4chan and porn site investigated by Ofcom over online safety
Ofcom says it has received complaints over potential illegal content on the website, which has not responded to its requests for information.
Under the Online Safety Act, online services must assess the risk of UK users encountering illegal content and activity on their platforms, and take steps to protect them from it.
Ofcom is also investigating porn provider First Time Videos over its age verification checks, and seven file sharing services over potential child sexual abuse material.
4chan has been contacted for comment.
Ofcom says it requested 4chan's risk assessment in April but has not had any response.
The regulator will now investigate whether the platform "has failed, or is failing, to comply with its duties to protect its users from illegal content".
It would not say what kind of illegal content it is investigating.
Ofcom has the power to fine companies up to 10% of their global revenues, or £18m - whichever is the greater number.
4chan has often been at the heart of online controversies in its 22 years, including misogynistic campaigns and conspiracy theories.
Users are anonymous, which can often lead to extreme content being posted.
It was the subject of an alleged hack earlier this year, which took parts of the website down for over a week.
How can you keep your child safe online?
Seven file sharing services also failed to respond to requests for information from the regulator.
They are Im.ge, Krakenfiles, Nippybox, Nippydrive, Nippyshare, Nippyspace and Yolobit.
Ofcom also says it has received complaints over potential child sexual abuse material being shared on these platforms.
Separately, porn provider First Time Videos, which runs two websites, is being investigated into whether it has adequate age checks in place to stop under-18s accessing its sites.
Platforms which host age-restricted content must have "robust" age checks in place by July.
Ofcom does not specify exactly what this means, but some platforms have been trialling age verification using facial scanning to estimate a user's age.
Social media expert Matt Navarra told BBC News earlier this year facial scanning could become the norm in the UK.
Two porn sites investigated for suspected age check failings
Pornhub leaves France over age verification law
Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
TikTok's new guidelines add subtle changes for LIVE creators, AI content, and more
TikTok is preparing an update to its Community Guidelines, which dictate the rules for participating on the social video platform as well as what standards the company uses to determine the videos that make it onto its For You feed. While the update largely rewrites the original text for simplicity's sake, there are a few items that jump out in the new revision — notably how TikTok prioritizes its marketplace, how deeply it personalizes the experience per user, and a small change to the type of AI-generated content that's permitted. Today, social media companies have to comply with a range of regulations globally, like the U.K.'s Online Safety Act (OSA), the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA), and the U.S.'s TAKE IT DOWN Act, which in part has led to policy revisions on some platforms, as with yesterday's update to Bluesky. TikTok's changes, which go live on September 13, 2025, are not as substantial, as it appears the company was often just rewriting text for clarity. However, one section that saw several additions in the updated guidelines covers the rules for TikTok LIVE creators. The company warns creators they're responsible for anything that happens on their live session, even if it involves third-party tools, like real-time translation or voice-to-text tools to read out viewers' comments. TikTok advises creators to monitor those tools to make sure they're not violating the rules through these third-party services. Another notable addition to this section introduces new guidelines for commercial content. TikTok stresses that commercial content must be disclosed. It also directly states that it will reduce the visibility of content that directs users to 'purchase products off-platform in markets where TikTok Shop is available.' The company also says it's customizing users' search results. While the prior version of the guidelines said TikTok provided 'search suggestions' that were relevant to the user, the new guidelines say both 'search results and recommendations may look different for everyone.' The guidelines explain that TikTok uses information like your past searches and what you've watched to make the search results more relevant. The updated rules reveal that comments are personalized, too. TikTok says comments are being sorted based on signals like past replies, likes, and reports. Again, this means the comment section will look different from user to user. The section on AI content has not changed dramatically, though the language here has become less verbose in parts when describing what sort of deepfake content is not allowed. TikTok previously banned content that 'shares or shows fake authoritative sources or crisis events, or falsely shows public figures in certain contexts,' it said. 'This includes being bullied, making an endorsement, or being endorsed.' That's now been replaced with language that says TikTok doesn't allow content 'that's misleading about matters of public importance or harmful to individuals.' It's interesting to note the language referencing AI endorsements was removed. (Perhaps TikTok is paving the way for celebrity-approved, AI-generated endorsements?) In some cases, the language in the guidelines has been simplified, such as in the case of the For You feed (FYF) Eligibility Standards section, which no longer has a long list of what's considered FYF ineligible content. Instead, details about the ineligible content are spread throughout the many different sections of the updated Community Guidelines, which makes it less helpful to reference since it's no longer all in one place. It's also worth noting that TikTok changed the language explaining the reason why it engages in content moderation. Before, the company said the process kept the platform 'safe, trustworthy, and vibrant.' Now it describes content moderation as helping TikTok be a 'safe, fun, and creative place for everyone.' It seems 'trustworthy' got the ax. Uh-oh. Sign in to access your portfolio
Politico
a day ago
- Politico
5 questions for Alexandra Reeve Givens
Alexandra Reeve Givens, a leading consumer protection advocate, is the CEO of the Center for Democracy & Technology, a nonprofit that advocates for digital rights. She previously served as the Senate Judiciary Committee's chief counsel covering technology and consumer protection, and directed Georgetown University's Institute for Technology Law & Policy. She talks to us about the problems with age verification and the importance of federal regulators in the age of artificial intelligence. The following has been edited for length and clarity. What's one big, underrated idea? Remembering that widespread adoption of AI is contingent on people's trust. AI agents that carry out routine tasks will work best if they connect with your email and calendar, know your preferences and routines — but users won't take that leap of faith unless companies are thinking seriously about privacy, security and robust user controls. Smart regulation can ensure the protections people need in our AI future, creating a baseline for consumer trust. What technology right now do you think is overhyped? I'm concerned by the wave of age verification tools being rolled out in response to new laws like the U.K.'s Online Safety Act without serious consideration of the trade-offs. The fact that sites are collecting users' driver's licenses, or images of users' faces, raises serious concerns about privacy, data breaches and people's right to access information anonymously. Many of the privacy-preserving techniques are under-theorized, relying on predictive tools that estimate users' ages from photos, which may not work well for everyone and relies on uncertain guarantees that the photos will be deleted. Or analyzing users' online behavior, which raises major privacy and accuracy questions, too. What do you think the government could be doing now about tech that it isn't? Honestly, I'm more worried about what the federal government is doing with technology right now. The Trump administration has taken extraordinary steps to access and consolidate sensitive data about hundreds of millions of people living in this country. From the Department of Homeland Security gaining access to Internal Revenue Service taxpayer and Medicaid information to target immigrants; to the administration demanding that states hand over personal information about the tens of millions of people who have applied for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits; to the Justice Department seeking the details of voter rolls with personal information and party affiliation from at least 19 states. These demands violate longstanding laws and precedents, are being used to profile and target people. [...] This moment should shock the conscience of people on the right and left. What has surprised you most this year? The political firings at the federal agencies charged with protecting consumers, workers, families and voters surprised me for their brazenness. Agencies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Federal Trade Commission, Federal Election Commission and Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board play an essential role protecting Americans. [...] The rule of law and well-functioning government serves everyone, consumers and businesses alike. The EEOC has been doing important work on the risk of algorithmic discrimination in hiring and management and firing decisions. [...] The FEC was doing important work on how to boost authentic and trusted sources of information in elections, so also navigating this AI era. And then the PCLOB is the main body charged with overseeing the government's surveillance capabilities. What book most shaped your conception of the future? Reading deeply about the Reconstruction era changed the way I view the world. I still remember as a young person facing the sobering reminder that progress isn't linear, that might can indeed overpower right. And that we have extraordinary forebears in history who persisted in the fight for justice anyway. Obviously, CDT is a tech organization, but we are at bottom a human rights organization. And so, when I view what our job is and what our digital future is, it's about what human rights look like in 2025. That's why this period of history is so relevant. Papers, please The Supreme Court refused to pause a Mississippi age verification law, POLITICO's Gabby Miller reports. The justices on Thursday denied an emergency appeal from NetChoice to temporarily block enforcement while its lawsuit challenging the law plays out in district court. Mississippi enacted the law in 2023, which compels platforms with a substantial portion of pornographic content to implement age-gating measures. NetChoice — an industry group that represents Meta, YouTube and X — argues the age verification requirements violate its members' First Amendment rights. MaryAsa Lee, communications director at the Mississippi Attorney General's Office, told POLITICO in a statement that the state is 'grateful' for the decision as 'the case proceeds in a way that permits thoughtful consideration of these important issues.' Yet the decision isn't a slam-dunk for Mississippi. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a concurrence that NetChoice was likely to prevail in demonstrating the law violates speech rights, but that it was too early to block it. AI bootcamp House and Senate staffers attended the fourth annual Congressional Boot Camp on AI this week at Stanford's Institute for Human-Centered AI, POLITICO's Chase DiFeliciantonio reports. Chase interviewed HAI's Executive Director Russell Wald to see how the three-day training session is helping staffers write more sophisticated laws for their bosses to push in Congress. The program included attendees from the House Intelligence Committee and the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who is now the director of Stanford's Hoover Institution, also joined to give her thoughts. Wald said there was particular interest in the technological advancement of smaller AI models. These models fulfill narrower tasks like answering patients' health care questions or gathering smart device data, as opposed to larger general-purpose models like ChatGPT. The event also featured a discussion on how the U.S.'s approach to AI differs from China's. The U.S. has traditionally taken a 'brute force approach' by throwing compute power into models, said Wald. U.S. models also tend to be proprietary. China on the other hand has invested more in STEM and public education, and embraced open-source systems, Wald said. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@
TechCrunch
a day ago
- TechCrunch
TikTok's new guidelines add subtle changes for LIVE creators, AI content, and more
TikTok is preparing an update to its Community Guidelines, which dictate the rules for participating on the social video platform as well as what standards the company uses to determine the videos that make it onto its For You Feed. While the update largely rewrites the original text for simplicity's sake, there are a few items that jump out in the new revision — notably how TikTok prioritizes its marketplace, how deeply it personalizes the experience per user, and a small change to the type of AI-generated content that's permitted. Today, social media companies have to comply with a range of regulations globally, like the U.K.'s Online Safety Act (OSA), the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA), and the U.S.'s TAKE IT DOWN Act, which in part, has led to policy revisions on some platforms, as with yesterday's update to Bluesky. TikTok's changes, which go live on September 13, 2025, are not as substantial, as it appears the company was often just rewriting text for clarity. However, one section that saw several additions in the updated guidelines covers the rules for TikTok LIVE creators. The company warns creators they're responsible for anything that happens on their live session, even if it involves third-party tools, like real-time translation or voice-to-text tools to read out viewers' comments. TikTok advises creators to monitor those tools to make sure they're not violating the rules through these third-party services. Another notable addition to this section introduces new guidelines for commercial content. TikTok stresses that commercial content must be disclosed. It also directly states that it will reduce the visibility of content that directs users to 'purchase products off-platform in markets where TikTok Shop is available.' Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $600+ before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW The company also says it's customizing users' search results. While the prior version of the guidelines said TikTok provided 'search suggestions' that were relevant to the user, the new guidelines say both 'search results and recommendations may look different for everyone.' The guidelines explain that TikTok uses information like your past searches and what you've watched to make the search results more relevant. The updated rules reveal that comments are personalized, too. TikTok says comments are being sorted based on signals like past replies, likes, and reports. Again, this means the comment section will look different from user to user. The section on AI content has not changed dramatically, though the language here has become less verbose in parts when describing what sort of deepfake content is not allowed. TikTok previously banned content that 'shares or shows fake authoritative sources or crisis events, or falsely shows public figures in certain contexts,' it said. 'This includes being bullied, making an endorsement, or being endorsed.' That's now been replaced with language that says TikTok doesn't allow content 'that's misleading about matters of public importance or harmful to individuals.' It's interesting to note he language referencing AI endorsements was removed. (Perhaps, TikTok is paving the way for celebrity-approved, AI-generated endorsements?) In some cases, the language in the guidelines has been simplified, such as in the case of the For You Feed (FYF) Eligibility Standards section, which no longer has a long list of what's considered FYF ineligible content. Instead, details about the ineligible content are spread throughout the many different sections of the updated Community Guidelines, which makes it less helpful to reference since it's no longer all in one place. It's also worth noting that TikTok changed the language explaining the reason why it engages in content moderation. Before, the company said the process kept the platform 'safe, trustworthy, and vibrant.' Now, it describes content moderation as helping TikTok be a 'safe, fun, and creative place for everyone.' It seems 'trustworthy' got the ax. Uh-oh.
