‘Devil in the Ozarks' who escaped prison likely still in Arkansas area: officials
It has been 72 hours since a former Arkansas police chief serving decades in prison for murder and rape escaped from prison on Sunday afternoon.
Former Gateway Police Department Chief Grant Hardin, 56, escaped from the North Central Unit on Sunday afternoon in Calico Rock, according to the Arkansas Department of Corrections (ADC).
"We have a pretty good idea of the route that he took and some of those circumstances… and what, if any, lapses happened," ADC Communications Director Rand Champion said during a Wednesday news conference.
"Based on the information that we have and the experience of our teams, they feel fairly confident that he is still fairly close to this region," Champion said, noting that "all it takes is one vehicle" for Hardin to use to travel elsewhere, though officials have established a perimeter around the area of Stone County.
Manhunt Underway After Disgraced Former Police Chief Convicted Of Murder, Rape Escapes Arkansas Prison
"As of this time, they are still very confident that he is in the area," Champion said.
Read On The Fox News App
Champion said the public should assume Hardin is "a very dangerous individual," and there is a risk he may commit more crimes while he is on the run.
It took less than 30 minutes for prison officials to notice that Hardin had disappeared from prison. Photos that the Stone County Sheriff's Office posted to social media show Hardin wearing an ADC-style uniform during his escape through a sally port, though Champion said the uniform he was wearing was not an official uniform.
4 Arrested For Allegedly Aiding Escaped Inmates In New Orleans
"It had to have either been homemade or brought in somehow," Champion said of the uniform.
Hardin, who became known as the "Devil in the Ozarks," was sentenced to 30 years for murder plus additional time for rape. He pleaded guilty to the 2017 murder of James Appleton, 59, a city water employee who was found shot in the face inside his work truck, KNWA reported.
While Hardin was being booked into the state prison, officials submitted his DNA sample into a database. His DNA ended up linking him to the rape cold case of a teacher in 1997, the outlet reported.
Massive Jail Break In New Orleans 'Impossible' Without Staff Involvement, Says Ex-fbi Fugitive Hunter
The victim, a teacher at Frank Tillery Elementary in Rogers, said she was raped by a man with a gun at the school.
"It was proven to be Mr. Hardin beyond all scientific certainty," Nathan Smith, the prosecuting attorney for Benton County at the time, told the outlet.
Authorities confirmed Hardin's DNA matched the DNA linked to the rape suspect. Harrison was ambushed while preparing a lesson plan for the week. The case had been cold for nearly two decades.
Hardin ended up pleading guilty to the rape in 2019.
"Grant Hardin, in my view and in my personal experience, is one of the most dangerous people that I ever seen for the reason that he does not at first appear that way," Smith previously said. "He is a man capable of a seemingly random, horrific murder as well as a random, horrific rape."
Hardin is described as a 6' white male, weighing approximately 259 pounds.
Fox News' Stepheny Price and Louis Casiano contributed to this report.Original article source: 'Devil in the Ozarks' who escaped prison likely still in Arkansas area: officials
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge rules Trump's deportations to El Salvador under Alien Enemies Act were illegal
A federal judge ruled Wednesday that nearly 140 Venezuelan men flown from the U.S. to El Salvador in March based on a wartime power invoked by President Donald Trump were deported illegally, but the court stopped short of ordering the Trump administration to seek to bring the men back. Chief U.S. District Judge James Boasberg gave the administration a week to propose a plan for how the men — believed to currently be in a notorious anti-terrorism prison in El Salvador — can pursue cases in U.S. courts challenging their deportations. 'Mindful of national-security and foreign-policy concerns, the Court will not — at least yet — order the Government to take any specific steps. It will instead allow Defendants to submit proposals regarding the appropriate actions,' Boasberg wrote in a 69-page opinion. But Boasberg said the Trump administration had plainly violated the rights of the men it summarily deported to El Salvador on March 15 just hours after Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act. The 1798 statute has been used just three other times in U.S. history and is meant to hasten deportations during wartime. Those men, who Trump claimed were members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, had no chance to contest their designations — a fact that several courts, including the Supreme Court, have determined violated their due process rights. For the men in El Salvador's infamous prison, known as CECOT, that violation is most egregious, Boasberg said. 'Significant evidence has come to light indicating that many of those entombed in CECOT have no connection to the gang and thus languish in a foreign prison on flimsy, even frivolous, accusations,' Boasberg wrote. On the day the men were deported in March, Boasberg issued an emergency order for U.S. officials to keep the men in their custody and to turn the planes carrying them around, if necessary. However, the planes continued to their destination and — under Hollywood-style lights and rolling cameras — the men were turned over to Salvadoran authorities who made a spectacle of shaving the prisoners' heads and stripping them. In April, Boasberg ruled that there was probable cause to believe that Trump administration officials deliberately flouted his order. He ordered the first phases of contempt-of-court proceedings that could result in criminal charges for individual officials who allegedly defied his directive, but an appeals court paused that process. As a result of his handling of the high-profile deportation dispute, Boasberg has become a lightning rod for criticism from Trump and his allies. In March, Trump called for Boasberg's impeachment and denounced him on social media as a 'Radical Left Lunatic,' although the Obama appointee is widely viewed as moderate and mild-mannered. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled, apparently unanimously, that Alien Enemies Act deportees are entitled to enough notice and time to 'actually seek' relief in court to block their deportations. However, the high court voted, 5-4, that Boasberg should not have handled the original lawsuit brought by the March 15 deportees. Rather, they should have filed in the Texas district in which they were confined in the days before they were sent to El Salvador. But those already deported no longer have a geographically obvious U.S. court to take up their claims, so lawyers for the men have pressed Boasberg to allow them to continue to seek relief from him in Washington, D.C. In the ruling Wednesday, he agreed. Several other courts have backed up Boasberg's concerns about the administration's handling of deportations under the Alien Enemies Act. Judges in Texas, Colorado and New York have agreed that the invocation of the Alien Enemies Act was flawed because the United States is not at war with Venezuela, nor is Tren de Aragua plausibly an arm of the Venezuelan government. Judges in Pennsylvania and California backed Trump's invocation of the law but said the Trump administration had nevertheless failed to give its targets enough time to contest their designations. "The court properly ruled that the Trump administration must fix its blatant constitutional violations and cannot simply chose to leave these individuals in a foreign gulag-type prison, perhaps incommunicado for the remainder of their lives," ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt said after Boasberg's Wednesday ruling.
Politico
4 hours ago
- Politico
Judge rules Trump's deportations to El Salvador under Alien Enemies Act were illegal
A federal judge ruled Wednesday that nearly 140 Venezuelan men flown from the U.S. to El Salvador in March based on a wartime power invoked by President Donald Trump were deported illegally, but the court stopped short of ordering the Trump administration to seek to bring the men back. Chief U.S. District Judge James Boasberg gave the administration a week to propose a plan for how the men — believed to currently be in a notorious anti-terrorism prison in El Salvador — can pursue cases in U.S. courts challenging their deportations. 'Mindful of national-security and foreign-policy concerns, the Court will not — at least yet — order the Government to take any specific steps. It will instead allow Defendants to submit proposals regarding the appropriate actions,' Boasberg wrote in a 69-page opinion. But Boasberg said the Trump administration had plainly violated the rights of the men it summarily deported to El Salvador on March 15 just hours after Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act. The 1798 statute has been used just three other times in U.S. history and is meant to hasten deportations during wartime. Those men, who Trump claimed were members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, had no chance to contest their designations — a fact that several courts, including the Supreme Court, have determined violated their due process rights. For the men in El Salvador's infamous prison, known as CECOT, that violation is most egregious, Boasberg said. 'Significant evidence has come to light indicating that many of those entombed in CECOT have no connection to the gang and thus languish in a foreign prison on flimsy, even frivolous, accusations,' Boasberg wrote. On the day the men were deported in March, Boasberg issued an emergency order for U.S. officials to keep the men in their custody and to turn the planes carrying them around, if necessary. However, the planes continued to their destination and — under Hollywood-style lights and rolling cameras — the men were turned over to Salvadoran authorities who made a spectacle of shaving the prisoners' heads and stripping them. In April, Boasberg ruled that there was probable cause to believe that Trump administration officials deliberately flouted his order. He ordered the first phases of contempt-of-court proceedings that could result in criminal charges for individual officials who allegedly defied his directive, but an appeals court paused that process. As a result of his handling of the high-profile deportation dispute, Boasberg has become a lightning rod for criticism from Trump and his allies. In March, Trump called for Boasberg's impeachment and denounced him on social media as a 'Radical Left Lunatic,' although the Obama appointee is widely viewed as moderate and mild-mannered. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled, apparently unanimously, that Alien Enemies Act deportees are entitled to enough notice and time to 'actually seek' relief in court to block their deportations. However, the high court voted, 5-4, that Boasberg should not have handled the original lawsuit brought by the March 15 deportees. Rather, they should have filed in the Texas district in which they were confined in the days before they were sent to El Salvador. But those already deported no longer have a geographically obvious U.S. court to take up their claims, so lawyers for the men have pressed Boasberg to allow them to continue to seek relief from him in Washington, D.C. In the ruling Wednesday, he agreed. Several other courts have backed up Boasberg's concerns about the administration's handling of deportations under the Alien Enemies Act. Judges in Texas, Colorado and New York have agreed that the invocation of the Alien Enemies Act was flawed because the United States is not at war with Venezuela, nor is Tren de Aragua plausibly an arm of the Venezuelan government. Judges in Pennsylvania and California backed Trump's invocation of the law but said the Trump administration had nevertheless failed to give its targets enough time to contest their designations. 'The court properly ruled that the Trump administration must fix its blatant constitutional violations and cannot simply chose to leave these individuals in a foreign gulag-type prison, perhaps incommunicado for the remainder of their lives,' ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt said after Boasberg's Wednesday ruling.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dana-Thomas House Foundation donates $50k for historic Springfield site restoration
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (WCIA) — Nearly $50,000 is headed to the Illinois Conservation Foundation for the restoration of a national historic landmark in Springfield. On Wednesday, it was announced that the Dana-Thomas House Foundation donated $48,874 to the Illinois Conservation Foundation to facilitate the purchase and installation of historically appropriate rugs at the Dana-Thomas House. Urbana City Council approves method to pay millions for previous agreement with Hotel Royer 'The Dana-Thomas House is not only an architectural masterpiece but also a vital piece of our state's cultural heritage,' said Natalie Phelps Finnie, director of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 'Preserving historic sites like this ensures future generations can learn from and experience Illinois' rich history.' The Dana-Thomas House is one of the most complete early examples of Frank Lloyd Wright's Prairie-style architecture. Wright designed the house in 1902 for socialite and philanthropist Susan Lawrence Dana. Additionally, the home contains over 100 pieces of original Wright-designed furniture and more than 250 examples of art glass. Monticello students build bike racks for park named after fallen Marine The Illinois Conservation Foundation will administer the donation to ensure it directly supports the carpet restoration project at the Dana-Thomas House. The Illinois Department of Natural Resources operates this house, as well as 55 other state historic states across the state. 'We are proud to work alongside the Dana-Thomas House Foundation on this effort,' said Jenny Vaughn, executive director of the Illinois Conservation Foundation. 'Public-private partnerships like this play a critical role in ensuring that Illinois' historic sites and state parks are protected and maintained for the future.' This historic site is open to the public for tours year-round. To learn more about the Illinois Conservation Foundation, or to support preservation efforts, visit Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
