
Five common myths about PIP that could be costing people up to £749 a month
A number of misconceptions are wrongly preventing people from claiming their disability benefit entitlement, Personal Independence Payments (PIP). PIP provides support for disabled individuals to help cover the additional costs they face. It offers four different rates ranging from £29.20 per week to £749.80 per month, depending on the severity of a person's disability.
Despite around 3.7 million currently receiving PIP, common myths and misunderstandings about the disability benefit could be stopping many more from claiming their entitlement. This is particularly relevant as proposed changes to PIP eligibility have been put on hold following controversy around Labour's welfare reform.
'I can't work and claim PIP'
Many believe that all DWP benefits are only available to those who are unemployed. However, PIP is a non-means tested benefit so your income, National Insurance contributions or working hours won't affect your eligibility or entitlement.
Claiming PIP does not prevent individuals from working, and claimants can alter their hours, earnings, or employment status without jeopardising this benefit. However, they may still need to report these changes to the DWP.
'I need a specific diagnosis'
The disability benefit is determined by how your condition or disability impacts your ability to carry out everyday tasks and move around. Although the DWP does release figures on what conditions are being claimed for, there isn't a definitive list of diagnoses that ensure you will or won't be eligible for the benefit.
According to Scope, you can even apply for PIP without having a diagnosis. The primary eligibility criteria is that your mental or physical condition has caused difficulty in everyday tasks or moving around for the past three months and you anticipate these difficulties to persist for at least another nine months.
'I can't have savings on PIP'
PIP is not affected by the amount of savings you have. It's not means-tested like Universal Credit, so the amount of money or assets you have saved won't impact your eligibility or the amount you may be entitled to.
However, if you successfully claim PIP, these earnings and any savings you accumulate from the benefit might affect your eligibility for means-tested benefits like Universal Credit.
'PIP is only for physical disabilities'
PIP can be granted for mental or even 'invisible' conditions as well as physical disabilities. This includes conditions that may not be apparent to the naked eye, such as Crohn's disease, autism or learning disabilities.
According to Benefits and Work, learning disabilities have one of the highest success rates for PIP claims at 90%, with 79% of claimants receiving the highest rates.
'I can manage without a support worker'
PIP, much like Attendance Allowance, is often misunderstood, with many believing that recipients must spend their benefit money on specific support such as a carer. However, there are no rules stipulating how claimants should spend their money, as the right support varies from person to person.
Some individuals may use their PIP funds to supplement their income if their disability has resulted in job loss. Others might utilise the money to make their homes or lifestyles more accessible, such as affording specialised food. The funds can even be used for hobbies, outings or savings.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Unemployed to get AI chatbot for filling out ‘boring' job applications
Unemployed people will be given an AI chatbot to help them fill out job applications as part of a government scheme to help Britons cut down on 'boring life admin'. The Government will next week unveil plans to develop an 'AI helper' that will help people apply for work – a move that critics warned could mean employers are flooded with irrelevant job applications. The scheme comes amid a surge in working-age Britons on jobless benefits and a slump in entry-level roles. Official data published this week showed that 3.7 million Britons are now claiming Universal Credit with no work requirements – a rise of more than a million since Labour came to power. On Monday the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology will issue a notice inviting AI companies to help develop an 'agent' that can fill in forms, complete job applications and register patients at doctors' surgeries. While existing chatbots such as ChatGPT are best known for answering questions, AI agents are capable of handling tasks such as booking flights and sending emails as well as answering questions. The Government's AI agent is expected to be in use in 2027. It could also be used to help people update addresses on driving licences and register to vote. Doing so would only require a short prompt, rather than filling in multiple pages of forms. Officials said the initiative was designed to 'save people time and modernise the state'. However, it comes as employers are grappling with a deluge of job applications as AI tools mean candidates can instantly generate CVs and cover letters tailored to job descriptions. A study by recruitment website Totaljobs released on Friday found that recruiters are drowning in CVs, with almost three quarters saying they were being inundated with irrelevant applications. Claire McCartney, of the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, said: 'When used appropriately, AI tools can be a useful aid for jobseekers.' However, she added: 'If candidates heavily rely on or misuse AI tools, it could mean that they're unsuitable for the roles they've applied for.' She said a quarter of firms were attempting to reduce or monitor the use of AI by applicants. Neil Carberry, the chief executive of the Recruitment and Employment Confederation, said: 'If you are advertising a job you will get hundreds more CVs than a few years ago and a large number will demonstrate they haven't really thought about the job. 'They have done 50 applications in a couple of days where previously they'd have done 10 good ones.' AI tools such as ChatGPT have been blamed for a decline in graduate opportunities, but Rachel Reeves has also been criticised for hitting the jobs market with record-breaking tax rises.


Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
SNP and Labour spending row as Nationalists claim £100bn 'wasted' since general election
It comes after figures released earlier this week showed that £91.4bn in tax receipts was raised in Scotland last year, with £117.6 billion forked out in public spending. The SNP and Labour are in a spending row after the Nationalists claimed that the UK Government has wasted £100 billion since the general election. New SNP research says Labour has wasted the billions in lost revenues from tax evasion, Brexit, Private Finance Initiative (PFI) schemes, nuclear power stations and High Speed Rail 2 (HS2). But Labour hit back, saying "these back of a fag packet numbers are nonsense" and blasting the SNP for having "squandered that money and wasted millions on ferries which have never sailed and a prison which is ten times over budget". It comes after figures released earlier this week showed that £91.4bn in tax receipts was raised in Scotland last year, with £117.6 billion forked out in public spending. This means the Scotland spends £26bn - 11.6 per cent - more than it brings in via tax. The UK as a whole spends 5.1 per cent more than it brings in. SNP Scotland Office spokesperson Stephen Gethins said: 'The eye watering £100 billion figure is a combination of economic self-harm and incompetence – Westminster has truly become a Wastemonster. This £100 billion of Westminster waste exposes the raw reality of a Britain that is bust and broken – a Brexit Britain that Scotland is paying a heavier and heavier price for. 'From the crippling costs of being isolated outside the European Union, to the ongoing price of Labour's botched PFIs, to a Westminster system that treats economic development outside the South-East of England as an afterthought – Scotland's potential and our prosperity will always be wasted by Westminster. 'For years, Westminster politicians have lectured those of us in Scotland about sound financial management – this research gives £100 billion reasons why they are in no position to lecture our country on economic competence." The bulk of the alleged waste came from Brexit and tax avoidance. The Nationalists said that £46.8bn had been wasted on the tax gap - which is the difference between expected and actual tax collected by HMRC. The party also cited a recent reported from the Centre of European Reform think tank which said the lost tax revenue because of Brexit was £40bn. Labour MP for Central Ayrshire Alan Gemmell said: "In a week when the SNP's plans for £14bn of cuts to Scottish public services have been laid bare, these back of a fag packet numbers from John Swinney are nonsense. The Labour UK Government has provided more funding for Scotland than at any point in the history of devolution, £9.1bn extra over the next three years. "The SNP have squandered that money and wasted millions on ferries which have never sailed and a prison which is ten times over budget. Their incompetence has left 1 in 6 Scots on an NHS waiting list and 10,000 children in temporary accommodation." The cost of the Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa ferries rose to £460m earlier this year - more than four times the £97m contract. The new Barlinnie jail in Glasgow is set to cost £1bn, despite original estimates saying it would only be £100m.


Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
'It's not Government money they're spending it's ours'
Record View reminds readers that all governments need to be careful how they spend the money they raise. Our political leaders often talk about spending 'government' money. But in reality that's not true. The cash they spend is actually your money – most of it gathered from taxes on our wages, VAT on consumer goods and company profits. That's why all governments need to be careful how they spend the money they raise. In today's Daily Record both Labour and the SNP are throwing barbs at each other about 'wasted money '. But both the UK and Scottish government s need to do better on that front. The Scottish Government has wasted hundreds of millions of pounds on various overspent or failed projects. The ferry fiasco, the scrapped bottle deposit scheme and the unwinnable Supreme Court legal fight on trans issues are just three areas where millions of pounds have been poured down a very big black hole. It is also true that the UK Government could be doing more to guard the public finances. They should be making sure big businesses – especially tech and energy giants – pay a fairer share of their profits to the public purse. Too much money has been blown on the HS2 high-speed rail project, with not one inch of track yet laid and the benefits to the whole UK not yet clear. We all know public services need paying for – and tax is vital for services like schools, hospitals and roads. But our governments in Edinburgh and London need to keep a closer eye on how they spend it. Together at last The world seems like a harsh place to be in 2025. Wars in Ukraine and Gaza are threatening global security. At home there seems to be a constant deluge of online hate and political discord. But it's always worth remembering that the vast majority of people out there are just trying to do their best. And some people go above and beyond to help those around them. One such person is Juleena Masters, an American lady who decided to donate bone marrow to save the life of young Scot Ava Todd. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. We reported in 2016 that Ava – then three – would not survive without a transplant due an inherited disorder. Our story made it to the US, where Juleena was found to be a match and agreed to be a donor for Ava. Now Ava is a happy and healthy girl of 12 – and has finally met up with Juleena for the first time to say thank you. It's the happiest of endings to a long and difficult journey for Ava. We hope it brightens up your day reading her story.