S'gor PH dismisses Azmin's claim that PN can take over state govt
Selangor PH secretary Khairuddin Othman says PN will face an uphill battle to take over the state, as its assemblymen have failed to effectively serve their constituencies. (Bernama pic)
PETALING JAYA : Selangor Pakatan Harapan (PH) has dismissed Azmin Ali's claim that Perikatan Nasional (PN) is capable of taking over the state government at the next polls.
Azmin, the Selangor PN chief, recently said the coalition could seize control of the state by winning 10 additional seats at the next state election. PN currently holds 22 out of 56 seats in the Selangor state assembly.
Speaking to FMT, Selangor PH secretary Khairuddin Othman said PN would face an uphill battle to secure enough seats as its assemblymen had failed to effectively serve their constituencies.
Acknowledging PN's right to aspire to govern Selangor, Khairuddin nevertheless expressed confidence that voters would be wise enough to determine which coalition genuinely prioritises their well-being.
He said many of the Selangor government's current programmes had boosted public confidence in the state administration, giving PH a strong chance of retaining its position in the next state polls.
'With our strong track record in public welfare, we're confident we will reclaim PN's marginal seats in Selangor – not the other way around,' he added.
In the Selangor state election in August 2023, PH, in cooperation with Barisan Nasional (BN), secured 34 seats and successfully formed the state government.
Khairuddin also reminded PH-BN coalition members to avoid 'shooting themselves in the foot' by openly criticising one another, warning that such behaviour would only erode public confidence in the alliance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
40 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
‘Firm yet close to the people': Home minister honours IGP Razarudin's service ahead of retirement
KUALA LUMPUR, June 19 — Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail has extended his appreciation to Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Tan Sri Razarudin Husain, who will conclude his two-year tenure at the helm of the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) this Sunday. Saifuddin Nasution, in a social media post, said he received a courtesy call from Razarudin at his office yesterday evening, held in conjunction with the retirement of the 14th IGP. 'In this cordial meeting, I took the opportunity to extend my personal appreciation and thanks to Tan Sri for his service, sacrifices and dedication to PDRM, especially during his tenure as IGP. 'Throughout his service, he demonstrated firm and principled leadership yet always remained close to the people,' he said. Meanwhile, according to a post on PDRM's official Facebook page, Razarudin was granted an audience with the Sultan of Perak, Sultan Nazrin Shah, and the Sultan of Terengganu, Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin, in conjunction with the conclusion of his contract. The audiences took place at Istana Hinggap Perak and Istana Hinggap Terengganu, respectively, earlier yesterday. Razarudin was appointed as the 14th IGP on June 23, 2023, on a two-year contract, succeeding Tan Sri Acryl Sani Abdullah Sani. — Bernama
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Raf for now: Don't look back in anger!
Raf for now: Don't look back in anger! JUNE 19 — It only took 70 years to get here. Not sure it'll last, but for now, it's real. In Malaysian mainstream politics when top positions are vied for in major parties, incumbents when defeated depart in the worst possible way. So much so, within parties, the cautionary tale is that leadership battles can end the party. Which is why, the decision by Rafizi Ramli post-defeat to stick around has major significance. All the way from Tengku Razaleigh vs Mahathir Mohamad in 1987 to Anwar Ibrahim vs Ghafar Baba in 1993. Even further back, in 1951, Abdul Rahman Abdul Hamid replaced exiting Onn Jaffar. Over in PKR, the ambitious left when defeated even if not the incumbent. In 2018, Khairy Jamaluddin Abu Bakar chose to stay in Umno after losing the presidential race to challenge Zahid Hamidi, but it was low stakes. It was less than two months after Umno lost national power, and incumbent Najib Razak with mounting legal cases opted out. Zahid till then was only deputy president picked by Najib after the tumultuous sacking of Muhyiddin Yassin. Long story short, Malaysian politics never matured to the point it was OK to lose an internal election and stay put. Acrimony accompanies open contests. The key premise which is unspoken is that members are pawns with no agency except to follow leaders. Leaders manage utilising backroom deals among the elites. Which is what repulsed Rafizi that a leadership decision to deny members the right to pick a president and deputy president was ignored by a substantial number of leaders to knock him off his perch. The man who rather less democracy can now champion more democracy in the party. Despite the trouncing by no less than the president's daughter after a single term, Rafizi pledges to be a party man. But not as minister, just a backbencher. Also, he moonlights as a podcaster and promises to be all fire and brimstone. Free of governmental roles, he is Rafizi Unchained. His vanquisher Nurul Izzah Anwar is warned. Rafizi may offer a new kind of competitive politics. He rebranded his old restrained Yang Bakar Menteri (He who grills ministers), to a more nuclear Yang Berhenti Menteri (The unchained minister). While it is cute to keep the YBM abbreviation, it is not exactly a leap forward, is it? To define oneself as what you were, rather than what you aspire to be. The people want to be inspired, well at least his supporters want to lift him up. YBM is less Malay Dilemma and more of a derivative of Khairy's Keluar Sekejap (Temporarily out). [ news/malaysia/2025/06/17/ rafizi-to-burn-and-enlighten- in-new-podcast-after-stepping- down-as-economy-minister/ 180711] But what is in a name? Based on public perception, a lot apparently. Nevertheless, his platform can transform local politics because it is from a senior politician from the party heading the national unity government. He has personally known the prime minister since he was an adolescent and worked closely with him. Khairy speaks about his experience weighed against developments, Rafizi can speak about current developments intimately and intimate truths. And pals like Chang Lih Kang and Akmal Nasir serve inside the administration. He also gets to attend Parliament for the next two years. News, not hearsay, gets to him fast. So, he'll draw a crowd. Which brings us to his nemesis and now in the spotlight, Nurul Izzah. Cricket, lads They will knock heads, that's totally expected. However, Rafizi's decision to stay deserves applause. Malaysia deserves to rise above pettiness. So too does Nurul Izzah, for not disparaging her predecessor and claiming there is space for all inside the party. Her ability to narrate an emergence separate from her father is also an attraction; handled wrongly, a distraction. Where does it leave PKR? The path to parties of ideologies, rather than parties of personalities, is through the corridor of open disputation. Parties are dull and lack meaning without dissent. Politics is adversarial by design. How can better ideas elevate to the top without examination by those most vocally against them? The thing to ask for is fairness in the proceedings. Can Rafizi provoke broader discussions and can Nurul Izzah and those inside, lead and take on the better thoughts from her party opponent, clearly both have 2028 in mind when the party president post is vacant? Staying in lane In the last 10 years, our politics after the end of the Barisan Nasional's monopoly has been about parties finding their sweet spot. PAS was assumed to be the walking wounded after a painful split with Pakatan Rakyat leading to the 2018 General Election. Them just being PAS, without any modern ideas, just a religious conviction appeased a base which was not over-enamoured by modern ideas and submits willingly to religion as the basis of government, and did not appreciate premature eulogies for the party. They emerged with more seats than they did previously with Pakatan. The Borneo parties in varying speeds have accelerated to the singular position that state dignity is only possible through state parties. The results and the continued conversion of politicians back the premise. Bersatu sticks to "we are more puritanical about our race politics than everyone else" as a selling point but as leaders abandon the cause, they may not regain a pulse without artificial resuscitation. Umno, MCA and MIC are at sea. They have their ageing supporters but no fresh take. DAP refuses to let go of Chinese chauvinism no matter how tantalising an alternate reality is to their core leaders. All of them, at best, hold on to their DNA with no apology. Principles are nice and exclusion is deplorable, but power is nicest and do turn away when people point out your hypocrisy, is the persisting belief in Malaysian politics. 'When they go low, we go high' The line associated with former first lady Michelle Obama, might just be the ticket for PKR. At least with this new Rafizi and Nurul Izzah dynamics. Rather than find a racial, religious or regional niche to thrive, PKR can resist the trite and use the presence of dissension inside the party to advertise the party being the first to join the evolution of Malaysian politics. The tests are almost here. Rafizi as former economics minister has much to say about the SST in motion and the retreat from measures to end subsidies. He is bound to say the prime minister should reconsider. The new deputy president, even when looking in from the outside, must back the PM and his Cabinet. The how it manages clashes of ideas is how PKR can demonstrate to all Malaysians, it is indeed going higher. The stage is set, however all you read is theory for now. The how is completely in their hands. I fear the past may overwhelm them and they too revert to type, to niches. That they wash their hands rather than guide members to better. Raf for now: Don't look back in anger! JUNE 19 — It only took 70 years to get here. Not sure it'll last, but for now, it's real. In Malaysian mainstream politics when top positions are vied for in major parties, incumbents when defeated depart in the worst possible way. So much so, within parties, the cautionary tale is that leadership battles can end the party. Which is why, the decision by Rafizi Ramli post-defeat to stick around has major significance. All the way from Tengku Razaleigh vs Mahathir Mohamad in 1987 to Anwar Ibrahim vs Ghafar Baba in 1993. Even further back, in 1951, Abdul Rahman Abdul Hamid replaced exiting Onn Jaffar. Over in PKR, the ambitious left when defeated even if not the incumbent. In 2018, Khairy Jamaluddin Abu Bakar chose to stay in Umno after losing the presidential race to challenge Zahid Hamidi, but it was low stakes. It was less than two months after Umno lost national power, and incumbent Najib Razak with mounting legal cases opted out. Zahid till then was only deputy president picked by Najib after the tumultuous sacking of Muhyiddin Yassin. Long story short, Malaysian politics never matured to the point it was OK to lose an internal election and stay put. Acrimony accompanies open contests. The key premise which is unspoken is that members are pawns with no agency except to follow leaders. Leaders manage utilising backroom deals among the elites. Which is what repulsed Rafizi that a leadership decision to deny members the right to pick a president and deputy president was ignored by a substantial number of leaders to knock him off his perch. The man who rather less democracy can now champion more democracy in the party. Despite the trouncing by no less than the president's daughter after a single term, Rafizi pledges to be a party man. But not as minister, just a backbencher. Also, he moonlights as a podcaster and promises to be all fire and brimstone. Free of governmental roles, he is Rafizi Unchained. His vanquisher Nurul Izzah Anwar is warned. Rafizi may offer a new kind of competitive politics. He rebranded his old restrained Yang Bakar Menteri (He who grills ministers), to a more nuclear Yang Berhenti Menteri (The unchained minister). While it is cute to keep the YBM abbreviation, it is not exactly a leap forward, is it? To define oneself as what you were, rather than what you aspire to be. The people want to be inspired, well at least his supporters want to lift him up. YBM is less Malay Dilemma and more of a derivative of Khairy's Keluar Sekejap (Temporarily out). [ news/malaysia/2025/06/17/ rafizi-to-burn-and-enlighten- in-new-podcast-after-stepping- down-as-economy-minister/ 180711] But what is in a name? Based on public perception, a lot apparently. Nevertheless, his platform can transform local politics because it is from a senior politician from the party heading the national unity government. He has personally known the prime minister since he was an adolescent and worked closely with him. Khairy speaks about his experience weighed against developments, Rafizi can speak about current developments intimately and intimate truths. And pals like Chang Lih Kang and Akmal Nasir serve inside the administration. He also gets to attend Parliament for the next two years. News, not hearsay, gets to him fast. So, he'll draw a crowd. Which brings us to his nemesis and now in the spotlight, Nurul Izzah. Cricket, lads They will knock heads, that's totally expected. However, Rafizi's decision to stay deserves applause. Malaysia deserves to rise above pettiness. So too does Nurul Izzah, for not disparaging her predecessor and claiming there is space for all inside the party. Her ability to narrate an emergence separate from her father is also an attraction; handled wrongly, a distraction. Where does it leave PKR? The path to parties of ideologies, rather than parties of personalities, is through the corridor of open disputation. Parties are dull and lack meaning without dissent. Politics is adversarial by design. How can better ideas elevate to the top without examination by those most vocally against them? The thing to ask for is fairness in the proceedings. Can Rafizi provoke broader discussions and can Nurul Izzah and those inside, lead and take on the better thoughts from her party opponent, clearly both have 2028 in mind when the party president post is vacant? Staying in lane In the last 10 years, our politics after the end of the Barisan Nasional's monopoly has been about parties finding their sweet spot. PAS was assumed to be the walking wounded after a painful split with Pakatan Rakyat leading to the 2018 General Election. Them just being PAS, without any modern ideas, just a religious conviction appeased a base which was not over-enamoured by modern ideas and submits willingly to religion as the basis of government, and did not appreciate premature eulogies for the party. They emerged with more seats than they did previously with Pakatan. The Borneo parties in varying speeds have accelerated to the singular position that state dignity is only possible through state parties. The results and the continued conversion of politicians back the premise. Bersatu sticks to "we are more puritanical about our race politics than everyone else" as a selling point but as leaders abandon the cause, they may not regain a pulse without artificial resuscitation. Umno, MCA and MIC are at sea. They have their ageing supporters but no fresh take. DAP refuses to let go of Chinese chauvinism no matter how tantalising an alternate reality is to their core leaders. All of them, at best, hold on to their DNA with no apology. Principles are nice and exclusion is deplorable, but power is nicest and do turn away when people point out your hypocrisy, is the persisting belief in Malaysian politics. 'When they go low, we go high' The line associated with former first lady Michelle Obama, might just be the ticket for PKR. At least with this new Rafizi and Nurul Izzah dynamics. Rather than find a racial, religious or regional niche to thrive, PKR can resist the trite and use the presence of dissension inside the party to advertise the party being the first to join the evolution of Malaysian politics. The tests are almost here. Rafizi as former economics minister has much to say about the SST in motion and the retreat from measures to end subsidies. He is bound to say the prime minister should reconsider. The new deputy president, even when looking in from the outside, must back the PM and his Cabinet. The how it manages clashes of ideas is how PKR can demonstrate to all Malaysians, it is indeed going higher. The stage is set, however all you read is theory for now. The how is completely in their hands. I fear the past may overwhelm them and they too revert to type, to niches. That they wash their hands rather than guide members to better. JUNE 19 — It only took 70 years to get here. Not sure it'll last, but for now, it's real. In Malaysian mainstream politics when top positions are vied for in major parties, incumbents when defeated depart in the worst possible way. So much so, within parties, the cautionary tale is that leadership battles can end the party. Which is why, the decision by Rafizi Ramli post-defeat to stick around has major significance. All the way from Tengku Razaleigh vs Mahathir Mohamad in 1987 to Anwar Ibrahim vs Ghafar Baba in 1993. Even further back, in 1951, Abdul Rahman Abdul Hamid replaced exiting Onn Jaffar. Over in PKR, the ambitious left when defeated even if not the incumbent. In 2018, Khairy Jamaluddin Abu Bakar chose to stay in Umno after losing the presidential race to challenge Zahid Hamidi, but it was low stakes. It was less than two months after Umno lost national power, and incumbent Najib Razak with mounting legal cases opted out. Zahid till then was only deputy president picked by Najib after the tumultuous sacking of Muhyiddin Yassin. Long story short, Malaysian politics never matured to the point it was OK to lose an internal election and stay put. Acrimony accompanies open contests. The key premise which is unspoken is that members are pawns with no agency except to follow leaders. Leaders manage utilising backroom deals among the elites. Which is what repulsed Rafizi that a leadership decision to deny members the right to pick a president and deputy president was ignored by a substantial number of leaders to knock him off his perch. The man who rather less democracy can now champion more democracy in the party. Despite the trouncing by no less than the president's daughter after a single term, Rafizi pledges to be a party man. But not as minister, just a backbencher. Also, he moonlights as a podcaster and promises to be all fire and brimstone. Free of governmental roles, he is Rafizi Unchained. His vanquisher Nurul Izzah Anwar is warned. Rafizi may offer a new kind of competitive politics. He rebranded his old restrained Yang Bakar Menteri (He who grills ministers), to a more nuclear Yang Berhenti Menteri (The unchained minister). While it is cute to keep the YBM abbreviation, it is not exactly a leap forward, is it? To define oneself as what you were, rather than what you aspire to be. The people want to be inspired, well at least his supporters want to lift him up. YBM is less Malay Dilemma and more of a derivative of Khairy's Keluar Sekejap (Temporarily out). But what is in a name? Based on public perception, a lot apparently. Nevertheless, his platform can transform local politics because it is from a senior politician from the party heading the national unity government. He has personally known the prime minister since he was an adolescent and worked closely with him. Khairy speaks about his experience weighed against developments, Rafizi can speak about current developments intimately and intimate truths. And pals like Chang Lih Kang and Akmal Nasir serve inside the administration. He also gets to attend Parliament for the next two years. News, not hearsay, gets to him fast. So, he'll draw a crowd. Which brings us to his nemesis and now in the spotlight, Nurul Izzah. Can Rafizi provoke broader discussions and can Nurul Izzah and those inside, lead and take on the better thoughts from her party opponent, clearly both have 2028 in mind when the party president post is vacant? — Bernama pic Cricket, lads They will knock heads, that's totally expected. However, Rafizi's decision to stay deserves applause. Malaysia deserves to rise above pettiness. So too does Nurul Izzah, for not disparaging her predecessor and claiming there is space for all inside the party. Her ability to narrate an emergence separate from her father is also an attraction; handled wrongly, a distraction. Where does it leave PKR? The path to parties of ideologies, rather than parties of personalities, is through the corridor of open disputation. Parties are dull and lack meaning without dissent. Politics is adversarial by design. How can better ideas elevate to the top without examination by those most vocally against them? The thing to ask for is fairness in the proceedings. Can Rafizi provoke broader discussions and can Nurul Izzah and those inside, lead and take on the better thoughts from her party opponent, clearly both have 2028 in mind when the party president post is vacant? Staying in lane In the last 10 years, our politics after the end of the Barisan Nasional's monopoly has been about parties finding their sweet spot. PAS was assumed to be the walking wounded after a painful split with Pakatan Rakyat leading to the 2018 General Election. Them just being PAS, without any modern ideas, just a religious conviction appeased a base which was not over-enamoured by modern ideas and submits willingly to religion as the basis of government, and did not appreciate premature eulogies for the party. They emerged with more seats than they did previously with Pakatan. The Borneo parties in varying speeds have accelerated to the singular position that state dignity is only possible through state parties. The results and the continued conversion of politicians back the premise. Bersatu sticks to "we are more puritanical about our race politics than everyone else" as a selling point but as leaders abandon the cause, they may not regain a pulse without artificial resuscitation. Umno, MCA and MIC are at sea. They have their ageing supporters but no fresh take. DAP refuses to let go of Chinese chauvinism no matter how tantalising an alternate reality is to their core leaders. All of them, at best, hold on to their DNA with no apology. Principles are nice and exclusion is deplorable, but power is nicest and do turn away when people point out your hypocrisy, is the persisting belief in Malaysian politics. 'When they go low, we go high' The line associated with former first lady Michelle Obama, might just be the ticket for PKR. At least with this new Rafizi and Nurul Izzah dynamics. Rather than find a racial, religious or regional niche to thrive, PKR can resist the trite and use the presence of dissension inside the party to advertise the party being the first to join the evolution of Malaysian politics. The tests are almost here. Rafizi as former economics minister has much to say about the SST in motion and the retreat from measures to end subsidies. He is bound to say the prime minister should reconsider. The new deputy president, even when looking in from the outside, must back the PM and his Cabinet. The how it manages clashes of ideas is how PKR can demonstrate to all Malaysians, it is indeed going higher. The stage is set, however all you read is theory for now. The how is completely in their hands. I fear the past may overwhelm them and they too revert to type, to niches. That they wash their hands rather than guide members to better.
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Zahid: Malaysia needs smart US strategy, driven by national interests
KUALA LUMPUR, June 19 — Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said Malaysia's diplomatic engagement with the United States must be carefully structured, guided by smart diplomacy and firmly rooted in comprehensive national interests. Ahmad Zahid, who is also Minister of Rural and Regional Development, said this was essential given the United States' role as a major global economic power, coupled with its evolving administrative dynamics. He said this matter was discussed during a courtesy call by Malaysia's newly appointed Ambassador to the United States, Tan Sri Muhammad Shahrul Ikram Yaakob. 'The meeting also generally touched on the importance of strengthening bilateral relations between Malaysia and the United States, particularly in areas such as investment, security, technology and strategic multidimensional cooperation that can yield mutual benefits,' he said in a Facebook post yesterday. Ahmad Zahid also hoped that Muhammad Shahrul Ikram would be granted strength and wisdom in carrying out the important responsibility and continue to excel in representing Malaysia's voice and interests on the international stage. On June 3, the Foreign Ministry announced the appointment of Muhammad Shahrul Ikram, a former secretary-general of the ministry, as Malaysia's new Ambassador to the United States. According to the ministry, the appointment was granted the consent of His Majesty Sultan Ibrahim, King of Malaysia, who presented him the instrument of appointment in a ceremony at Istana Negara on June 3. — Bernama
