logo
2026 Social Security COLA estimated at 2.4% after latest inflation report

2026 Social Security COLA estimated at 2.4% after latest inflation report

USA Today13-05-2025

2026 Social Security COLA estimated at 2.4% after latest inflation report
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Social Security checks increasing in 2025
The Cost of Living Adjustment is rising in 2025, which will change the amount of money people will receive in their Social Security checks.
Fox - 10 Phoenix
Social Security checks could increase by 2.4% next year based on Tuesday's consumer inflation report, according to estimates by an independent analyst.
Overall consumer prices increased 2.3% from a year earlier, down from 2.4% rise the previous month and the smallest annual increase since February 2021, according to the Labor Department's consumer price index, a measure of average changes in goods and services costs. The so-called CPI-W subset of the consumer price report that's used to determine Social Security's cost-of-living increase rose 2.1%, down from March's 2.2% increase.
The official 2026 COLA will not be determined until October because it depends on inflation data from the third quarter, which is collected between July and September. But analysts often track the estimates in the months leading up to the crucial July through September timeframe.
A 2.4% COLA would be the smallest increase since 2020 and raise the average retiree benefit in April of $1,999.97 per month by about $48. In January, the average beneficiary received a 2.5% increase, which amounted to a $50 raise to $1,957, up from $1,907 in January 2024.
While the estimated 2.4% COLA increase is higher than last month's forecast for 2.2%, it still may underestimate the final 2026 COLA, said Mary Johnson, independent Social Security and Medicare policy analyst.
"Trump Administration tariffs are only beginning to have an impact raising consumer prices," she said.
How could Trump's tariffs affect the COLA?
Though some of the highest of President Donald Trump's tariffs have been lowered or paused for now, economists still believe the ones in place will be enough to increase inflation soon.
The "de-escalation with China provided some near-term relief. But the reality remains that we will still likely see inflation peaking at 3% later this year and there remains significant uncertainty around what U.S. trade policy will look like beyond the next 90 days," said Mike Reid, senior U.S. economist at Royal Bank of Canada.
On Monday, China and the U.S. said they would pause their reciprocal tariffs for 90 days. Effective from Wednesday, the U.S. will temporarily reduce tariffs on China to 30%, down from 145%, and China will reduce tariffs on U.S. goods to 10%, down from 125%.
COLA should rise in line with any inflation increases.
What is CPI-W?
The Social Security Administration bases its COLA each year on average annual increases in the consumer price index for urban wage earners and clerical workers (CPI-W) from July through September.
CPI-W is a subset of the overall consumer inflation index that looks at the price inflation experienced by working adults younger than 62, Johnson said. The problem with that is younger working consumers spend their money differently than older people covered by Medicare. For example, economists estimate younger workers spend about 7% of their budget on healthcare costs, but research and surveys have indicated that older adults tend to spend on average 15% or more of their incomes on healthcare, she said.
As a result, COLA often seems insufficient to keep up with rising costs, Johnson said.
However, this year, Johnson noted that prescription drug prices have not been growing quite as fast as in past years. Prescription drug prices rose 2.3% through April from one year ago, as measured by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In 2023, prescription drug prices increased by 3.3% from December 2022 to December 2023 before slowing down last year.
Since 2023, the Inflation Reduction Act requires drug companies to pay Medicare rebates if drug prices rise faster than inflation. 'That provision, which was widely supported by Medicare beneficiaries, could be restraining runaway drug prices,' she said.
Can Trump further rein in prescription drug prices?
Trump signed an executive order on Monday encouraging linking the cost of prescription drugs to what's paid in other nations where drug prices are negotiated by their government and tend to be much lower.
The proposal is widely supported by older Americans, but it's unclear if Trump's order would lower costs, Johnson said.
'An executive order, however, is not the same thing as a law change giving Medicare the authority to use these prices in negotiations with drug companies,' Johnson noted. Courts also blocked a similar plan during Trump's first presidency.
Instead, the executive order appears to encourage direct-to-consumer sales using the most favored nation pricing, which suggests it could apply to transactions outside of Medicare coverage, she said. The executive order also mentions waivers to allow for importing prescriptions from other countries where prices may be lower.
'If that doesn't muddy the waters enough, one has to wonder what effect tariffs would have on the final drug prices,' she said.
Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@usatoday.com and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Treasury yields slip as U.S.-China trade talks enter Day 2
Treasury yields slip as U.S.-China trade talks enter Day 2

CNBC

time11 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Treasury yields slip as U.S.-China trade talks enter Day 2

Treasury yields slipped Tuesday as U.S. and Chinese officials resumed trade negotiations in London for the second day. The 10-year Treasury yield was down almost 3 basis points to 4.456% at 3.30 a.m. ET. The 2-year yield slipped around one basis point to 3.993%. The 30-year yield was lower by 3 basis points to 4.921%. One basis point equals 0.01%. Yields and prices move inversely in the bond market. U.S.-China trade negotiations in London resumed on Tuesday, building on a recent call between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping. On Monday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer had talks with Chinese officials. Both sides have intensified diplomatic efforts following weeks of escalating trade tensions and uncertainty sparked by Trump's broad import tariffs on China and other key trading partners in April. "While we await any concrete news, it's worth remembering that markets have been used to a lot of back-and-forth in recent weeks," Deutsche Bank's analysts said, in reference to how U.S. tariffs slapped on China went all the way up to 145%, before being slashed to 30%, among other instances of policy reversals. "There've been several twists and turns already, and markets are getting fairly used to this uncertainty by now," wrote in a note published Tuesday. Deflation in China is also putting pressure on the Chinese government to negotiate a trade deal with Trump that benefits both countries, said Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research. China's consumer prices fell for a fourth consecutive month in May, with the CPI falling 0.1% from a year earlier, data from the National Bureau of Statistics showed on Monday.

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures tread water ahead of next round of US-China talks
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures tread water ahead of next round of US-China talks

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures tread water ahead of next round of US-China talks

US stock futures were in a holding pattern on Tuesday ahead of the second day of renewed trade talks between the US and China after an upbeat initial meeting. Futures on the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F), the S&P 500 (ES=F), and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) hovered just below the flat line. Stocks edged higher on Monday after Trump officials suggested that trade talks with China in London had been productive. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said it was a "good meeting," while President Trump cautioned that while "China's not easy," he received "good reports." Representatives for the countries are set to reconvene Tuesday morning in London and are expected to focus negotiations on rare earths and tech. Investors are eager for tensions between the two trading partners to resolve as the risks to economies worldwide remain high. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs Meanwhile, investors are counting down to the release of the May Consumer Price Index (CPI) report on Wednesday. The report will offer fresh insight into the state of inflation amid Trump's evolving trade policy. Analysts expect to see price pressures accelerated last month.

Uncle Elon's final report card
Uncle Elon's final report card

Business Insider

time21 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Uncle Elon's final report card

All good buddy comedies come to an end. For President Donald Trump and first friend "Uncle Elon" Musk, theirs wrapped up with the same explosive fanfare upon which it started. But now their shared enthusiasm for cutting government waste has morphed into animosity for each other so deep and personal that it's become a textbook case study in management gone wrong. In November, just after Trump's reelection, I asked management experts if Musk could mimic his track record of juicing everything he could out of his lean companies to make the government run more efficiently. They were reluctant to doubt Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency, but just as reluctant to think his efficiency tactics at Tesla and X meant he could single-handedly transform the government. I checked back in with some of them in March, six weeks into DOGE's chaotic tenure, after it dismantled USAID and axed tens of thousands of federal workers. They described his management as "clumsy," "wrongheaded," and full of "political recklessness." Now, the breakup of the bromance between two of the world's biggest, boldest personalities is surprising only in that it took so long to unfold and, once it did, moved with the speed that only two social media savvy, chronically online posters could propel. (Musk posted on X more than a dozen times lambasting Trump and his " Big Beautiful Bill" late last week, since deleting some of the most disparaging claims, and Trump suggested Musk might be suffering from "Trump derangement syndrome.") If DOGE is a cautionary tale in how not to manage, it's one from the furthest extreme, marked by a clash between the egos of two of the world's most powerful men that made politics extremely personal. Still there are business lessons to be gleaned even for those of us who run fewer than six companies and have fewer than 220 million social media followers. DOGE has proved "unsuccessful" up to this point, and is so far a "failed venture" for Musk and for the government, says Subodha Kumar, a professor at Temple University's Fox School of Business. It brought "disruption, a lot of delays, a lot of mistrust, and a lot of good people have left the organization," he says. "This kind of damage takes a long time to repair." To date, DOGE has claimed it found $180 billion in savings (Musk in May called DOGE "effective," but "not as effective as I'd like," as the original goal was to save $2 trillion). An analysis in April from nonpartisan research group Partnership for Public Service found that the department's actions could cost as much as $135 billion, an estimate of the costs of the firings, re-hirings, and lost productivity. Meanwhile, the four months Musk spent working taking a chainsaw to the federal government are wrapping up doused in drama that has spilled over to his other companies. After his 130-day post as a special government employee ends, Musk is pointing the blame for government waste back on Trump, skewering the spending bill for being too big and ugly, and endorsing a call to impeach Trump and replace him with Vice President JD Vance (that post has since been deleted). The lesson here is akin to that of two mob bosses of the gangster world who both crave the superior distinction of being the number one boss. Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a Yale School of Management leadership professor The escalating tension is just the beginning of a fight that could get worse for Musk, and likely has little benefit for Trump, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a Yale School of Management leadership professor who has studied Trump for decades and advised presidents, tells me in an email. DOGE, he notes, overpromised savings and may actually cost US taxpayers more when it comes to rehiring costs, repairing systems, and weakened cybersecurity. As WIRED reported last week, DOGE is hiring, and even has reached out to technologists who formerly worked for the government. Musk's involvement with the DOGE proved tumultuous for his businesses from the start. His personal wealth ballooned by some $200 billion in 2024, surpassing $400 billion after Election Day. Once he got to work in the White House, his absenteeism from his companies — paired with a growing distaste for DOGE's actions among the electorate and protests targeting Tesla — led his net worth to drop alongside Tesla's market cap. Last Thursday, Musk's open beef with Trump further hampered his wealth, leading the Tesla CEO to lose $34 billion personally in a single day. Tesla stock, which has taken a beating as people turn on the company to protest Musk's government work, took its biggest tumble since March, closing 14% lower and wiping out $152 billion from the company's market cap. Musk is still the richest person in the world. For Musk, there's damage to the Tesla brand in need of repair. His next step could be "to portray himself as a purist who came in to offer his technical help and didn't realize how deep the corruption runs," says Michael Morris, a professor at Columbia Business School. "Musk could potentially portray himself as a wayward son of the tech industry." This might only work if the Trump administration continues to stumble, and if Musk also sees more success, like winning big with his robotaxi push. As Taylor Lorenz reported in User Mag Friday, some high-profile Democrats are already signaling that they would welcome Musk back into the fold. Trump over the weekend told NBC News Musk would face "serious consequences" if he donated to Democratic candidates (he did not specify what they would be). It's yet to be seen where Musk will find his next political alliances: On Friday, he ran a poll on X asking if a third political party should emerge to include the 80% of Americans in the middle of Republicans and Democrats, as he sees it. The president has threatened to go after Musk's government contracts — which total in tens of billions of dollars for SpaceX and Tesla. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" Trump himself bought a Tesla just three months ago, and is now considering selling it. (Best of luck to him, the cars' resale values have tanked). As Trump and Musk part ways, it's clear that Musk's brazen, fully autonomous leadership style didn't work in the government world, as it eschewed transparency and collaboration in favor of a top-down approach. "The one-size-fits-all policy does not work everywhere," says Kumar. "You have to understand the culture of the organization and you have to work from inside rather than from outside." Back in November, experts told me it wasn't clear what authority Musk would actually wield in the newly-created position to implement massive spending cuts. Trying to employ tech-world leadership tactics from the White House created a rivalry between Musk and Trump for power and control, undercutting the alliance between the two and leaving DOGE far short of its savings goals. "The lesson here is akin to that of two mob bosses of the gangster world who both crave the superior distinction of being the number one boss — with surging parallel drives for grandiosity," Sonnenfeld says. "Musk's tragic mistake was that he forgot his role — as a staffer and advisor to Trump, not the primary character he foolishly believed himself to be, and even now, continues to overestimate his own importance and indispensability."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store