Bill Gates Would Be Worth A Lot More Than Elon Musk If He'd Kept His Microsoft Stock
If he'd never given away a dime or sold a share of the software giant, Gates would have nearly 10 times more to give away.
On Thursday, Bill Gates publicly reiterated that he'll give away almost all of his remaining wealth and wind down the namesake charitable foundation he cofounded with his ex-wife, Melinda French Gates, by the end of 2045. Fueled by Microsoft's soaring stock price and dividends, Bill and Melinda have already poured a combined $60.2 billion into the Gates Foundation since its founding in 2000, helping cement their status as America's second-biggest philanthropists. Even after their generosity, they're still the 13th and 56th richest people in the world, worth an estimated $113 billion and $30.4 billion, respectively.
But what if Bill and Melinda never discovered philanthropy–and never sold a share of Microsoft? They'd be worth $1.5 trillion combined, Forbes figures, and Bill would likely be the world's first trillionaire, with a $1.2 trillion fortune, even after his 2021 divorce. That's more than triple the net worth of Elon Musk, the richest person ever (estimated net worth: $388 billion, though he peaked at $464 billion in December). Melinda, meanwhile, would be worth an estimated $300 billion, assuming she would've gotten the same estimated percentage of the couple's assets in the divorce, which would make her the third richest person in the world after Bill and Musk .
Just before he took Microsoft public in 1986, Bill owned 11.2 million shares of the company, representing a 49% stake worth around $200 million based on the IPO price. If he'd held onto all of that stock for the next four decades, he and Melinda would now own 3.2 billion shares combined after stock splits, giving them a 43% stake in Microsoft worth $1.4 trillion. The former couple would also have another $100 billion or so of cash from dividends after-tax, according to Forbes estimates. That cash pile alone is higher than the entire net worths of all but 18 of the world's more than 3,000 billionaires.
In reality, Bill did not hold onto his Microsoft holdings. Instead he sold and gave them away steadily. Today his Microsoft ownership has shrunk to an estimated 0.9% stake worth only $28 billion (or a quarter of his net worth), as he and his Cascade Investments family office have broadly diversified what remains of his still sizable portfolio after all of his charitable giving and the divorce. Among his largest known holdings: waste disposal company Republic Services, tractor giant Deere & Co and Four Seasons Hotels. Melinda, meanwhile, is estimated to own 380,000 Microsoft shares worth only $170 million (or less than 1% of her net worth). Neither Bill nor Melinda have shown up in Microsoft's SEC filings since Bill stepped down from the board in 2020 after retiring as CEO to focus on his philanthropy in 2008.
Of course, this alternate reality in which Bill and Melinda hoarded all their Microsoft shares would have deprived the world of a lot of good. Through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which was renamed the Gates Foundation after Melinda resigned as co-chair in June 2024, the couple has doled out an estimated $47.7 billion to date to charitable organizations focused on health and poverty alleviation. That's more than anyone other than Warren Buffett, who has given away an estimated $62 billion so far, mostly through the Gates Foundation; Buffett was long believed to have earmarked much of his wealth to the Gates Foundation, but wrote in a letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders in November 2023 that a charitable trust overseen by his three children will be the sole beneficiary of his estate. Then last June, Buffett told the Wall Street Journal that 'The Gates Foundation has no money coming after my death.'
Melinda has redrawn her philanthropic plans too, pouring $674 million into a new foundation called Pivotal Philanthropies in 2022. Then last June, after committing to donate $1 billion over three years to support womens' and girls' rights a month earlier, she announced that she would be getting another $12.5 billion for philanthropy as part of her decision to resign as co-chair of the Gates Foundation.
Both Bill and Melinda remain set on fulfilling the Giving Pledge, which they cofounded with Buffett in 2010, in order to encourage other wealthy individuals to give away at least half of their wealth before they die or in their will.
'My parents taught me what generosity looked like through how they used their time and resources,' Bill wrote in his Giving Pledge Letter. 'When the time came to choose what to do with my wealth from Microsoft, I knew I had to follow their example. I decided that the vast majority of my wealth would go toward helping as many people as possible.'
Added Melinda in her Giving Pledge Letter: 'I recognize the absurdity of so much wealth being concentrated in the hands of one person, and I believe the only responsible thing to do with a fortune this size is give it away—as thoughtfully and impactfully as possible.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
18 minutes ago
- Forbes
Microsoft Confirms Security Pause For Outlook Email Encryption
Two-click encrypted email adds security pause for Outlook users. There are lots of ways that email platforms can come under attack. Your passwords can be compromised, whether you are using Outlook or Gmail. Two-factor authentication code session cookies can be stolen by hackers enable easy account access. And you can, in effect, compromise your own email by not taking privacy considerations seriously enough. This can even be, maybe even especially be, the case when encrypted email is concerned. Which is why Microsoft is introducing a security pause for users of New Outlook for Windows. Here's what you need to know about the new 2-click encryption view. As regular readers of the cybersecurity section here at Forbes will know, I'm a great advocate for security being simple if it is to be effective. Anything that gets in the way of a smooth user experience will likely be ignored or disabled, and thus quickly becomes counterproductive from the perspective of attack mitigation. You might be surprised to learn, therefore, that I'm all in when it comes to the latest Microsoft announcement that Outlook is introducing a security pause to the encrypted email viewing process. 'New Outlook for Windows will now support a two-click view for encrypted emails,' Microsoft said. 'This feature enables admins to require user confirmation before allowing access to encrypted emails.' Sounds like an extra security hurdle to me, for sure, but in this case, it is a desired one. Why so? Because we are talking about preventing users from opening an encrypted email without giving any thought at all. What if the user is in an inappropriate environment? What if there are people around who should not be able to view the contents? Poor privacy controls are the doorway to compromise, especially when sensitive data is concerned, and let's face it, why would you encrypt email if it were not meant to kept private? Admins with control over New Outlook for Windows, as well as Outlook for the web, iOS and Android, will be able to implant the security pause from the TwoClickMailPreviewEnabled setting in the Microsoft Azure directory, and Microsoft said they can also set this up using a Microsoft PowerShell command in Microsoft Exchange Online PowerShell. The feature will start rolling out in early April and be complete by the end of that month, although Android and iOS implementations will come a little later, with the end of June being the target completion date, according to Microsoft.
CNET
26 minutes ago
- CNET
Should You Buy or Rent Your Router? The Wrong Choice Set Me Back Nearly $1,000
I've been writing about the internet for six years, and for most of them, I carried around a shameful secret: I rented a Wi-Fi router from Xfinity. Even though I've always advised readers to buy their own equipment, my rented modem and router worked fine. But all that time, in the back of my mind, I knew it was a waste of money. A monthly charge of $15 for internet equipment doesn't seem too bad when you're first signing up for internet, but after a few years of paying that monthly fee, you'll quickly rack up hundreds of dollars for a cost you could have avoided. When I looked through my old bills and added up the cost of renting internet equipment, I found I spent $873 on Xfinity's equipment fees over those six years. Buying your router and modem may seem like a hefty upfront cost, but it will likely pay for itself in the first year. With the money I've spent renting Xfinity equipment, I could've bought the most advanced router CNET's ever tested and then bought another as a backup. I could've doubled the internet speed I was getting. I could've booked a flight to Oslo. I was finally ready to enter the world of modem and router ownership. Locating local internet providers As satisfied as I was with my Xfinity gear, owning your own equipment is almost always the better option. You'll often get better performance -- my upload speeds increased by more than 2,000%. As I said, it'll usually pay for itself within the first year or two. The average internet bill in the US comes in at $78 per month -- and that's before you add the extra taxes and fees, which you should be able to see on your ISP's broadband nutrition label. Some of these are unavoidable, but equipment rental fees don't fall into that category. You might be perfectly content to pay a bit extra for the convenience of not having to buy and set up your own equipment. But if you're looking to save money in the long run and are comfortable purchasing and managing your own gear, it's a far better deal to shell out for your own router and modem. You may also be able to take advantage of any low-income discounts available in your state if you qualify. Here's what I've learned about making the switch from rented equipment to my own, and here's how you can make a similar change as painless as possible. How to choose the right modem and router The best internet is the internet you never notice, and I can't remember the last time my connection went out or I saw a buffering wheel in my home. And this is all with a device from 2017 that Xfinity describes as an "old Wireless Gateway with limited speeds and functionality." This goes to show how much the type of internet user you are has to do with what kind of equipment you need. I live in a 750-square-foot apartment, and my internet needs are mostly limited to video calls and TV streaming. If you live in a larger home with multiple floors, the same router likely won't cut it. Similarly, activities like online gaming hinge on split-second reactions. If this instantaneous responsiveness is important to you, it's probably worth investing in a gaming router that minimizes lag. Wi-Fi routers run the gamut from entry-level models like the TP-Link AC1200 for $30 to ultra-advanced mesh systems like the Netgear Orbi 970 Series for $1,500. To test each Wi-Fi router, CNET runs three speed tests in five different rooms in our testing facility, logging results for download speed, upload speed and latency. That process is repeated six times, accounting for variations in network performance at different times of the day. Ry Crist/CNET After consulting our picks for the best Wi-Fi routers, I decided to go with a budget pick: the TP-Link Archer AX21, of which my former CNET colleague and router connoisseur Ry Crist wrote, "It's nothing fancy, but it offered near flawless performance for small- to medium-size homes in our tests, and it's a cinch to setup." I get only 200Mbps through my Xfinity plan, so the 700Mbps speed the TP-Link hits at close range is more than enough juice and only cost $85 when I bought it. (Several government agencies have since opened investigations into TP-Link for ties to Chinese cyberattacks. But I don't have any plans to replace my TP-Link router just yet.) A cable modem like the Hitron CODA connects your home to your internet provider through a coaxial cable. Hitron Do you need to buy a modem? Depending on your internet connection, you may need to purchase a cable modem in addition to your router. Some ISPs, like Spectrum, include the modem for free but charge extra for a router. The main thing to look for in a modem is compatibility. Your internet provider will have a page on their website that lists all the models that it works with, and you shouldn't stray from this. You may also have a choice between DOCSIS 3.0 and 3.1; the newer standard provides faster speeds, but DOCSIS 3.1 modems are typically more expensive. (Note: Although some ISPs have DOCSIS 4.0 modems available to rent, most are not yet widely available for purchase.) Other things to consider are the modem's speed limits -- make sure they're equal to or above your internet plan -- and the number of Ethernet ports. Xfinity doesn't provide a free modem, so I had to buy one in addition to a Wi-Fi router. I opted for the Hitron CODA Modem -- a DOCSIS 3.1 model that's one of the cheapest Xfinity-compatible models I could find for $100 at the time I purchased it. It supports download speeds up to only 867Mbps, but that's still far more than my Xfinity plan. How to set up your new modem and router Ordering the equipment is the easy part; the ordeal of setting up third-party equipment is what keeps many customers on the hook for years. The process is largely the same whether you're starting service fresh with a new provider or swapping out old equipment. Here's everything you'll need to do. 1. Activate your new modem with your ISP The modem is the piece of equipment that brings the internet to your home through a coaxial cable connected to your internet provider's network. Before it can work, ISPs need to tie your specific modem to your account. If you're replacing old equipment, they will also turn this off as they activate the new modem. ISPs do this by logging your MAC (media access control) number, which can be found on the bottom of the modem. You can typically do this through your internet provider's app, in a live chat or by calling a customer service number. 2. Connect the coax cable to your modem After your new modem's MAC address is registered with your ISP, you'll be prompted to connect your modem to the cable outlet in your wall and plug it into a power outlet. You may have to wait up to 5 minutes, and your modem's lights will tell you when it's receiving the internet signal. Once the indicator lights are on, you're ready to set up your wireless router. This TP-Link router offers wireless access to your modem's connection with the web (hence the antennas). Ry Crist/CNET 3. Set up your Wi-Fi router Each Wi-Fi router has its own setup process, so you'll want to follow the instructions provided. In the case of the TP-Link Archer AX21, that meant unplugging the modem's power, connecting the modem to the router's WAN port via an Ethernet cable, powering on the modem and then plugging the router into a power outlet. From there, I set up my new network through the TP-Link app. That's the short version. There's a lot more to consider when setting up a wireless router, including choosing the optimal location, setting up parental controls and protecting your privacy. For my purposes, though, I was ready to start testing out my new internet connection. Speed comparison: Which setup is fastest? I wanted to see how my new modem and router would compare with my old equipment, so I ran speed tests before and after I was connected: one from my desk next to the router and one from the furthest corner of my apartment (regrettably, the bathroom). My old modem and router returned 164/5Mbps speeds from my desk and 143/5Mbps from the bathroom -- not bad for an internet plan that advertises 200/10Mbps speeds. But the speeds with my new equipment were eye-popping: 237/118Mbps at both my desk and my bathroom. I didn't just save money by purchasing my own equipment -- I'm actually getting a significant speed boost, too. Joe Supan / CNET I have no idea why my new equipment picked up 10 times the upload speeds of my old one. I subscribe to Xfinity's Connect More plan, which is supposed to get only 10Mbps upload speeds. In 2022, Xfinity announced that it was increasing upload speeds on my plan to 100Mbps -- but only for customers who pay for its $25-per-month xFi Complete equipment. Apparently, I'm reaping those same benefits with my new modem and router. My best guess is that the upgrade from a DOCSIS 3.0 to a 3.1 modem is the main reason for the jump in upload speeds. How to save yourself some headaches I eventually got my modem and router set up properly, but I made plenty of mistakes along the way. Here's what I would do differently: Buy your modem and router on day one. Moving is a pain, and no one wants to make their to-do list even longer, but this is one task where the extra effort pays off (nearly a thousand dollars in my case). A technician Use your ISP's list of compatible modems. Routers aren't tied to specific providers, but if you have to purchase your own modem, you'll need to make sure that it works with your ISP. Don't cut corners here. I searched Amazon for a modem that said it was compatible with Xfinity and ended up having to return it a week -- and several hours of phone calls -- later. Your provider should have a page where it lists all the modems that it works with -- don't stray from this. Pay for only the speed you need. Internet equipment is expensive, and there's no reason to pay for a modem certified for 2,000Mbps when you're getting only 200Mbps with your plan. The same goes for routers -- you don't need to pay top dollar for a gaming router with exceptional latency if you're just streaming TV and scrolling the internet. My final thoughts Setting up a new modem and router is not fun, but it's absolutely worth it. My internet speeds have dramatically improved, and I'm paying significantly less for them. I'm saving $15 per month on equipment, and somewhere along the line, an Xfinity agent bumped my plan price down for the following year. My monthly bill went from $78.54 to $50. That's far more than I expected to save, and my new equipment paid for itself within the first six months. My only regret is that I didn't make the leap sooner.
Washington Post
39 minutes ago
- Washington Post
$75 billion firm wins carve-out in tax bill after lobbying push
The tax bill before Congress would partially exempt the U.S. Virgin Islands from a law meant to crack down on tax havens, after a lobbying campaign by the territory's government and a large private credit firm that stands to benefit from the measure. Over the past three years, an affiliate of the credit giant Golub Capital paid a Washington firm more than $500,000 to urge Congress to relax a global minimum tax approved as part of the 2017 GOP tax law, lobbying disclosures show. The push was supported by the Virgin Islands' governor and Democratic member of Congress. House Republicans included a bipartisan provision partially exempting the Virgin Islands from that law in the tax legislation they approved last month — a decision that has puzzled experts on both the left and right, who say it has little clear policy justification.
