizenship and has hinted at a possible re-location to Europe because he is scared of President Donald Trump. 'I did get Italian citizenship,' Kimmel shared on The Sarah Silverman Podcast Aug. 7. 'I do have that.' And his reasoning? 'What's going on is as bad as you thought it was gonna be.'The 57-year-old late night American television host and comedian revealed he is seriously thinking about leaving the United States. Sarah Silverman noted that several outspoken Trump critics have already left the country. 'What's going on is … as bad as you thought it was gonna be, it's so much worse. It's just unbelievable. I feel like it's probably even worse than [Trump] would like it to be,' Kimmel responded. ALSO READ: DOGE price forms golden cross for the first time since Nov 2024. Could a massive 300% surge be next? Jimmy Kimmel has revealed that he recently obtained Italian citizenship and is considering moving to Europe because he is scared of Trump. His remarks came days after Trump said he and his fellow late-night host Jimmy Fallon would be next to lose their jobs following the cancellation of Stephen Colbert's CBS added that he had no hard feelings toward former MAGA supporters who are now doing a 180 on their political stance. 'There are a lot of people … now you see these clips of Joe Rogan saying, 'Why's he doing this? He shouldn't be deporting people.' People go, 'F–k you, you supported him.' I don't buy into that. I don't believe 'F–k you, you supported him,' ' he said, referring to the podcaster speaking out against Trump's deportation policy after having supported the commander-in-chief in previous elections.'I think the door needs to stay open. If you want to change your mind, that's so hard to do. If you want to admit you were wrong, that's so hard and so rare to do. You are welcome.' ALSO READ: Seven simple brain exercises to lower your dementia risk Earlier this month, Trump doubled down on Jimmy Kimmel that would be 'next' to be canceled during a press conference. Trump cited CBS' recent cancellation of 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' as an example and added that he believes Jimmy Fallon and Kimmel are next.'Well, it hasn't worked,' Trump said. 'And it hasn't worked, really, for a long time, and I would say pretty much from the beginning. Colbert has no talent. I mean, I could take anybody here. I could go outside in the beautiful streets and pick a couple of people that do just as well or better. They'd get higher ratings than he did. He's got no talent.'ALSO READ: Millions of US citizens to receive $1,390 stimulus soon? Check if you qualify and when to expect it He continued, 'Fallon has no talent. Kimmel has no talent. They're next. They're going to be going. I hear they're going to be going. I don't know, but I would imagine because they'd get—you know, Colbert has better ratings than Kimmel or Fallon.'Trump made a similar declaration on Truth Social after Colbert's show was canceled last month.'The word is, and it's a strong word at that, Jimmy Kimmel is NEXT to go in the untalented Late Night Sweepstakes and, shortly thereafter, Fallon will be gone,' Trump continued, 'These are people with absolutely NO TALENT, who were paid Millions of Dollars for, in all cases, destroying what used to be GREAT Television. It's really good to see them go, and I hope I played a major part in it!'
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
US embeds trackers in AI chip shipments to catch diversions to China
US authorities have secretly placed location tracking devices in targeted shipments of advanced chips they see as being at high risk of illegal diversion to China, according to two people with direct knowledge of the previously unreported law enforcement measures aim to detect AI chips being diverted to destinations which are under US export restrictions, and apply only to select shipments under investigation, the people show the lengths to which the US has gone to enforce its chip export restrictions on China, even as the Trump administration has sought to relax some curbs on Chinese access to advanced American semiconductors. The trackers can help build cases against people and companies who profit from violating US export controls, said the people who declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue. Location trackers are a decades-old investigative tool used by US law enforcement agencies to track products subject to export restrictions, such as airplane parts. They have been used to combat the illegal diversion of semiconductors in recent years, one source said. Five other people actively involved in the AI server supply chain say they are aware of the use of the trackers in shipments of servers from manufacturers such as Dell and Super Micro, which include chips from Nvidia and AMD. Those people said the trackers are typically hidden in the packaging of the server shipments. They did not know which parties were involved in installing them and where along the shipping route they were put in. Reuters was not able to determine how often the trackers have been used in chip related investigations or when US authorities started using them to investigate chip smuggling. The US started restricting the sale of advanced chips by Nvidia, AMD and other manufacturers to China in 2022. In one 2024 case described by two of the people involved in the server supply chain, a shipment of Dell servers with Nvidia chips included both large trackers on the shipping boxes and smaller, more discreet devices hidden inside the packaging - and even within the servers themselves. A third person said they had seen images and videos of trackers being removed by other chip resellers from Dell and Super Micro servers. The person said some of the larger trackers were roughly the size of a smartphone. The US Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security, which oversees export controls and enforcement, is typically involved, and Homeland Security Investigations and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, may take part too, said the sources. The HSI and FBI both declined to comment. The Commerce Department did not respond to requests for comment. The Chinese foreign ministry did not have immediate comment. Super Micro said in a statement that it does not disclose its "security practices and policies in place to protect our worldwide operations, partners, and customers." It declined to comment on any tracking actions by US authorities. Dell said it is "not aware of a US Government initiative to place trackers in its product shipments." Nvidia declined to comment, while AMD did not answer a request for comment. Chip restrictions The United States, which dominates the global AI chip supply chain, has sought to limit exports of chips and other technology to China in recent years to restrain its military modernization. It has also put restrictions on the sale of chips to Russia to undercut war efforts against Ukraine. The White House and both houses of Congress have proposed requiring US chip firms to include location verification technology with their chips to prevent them from being diverted to countries where US export regulations restrict sales. China has slammed the US exports curbs as part of a campaign to suppress its rise and criticized the location tracking proposal. Last month, the country's powerful cyberspace regulator summoned Nvidia to a meeting to express its concerns over the risks of its chips containing "backdoors" that would allow remote access or control, which the company has strongly denied. In January, Reuters reported the US had traced organized AI chip smuggling to China via countries such as Malaysia, Singapore, and the UAE - but it is unclear if tracking devices were involved. The use of trackers by US law enforcement goes back decades. In 1985, Hughes Aircraft shipped equipment subject to US export controls, according to a court decision reviewed by Reuters. Executing a search warrant, the US Customs Service intercepted the crate at a Houston airport and installed a tracking device, the decision noted. US export enforcement agents sometimes install trackers after getting administrative approval. Other times they get a judge to issue a warrant authorizing use of the device, one source said. With a warrant, it is easier to use the information as evidence in a criminal case. A company may be told about the tracker, if they are not a subject of the investigation, and may consent to the government's installation of the trackers, the source added. But the devices can also be installed without their knowledge. People involved in diverting export-controlled chip and server shipments to China said they were aware of the devices. Two of the supply chain sources, who are China-based resellers of export-controlled chips, said they regularly took care to inspect diverted shipments of AI chip servers for the trackers due to the risks of the devices being embedded. An affidavit filed with a U.S Department of Justice complaint regarding the arrests of two Chinese nationals charged with illegally shipping tens of millions of dollars' worth of AI chips to China earlier this month describes one co-conspirator instructing another to check for trackers on Quanta H200 servers, which contain Nvidia chips. It said the English language text was sent by a co-conspirator, whose name was redacted, to one of the defendants, Yang Shiwei . "Pay attention to see if there is a tracker on it, you must look for it carefully," said the person, who went on to call the Trump administration by an obscenity. "Who knows what they will do."
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
The ultimate guide to the Trump tariff fallout: Trade wars, Russian oil, and India-US ties
New Delhi: A fortnight after Donald Trump won the US presidential election in November 2024, Rahul Roy-Chaudhuri, a senior fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, was speaking at a global conference on Trump in Naples, Italy. 'I noticed that the Europeans were very pessimistic, whereas the Indians were optimistic—cautious, but optimistic. They were upbeat about Trump," said Roy-Chaudhuri, a specialist in South Asian affairs, who was presenting a paper on the Indian perspective. Now, days after Trump announced a stiff new tariff regime and secondary sanctions against India, the London-based strategic analyst wonders, 'Did we get that wrong? Were the Europeans right after all?" He's not the only one left bewildered by Trump's measures—although this story is still developing, with a myriad unknowns that could tip the scales in favour of India. Why us, is a common refrain heard among civil servants and businesses in New Delhi these days, although some say India should have seen this coming, and drawn hard lessons from Trump's first term, when he forced India to lower tariffs on US-made Harley Davidson motorcycles and bourbon whisky. Back when Trump first made a bid for the US presidency in 2016, India and Indians leapt to his aid. With the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party champing at the bit to craft a new foreign policy that would eject ideology in favour of trade and business, the moment seemed opportune. Hell, you could even say auspicious. Some in India publicly prayed for Trump's victory with garlands, chants and conch-shells. In the US, meanwhile, influential Indian-origin supporters of his Republican Party swiftly swung into action helping organise glamorous fund raisers and public meetings. Back then, it seemed, India couldn't put a foot wrong as both countries forged closer ties against the backdrop of Chinese belligerence in India's neighbourhood and the Asia-Pacific region. But seven months into his second term, Trump has hiked tariffs on some Indian imports to 25% and imposed secondary sanctions in the form of another 25% tariffs for purchases of sanctioned Russian oil, which are set to kick in on 27 August. Announced in the middle of US-India negotiations on a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) that the two sides expect will take mutual trade to $500 billion by 2030, India called the move 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable". Mint breaks down the tariff war, the future of bilateral trade, India's (and the world's) energy trade with Russia, the changing landscape of foreign policy, and what could heal the injured Indo-US ties. What went wrong 'There was a mismatch of expectations around the bread and butter issues of the trade agreement," said Pankaj Saran, former deputy national security adviser and ex-ambassador to Russia. 'Even the first time around (the first Trump presidency), we had a difficult experience. This time, we were mindful of past experience and offered a generous package, with a lot of concessions. The Americans admitted they had received it but they were unsure how to handle it internally." Not just Americans and Indians, no one's quite sure how to deal with the most mercurial US presidency in living memory. But the reversal in India-US ties, as India pushed back on American demands to open up its market for agricultural produce and allow genetically modified (GM) products, has been stunning. 'There is no precedent," said Saran. 'Trump's mode of operation is that there is no last word. It is a combination of strategies involving a mix of carrot, stick and public admonition. For him, it seems, outcomes are more important." Who needs Russia more? Both Europe and America continue to buy vital commodities from Russia. America, for instance, continues to import Russian enriched uranium, plutonium, fertilisers and palladium, a key mineral used in catalytic converters in vehicles. And although European Union (EU) imports from Russia have fallen 86% since the first quarter of 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine, Reuters reported on 6 August that the 27-nation grouping continues to buy Russian oil, nickel, natural gas, fertilizer, iron and steel from Russia. In fact, according to energy trade data tracked by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, a non-profit think-tank founded in Helsinki, the EU was the world's leading buyer of Russian LNG and piped gas—key to heating up countries with growing ageing populations and harsh winters. Indian purchases were convenient for the US and EU, which bought products refined in India from Russian crude, while global prices were shored up. As Eric Garcetti, who was US ambassador to India under former President Joe Biden, told the Washington-based Council on Foreign Relations in May 2024, 'They [India] bought Russian oil because we wanted someone to buy Russian oil at a price cap—that was not a violation or anything, that was actually the design of the policy, because as a commodity, we did not want the price of oil to go up. They fulfilled that." Trump's political priorities Trump wants to address three overarching domestic problems by the tariffs—trade balance, budget deficit and his fiscal problem, said Mohandas Pai, chairman of Aarin Capital. 'He wants to reduce the trade deficit with India ($45.8 bn in 2024) by cutting imports. But the US has very little to export except high-tech products, defence equipment and aircraft. Trump seems to have forgotten the 450 Boeing aircraft orders India has already placed," Pai said. 'Tariffs don't work' There are several dimensions to the current political problems that the Trump administration is attempting to solve, and pivoting to just one, that is restricting imports, will not solve problems that are large and generic in nature, said Neelkanth Mishra, chief economist at Axis Bank. 'The Americans have forgotten that tariffs don't work. If anyone thinks that the profit pools of exporters to the US or American firms importing goods are so large that $500-600 billion of tariffs can be absorbed, then they are completely mistaken. These are efficient markets, and therefore have thin margins." Figures released by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, analysed by Fox News, showed that the US budget deficit ballooned by $109 billion to $1.6 trillion in the first 10 months of FY25 compared with the same period a year ago, despite the tariffs. Spending rose by $372 billion over this period, led by expenditure on benefits, including for medical aid for America's ageing population. National debt surged $60 billion to $37 trillion. Inflation is coming Cost escalations are set to be passed on to American consumers. According to research by The Budget Lab, an independent think tank of Yale University, published on 7 August, American consumers are set to bear an overall average effective tariff rate of 18.6%, the highest since 1933. After taking into account changes in consumer spending patterns, influenced by factors like income and prices, the average tariff rate will be 17.7%, the highest since 1934. This is not good news for Indian exports either. The tariffs disproportionately impact labour-intensive clothing and textiles, with US consumers facing 39% higher shoe prices and 37% higher apparel prices over the next two years. Not surprisingly, Trump has spared two sectors from high tariffs, pharmaceuticals and smartphones, unwilling to tinker with cheap Indian-made generic drugs and mobile phones prices. The prize for peace Things could turn around very quickly for India if a planned 15-August summit between Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin manages to strike a peace deal—an outcome that should scotch at a stroke the raison d'être for secondary sanctions. It is not known if Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, who has European backing, will attend. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Zelensky had a conversation on Monday, following which the Ukrainian leader said on X, 'I had a long conversation with the Prime Minister of India. We discussed in detail all important issues—both of our bilateral cooperation and the overall diplomatic situation. I am grateful to the Prime Minister for his warm words of support for our people. It is important that India is supporting our peace efforts and shares the position that everything concerning Ukraine must be decided with Ukraine's participation. Other formats will not deliver results." To be sure, even if the peace deal goes through, which would be a massive feather in Trump's world peace-building cap and Nobel peace prize aspirations, it is not clear if Washington would withdraw the 25% tariffs. The 'superimposition' shock Analysts say signs of Trump's tariff obsession have long been strewn around global trade channels. He began calling India the 'tariff king" in his first presidency and, continuing to riff on the theme, made clear in the hustings last year that he will stop countries from selling goods on the cheap in America, a key pledge that pleased his core MAGA (Make America Great Again) constituency. Rather, it is the non-trade stuff, chiefly the way Trump handled the aftermath of this year's India-Pakistan conflict, that came as a shock—an intrusion that Saran calls 'the superimposition of the political aspect". This was marked by Trump's repeated claims to have helped end the conflict, denied by New Delhi, which views Kashmir mediation as a red line, and his hosting the Pakistan army chief, Gen. Asim Munir, at the White House. The man later issued outrageous nuclear threats from American soil. 'There's no doubt that Pakistan has come up in the political relationship (with America)," said Saran in comments made before Munir's nuclear threats. 'Trump probably found the India-Pakistan conflict to be a geo-political surprise, and he is convinced about the American role in ending it. The difference between the Indian and Pakistani approach to this was sharp. The disagreements began with trade, and political aspects were superimposed on it." White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said Trump hosted Munir after he called for the president to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. According to Roy-Chaudhuri of IISS, New Delhi may have 'mismanaged massaging his (Trump's) ego". How to heal With India seen by much of the world as key to addressing the negative impact of a fragmented world described by some experts as a fallout of 'deglobalization," its relationship with the US will be keenly watched. For ties to heal, some suggest looking at some of the domestic economic areas that have emerged as irritants. 'Politicians, like markets, tend to be forward-looking," said Mishra, asked if tariffs could spur domestic reforms. 'Consensus needs an external pressure to allow the government to go through meaningful reforms, in agriculture and GM crops for instance. We've been reluctant to change. Why not change now? In manufacturing, we should be looking at domestic demand. The assumption everyone makes is that manufacturing is chiefly for exports—that is wrong. Export competitiveness is important for better productivity, but exports as a source of end-demand are unlikely to be large enough." To be sure, introducing such reforms in India won't be easy. New Delhi, after all, chose to walk out of the Doha Round of trade talks in 2008 rather than give in to American pressure on agriculture. China supported the Indian position against the US then, and something similar may be happening this time around too, with four of the Brics Plus grouping founders— Brazil, Russia, India and China—reportedly eyeing a response to tariffs. Trump is deeply suspicious of Brics, viewing it as anti-American, and this has emerged as another sticking point in India-US ties. But the Russian ambassador to India told a recent meeting on Brics, organised by the India Foundation, more than once that 'de-dollarization (finding an alternative to the global currency of trade) was never a Brics proposal". Pai recommends keeping the temperature down. 'India and the US are joined at the hips when it comes to technology. As many as 25 major US tech companies have Indian-origin CEOs," said Pai, whose Aarin Capital is an investor in technology-intensive businesses. 'It's a temporary set-back. In India, there's a lot of pride; we are not deal-driven." A test ahead 'Trump's Presidency is a work in progress," said Saran. 'You have to play with the cards you are dealt. We have to find our own equilibrium with President Trump, and be careful not to make matters worse. Indian diplomacy will be strongly tested in the coming years, with flashes from the Cold War years, now fuelled by terrorism, threatening to cloud what promised to be a new era of growth-fuelled development. Equally, with a mercurial US president, things could swing right back to a more predictable and respectful relationship. But even amid the current uncertainty, Indian diplomats can draw satisfaction from the fact that an increasingly multipolar world sees India as a shining example of economic progress. And that's something even Trump cannot ignore.
