logo
RBC tells customer she's responsible for $14K stolen from account in bank investigator scam

RBC tells customer she's responsible for $14K stolen from account in bank investigator scam

Yahoo10-07-2025
At first, Melissa Plett didn't think there was anything suspicious about a fraud alert call she got last month purportedly from her bank, the Royal Bank of Canada (RBC).
Her phone's call display showed the number was RBC's. Plus, the caller used language she's heard before when dealing with her bank.
"It was very, very, very well executed," said Plett, 44. "It's like they had the entire opening script memorized and rehearsed. There were just no red flags."
The caller told Plett, who lives just outside Montreal, that someone in Vancouver was trying to steal $2,000 from her bank account. So she complied when he instructed her to log into her RBC banking app while he was on the phone with her, and followed instructions he said would safeguard her money.
By the time the call was over, $14,510 had vanished from Plett's two RBC accounts, one personal and one for her marketing business. Plett said she found out she was scammed because the real RBC called her shortly after to report fraudulent activity in her account.
She says she didn't share any personal information or codes with the fraudster. But when she asked RBC for a refund, Plett says the bank declined, and told her that she was responsible because she was active in her account when the money disappeared.
"It's a lot of money," said Plett. "For you to have just a little bit of a savings account and it just to be gone, it's like, I'm going to cry now. You just feel helpless."
Plett is one of many victims of the bank investigator scam, where fraudsters pose as bank investigators or other types of fraud investigators — typically by phone. The scammers tell victims one or more of their banking products has been compromised, and they need to take urgent and necessary action, such as sharing credit card numbers.
In many cases, the fraudsters have personal information on the victim, such as their full name and the name of their bank. They also use a technique known as spoofing to make it appear as though they are calling from a number associated with the victim's bank.
"If they have personal information, then it makes it believable," said Jeff Horncastle, outreach officer with the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre. "Victims are seeing the number on the call display that they trust."
The scam isn't new, but it's growing in sophistication, leading to bigger financial losses.
For the first six months of this year, the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre heard from 677 victims of the fraud, and recorded $11.7 million in financial losses — close to double the amount in the same period last year.
Montreal police, who are investigating a criminal network involved in the scam, told CBC News they have identified at least 220 RBC customers who were victims of the fraud. Police estimate total losses of $1.5 million.
RBC told CBC News the bank doesn't comment on ongoing police matters, but said that it worked closely with Montreal police during the investigation.
When should victims be compensated?
After RBC denied her refund, Plett says she escalated her case at the bank and was denied again, so she has now escalated it to the final level at RBC.
"They can do better for the people that are trusting them with their money," she said. "I understand that I messed up, but I didn't know I was messing up."
Victims of the bank investigator scam can seek reimbursement, but banks often hold the customer responsible and reject their request, or provide only a partial refund.
WATCH | Scotiabank scam victim on the hook for $20K:
Consumer advocate and lawyer Sylvie De Bellefeuille argues banks should be obligated to provide full compensation.
"People were tricked," she said. "They shouldn't be held liable. We have to take into consideration, these kind of scams are very elaborate strategies."
De Bellefeuille and her organization, Option Consommateurs, are currently helping 14 victims of the bank investigator scam — all seniors in Quebec — fight for reimbursement from their banks. She says 12 of the victims are RBC customers.
"[It] really has a bad effect on people," De Bellefeuille said, adding that some of the victims have lost part of their retirement savings.
Victims of credit card fraud are protected under federal law, but banks can argue the rules don't apply if they determine the customer "demonstrated gross negligence."
And there are currently no legislative requirements for banks to reimburse customers for unauthorized banking transactions, Finance Canada told CBC News.
De Bellefeuille says the federal government needs to beef up regulations to ensure victims of this type of scam get their money back.
"People feel victimized [the] first time because they've been a victim of fraud, but also a second time because, afterwards, the banks basically said, 'Well, sorry, it was your fault.'"
RBC responds
RBC spokesperson Cheryl Brean didn't answer questions about Plett's case, including questions about why the bank declined to provide a refund.
She did say the bank takes customer concerns seriously and deals with its clients directly. Brean also said that RBC works hard to prevent, detect and investigate fraud, which includes collaborating with police and other entities on the matter.
"Financial crimes are increasingly sophisticated," she wrote in an email.
On its website, RBC guarantees customers a full refund for digital transactions they didn't make or approve, if they show they've "been a victim of fraud, theft or have been coerced by trickery, force or intimidation."
Plett says because she learned she had been scammed from RBC, the bank knows she's a victim of fraud. She says when the real RBC called shortly after the scam call, the bank told her that a fraudster had made two wire transfers totalling $5,410 from her business account.
"They're the ones that called me and said there's been fraudulent activity in your account. So then you would think, 'Oh good, they're going to help me.' "
Plett's bank records, seen by CBC News, show that money was also taken from her mortgage line of credit. On top of losing $14,510, RBC charged her $35 in fees for the two wire transfers.
Hours after CBC News sent RBC a media inquiry about Plett's case, she said the bank called to tell her it's investigating the matter.
What is Ottawa doing?
Last year, the federal government held consultations on proposed changes to strengthen federal protections for bank customers.
Proposals include a requirement for banks to collect and report data on scams targeting customers, and provide fraud victims reimbursement beyond a yet to be determined amount, regardless of how their funds were accessed. The maximum amount card fraud victims are liable for is generally capped at $50.
The federal Department of Finance had no update for CBC News on when the proposals could take effect.
De Bellefeuille says change needs to come soon, because the bank investigator scam does not appear to be letting up.
"Lots of people are losing money."
If you get a fraud alert call from your bank, experts advise that you should hang up and call the bank back directly using the number on their official website or your bank card to ensure it was actually your bank that called.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Auto theft sees sharp drop in first half of 2025, industry association says
Auto theft sees sharp drop in first half of 2025, industry association says

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Auto theft sees sharp drop in first half of 2025, industry association says

OTTAWA — The pace of auto theft is dropping in Canada thanks to collective efforts to crack down on thieves, says an industry group focused on insurance fraud and crime. Équité Association said in a report released Monday that the number of vehicles reported stolen nationally dropped 19.1 per cent in the first half of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024. Just over 23,000 vehicles were reported stolen in the first six months of the year in Canada, the report said. The decline is particularly stark in Ontario and Quebec, which saw annual drops of 25.9 per cent and 22.2 per cent, respectively. The year-over-year drops are more modest in Atlantic Canada and Western Canada at roughly nine per cent. Alberta saw a decline of 12.5 per cent. Bryan Gast, national vice-president of investigative services at Équité Association, credits greater public awareness of the threat and efforts by various levels of government and law enforcement agencies to collectively tackle the problem. "It's really definitely a collaborative effort," he said. Gast said law enforcement agencies in Ontario and Quebec in particular have stepped up enforcement with police units dedicated to vehicle theft. So far this year, residents of Ontario and Quebec have reported 9,600 and 3,889 vehicle thefts respectively — high numbers that Gast attributed to the provinces' larger populations and proximity to the Port of Montreal. With 4,411 vehicles reported stolen over the first half of 2025, Gast said Alberta continues to lead the country in auto theft on a per-capita basis. Statistics Canada data released earlier this week confirms national progress on the file. The agency reported a 17 per cent annual drop in the rate of police-reported motor vehicle thefts, down to 239 incidents per 100,000 people last year. In 2023, the number of auto thefts had increased 40 per cent over the historic low recorded in 2020, StatCan said. That trend came to a head last year when the federal government convened a summit in February to address car thefts. Ottawa followed up by giving the Canada Border Services Agency millions of dollars in new funding to track vehicles leaving through the country's ports, after having given Ontario $121 million in January of that year to tackle gang crime and auto thefts. Gast said some of the progress can likely be attributed to Canadians' heightened awareness of the issue. "Now I think you can talk to anybody and, if their car hasn't been stolen, they know somebody's car that has been stolen," he said. "I think they are taking those precautions and some of those steps to make their vehicle less of a target." Vehicle recovery rates also rose 3.4 percentage points year over year to 56.5 per cent in the first half of 2025, Équité Association said. The organization said that was nearing the "pre-crisis" level of 57.2 per cent recorded in 2021. Despite progress on vehicle theft, the Insurance Bureau of Canada warned it's still a "significant concern" and "far from the only factor contributing to rising auto insurance costs." "A combination of inflation, tariffs, rising repair and vehicle replacement costs, legal pressures, and regulatory challenges are driving rates up across the country," the bureau said in a media statement. Tariffs on vehicle parts are driving up the costs of repairs and replacement cars, the bureau noted. Gast said that while it's not clear yet, tariffs might be playing a role in the increase Équité Association is seeing in domestic chop shops and vehicle parts being sent overseas. He said that whenever there's a disruption to supply chains — like the one that made semiconductor inputs a hot commodity during the COVID-19 pandemic — the criminal element tends to adapt to meet that demand. While he's encouraged by the progress Canada has posted to date in tamping down auto theft, he said now is not the time to let up. "Don't consider the problem solved," he said. "To keep it manageable and the numbers trending in the right direction, I think we still need to focus on it." This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 28, 2025. Craig Lord, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Data breach at Allianz Life Insurance affects 1.4 million customers
Data breach at Allianz Life Insurance affects 1.4 million customers

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Data breach at Allianz Life Insurance affects 1.4 million customers

Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America has announced a significant data breach impacting the personal information of a large portion of its 1.4 million customers. The Minneapolis-based company, a subsidiary of Allianz SE based in Munich, reported that the breach occurred on 16 July via a third-party cloud service. In a statement, Allianz Life indicated that a 'malicious threat actor' gained access to the external platform through social engineering, a method whereby attackers deceive individuals into revealing sensitive information or access credentials. 'The threat actor was able to obtain personally identifiable data related to the majority of Allianz Life's customers, financial professionals and select Allianz Life employees,' the statement noted. While the specifics of the compromised data have not been detailed, such breaches typically involve personal details such as names, contact information, social security numbers and financial data. Notably, Allianz Life clarified that its internal systems were not affected. 'This incident was limited to a third-party cloud platform. Our systems remain secure,' a spokesperson for the company stated. In response to the incident, Allianz Life reported that it took immediate measures to contain the breach and has informed the FBI. The incident has also been reported to various authorities including the Office of the Maine Attorney General, as companies are mandated to disclose data breaches that impact residents of the state. According to a filing with the Maine Attorney General's office, Allianz became aware of the breach the day after it occurred and is providing affected individuals with 24 months of complementary credit monitoring and identity theft protection services. The breach is limited to Allianz Life's operations in the US and does not extend to other Allianz corporate entities worldwide. The company has informed the FBI about the incident and indicated that its ongoing investigation has found no evidence that its internal network or other systems including the policy administration system were compromised. In May this year, Allianz reported a net income of €2.42bn ($2.82bn) for the first quarter of 2025 (Q1 2025), a 2.1% decrease from €2.47bn in Q1 2024. However, the German insurer's operating profit increased by 6.3% to €4.2bn, up from €3.9bn the previous year. The property-casualty segment contributed €2.1bn with a 5% rise in operating profit, while the life/health segment saw a 7.5% increase to €1.4bn. "Data breach at Allianz Life Insurance affects 1.4 million customers" was originally created and published by Life Insurance International, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

How Trump let Boeing off the hook for the 737 MAX crashes
How Trump let Boeing off the hook for the 737 MAX crashes

The Verge

time11 minutes ago

  • The Verge

How Trump let Boeing off the hook for the 737 MAX crashes

On July 18th, a federal judge in Texas scheduled what will likely be the final hearing in the case of United States v. The Boeing Company. After five years of litigation, the end result can only be described as a victory for Boeing — and a permanent setback for those who hoped that the company would be held accountable for a decade of safety violations. Last year, Boeing's prospects looked far bleaker. In 2021, the Department of Justice charged the company with conspiracy to defraud the government about the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) software on the 737 MAX, which has been linked to the deaths of 346 people in the crashes of Lion Air 610 and Ethiopian Airlines 302. (The Verge first covered this story in 2019.) After years of legal maneuvering, the company agreed to plead guilty to the conspiracy charge in July 2024 in order to avoid a criminal trial. Under the plea bargain's terms, Boeing would pay nearly $2.5 billion to airlines, families of crash victims, and the government, plus accept three years of monitoring from an independent safety consultant. That agreement was thrown out by a federal judge in December, and a trial date was set for June 2025. If convicted, Boeing would not be able to simply pay its way out of trouble. As a corporate felon, the company would have to permanently accept increased government scrutiny over every part of its business — a return to a regulatory model that Congress repealed in 2005, after significant lobbying by the aviation and defense industries. According to one legal think tank, United States v. Boeing had the potential to be one of the most significant corporate compliance judgments in decades. But then Donald Trump returned to the White House. Many of Trump's strongest political allies have benefited from significant changes in policy under the new administration: the crypto industry, industrial polluters, and Elon Musk, to name a few. Boeing has spent a considerable amount of money building a relationship with Trump, too. It donated $1 million to his inauguration fund, and its CEO accompanied Trump on his recent trip to Qatar. Its payout came last May, when the head of the DOJ's Criminal Division, Matthew Galeotti, announced a change of enforcement strategy. Galeotti directed his division to no longer pursue 'overboard and unchecked corporate and white-collar enforcement [that] burdens U.S. businesses and harms U.S. interests.' Instead, he wanted it to focus on a narrower set of crimes, including terrorism, tariff-dodging, drug trafficking, and 'Chinese Money Laundering Organizations.' 'Not all corporate misconduct warrants federal criminal prosecution,' the memo stated. 'It is critical to American prosperity to acknowledge …companies that are willing to learn from their mistakes.' Boeing has spent a considerable amount of money building a relationship with Trump. Two weeks later, the DOJ agreed to drop the charges against Boeing completely. Instead of pleading guilty, Boeing would now just be liable for a reduced monetary penalty of around $1.2 billion: $235 million in new fines, plus $445 million into a fund for the families of the 737 MAX crash victims. It would also have to invest $455 million to enhance its 'compliance and safety programs,' part of which would pay for an 'independent compliance consultant' for two years of oversight. It avoided a felony charge, and more importantly, it was allowed to continue self-auditing its own products. The DOJ's rationale for the change was that it expects companies to be 'willing to learn from [their] mistakes.' This is not a skill that Boeing seems to possess. The company makes plenty of mistakes. Its 737 MAX has been plagued by computer errors that go far beyond MCAS. Its strategy of outsourcing production to third-party suppliers has been a consistent source of manufacturing errors and delays for almost a decade. Its lack of investment in quality control in its factories have caused new airplanes to be delivered with a variety of severe defects: excessive gaps in airplane fuselages, metal debris near critical wiring bundles or inside fuel tanks, and door plugs installed without security bolts. The latter issue led to the explosive decompression of Alaska Airlines 1282 in January 2024, an incident that went viral thanks to the dramatic passenger video taken from inside the cabin. But Boeing does not seem to be able to learn from its mistakes. According to the DOJ, Boeing has known all of this and has still 'fail[ed] to design, implement, and enforce a compliance and ethics program.' Although the company has brought on two new CEOs in the last six years, each of whom promised to clean things up, Boeing's core culture still remains — which is the root cause of all of its technical problems. The DOJ's rationale for the change was that it expects companies to be 'willing to learn from [their] mistakes.' This is not a skill that Boeing seems to possess. As I wrote in my book about the 737 MAX crashes, Boeing is so large and so firmly entrenched as one of the world's two major commercial airplane makers that it is functionally immune from the market's invisible hand. It is so strategically and economically important that it will always get bailed out, even in the face of a global crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic. And it makes so much money every year that even the multibillion-dollar fines that the DOJ is willing to impose amount to just a small portion of its annual revenues. 'Boeing became too big to fail,' former FTC chair Lina Khan said in a 2024 speech. 'Worse quality is one of the harms that most economists expect from monopolization, because firms that face little competition have limited incentive to improve their products.' If regulators won't step in and force Boeing to change, then it will continue to prioritize profits over safety — the only rational choice in a consequence-free environment. This might be a good bargain for its shareholders, but not for passengers. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Darryl Campbell Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Aviation Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Boeing Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Politics Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Transportation

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store