logo
Padres ownership fight: Seidler brothers call Peter's widow Sheel 'reckless' for suing while team pursued Roki Sasaki

Padres ownership fight: Seidler brothers call Peter's widow Sheel 'reckless' for suing while team pursued Roki Sasaki

Yahoo28-01-2025

So far, the San Diego Padres' offseason will be remembered for two things: missing out on Roki Sasaki and the start of a bareknuckle ownership fight. As it turns out, they two might be related.
That ownership fight involving former Padres chairman Peter Seidler's widow Sheel and brothers got uglier on Monday night. In response to Sheel's lawsuit alleging breaches of fiduciary duty and fraud, Matt Seidler, one of the brothers, filed a response with its own set of allegations.
Most notably for Padres fans, Matt Seidler painted the timing of Sheel's lawsuit as reckless in regard to the team's pursuit of Sasaki, a Japanese phenom with so much built-in surplus value he could have transformed its offseason.
From The Athletic:
'During a crucial time when Padres management was in late negotiation stages with a star pitcher, Sheel's lawsuit recklessly suggested that Matt and his brothers were plotting to relocate the Padres elsewhere,' the filing read.
The phrasing of "late negotiation stages" with Sasaki would indicate the Padres were making progress in convincing Sasaki to sign, though it's hard to take something written in a legal filing as an objective portrayal of those negotiations.
However, Sasaki's side definitely noticed:
'We knew it was an issue,' Sasaki's agent, Joel Wolfe, said Tuesday when presented with the wording in Matt Seidler's response. 'The timing of it appeared oddly strategic, and I wanted to allow the Padres to deal with it first on their own terms rather than try to figure it out on our own, which they did.'
The Padres were seen as the most likely team to land Sasaki if he spurned the Dodgers and were not shy about their interest. Padres general manager A.J. Preller went as far as calling out Sasaki by name at Peter Seidler's celebration of life last March. The team was reported to be willing to trade for enough international bonus pool money to offer him a bonus in excess of $10 million, significantly higher than the $6.5 million he got from the Dodgers.
Instead, Sasaki chose the Dodgers. During his introductory news conference, he said the No. 1 thing that stood out about his new team was "the stability of the front office."
Some saw that as an indirect dig at the Padres and their situation. Former Padres outfielder Jurickson Profar said things more explicitly after leaving the team for a three-year, $42 million deal with the Atlanta Braves, calling out the team's ownership "issue" as a reason why a return to San Diego would have been difficult.
More broadly, the team's ownership woes can be seen by the fact the Padres didn't sign a free agent to a major-league contract this offseason until Tuesday, when they brought back catcher Elias Díaz on a one-year, $3.5 million deal. Meanwhile, the Dodgers have blown the baseball world away and the San Francisco Giants and Arizona Diamondbacks have both signed free agents to nine-figure deals.
San Diego ran up some of the largest payrolls in baseball during the last years of Peter Seidler's life, but have continued to cut payroll since losing him.
Matt Seidler's response to Sheel reportedly goes well beyond the Sasaki line, alleging she demanded $20 million in annual distributions from the team and describing her as "unhappy" that Peter didn't leave her in control of the team after his death. It claims that Peter amended his trust at least seven times following his marriage in 2008 and didn't name her as a successor trustee once.
Another of Peter's brothers, John Seidler, is scheduled to be voted by MLB owners as the Padres' permanent control person next week.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Marelli Bankruptcy: Tariffs Crush Auto Parts Giant
Marelli Bankruptcy: Tariffs Crush Auto Parts Giant

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Marelli Bankruptcy: Tariffs Crush Auto Parts Giant

The Wall Street Journal is calling it 'the first big casualty of the tariff war.' Marelli – the auto parts giant and supplier to big names like Stellantis and Nissan – has filed for bankruptcy protection. Most Read on IEN Ship Carrying 3,000 Vehicles Abandoned in Pacific Ocean Raccoon Break-In Snarls Airbus Jet Production PODCAST: Ford Sues Lawyers; Shoemaker Outsmarts Tariffs; RIP Penny Oreo Maker Mondelez Sues Aldi Known for its electronics, power train and lighting related products for the automotive industry, Marelli had reportedly been struggling with heavy debt and supply chain challenges over the past few years But when revealing its filing, company leaders identified something else. Marelli CEO David Slump cited 'macroeconomic headwinds associated with … tariffs' as the tipping point that caused the company's situation to worsen. Slump said pandemic-era supply chain issues restricted the company's access to both labor and parts, including semiconductors. The company, which invested heavily in the EV transition, was struggling with liquidity when fresh woes hit in 2025. Slump said Marelli was 'severely affected by tariffs due to its import/export-focused business and the imposition of tariffs specifically against automotive manufacturers and suppliers.' Marelli was formed in 2019 when a private equity firm merged 100-year-old Japanese parts business Magneti Marelli with a Fiat-Chrysler auto parts business. The resulting tie-up has 40,000 employees and 150+ locations in 23 countries, including the U.S. Marelli says it plans to continue operating after establishing a deal with its lenders and creditors that will bring in more than $1 billion to finance the company's restructuring. Meanwhile, the situation has led some observers to question whether Marelli is the canary in the coal mine. Bloomberg, citing the analyst firm AlixPartners, recently suggested that the automotive industry is the global sector 'most vulnerable to financial distress' this year. Click here to subscribe to our daily newsletter featuring breaking manufacturing industry news. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

FAW Toyota launches new bZ5 electric SUV
FAW Toyota launches new bZ5 electric SUV

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

FAW Toyota launches new bZ5 electric SUV

FAW Toyota Motor Company, one of Toyota's main Chinese joint ventures, officially launched its new competitively-priced bZ5 battery-powered SUV on the local market, as the Japanese automaker looks to strengthen its foothold in China's fast-expanding new energy vehicle (NEV) market. The new bZ5 is available initially in four main variants, the 550 Joy, 550 Pro, 550 Pro Smart Drive and the 630 Pro, offering varying levels of equipment and trim, and with prices ranging between CNY 129,800 and CNY 159,800 yuan (US$ 18,100-US$ 22,300), inclusive of manufacturer incentives. The bZ5 550 models are powered by 200 kW motors, with their standard battery pack offering a maximum range of 550 km on a single charge. The come with features such as 16-inch central touchscreen, 5G connectivity, and AI-powered voice control. The 630 Pro model has an extended range of 630 km. The bZ5 range is designed to compete with the Tesla Model Y, China's best-selling battery-powered SUV, and is priced significantly lower than the Model Y's starting price of CNY263,500 while offering a similar range. "FAW Toyota launches new bZ5 electric SUV" was originally created and published by Just Auto, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel, so long as it fits the government's terms

time16 minutes ago

Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel, so long as it fits the government's terms

WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel, so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But the iconic American steelmaker and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a ' golden share" — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected against cutbacks in steel production. 'We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership," the two companies said. "This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement said. 'The partnership is expected to be finalized promptly,' the statement said. U.S. Steel rose $2.66, or 5%, to $54.85 in afterhours trading Friday. Nippon Steel's original bid to buy the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in late 2023 had been valued at $55 per share. The companies offered few details on how the golden share would work, what other provisions are in the national security agreement and how specifically the $11 billion would be spent. White House spokesman Kush Desai said the order 'ensures U.S. Steel will remain in the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and be safeguarded as a critical element of America's national and economic security.' James Brower, a Morrison Foerster lawyer who represents clients in national security-related matters, said such agreements with the government typically are not disclosed to the public, particularly by the government. They can become public, but it's almost always disclosed by a party in the transaction, such as a company — like U.S. Steel — that is publicly held, Brower said. The mechanics of how a golden share would work will depend on the national security agreement, but in such agreements it isn't unusual to give the government approval rights over specific activities, Brower said. U.S. Steel made no filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday. Nippon Steel originally offered nearly $15 billion to purchase U.S. Steel in an acquisition that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. As it sought to win over American officials, Nippon Steel gradually increased the amount of money it was pledging to invest into U.S. Steel. American officials now value the transaction at $28 billion, including the purchase bid and a new electric arc furnace — a more modern steel mill that melts down scrap — that they say Nippon Steel will build in the U.S. after 2028. Nippon Steel had pledged to maintain U.S. Steel's headquarters in Pittsburgh, put U.S. Steel under a board with a majority of American citizens and keep plants operating. It also said it would protect the interests of U.S. Steel in trade matters and it wouldn't import steel slabs that would compete with U.S. Steel's blast furnaces in Pennsylvania and Indiana. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, and using his authority Biden blocked the transaction on his way out of the White House. But Trump expressed openness to working out an arrangement once he returned to the White House in January. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. Trump said then that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans,' although Nippon Steel has never backed off its stated intention of buying and controlling U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. 'We have a golden share, which I control,' Trump said. Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.' The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part CFIUS by the closing date of the transaction.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store