
Samsung hit the sweet spot: AT&T talks Galaxy Z Fold 7, tri-folds and more
Previous years have seen Samsung launch iterative versions of its phones. These would feel special in their own right, but wouldn't hit the same heights as the biggest rivals for the world's thinnest phone title: the current holder, the Honor Magic V5, and the past holder, the Oppo Find N5.
Recommended Videos
Against this, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 changes everything. It's the thinnest and lightest folding phone yet, and by far, the most successful Samsung folding phone ever. Customers are happy, as evidenced by the record pre-order numbers at both Samsung and carriers, but what makes the Fold 7 so special? How have carrier customers reacted to it, and what does the future hold for folding phones on the big carriers?
To answer these questions and dive further into the world of folding phones from the perspective of a carrier, I spoke with Jeff Howard, Vice President of Mobile Devices and Accessories at AT&T. Here's what I discovered.
Samsung figured out what foldables should be
One of the biggest surprises with the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is the initial reaction to holding it for the first time. Despite trying every folding phone, I was still taken aback by the ultra-thin design, which is the best I've seen so far on a folding phone.
It turns out that I wasn't the only one. We showed the Galaxy Z Fold 7 to 30 average smartphone users and discovered that most customers are impressed with the design. Jeff put it more succinctly:
Customers come in and discover that it's finally in a form factor that's thin enough for me to carry around.
Achieving this required 'Incredible attention to detail', which Jeff can intimately appreciate as he's also an engineer.
Jeff also reserved praise for TM Roh, the current CEO of Samsung's Mobile Experiences (MX) division. 'Tim's been pushing his team for quite a while since he moved out of engineering and into the CEO position. I think they finally figured out what foldables should be.'
Why AT&T picks some folding phones and not others
Alongside the Fold 7, Samsung released the Flip 7 and Flip 7 FE. The former is the new flagship flip phone with a stunning 4.1-inch main display, while the latter is the company's first affordable flip phone.
The Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is nearly identical to last year's Galaxy Z Flip 6, but unlike that flagship, the Flip 7 FE isn't being stocked by most major carriers. The answer is fairly straightforward, with Jeff explaining:
Our customer base demands leading-edge technology, and they're super patient when it comes to trying new things. They always want the latest and greatest.
The US market in particular poses additional challenges because of how the majority of phones are purchased. Unlike in some countries where customers pay upfront for a phone, most phones in the US are bought on installment plans. This makes the $300 price difference between the Galaxy Z Flip 7 and 7 FE far less meaningful.
One of the challenges in the US market, specifically, is installment plans… and so when you're dividing payments by 36 months… it ends up being a couple of dollars [difference] per month.
To further entice your purchase, Samsung and its carrier partners put together some of the best Galaxy Z Fold 7 deals. On AT&T, this includes up to $1,100 off a new Galaxy Z Fold 7 with any trade-in and a new line, and the Next Up Anytime program means you can get a new folding phone each year.
These deals won't be for everyone, however, and in particular, there is a subset of customers that more affordable flip phones like the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE are arguably designed for: the budget-conscious. For carriers, this plays out with value-focused MVNOs like Cricket Wireless and others. Jeff explained why the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE could still have a key role to play:
Things like the FE that we've chosen not to carry… you'll notice that it and the [base] Razr are not in that category [of the newest and latest technology]. Our Cricket customers love that product… It's just a very different set of buying behaviors.
When you look at a Cricket customer, they come in and say I may have to pay full price for this. There may be a financing option, but if I'm paying full price, then a value-type device fits my needs [better].
Rounding out the discussion on Samsung's latest folding phones, Jeff revealed his admiration for the Fold 7.
To the [book-style folding phone] form factor and how things are being used today, I feel like they've absolutely hit a sweet spot.
In our Galaxy Z Fold 7 review, I called it the best folding phone for most people. The record sales so far and the wide praise it has received suggest that Samsung really did hit the sweet spot.
Tri-folding phones and other form factors
While discussing the broader market with Jeff, the conversation turned to the subject of other form factors. In particular, tri-folding phones and smart glasses.
AT&T is well-known for adopting the latest and greatest technology. The carrier was the original launch partner of the iPhone. More recently, it carried Microsoft's Surface Duo and Surface Duo 2 before they were killed, and it has stocked every Fold so far as well. Unsurprisingly, Jeff confirmed that this has no plans to stop:
It doesn't matter if it's glasses, smartphones, watches, wearables, etc, whatever our customer wants when they're consuming content, we're going to [have] a solution for them.
The Galaxy Z Fold 7 isn't likely to be Samsung's last folding phone this year, as the company is expected to unveil the upcoming Galaxy G Fold tri-folding phone. Designed as a competitor to the Huawei Mate XT Ultimate — the world's first tri-folding smartphone, which was launched last year — the form factor allows you to unfold a smartphone into a tablet-sized 10-inch display.
Yet, this comes with a specific trade-off: the size. Looking at Huawei for an example, the Mate XT Ultimate is supremely thin at 3.6mm thick when unfolded, but given the two folds, it measures 12.8mm thick when folded. Granted, this is only 0.7mm thicker than the Galaxy Z Fold 6, but there's a definitive concern around size. Jeff echoed this sentiment as well:
I think the real question is how good a tri-fold is from a size point of view… It's possibly a niche play as the use cases aren't immediately apparent for the form factor… I'm wondering whether there will be a need for continued growth and screen size for customers versus voice input.
The latter point raised the final key area I wanted to discuss: other form factors. We've seen AI devices adopt many form factors, and Google is already working on a VR headset with Samsung, as well as smart glasses with Xreal and Warby Parker. Are smart glasses the answer?
If I'm wearing smart glasses and they have a display inside, that's where I'm going to consume content… If I don't want to carry around a 7-inch display, I'll carry around my glasses, and I can view content in that way, which is more convenient.
Despite some uncertainty around exactly what the final form factor for folding phones will look like, one thing is clear: the mobile industry has never been as exciting as it is now. I'm almost twenty years into reviewing technology, and there's never been a more exciting time in terms of the experiments and innovations that companies are building.
As Jeff Howard put it:
I've been in this industry for over 25 years… There hasn't been a time when the industry has moved faster. And it's customers who are driving that innovation.
I look forward to this technology and these folding displays providing many more opportunities from a hardware point of view.
Thanks again to Jeff and AT&T for taking the time to discuss the Galaxy Z Fold 7 with us. One month in, it's an incredible folding phone that you should consider for your next phone. Alternatively, one of the best phones may be a better fit, but regardless of which you buy, given the customer base, it'll most likely be available at AT&T.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Verge
a minute ago
- The Verge
Teenage Engineering did it again
Hi, friends! Welcome to Installer No. 94, your guide to the best and Verge-iest stuff in the world. (If you're new here, welcome, did you hydrate today, and also you can read all the old editions at the Installer homepage.) This week, I'm visiting LinkedIn way too much because of Mini Sudoku, looking at the fake texts in Apple's marketing materials, marveling at tiny doodles on microchips, listening to Taylor Swift's New Heights podcast episode, learning about model railroad power debates, reading about the death of expertise, catching up on my favorite HGTV home renovation show, and watching a very good drumline. I also have for you some durable cables, a great new Alien show, a strange RPG, and more. (As always, the best part of Installer is your ideas and tips. What do you want to know more about? What awesome tricks do you know that everyone else should? What app should everyone be using? Tell me everything: [email protected]. And if you know someone else who might enjoy Installer, forward it to them and tell them to subscribe here.) This week I'm featuring Soren Iverson, who you may recognize as the person who posts unhinged design concepts on social media like an iOS app icon filling up based on how many notifications the app has. Whenever these cross my feed, I nearly always cackle. I expected him to bring some of that chaos on his actual homescreen, but I was surprised to learn that his homescreen is even more minimal than mine — which inspired me to make mine a little less busy, too. The phone: iPhone 15 Pro The wallpaper: A black screen. I try to make time on my phone intentional, I call, text, or take notes most frequently. Everything else I bury as a more intentional action I have to take so that I'm generally more focused. The apps: Phone, Messages, Notes I also asked Soren to share a few things he's into right now. Here's what he said: Here's what the Installer community is into this week. I want to know what you're into right now as well! Email [email protected] with your recommendations for anything and everything, and we'll feature some of our favorites here every week. For even more great recommendations, check out the replies to this post on The Verge, this post on Threads, and this post on Bluesky. 'Buying a bunch of Ubiquiti gear for the new house that totally isn't overkill.' — SorryAboutYourCat 'Model railroading. Been holding off converting to DCC from DC hoping a well designed modern alternative will appear, but it's the same over priced out of date market it's always been.' — RoboticsRob 'I've been playing Merge Maestro way too much. It's a fun match game with Super Auto Pets-like emoji artwork. Free-to-start on mobile with a $2 price for the entire game.' — Dominick 'Reading: The Next Conversation by Jefferson Fisher. Playing: Dishonored for the first time. Watching: Mr. Robot and Murderbot (does this count as a theme?) Rabbit hole: Home Assistant and generally reducing my digital footprint (I say as making this public post).' — Omega86 'Just got to watching The Penguin, and it's a really fun gangster romp set in Gotham. I've mostly tired of the superhero stuff, but I'm always a sucker for good origin tales, and this really delivers. And the secret is, it's really about Sofia Falcone and her war with her patriarchal mob family. Cristin Milioti is fantastic in the role.' — verge_user_m573tv18 'UFO 50 just came out on the Nintendo Switch. I've been following the podcast Eggplant: The Secret Lives of Gamers, which is going through each of the 50 games in a book club-like format, with just one game a week.' — -goobers 'I, like many other people, watched Barbarian recently on Netflix. It's leaving on August 31st. The director's new movie, Weapons, just came out. Highly, highly recommend Barbarian. It's fun to go in blind, and even if you've seen the trailer, you'll still be spared some of its great twists. There's more humor in it than you might expect, and the gruesome aspects aren't over-the-top.' — Cameron Google is about to kick off the 2025 gadget season with its Pixel launch event on August 20th. I'd love to hear from you all: Are you planning to upgrade anything this year, and if so, why? What are you hoping Apple, Google, and others will announce? Or are you going to keep holding onto your gear? See you next week! Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Jay Peters Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Installer Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Booking.com phishing scam uses secret characters to trick victims - last-minute holiday hunters beware
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Cybercriminals are using the Japanese alphabet to spoof Scammers are targeting people with listings on the site Users are advised to carefully review incoming messages Cybercriminals are spoofing with a clever use of Unicode characters in their phishing landing pages to spread malware. Independent security researcher alias JAMESWT recently reported seeing phishing emails being sent to people listing their real estate on the popular lodging reservation service. In the email, the victims are told that someone complained about their listing, and that they should review it fast or face termination. The email also provides the link which when opened, at first glance looks legitimate. However, upon closer inspection, it can be seen in the URL that instead of the forward dash character '/', the link actually uses 'ん' - a Japanese hiragana character representing the sound 'n'. Typosquatting Hiragana is one of the three main scripts used in written Japanese, alongside katakana and kanji. Those that fail to spot the trick and open the site will get served a malicious MSI installer from a CDN link. The researcher added that samples of the malicious site are already available on the cybersecurity platform MalawareBazaar, and that the analysis already shows the infection chain. It is believed that the attackers are spoofing to deliver infostealers and remote access trojans (RAT). Replacing a single character in the URL, in order to trick victims into opening websites, is a long-established practice. It is called 'typosquatting' and banks on the victims not being careful when reviewing the URL they are opening. being one of the most popular lodging reservation services in the world, is often spoofed in such attacks, together with the likes of Amazon, Microsoft, DHL, and others. Defending against these attacks is relatively easy, and requires users to slow down and carefully review incoming communications, especially unsolicited messages. Double-checking links, attachments, websites, and thinking twice about sharing sensitive data is the best course of action these days. Via BleepingComputer You might also like Microsoft warns about a new phishing campaign impersonating Take a look at our guide to the best authenticator app We've rounded up the best password managers Solve the daily Crossword


CNET
33 minutes ago
- CNET
LCD vs. OLED: TV Display Technologies Compared
Nearly every TV sold today is either LCD or OLED. LCD TVs, also called LED TVs, have been around since the early 2000s. The best ones feature technologies like quantum dots or local dimming to create a vibrant, 4K HDR image. Because they've been on sale for so long, LCD-based TV are often marketed with fancier-sounding names like QLED or mini-LED, but the core technology is LCD -- which stands for Liquid Crystal Display. The other TV tech, organic light-emitting diode, is newer to the mainstream market, although they've still been available for more than a decade. OLED panels are made by LG and Samsung, and are also called QD-OLED and WOLED depending on the specific version of the technology used. How they work (the oversimplified edition) The biggest difference between the two technologies is in how they work. Every TV's picture is composed of millions of tiny "pixels," or picture elements, that combine to create the image. With OLED, each pixel provides its own illumination so there's no separate backlight. With an LCD TV, all of the pixels are illuminated by a separate LED backlight. This can have a handful of LEDs in the case of smaller, inexpensive TVs, or hundreds and thousands of LEDs for larger, more expensive TVs. This difference in how they create light directly impacts their overall picture quality, some of which favor LCD, but most of which benefit OLED. Read more: QLED vs. OLED: What's the difference between these types of TV? LCD panels themselves are made by a number of companies across Asia. All current OLED panels are built by either LG Display or Samsung Display, the display panel manufacturing divisions of those companies. Other companies will buy panels from those manufacturers, sometimes even between each other, but if you're buying an OLED TV the image-producing panel is made by one of those companies. OLED is consistently, year over year and test after test, the picture quality king, but LCD TVs usually cost less and can still provide excellent picture quality. A variety of new technologies, which we'll discuss, help keep LCD from getting too far behind its newer tech competition. So which one is better? Read on for their strengths and weaknesses. In general we'll be comparing OLED to the best (read: most expensive) LCD has to offer, mainly because there's no such thing as a cheap OLED TV (yet). Light output (brightness) Winner: LCD Loser: OLED Take this category with a grain of salt. Both TV types are very bright and can look good in even a sunny room, let alone more moderate indoor lighting situations or the dark rooms that make TV images look their best. When it comes down to it, no modern TV could ever be considered "dim." LCD gets the nod here specifically because the whole screen can be brighter, which is a function of its backlight. Generally, it's mini-LED that offers the highest brightness. Both QD-OLED and LG's new 4-stack OLED still offer impressive brightness though, so the difference here isn't as big as it once was. Raúl Vázquez/EyeEm/GettyImages Black level Winner: OLED Loser: LCD At the other side of light output is black level, or how dark the TV can get. OLED wins here because of its ability to turn off individual pixels completely. It can produce truly perfect black. The better LCDs have local dimming, where parts of the screen can dim independently of others. This isn't quite as good as per-pixel control because the black areas still aren't absolutely black but it's better than nothing. The best LCDs have full-array local dimming, which provides even finer control over the contrast of what's onscreen -- but even they can suffer from "blooming," where a bright area spoils the black of an adjacent dark area. Most notably, mini-LED has significantly more LEDs than traditional LED LCDs, so they can look almost as good as OLED in some situations. Check out this LED LCD backlights explainer and LED local dimming explained for more info. Contrast ratio Winner: OLED Loser: LCD Here's where it comes together. Contrast ratio is the difference between the brightest and the darkest a TV can be. OLED is the winner here because it can get extremely bright, plus it can produce absolute black with no blooming. It has the best contrast ratio of any modern display. Contrast ratio is the most important aspect of picture quality. A high contrast-ratio display will look more realistic than one with a lower contrast ratio. There's a far greater difference between the best LCD and the worst, with mini-LED once again offering the best performance overall for that tech. The "worst" OLED will still look better than almost all LCDs, however. For more info, check out the basics of contrast ratio and why it's important to understand contrast Winner: Tie This one's easy. Both OLED and LCD are widely available in UltraHD, aka 4K, form, and there are 8K versions of both if you're particularly well-heeled. There are also small, inexpensive 1080p and even 720p resolution LCDs. There are no 1080p or lower resolution OLEDs currently on the market. Refresh rate and motion blur Winner: Tie Refresh rate is important in reducing motion blur, or the blurring of anything on screen that moves (including the whole image if the camera pans). Sadly, the current version of OLED has motion blur, just like LCD. OLEDs, and mid- and high-end LCDs, have a 120Hz refresh rate. Cheaper LCDs are 60Hz. Keep in mind, most companies use numbers that are higher than their "true" refresh rate. OLEDs and many LCD use black-frame insertion, which is a way to improve motion resolution without resorting to the (usually) dreaded Soap Opera Effect. Don't stand this close when checking out a angle Winner: OLED Loser: LCD One of the main downsides of LCD TVs is a change in picture quality if you sit away from dead center (as in, off to the sides). How much this matters to you certainly depends on your seating arrangement but also on how much you love your loved ones. A few LCDs use in-plane switching panels, which have better off-axis picture quality than other kinds of LCDs but don't look as good as other LCDs straight on (primarily because of a lower contrast ratio). OLED doesn't have the off-axis issue LCDs have; its image looks basically the same, even from extreme angles. So if you have a wide seating area, OLED is the better option. High Dynamic Range (HDR) Winner: OLED (with caveats) Watching High Dynamic Range content lets your TV really expand its potential. Sort of like driving on the highway vs a two-lane dirt road. It lets your TV produce more colorful bright highlights and typically a wider color gamut. Nearly all current TVs are HDR compatible, but that's not the entire story. Just because a TV claims HDR compatibility doesn't mean it can accurately display HDR content. All OLED TVs have the dynamic range to take advantage of HDR, but lower-priced LCDs, especially those without local-dimming backlights, do not. So if you want to see HDR content in all its dynamic, vibrant beauty, go for OLED or an LCD with local dimming, for example mini-LED. In our tests comparing the best new OLED and LCD TVs with HDR games and movies, OLED usually looks better. Its superior contrast and lack of blooming win the day despite LCD's brightness advantage. In other words, LCD TVs can get brighter, especially in full-screen bright scenes and HDR highlights, but none of them can control that illumination as precisely as an OLED TV. It's also worth learning about the differences between HDR for photography and HDR for TVs. The smallest triangle (circles at corners) is what your current HDTV can do. The next largest (squares) is P3 color. The largest (triangle edges) is Rec 2020. Geoffrey Morrison/CNET (triangles); Sakurambo (base chart) Expanded Color Gamut Winner: Tie Wide Color Gamut, or WCG, is related to HDR, although you can technically have one without the other. It's an expansion of the colors possible on "standard" TVs. Think richer, deeper and more vibrant colors. Most mid- and high-end LCDs and all new OLED models are capable of WCG. In some models of both that capability is caused by the use of quantum dots. Read more about how TVs make color, how they will make color and how Wide Color Gamut works. Uniformity Winner: OLED Loser: LCD Uniformity refers to the consistency of brightness across the screen. Many inexpensive LCDs are pretty terrible with this, "leaking" light from their edges. This can be distracting, especially during darker movies. On mid- and higher-end models this is usually less of an issue. Energy consumption Winner: Basically a tie OLED's energy consumption is directly related to screen brightness. The brighter the screen, the more power it draws. It even varies with content. A dark movie will require less power than a hockey game or ski competition. The energy consumption of LCD varies depending on the backlight setting. The lower the backlight, the lower the power consumption. A basic LED LCD with its backlight set low will draw less power than OLED. Overall, though, all new TVs are fairly energy efficient, and even the least energy efficient modern TV would only cost you a few dollars more per year to use. That said, larger, brighter TVs will use a lot more energy than smaller, dimmer ones. shaunl/Getty Images Lifespan Winner: Tie (sort of) LG has said their OLED TVs have a lifespan of 100,000 hours to half brightness, a figure that's similar to LED LCDs. Generally speaking, all modern TVs are quite reliable and should last many years. Does that mean your new LCD or OLED will last for several decades like your parent's last CRT (like the one pictured). Probably not, but then, why would you want it to? A 42-inch flat panel cost $14,000 in the late 90's, and now a 55-inch TV with more than 16x the resolution and a million times better contrast ratio costs $250. Which is to say, by the time you'll want/need to replace it, there will be something even better than what's available now, for less money. Because they are quite reliable on the whole, you won't have to replace them anytime soon. Burn-in Winner: LCD Loser: OLED All TVs can "burn in" or develop what's called "image persistence," where the ghost of an image remains onscreen. It's really hard to do this with most LCDs. It's easier with OLED, so LCD wins this category. Even with OLED TVs, however, most people don't have to worry about burn-in. Some edge-lit LED LCD, typically cheaper models, can have their own version of burn in where the LEDs age poorly and the plastic layers that help create the image warp and discolor. Which is to say, both technologies have issues but how those issues manifest is different. If you want a REALLY big TV, neither OLED nor LCD will do. LG Screen size Winner: LCD Loser: OLED OLED TVs are available in sizes from 48 to 97 inches but LCD TVs come in smaller and even larger sizes than that -- with many more choices in between -- so LCD wins. At the high end of the size scale, however, the biggest "TVs" don't use either technology. The easiest, and cheapest, way to get a truly massive image in your home is with a projector. For about $1,000 you can get an excellent 100-inch-plus image. If you want something even brighter, and don't mind spending a literal fortune to get it, Samsung, Sony, LG and some other companies sell direct-view LED displays. In most cases these are microLED. Price Winner: LCD Loser: OLED You can get 4K resolution, 50-inch LCDs for less than $200. It's going to be a long time before OLEDs are that price, but they have come down considerably. So if your goal is to get the cheapest TV possible, that's LCD. If you want something with great picture quality, the prices are fairly comparable. The most expensive OLED TVs are more expensive than the best similarly sized LCD TVs, but that difference shrinks every year. And the picture-quality winner is ... OLED LCD dominates the market because it's cheap to manufacture and delivers good enough picture quality for just about everybody. But according to reviews at CNET and elsewhere, OLED wins for overall picture quality, largely because of the incredible contrast ratio. The price difference isn't as severe as it used to be, and in the mid- to high-end of the market, there are a lot of options. LCDs continue to improve, though, and many models offer excellent picture quality for far less money than OLED, especially in larger sizes. Which is to say, there are a lot of great TVs out there. In addition to covering cameras and display tech, Geoff does photo essays about cool museums and other stuff, including nuclear submarines, aircraft carriers and 10,000-mile road trips. Also, check out Budget Travel for Dummies, his travel book and his bestselling sci-fi novel about city-size submarines. You can follow him on Instagram and YouTube.