
Native American groups slam Trump call to bring back Redskins name
In Sunday posts on his Truth Social platform, Trump said there was "a big clamoring" for the team, which has been called the Commanders since 2022, to revert to its former name and that "our great Indian people" want it to happen.
Trump also urged Major League Baseball's Cleveland Guardians, who changed their name from Indians in 2021, to follow suit.
But some Native American groups slammed Trump for pushing for a return to what they called harmful names.
"These mascots and names do not honor Native Peoples — they reduce us to caricatures," the Association on American Indian Affairs said in a statement. "Our diverse Peoples and cultures are not relics of the past or mascots for entertainment."
"Native Nations are sovereign, contemporary cultures who deserve respect and self-determination, not misrepresentation."
After decades of criticism that the name was a racial slur, the Washington NFL team in July 2020 retired the Redskins name and logo -- featuring the profile of a red-faced Native American with feathers in his hair -- that had been in place since 1933.
The National Congress of American Indians said it opposes any effort to revive what it called racist mascots that demean Indigenous communities, calling it "an affront to Tribal sovereignty."
"For 75 years, NCAI has held an unbroken voice: Imagery and fan behaviors that mock, demean, and dehumanize Native people have no place in modern society," NCAI President Mark Macarro said in a statement.
Because Congress retains oversight of D.C. under its home-rule law, Trump could try to influence federal funding or approvals tied to the stadium, but he lacks direct authority to block it.
Congress, controlled by Trump's Republicans, also has the power to override decisions by the Democratic-dominated Washington, D.C., City Council, though it rarely exercises this authority.
The team, which has been in suburban Landover, Maryland, since 1997, reached an agreement with the District of Columbia government in April to return to the city with a new stadium expected to open in 2030.
The White House did not respond to a request for further comment on Trump's post. The Commanders and NFL also did not respond to requests for comment.
While some groups oppose the Commanders returning to the former name, the Native American Guardians Association said it supported Trump's desire to bring back the Redskins name.
"The Native American Guardians Association stands with the President of the United States in the call to return common sense and sanity back to our nation," the group said in a statement.
"Virtually all Americans, to include American Indians, are fed up with cancel culture."
The Commanders have won three Super Bowls and are one of the NFL's marquee franchises, ranked by Forbes last year as the league's 10th most valuable franchise at $6.3 billion.
Many American professional and collegiate sports teams have Native American-themed names. Major League Baseball's Atlanta Braves, the National Hockey League's Chicago Blackhawks and NFL's Kansas City Chiefs have said they have no plans to change their names.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Trump hits Brazil and India with hefty tariffs over decisions he doesn't like
LAST UPDATE | 30 Jul THE US PRESIDENT has issued massive blanket tariffs on India and Brazil as Donald Trump falls out with the leaders of two of the largest global economies. Trump this evening announced a 25% tariff and an as-yet unspecified 'penalty' against India in retaliation against it purchasing weapons and energy from Russia. The tariff rate is lower than previously announced, but higher when compared to other Asian countries. India, the world's most populous country, was one of the first major economies to engage the White House in broader trade talks, but negotiations have now collapsed after India's reluctance to fully open its agricultural and other sectors. Speaking this evening, Trump said that while India is a 'friend' of the US, its current tariffs on US exports are 'too high'. He also accused the country of continuing to purchase weapons from Russia, which is continuing its brutal invasion of Ukraine. Advertisement Trump has signalled he intends to tighten US pressure on Moscow to halt fighting in Ukraine and negotiate a peace deal. Yesterday, he gave Russian President Vladimir Putin ten days to change course in Ukraine or face new tariffs. Despite the tariff threat, India said it was committed to continuing negotiations on 'a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement'. Tariffs on Brazil and sanctions on judge Elsewhere today, Trump imposed Brazil with 50% tariffs to pressure the country to stop the trial of far-right former president Jair Bolsonaro, who is accused of coup charges. Trump has termed the trial a 'witch hunt'. The US this morning also announced sanctions on a judge overseeing the case against Bolsonaro. The Brazillian government said the American decision was 'arbitrary and unjustifiable'. With reporting by AFP 2025 Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

Business Post
2 hours ago
- Business Post
John Deasy: EU's Trump capitulation exposes Irish spin
Business Post subscribers can read: • Why the US-EU trade deal could devastate Ireland's pharma sector — and why officials didn't see it coming • How decades of overestimated 'access' in Washington have left Ireland defenceless under Trump


Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
John Whelan: Every penny of available Apple cash needed to back Irish AI development
China's big AI Summit, launched last week in Shanghai by Premier Li Qiang, kicked off just days after US president Donald Trump pledged that that the US will 'do whatever it takes to lead the world in artificial intelligence'. After unveiling a so-called AI Action Plan, he went on to declare that America is the country that started the AI race, and 'is going to win it'. In stark contrast, Premier Li Qiang headlined his AI Summit opening night by announcing that China will organize the launch of an international body to jointly develop the technology, with the goal of preventing it from becoming 'an exclusive game for a small number of countries and enterprises'. Fianna Fáil TD for Kildare North, Naoise Ó Cearúil, last month introduced the National Artificial Intelligence Bill 2026, which will establish a state body to oversee, enforce, and support the ethical, transparent, and innovative use of artificial intelligence in Ireland. Speaking at Leinster House, Deputy Ó Cearúil stated: 'This is the first time in our history that Ireland has a real chance to lead during a global technological revolution. While countries like the US, UK, and China are investing billions into AI, Ireland must act quickly to secure its own advantage. Not just as adopters, but as global contributors and leaders." The Bill dovetails much more with the China Summit theme 'Global solidarity in the AI era' than with Mr Trump's AI action plan to dominate and control the AI global growth. Beijing, by comparison, likes to say their approach democratises access to AI by offering the world the ability to freely build atop its tools, and it gives local developers an edge. The Chinese approach is much more likely to suit Ireland's entrepreneurs as they try to develop their own range of AI products for the market, obviously to markets outside the US. Trump's AI Action Plan begins, correctly, with the observation, 'Whoever has the largest AI ecosystem will set global AI standards and reap broad economic and military benefits.' The Plan has three core components: (1) addressing regulatory barriers, (2) building AI infrastructure, and (3) leading in AI diplomacy and security. Tracing through the US Action Plan is the core issue of deregulation, which sits well with the mantra of the Big Tech US firms Meta, Alphabet, Microsoft, and Amazon, who are currently dominating the international market for AI products. Altogether, the four companies are expected to spend more than $344bn (€296bn) for the year, with much of it going to the data centres necessary to run AI models. North American tech companies led the global AI market in 2024, capturing over 37% of the total market share. But the Asia Pacific AI market is projected to grow at the fastest growth of 20% between 2025 and 2034. The conundrum facing Ireland and its attempts to help entrepreneurs to maximise their position in the global marketplace, is the recognition that they cannot wean themselves entirely from the US but they need to focus on strategic growth areas in Europe and Asia where they can build a comparative advantage. The all-or-nothing sales pitch from Mr Trump will make it hard to find this balance and heighten concerns about our dependence on U.S. technology. And there are other issues facing Irish AI entrepreneurs, particularly costs of data to train their AI models and the associated data centres. Big Tech in owning data centres clearly have an advantage, particularly as they are funding these out of current revenue cash flow. But there are other costs, which put Irish AI companies at a disadvantage. Electricity costs are the second highest in Europe, adding high energy prices on to the required large scale computing costs. Finally, AI is trained on data, and public data resources, such as media archives and healthcare data, are incredibly valuable assets that are crucial to building a resilient, sovereign AI ecosystem. Ireland can further AI innovation by identifying and responsibly making available to AI entrepreneurs key public data resources, while preserving privacy. Every penny of the €2bn Apple money available from the EU sanctions will be needed if Ireland's entrepreneurs are to produce AI products capable of competing in international markets, with the Big Tech behemoths.