Tech firms face demands to stop illegal content going viral
"We're holding platforms to account and launching swift enforcement action where we have concerns," he said."But technology and harms are constantly evolving, and we're always looking at how we can make life safer online."The consultation highlighted three main areas in which Ofcom thinks more could be done:stopping illegal content going viraltackling harms at sourcegiving further protections to childrenThe BBC has approached TikTok, livestreaming platform Twitch and Meta - which owns Instagram, Facebook and Threads - for comment.Ofcom's range of proposals target a number of issues - from intimate image abuse to the danger of people witnessing physical harm on livestreams - and vary in what type or size of platform they could apply to.For example, proposals that providers have a mechanism to let users report a livestream if its content "depicts the risk of imminent physical harm" would apply to all user-to-user sites that allow a single user to livestream to many, where there may be a risk of showing illegal activity.Meanwhile potential requirements for platforms to use proactive technology to detect content deemed harmful to children, would only apply to the largest tech firms which present higher risks of relevant harms."Further measures are always welcome but they will not address either the systemic weaknesses in the Online Safety Act," said Ian Russell, chair of the Molly Rose Foundation - an organisation set up in memory of his 14-year-old daughter Molly Russell, who took her own life after viewing thousands of images promoting suicide and self-harm.He added that Ofcom showed a "lack of ambition" in its approach to regulation."As long as the focus is on sticking plasters not comprehensive solutions, regulation will fail to keep up with current levels of harm and major new suicide and self-harm threats," Mr Russell said."It's time for the prime minister to intervene and introduce a strengthened Online Safety Act that can tackle preventable harm head on by fully compelling companies to identify and fix all the risks posed by their platforms."What the Online Safety Act is - and how to keep children safe onlineThe consultation is open until 20 October 2025 and Ofcom hopes to get feedback from service providers, civil society, law enforcement and members of the public.It comes as tech platforms look to bring their services in line with the UK's sweeping online safety rules that Ofcom has been tasked with enforcing.Some have already taken steps to try and clamp down on features that experts have warned may expose children to grooming, such as through livestreaming.In 2022, TikTok banned children raised its minimum age for going live on the platform from 16 to 18 - shortly after a BBC investigation found hundreds of accounts going live from Syrian refugee camps with children begging for donations.YouTube recently said it would increase its threshold for users to livestream to 16, from 22 July.
Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
Berlin weighs trusteeship extension for Rosneft's German assets, sources say
BERLIN/FRANKFURT, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Berlin is considering extending its trusteeship over the German assets of Russian oil producer Rosneft ( opens new tab for a sixth time, two people familiar with the matter said, as efforts to sell the business drag on. The repeated trusteeship renewals raise pressure on Berlin to come up with a better legal structure for Rosneft's activities in Germany. The situation is emblematic of the challenges Berlin faces in dealing with Russian assets in Germany at a time when efforts to end the war in Ukraine are picking up pace. Rosneft's German assets, including stakes in the Schwedt, MiRo and Bayernoil refineries, were put under government trusteeship in September 2022 in the wake of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which sparked an energy crisis due to the collapse of Europe's relations with key supplier Russia. So far, Berlin has shied away from nationalising Rosneft's activities, opting instead to maintain de facto control over them via a trusteeship that still leaves legal ownership in Russian hands. The trusteeship, which has to be renewed every six months, currently runs until September 10 and is being enacted by the German network regulator, the Bundesnetzagentur, on behalf of the economy ministry. A formal decision about the trusteeship extension is still outstanding, the sources said. Rosneft, Russia's biggest oil producer, has sought to sell its German businesses, including a 54.17% stake in the PCK Schwedt refinery, but talks with potential suitors, including Qatar, have proven unsuccessful so far. The first source said talks between Rosneft and Qatar were ongoing. Rosneft also owns a 24% stake in the MiRo and a 28.57% stake in the Bayernoil refineries. The economy ministry said that Berlin was examining various options regarding the group's German assets. "Ensuring security of supply remains the primary goal," a spokesperson for the ministry said, adding that Berlin was not part of the sales negotiations and could not provide information about it. The Qatar Investment Authority and Rosneft did not respond to requests for comment. Gazprom Germania, now operating under the name Sefe, was nationalised by Berlin in 2022 after the group's former Russian parent ditched the division, which is a vital part of Germany's gas supply. "The federal government is locked into its own strategy. For the (conservatives) Christian Democrats, expropriating companies would be against their campaigns ... it would be a major step with a very high threshold," the first source said.
The Guardian
8 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Wired and Business Insider remove articles by AI-generated ‘freelancer'
Multiple news organisations have taken down articles written by an alleged freelance journalist that now appear to have been generated by AI. On Thursday, Press Gazette reported that at least six publications, including Wired and Business Insider, have removed articles from their websites in recent months after it was discovered that the stories – written under the name of Margaux Blanchard – were AI-generated. Wired published a story titled 'They Fell in Love Playing Minecraft. Then the Game Became Their Wedding Venue' in May. A few weeks later, the outlet took down the story, stating in an editor's note: 'After an additional review of the article … Wired editorial leadership has determined this article does not meet our editorial standards.' The story cited a 'Jessica Hu', an alleged 34-year old 'ordained officiant based in Chicago' who reportedly 'made a name for herself as a 'digital celebrant', specialising in ceremonies across Twitch, Discord and VRChat', according to Press Gazette, which reviewed the Wired article. Both the Press Gazette and the Guardian were not able to verify the identity of Hu. Press Gazette further reported that in April, Business Insider published two essays by Blanchard titled: 'Remote work has been the best thing for me as a parent but the worst as a person' and 'I had my first kid at 45. I'm financially stable and have years of life experience to guide me.' Earlier this week, Business Insider removed the articles after Press Gazette alerted the outlet over the authenticity of the author. Both article pages now feature a message saying that the stories were 'removed because [they] didn't meet Business Insider's standards'. The Guardian has contacted both Wired and Business Insider for comment. Press Gazette says it was first alerted to the inauthenticity of Blanchard's articles by Jacob Furedi, editor of a new magazine called Dispatch. Furedi said that he received a pitch from Blanchard earlier this month about 'Gravemont, a decommissioned mining town in rural Colorado that has been repurposed into one of the world's most secretive training grounds for death investigation'. In the pitch, which Furedi shared with Press Gazette, Blanchard wrote: 'I want to tell the story of the scientists, ex-cops, and former miners who now handle the dead daily – not as mourners, but as archivists of truth. I'll explore the ethical tightrope of using real human remains in staged environments, the shadow economy of body donations, and the emotional toll on those who make a living from simulated tragedy. 'I'm the right person for this because I've reported on hidden training sites before, have clearance contacts in forensic circles, and know how to navigate sensitive, closed-off communities with empathy and discretion,' she added. Furedi told the Press Gazette that pitch sounded like it was generated by ChatGPT and couldn't find details about Gravemont. The Guardian has also not been able to verify details of the alleged town. Upon asking Blanchard how she discovered the town, she replied: 'I'm not surprised you couldn't find much – Gravemont doesn't advertise itself. I first heard about it while interviewing a retired forensic pathologist for an unrelated piece.' She went on to say: 'Over the next few months, I pieced together more through a mix of public records requests, conversations with former trainees, and hints buried in conference materials from forensic associations. None of them referred to it by name in print, but the details lined up. Eventually, I spoke with a former miner from the area who confirmed the site's transformation after the mine closure. 'It's one of those places that exists in the industry's collective memory, but just under the radar enough to evade coverage – which is exactly why I think it would resonate with Dispatch readers,' Blanchard added. Furedi told Press Gazette that despite the pitch seeming 'very convincing', he knew she was 'bullshitting'. He asked Blanchard for public record requests, about her standard rate and how long she planned to spend in the field. In response, Blanchard ignored Furedi's request to see public records requests and instead said she would 'ideally spend 5-7 days on the ground' and be paid around $670, Press Gazette reports. Last Friday, Furedi accused Blanchard via email of publishing false stories to which she has not responded. Press Gazette further reports that Blanchard has not responded to its own request for her to provide evidence that she is a real person. This incident of false AI-generated reporting follows a May error when the Chicago Sun-Times' Sunday paper ran a syndicated section with a fake reading list created by AI. Marco Buscaglia, a journalist who was working for King Features Syndicate, turned to AI to help generate the list, saying: 'Stupidly, and 100% on me, I just kind of republished this list that [an AI program] spit out … Usually, it's something I wouldn't do … Even if I'm not writing something, I'm at least making sure that I correctly source it and vet it and make sure it's all legitimate. And I definitely failed in that task.' Meanwhile, in June, the Utah court of appeals sanctioned a lawyer after he was discovered to have used ChatGPT for a filing he made in which he referenced a nonexistent court case.
Times
8 minutes ago
- Times
Is this the right time to buy shares in Pagegroup?
The last time this column looked at Pagegroup back in January 2024, the recruiters were coming off the back of a tough 12 months but there was optimism that a rebound was not too far away. Fast-forward 18 months and the market slowdown that began towards the end of 2022 is still here: companies are not hiring and candidates are not moving. This is the longest downturn anyone in the industry can remember. The Tempus advice to avoid Pagegroup was sage: since the start of last year, shares in the company are down 46 per cent. Pagegroup enjoyed a couple of record years after the pandemic during the 'great resignation' as people, after months sitting at home, rethought what they wanted from a job. It helped, too, that in their rush to ready themselves for the post-lockdown economic rebound, companies were offering generous pay increases to rebuild their workforces. That mini-boom came to an end almost three years ago and the intervening period has been marked by rapid inflation, spiralling interest rates, wars and general economic and geopolitical uncertainty. Page's fee income has been falling since the start of 2023 and it is still dropping. Earlier this month it dashed any hopes of an imminent improvement in the market having seen, if anything, a 'slight deterioration in activity levels' in Europe over the summer, particularly in Germany and France, the two largest countries. No one in the industry knows when the market will pick up again, but it almost certainly will not be this calendar year. The timeline for a recovery has been pushed back so many times that recruitment firms have stopped offering their predictions. Page has suffered more than some of its rivals because of its reliance on filling full-time roles for its clients. Permanent hiring still makes up 72 per cent of its fee income, versus 28 per cent for its contracting division. Many of those companies that are still hiring are bringing in workers on fixed-term contracts to oversee specific projects. Page has said that this trend is because companies, faced with uncertainty, are seeking 'more flexible options'. In response to the prolonged downturn, the company has shaved £15 million from its annual cost base, a chunk of which has come from cutting its headcount. In 2022, it had more than 7,000 recruiters but its staff numbers have since been reduced by about a quarter as its fees have dried up over the past couple of years. It now has 5,163 recruiters around the world, having cut a further 207 consultant roles so far in 2025. It has also done away with special dividends, which tripled investors' income in the good years. Due to the sometimes drastic measures, Page is just about keeping its head above water. In the first six months of 2025, it made a profit of £200,000, down from £27.7 million in the same period of 2024. For context, in the first half of 2022, it made a pre-tax profit of £114.5 million. Its shares still look expensive relative to peers though. Its enterprise value-to-underlying profit ratio of 9.4 times compares with 7.4 times at Hays, for example. • Recruiter Hays slashes dividend after 90% drop in profits Analysts at Panmure Liberum expect Page will turn an underlying profit of about £22 million this year — not too dissimilar to what it made in 2009, during the depths of the financial crisis, and in the lockdown-hit 2020. Management's target of achieving an underlying profit of £400 million currently looks unreachable, but they have stuck with it. Even when the recovery does come, there remain long-term doubts not just about Page but the recruitment industry more generally. Advances in artificial intelligence mean companies' internal HR teams can now scan through hundreds of CVs and cover letters and pick out four or five people for an in-person interview. Social media, particularly LinkedIn, has made hunting for jobs or candidates off your own bat that bit easier. Given the shares' performance over the past 12 months, and with Page's focus on permanent hiring making it more exposed to the economic cycle, any sniff of a pick-up in activity will boost its share price. But no one expects that inflection point to arrive soon. There is too much uncertainty, both in the short and long term, to recommend buying shares in Pagegroup — especially at a time when the broader London stock market is hitting fresh records almost daily. Advice Avoid Why Outlook remains uncertain and AI poses a threat
