Investbanq secures US$3 million in Pre-Series A funding
0
The round drew participation from Constructor Capital, Orvel, Big Sky Capital and several other prominent investors, underscoring growing investor demand for next-generation WealthTech infrastructure.
Investbanq recently captured global attention by winning Meet The Drapers, the international startup show judged by venture capitalist Tim Draper, and by receiving Global Private Banker's 'Best WealthTech - AI' award, reaffirming its technological leadership and global market potential.
Investbanq is the next-generation wealth management platform, enabling banks, asset managers, and family offices to transition into AI-driven WealthTech players. Its WealthOS product allows efficient management of the rapidly growing capital pools of affluent millennials and other digitally native investors across Asia and the MENA region
'The number of individuals requiring advanced Wealth Management was growing for 50 years, and will be exponentially accelerated by GenAI,' said Dr. Serg Bell, Founder and Chairman of Constructor Capital. 'Investbanq's dynamic and adaptive AI engine creates diversified portfolios in real time, completes onboarding in days, not months, and lowers long-standing barriers for those wanting to access private-market opportunities.'
Investbanq is headquartered in Singapore, with additional offices in Kazakhstan and the UAE. The startup has completed the EBRD Star Venture program and is now enrolled in both the NVIDIA Accelerator and First Rate Connect—evidence of strong expert backing and the platform's global potential.
'We want to help create a world where anyone can master, grow, and pass on their wealth with confidence and clarity,' said Oz Zhiyenkul, Co-founder and CEO of Investbanq.
'We are pleased that investors sharing our vision for the future of WealthTech have placed their trust in Investbanq,' added Tk Kantayev, Co-founder and COO.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
24 minutes ago
- Times
What happened when we let Times readers bet $10,000 on stocks
If you could go back in time to the day of the 2024 US election — armed with $10,000 and everything you know now — how much money could you make in the stock market? That is the challenge we set Times readers last week. Buy and sell any stock in the S&P 500 or the FTSE 100 and jump forward in time, watching how the actions of the Trump administration have affected global markets. You can play it here. So, how did readers get on as stock market traders? The average player managed to turn their $10,000 investment into about $14,000 over the eight simulated months, meaning that they generated $4,000 profit — a return of 40 per cent. This is a pretty good return, even if readers knew exactly what would happen: $10,000 invested in the S&P 500 would have returned $10,787, and the same in the FTSE 100 would have resulted in $11,095 — although $10,000 in bitcoin, turning into $16,931, would have beaten the lot. Trump's tariffs resulted in a frenzy of trading, helping Barclays to a 23 per cent jump in pre-tax profits in the first half of the year. There are, of course, some objectively 'better' stocks to pick. The US AI firm Palantir, co-founded by the Trump ally Peter Thiel, has more than tripled its value since the election. Other US AI firms and computer chip manufacturers (such as Super Micro Computer Inc and Jabil Inc) have also experienced strong growth, as well as companies in AI adjacent sectors, particularly energy stocks such as the General Electrics power spin-off GE Vernova Inc, which has benefited from increased demand from AI data centres. • The cheap and easy way to invest (without the risk) A significant number of readers wisely put all their money into Palantir, yielding returns of 200 per cent. But the highest profits were for those who traded repeatedly at optimum times. Only two players turned their $10,000 into more than $100,000; at the time of writing, the top score was an eye-watering $441,681. The highest possible score, buying the best performing stock day after day, was well over a trillion dollars. Compounding returns, to paraphrase Albert Einstein, really are the eighth wonder of the world. For data privacy reasons, we don't know which stocks the top performer picked. However, on average, those who played did not opt for high-risk, high-reward US tech stocks. In fact, most readers put their money into recognisable UK companies that had a track record of doing well. Readers rightly focused on UK defence stocks such as Rolls-Royce, BAE and also Babcock, the best performing FTSE 100 company during the period. All those stocks boomed after Trump's realignment of global defence. • Bull or bear? Find out what kind of investor you are Other top performers picked out by readers included Airtel Africa, International Airlines Group (which owns British Airways) and the mining firm Fresnillo. For the FTSE at least, readers had a good sense of where the gains have been, with most of the ten best-performing stocks over the period being in the most-bought list. The above looks at which stocks had the most money invested. But the list of stocks that were bought and sold the most — that is, with the highest number of trades — shows a preference towards US growth firms. Top of this list is Coinbase, the cryptocurrency exchange, and Elon Musk's Tesla, both of which have share prices inherently tied to unpredictable and volatile entities. Readers also explored options with oil and steel stocks. Due to tariff changes, these companies were particularly volatile. Many readers bought BP, others looked at Chevron or the US steel manufacturer Steel Dynamics. There were good profits to be had with all these, but you'd need to buy and sell at specific times to really make a good profit. • I want to invest in Europe's comeback. Where do I start? These lists also feature unexpected appearances from 3M, 3i Group, AES Corporation and APA Corporation. Theses companies didn't perform particularly well over the period and their inclusion is likely to be due to their names appearing at the top alphabetically, rather than being selected as part of a broader investment strategy.
Geeky Gadgets
an hour ago
- Geeky Gadgets
ChatGPT-5 vs Claude vs Qwen : The Hidden Costs of Picking the Wrong AI Model
What if the future of app development hinged on the AI model you choose? With the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence, developers are faced with a critical question: which model delivers the best balance of speed, reliability, and cost-effectiveness? In the race to build smarter, faster applications, three contenders—ChatGPT-5, Claude, and Qwen—have emerged as frontrunners. Each features unique strengths, yet their differences could mean the success or failure of your next project. Imagine building a tool like 'Newsletter Digest,' a web app designed to summarize newsletters, only to discover that your chosen AI model struggles to deliver functional results. The stakes are high, and understanding these models' capabilities is no longer optional, it's essential. In this comparative overview, Rob Shocks explains how these AI models stack up in real-world scenarios, using the development of 'Newsletter Digest' as a case study. You'll uncover insights into their performance metrics, strengths, and limitations, as well as the hidden costs that could impact your budget. Whether you're a developer seeking reliability, a strategist prioritizing creativity, or someone chasing speed, this breakdown will help you navigate the trade-offs. By the end, you might find yourself rethinking what matters most in an AI partner: precision, adaptability, or efficiency? AI Model Comparison Summary Project Overview: Developing 'Newsletter Digest' 'Newsletter Digest' is a web application that connects to Gmail, aggregates newsletters, and summarizes key stories for users. It also allows users to view individual newsletters in a streamlined interface. The app was developed using a modern tech stack to ensure scalability, responsiveness, and ease of use: A React-based framework for building a dynamic and efficient front end. A React-based framework for building a dynamic and efficient front end. Tailwind CSS: A utility-first CSS framework that enabled clean, responsive design. A utility-first CSS framework that enabled clean, responsive design. Neon: A Postgres database solution for managing user and application data. A Postgres database solution for managing user and application data. Prisma: A database toolkit that simplified schema generation and management. A database toolkit that simplified schema generation and management. Clerk: A user authentication and management tool integrated with Stripe for seamless billing functionality. The core functionality of summarizing newsletters relied on the capabilities of Claude, GPT-5, and Qwen Coder. These models were tested for their ability to deliver a functional app, their speed, usability, and cost-effectiveness. Comparing the AI Models Claude (Opus 4.1 and Sonnet 4) Claude proved to be the most reliable and mature AI model for this project. It excelled in generating a fully functional app with minimal errors, particularly in tasks such as database schema generation and implementing app features. Its workflow required fewer corrective prompts, which significantly reduced development time. However, this high level of performance came at a premium, as Claude was the most expensive model in the comparison. For developers prioritizing reliability and efficiency, Claude offers a robust solution, albeit at a higher cost. GPT-5 GPT-5 demonstrated strong strategic thinking and versatility but fell short in implementation compared to Claude. While it made reasonable progress in building the app, it required more corrective prompts and encountered occasional errors during the setup process. The Cursor CLI, used to interact with GPT-5, is still in beta, which introduced some glitches and limited functionality. Despite these challenges, GPT-5 showcased its ability to handle complex tasks with guidance, making it a viable option for developers who can invest additional time in troubleshooting and refinement. Qwen Coder Qwen Coder stood out for its speed, delivering rapid responses during the development process. However, it struggled to produce a complete and functional app. Its outputs were often incomplete, and it frequently stopped abruptly, requiring significant manual intervention to fill in the gaps. While its speed is promising, Qwen's lack of reliability and functionality placed it behind both Claude and GPT-5 in this comparison. Developers seeking a balance between speed and reliability may find Qwen less suitable for complex projects. ChatGPT-5 vs Claude vs Qwen Watch this video on YouTube. Stay informed about the latest in AI Models Comparison by exploring our other resources and articles. Performance Metrics The three AI models were evaluated based on their overall performance in building 'Newsletter Digest.' The results revealed clear distinctions in their capabilities: Claude: Delivered the most reliable and functional app with minimal errors and a smooth workflow. Delivered the most reliable and functional app with minimal errors and a smooth workflow. GPT-5: Ranked second, offering decent progress but requiring more corrections and encountering occasional errors. Ranked second, offering decent progress but requiring more corrections and encountering occasional errors. Qwen: Ranked third, excelling in speed but failing to deliver a complete and reliable app. Claude's ability to produce a polished and functional app with fewer iterations made it the top performer, while GPT-5's versatility and Qwen's speed highlighted their respective strengths and limitations. Cost Analysis Cost is a significant factor when selecting an AI model, particularly for projects with budget constraints. Here's a breakdown of the pricing for each model: Claude (Opus 4.1): $15 per million input tokens, $75 per million output tokens. $15 per million input tokens, $75 per million output tokens. GPT-5: $0.125 per 1,000 input tokens, $0.10 per 1,000 output tokens. $0.125 per 1,000 input tokens, $0.10 per 1,000 output tokens. Qwen: Pricing varies but is generally more affordable than Claude and GPT-5. While Claude was the most expensive option, its superior performance justified the higher cost for this project. GPT-5 offered a more affordable alternative with slightly reduced effectiveness, while Qwen's lower cost reflected its limited functionality and reliability. Insights on Development Tools The development process also highlighted the importance of the tools used alongside the AI models. These tools played a critical role in streamlining the workflow and making sure a smooth development experience: Clerk: Simplified user authentication and integrated seamlessly with Stripe for billing, reducing the complexity of managing user accounts. Simplified user authentication and integrated seamlessly with Stripe for billing, reducing the complexity of managing user accounts. Cursor CLI: Provided access to multiple AI models but, as a beta tool, had limited features and occasional glitches that impacted usability. Provided access to multiple AI models but, as a beta tool, had limited features and occasional glitches that impacted usability. Neon (Postgres DB): Worked effectively for database management, especially when paired with Prisma for schema generation and maintenance. While most tools performed well, the beta status of Cursor CLI highlighted the need for further refinement to improve its reliability and feature set. Looking Ahead: Future Considerations As of August 2025, the AI landscape continues to evolve, with emerging models like Grok and Gemini showing potential to disrupt the market. Developers should remain vigilant for advancements in AI capabilities and pricing structures. For now, Claude remains the preferred choice for projects requiring maturity, reliability, and comprehensive functionality. GPT-5 offers a strong alternative for tasks that demand strategic thinking and creative input, while Qwen Coder's speed may appeal to developers working on less complex applications. Continued refinement of tools like Cursor CLI and exploration of new technologies will further enhance the app development process, paving the way for more efficient and innovative solutions. Media Credit: Rob Shocks Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
NHS to pilot AI prostate cancer tests
An AI tool to spot prostate cancer earlier is being piloted by the NHS. The two-year scheme involving more than 3,000 men aims to speed up diagnosis of the disease, which is the most common form of cancer in men. Every year around 55,000 men in the UK are diagnosed with prostate cancer and 12,000 die from it. But just half of cases are caught at an early stage, when treatment is most effective. Trials suggest the technology can help radiologists detect around 11 per cent more early-stage cancers by highlighting suspicious regions in MRI scans. The software by Quibim uses advanced AI, trained on real pathology results, to segment the prostate into zones and highlight areas most likely to contain aggressive disease. The two-year pilot, backed by £2.6 million in NHS funding, will be rolled out to seven hospitals in England. Clinical trials suggest it can raise detection rates from 80 per cent to more than 90 per cent. Early detection dramatically improves survival rates. Almost all men who are diagnosed with stage one or two of the disease are alive five years later, compared with rates of less than 50 per cent for those with late-stage disease. As well as looking at detection rates, the pilot will examine the cost-effectiveness of the approach to see if the NHS can save money by catching the disease sooner. It will also examine the impact on inequalities in heath, with black men twice as likely to get prostate cancer. Prof Peter Johnson, national clinical director for cancer at NHS England, said: 'The NHS is funding and testing this exciting AI technology to help us diagnose and treat prostate cancer patients as quickly as possible and offer them the best chance of survival. 'As part of the 10-Year Health Plan, the NHS is taking advantage of our unique position to test state-of-the-art technology like this, and rolling it out as fast as we can to make the NHS fit for the future.' Dr. Ángel Alberich-Bayarri, chief executive of Quibim said: 'This NHS rollout is a major milestone in our mission to improve cancer diagnostics through AI. 'We're proud to support the NHS in advancing early detection and addressing health inequalities in prostate cancer care. By empowering radiologists with AI, we can help ensure more men are diagnosed earlier, when their chances of survival are highest.' Screening could cut deaths by 40 per cent The findings come as The Telegraph launches a campaign calling for the introduction of targeted screening for prostate cancer. Currently, men are not offered tests, even if they have a family history of the disease. Experts believe there is a growing case for targeted screening, meaning that PSA blood tests would be offered to those at heightened risk of the disease. Even though prostate cancer is the most-common male cancer in the UK, it is the only major cancer with no screening programme. The UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC) is currently considering whether to recommend the rollout of testing. In the past, it has rejected the idea because of concern that PSA tests are too unreliable, and would result in too many men undergoing needless procedures. In recent years, however, the back-up technology used to confirm a diagnosis has significantly improved, with hopes that further advances being tested, could mean that in the future, screening could cut deaths by 40 per cent. Prof Shonit Punwani, Professor of magnetic resonance and cancer imaging and consultant radiologist at UCLH, said: 'Initial studies have shown that the tool helps radiologists to enhance their diagnostic accuracy through identifying subtle early stage lesions that are sometimes not obvious on scans. 'Ultimately, QP-Prostate aims to improve patient outcomes by assisting radiologists in creating more accurate and reliable MRI reports.'
