E-commerce, market-driven lifestyle weaking human bonds: Hosabale
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale on Tuesday said e-commerce and a market-driven lifestyle adversely impacted basic human bonds and relationships. He was speaking at a book release function held in Mumbai.
According to him, the e-commerce and market-driven lifestyle were detrimental and weakened social bonds, altering the fundamentals of human relationships.
The senior RSS functionary was speaking at the launch of the book Integral Humanism: A Distinct Paradigm of Development by Ashok Modak, published by the Indian Council of Social Science Research.
According to Hosabale, 'A market-driven, government-oriented life was damaging for society as it adversely impacted human equations. E-commerce is a glaring example. It has reduced relationships to mere transactions.'
While underlining the seriousness of such lifestyle and its overall impact on the individual, family and society at large, he said, 'If I want to get Modak's book in a village in Tamil Nadu, I can easily order it online. It seems convenient. I pay and they deliver. But is it really that simple? Earlier, traditional marketplaces were rooted in long-standing relationships. It has special connected. A human bond. Which evoked sentiments. In the past, a farmer would borrow from a trader who knew him and his family for years. Now, such things are unimaginable. Everything is personal, individualistic.'
He added, 'Will Amazon ever understand or replicate that kind of trust? It is faceless. We are slowly losing the essence of such human connections.'
Hosabale cited how in the United States, society has practically disappeared. Only individuals and the state were left in that country. This disconnect and lack of emotions is worrying.
'This model of a welfare government and a market-centric life is not sustainable for a healthy society,' he said.
The senior RSS functionary raised an alarm about the modern world's approach to nature and lifestyle, highlighting changes in living standards, which have over the decades become essential aspects.
'We cannot live without electricity, but we must think about how to generate it efficiently and integrate it into our lives in a way that respects the environment,' Hosabale said.
Another significant point he made was that education should focus on imparting values and not just disseminating information.
'The new knowledge must be created to build a cohesive society,' he stressed.
Referring to Modak's book, Hosabale said, 'The western world view revolves around individual rights, survival of the fittest, and exploitation of nature. A human being is part of society, and society cannot exist without nature.'
The RSS leader lauded Bhutan's Gross National Happiness model as an alternative vision to economic indices. 'Human and societal well-being are complementary. They cannot exist without nature,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Haryana: Will lock HAU gates if demands unmet by Jun 26, warn protesters
Students of Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University (CCSHAU) in Hisar, who have been demanding resignation of vice-chancellor (VC) Prof BR Kamboj in connection with June 10 lathicharge, on Tuesday said they would close all four gates of the varsity and suspend the work if their demands were not met by June 26. The protesting students had called a mahapanchayat which was attended by several social activists, farmer union leaders, political leaders and student union leaders from across the country. Addressing the students, farmer leader Rakesh Tikait said the people associated with Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) have taken control over the educational institutes without any merit. (HT Photo) Farmer union leaders Rakesh Tikait, Yudhvir Singh and political leaders, including Rania MLA Arjun Chautala of the Indian National Lok Dal, his cousin Digvijay Singh Chautala, who heads the youth wing of the Jannayak Janta Party (JJP), former finance minister and senior Congress leader Sampat Singh and Kaithal MLA Aditya Surjewala, were among those who attended the mahapanchayat and extended their support to the students. Vinod Kumar, a student leader, said, 'We have given an ultimatum to the government and sought acceptance of our eight demands by June 26. If they fail to do so, we, along with social activists, will close all four gates of the university on June 27 morning. We are demanding resignation of vice-chancellor BR Kamboj, action against those named in the FIR and their termination, revision of the stipend structure, rollback of seat reservations for Land Donation Villages (LDV), and medical compensation for injured students, taking back FIR registered against students along with other demands,' he said. Addressing the students, farmer leader Rakesh Tikait said the people associated with Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) have taken control over the educational institutes without any merit. 'Earlier, this government used lathis on farmers. Now, they thrashed students. These students come from humble backgrounds from all castes, whose forefathers played a key role in India's independence. The students had changed regimes earlier too and this is a fight just to remove the vice-chancellor,' he added. INLD's Rania MLA Arjun Chautala said he raised the issue of 'autocratic' functioning of the vice-chancellor, who 'falsely claimed to receive the MS Swaminathan award' for his contribution in the farming sector. 'The VC is running his own government on the campus and he instructed the security guards to attack the students. He will have to go. Our party and student body are standing with the students. You have to stay firm on your demands. I will again raise this issue in the state assembly,' he added. Kaithal MLA Aditya Surjewala said the Congress would stand in solidarity with students from Chandigarh to Delhi. He said that the party would raise the issue in the state assembly and Parliament. JJP's youth body state president Digvijay Chautala condemned the attack on students and termed it a 'cowardly act' by the vice-chancellor. 'A person who gave orders to use baton on students has no right to run the office. His arrogance and oppressive action has crossed all limits and now he should pack his bag to vacate the campus,' he added. Former student leader and social activist Ramesh Punia alleged, 'The vice-chancellor is indulged in corrupt practices as he appointed his relatives and loyalists to key positions. Assistant professor Radhe Shyam, who was arrested for assaulting students, is a relative of another accused — chief security officer Sukhbir Singh — and he was appointed during Kamboj's tenure. Sukhbir was promoted as chief security officer by changing several rules while his wife Bas Kaur was appointed assistant professor and hostel warden. She is mounting pressure on girl students to stay away from protest.' He further alleged that VC's wife Santosh Kumari had claimed house rent allowance in violation of norms while serving as a government school principal, and later returned the same. 'The VC appointed his wife as director of the HAU's campus school without any advertisement,' he said, adding, 'Sukhbir Singh terminated the services of 52 security guards on VC's direction and appointed 40 security guards from their closed circle. The government should remove the VC and initiate a high level probe.' Repeated attempts to establish contact with VC Kamboj, chief security officer Sukhbir Singh and others went futile as they didn't respond to calls.
Deccan Herald
3 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Those who got power after Emergency didn't punish guilty: Gurumurthy
RSS ideologue S Gurumurthy said: 'After the 2024 elections, Rahul Gandhi started displaying a copy of the Constitution and spoke of saving the Constitution. Didn't he know that his grandmother had 'suspended' the Constitution during the Emergency."
The Print
6 hours ago
- The Print
Dhankhar invokes Savarkar's realism, backs national interest as India's international diplomacy compass
'Browsing through the pages of New World, I felt the imprint of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar in the author's thought… Savarkar, despite all the untenable misgivings in extremity, remains a celebrated thinker…,' Dhankhar said. At the launch of the book 'New World: 21st Century Global Order in India', authored by senior RSS leader & India Foundation president Ram Madhav, Dhankhar said he saw a Savarkarite lens in the author's worldview. New Delhi: Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar Monday recalled Vinayak Damodar Savarkar who had said that global politics is dictated by realism and self-interest, not morality or solidarity. 'Savarkar, a staunch realist, believed in a post-war world where nations would act only in pursuit of their own interests not based on idealism, morality or international solidarity. Imagine how prophetic he has been. Look around—last fortnight, last 3 months. All this has been seen by all of us,' he said. He also echoed Savarkar's critique of Western institutions, saying the nationalist leader had rejected 'pacifist or utopian internationalism' and 'emphasised that India must safeguard its sovereignty through strength, not by relying on Western-dominated institutions like the League of Nations or later the United Nations, both ignoring due place to one-sixth of humanity.' Also read: 'Picture of ideal democracy': Mohan Bhagwat praises political unity post-Pahalgam, calls for self-reliance 'Strengthening Bharat is the governing philosophy today' In a strong endorsement of the Modi government's worldview, Dhankhar said: 'Friends, today, strengthening Bharat is the governing philosophy and resolve of this government. It is steadfast, firm, non-negotiable, and notwithstanding the critics—it is spinally strong.' 'Let us not be misguided by the distraction—who said what. The government, and India and its people, stand firmly for the nation—nation first and our nationalism… Those who take a stand for momentary situations are not in the psyche or groove of Bharat. Once we attain strength inwards, we can shape our strategic environment outwards,' he added. Backing Ram Madhav's thesis in the book, he said, 'I couldn't agree more with the lamentations of the author Dr. Ram Madhav. He highlights a perpetual decline of global multilateralism and prescribes India to give up romanticism and focus on economic growth.' 'George Tanham was wrong—India's strategic thought is deep-rooted' The Vice-President also took on longstanding Western criticisms about India's lack of strategic culture. 'George Tanham, an American thinker, 3 decades ago, in a treatise effectively suggested that there is absence of a strategic thinking in India on account of its Hindu philosophical roots and there were takers of it. But with Shri Ram Madhav's volume, George Tanham stands corrected. He couldn't be more wrong,' Dhankhar said. He added: 'The principle 'Rajadharma' (ethical statecraft) and 'Dharmayudha' (just war) in Mahabharata; Dhamma diplomacy in Ashokan edicts; and the Mandala Theory of Kautilya are all examples of theorising strategic environments—all feast to the intellect. These philosophies have ever been relevant, but in our contemporaneous challenging times, these are the needs of the global order.' 'India must re-strategise for a shifting global order'—Ram Madhav Speaking to the media after the launch, author Ram Madhav said the world is shifting away from the liberal international order formed post-World War II, and India must reorient its strategy to keep pace. 'We are moving away from the international liberal order that was created some 75 years ago. We are entering into a new kind of world,' he said. He cited the emergence of China and the rising importance of smaller nations like Turkey. 'In our recent clash with Pakistan, we not only talked about Pakistan, but also about Turkey. So, the realisation is Turkey is also a power today,' he said. Madhav pointed out that wars are now being fought in unconventional ways—'no army is facing each other'—and that India must adapt quickly if it wants to become a Viksit Bharat by 2047. 'India has to re-strategise its whole future trajectory…That means doing some very important things and becoming a very proactive participant in this new order,' he said. He added that international diplomacy must now be grounded in national interest, not ideological loyalty. 'In politics and diplomacy, there are no permanent friends and no permanent foes…That was a romantic approach of the past. There are only permanent interests.' He also emphasised India's message to global institutions, saying, 'India has told the UN leadership that you are not delivering…you are failing. If you fail, we have to look for other ways…other countries will have to come forward.' Underscoring New Delhi's diplomatic positioning amid global conflicts, Madhav said: 'India is not taking sides, India is fighting—or is working—for peace.' Trump, Iran bombing, China, Kargil 2.0—a volatile new world The backdrop to Monday's discussion was a rapidly evolving geopolitical landscape. Tensions in West Asia have intensified in recent months, with the long-simmering Iran-Israel conflict spilling over into open confrontation. The US, a key Israeli ally, has become directly involved following a series of escalations, including Iranian missile strikes and retaliatory US airstrikes on Iranian military targets—marking a significant deepening of the regional conflict. Congress MP Manish Tewari, who also spoke at the event, listed these global crises while framing the shifts in strategic thinking. 'There are unprecedented trade tensions across the world triggered by President Trump's attempt to restructure the international architecture of commerce. The Russia-Ukraine war that began in February of 2022, the Israel-Hamas-Hezbollah-Houthi-Iran conflict that broke out in October of 2023, and the rise of China over the past three decades that has attained potential overtones in large parts of the world beyond the immediate Chinese realms in North Asia, Southeast Asia, and South Asia. The added dynamic is the latest India-Pakistan standoff, the worst after the Kargil war 26 years ago, and now the US bombing of Iran. Modern strategic thought is essentially a European construct because of the experimentation with ideas and the impulses of colonialism,' Tewari said. 'Democracy means dialogue' Spealing about the 'sarve bhavantu sukhinah, sarve santu niramayah' philosophy, Dhankhar said, 'Friends, even the Fabian socialists of the 50s cannot disagree with the direction of the country as we strive to attain. And what do we strive to attain? We are not creating Bharat, it was not born on 15 August, 1947. We only got rid of the colonial power then. 'Sarve bhavantu sukhinah, sarve santu niramayah'—that is our philosophy. May all beings be happy, may all beings be free from illness.' Adding to this philosophical dimension, Dhankhar underlined the centrality of expression and dialogue to India's democratic ethos. 'We firmly believe that democracy is primarily defined by expression and dialogue. Both are complementary. This, in our Vedic philosophy, is anantavada. One of the fundamentals is, and that is inalienable facet, non-negotiable, respect the others' point of view. My own experience shows, more often than not, the other point of view is the correct point of view.' Cautioning against internal division, Dhankhar urged political dialogue and maturity. 'Friends, the pathway to Bharat's rise would require careful treading. There are forces that are determined to make our life difficult. There are forces within the country and outside. These sinister forces, pernicious to our interests, want to strike by dividing us on issues even like language,' he said. 'Which country in the world can take pride in their language richness like Bharat can? Look at our classical languages, their number. In parliament, 22 such languages allow and afford opportunity for anyone to express in them.' 'It would require many such thinkers to come together and debate and discuss challenges and opportunities and aid policymakers in making right strategic choices. Evolution of policies must take place now with a little more representative character.' Calling for political convergence, Dhankhar concluded that 'convergence' is required. 'There has to be greater dialogue among political parties. I firmly believe we have no enemies in the country. We have enemies outside. And some who are enemies within—a small fraction—they are rooted in outside forces, inimical to Bharat.' (Edited by Zinnia Ray Chaudhuri) Also read: Savarkar severely criticised RSS for its 'purely cultural' orientation
