logo
Trial of professors protecting pro-Palestinian students from Trump deportations begins

Trial of professors protecting pro-Palestinian students from Trump deportations begins

Al Arabiya12 hours ago
Groups representing US university professors seeking to protect international students and faculty who engage in pro-Palestinian advocacy from being deported are set to do what no other litigants challenging the Trump administration's hardline immigration agenda have done so far: Take it to trial.
A two-week non-jury trial in the professors' case scheduled to kick off on Monday in Boston marks a rarity in the hundreds of lawsuits that have been filed nationally challenging Republican President Donald Trump's efforts to carry out mass deportations, slash spending and reshape the federal government.
In many of those cases, judges have issued quick rulings early on in the proceedings without any witnesses being called to testify. But US District Judge William Young in keeping with his long-standing practice instead ordered a trial in the professors' case, saying it was the 'best way to get at truth.'
The lawsuit was filed in March after immigration authorities arrested recent Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil, the first target of Trump's effort to deport non-citizen students with pro-Palestinian or anti-Israel views.
Since then, the administration has canceled the visas of hundreds of other students and scholars and ordered the arrest of some, including Rumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts University student who was taken into custody by masked and plainclothes agents after co-writing an opinion piece criticizing her school's response to Israel's war in Gaza.
In their cases and others, judges have ordered the release of students detained by immigration authorities after they argued the administration retaliated against them for their pro-Palestinian advocacy in violation of the free speech guarantees of the US Constitution's First Amendment.
Their arrests form the basis of the case before Young, which was filed by the American Association of University Professors and its chapters at Harvard, Rutgers and New York University, and the Middle East Studies Association.
They allege the State Department and Department of Homeland Security adopted a policy of revoking visas for non-citizen students and faculty who engaged in pro-Palestinian advocacy and arresting, detaining and deporting them as well.
That policy, they say, was adopted after Trump signed executive orders in January directing the agencies to protect Americans from non-citizens who 'espouse hateful ideology' and to 'vigorously' combat anti-Semitism.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio in late March said he had revoked more than 300 visas and warned that the Trump administration was looking every day for 'these lunatics.'
The goal, the plaintiffs say, has been to suppress the types of protests that have roiled college campuses after Israel launched its war in Gaza.
Trump administration officials have frequently spoken about the efforts to target student protesters for visa revocations. Yet in court, the administration has defended itself by arguing the plaintiffs are challenging a deportation policy that does not exist and cannot point to any statute, rule, regulation or directive codifying it.
'We don't deport people based on ideology,' Homeland Security Department spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem 'has made it clear that anyone who thinks they can come to America and hide behind the First Amendment to advocate for anti-American and anti-Semitic violence and terrorism - think again. You are not welcome here,' McLaughlin said.
The trial will determine whether the administration has violated the plaintiffs' First Amendment free speech rights. If Young concludes it has, he will determine a remedy in a second phase of the case.
Young has described the lawsuit as 'an important free speech case' and said that as alleged in the plaintiffs' complaint, 'it is hard to imagine a policy more focused on intimidating its targets from practicing protected political speech.'
The case is the second Trump-era legal challenge so far that has gone to trial before Young, an 84-year-old appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan.
While other Trump-era cases have been resolved through motions and arguments in court, the veteran jurist has long espoused the value of trials and in a recent order lamented the 'virtual abandonment by the federal judiciary of any sense that its fact-finding processes are exceptional.
Young last month after another non-jury trial delivered civil rights advocates and Democratic-led states a win by ordering the reinstatement of hundreds of National Institutes of Health research grants that were unlawfully terminated because of their perceived promotion of diversity, equity and inclusion.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republican Chris Carr Raises $1.25M More for 2026 Georgia Governor Bid
Republican Chris Carr Raises $1.25M More for 2026 Georgia Governor Bid

Al Arabiya

timean hour ago

  • Al Arabiya

Republican Chris Carr Raises $1.25M More for 2026 Georgia Governor Bid

Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr said Monday he raised another $1.25 million for his 2026 gubernatorial bid from February 1 to June 30. The Republican announced the fundraising totals to The Associated Press on Monday, although he hasn't yet filed an official report with the state Ethics Commission. Those reports are due Tuesday. Carr raised $2.2 million from November through mid-January but couldn't raise money while lawmakers were in session from mid-January until the end of March. He didn't immediately say how much he has spent of the nearly $3.5 million he has raised. Carr is the only major GOP candidate who has announced for the race in Georgia, which saw titanic battles for the governor's chair between Republican Brian Kemp and Democrat Stacey Abrams in 2018 and 2022. Abrams lost both races, and no Democrat has won a governor's race in Georgia since Roy Barnes in 1998. Republicans argue Georgia needs the stability of continued Republican control. Democrats are meanwhile trying to prove their successes in other races weren't a fluke. Former President Joe Biden won Georgia in 2020, and US Sens. Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff were elected to the Senate in runoffs in January 2021. In 2022, Warnock beat Republican Herschel Walker in a runoff to claim a full six-year term. Carr took the unprecedented step of announcing his run for governor in November, in part because he said he needed to get an early jump on fundraising. He could face Republican rivals with enough personal wealth to fund their own campaigns. Republican Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, whose family has made a fortune running and supplying gas stations, is expected to announce his bid for governor in the coming weeks. Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who sold a substantial engineering company, could also make a bid in the Republican primary. Carr said in a statement that his numbers 'show that kind of energy can't be bought – it's earned, and we're ready to deliver.' Carr has aligned closely with Kemp but could face opposition from President Donald Trump and his supporters in a primary election. Jones has been close to Trump and would likely angle for his endorsement. Fueled by displeasure that Carr didn't back Trump's attempts to overturn his 2020 presidential election loss in Georgia, Trump in 2022 endorsed a primary opponent who lost to Carr. Last week, the two leading Democrats said they had each collected about $1.1 million in early fundraising. Former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms said she loaned her campaign $200,000 and collected $900,000 from donors, while state Sen. Jason Esteves said he made a much smaller donation to his campaign, with the rest coming from donors.

Migrants Deported From US To Salvadoran Prison Remain Under US Control, Salvadoran Officials Tell UN
Migrants Deported From US To Salvadoran Prison Remain Under US Control, Salvadoran Officials Tell UN

Al Arabiya

timean hour ago

  • Al Arabiya

Migrants Deported From US To Salvadoran Prison Remain Under US Control, Salvadoran Officials Tell UN

The government of El Salvador has acknowledged to UN investigators that the Trump administration maintains control of the Venezuelan men who were deported from the US to a notorious Salvadoran prison–contradicting public statements by officials in both countries. The revelation was contained in court filings Monday by lawyers for more than 100 migrants who are seeking to challenge their deportations to El Salvador's mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT. The case is among several challenging President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. 'In this context, the jurisdiction and legal responsibility for these persons lie exclusively with the competent foreign authorities,' Salvadoran officials wrote in response to queries from the unit of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. The UN group has been looking into the fate of the men who were sent to El Salvador from the US in mid-March, even after a US judge had ordered the planes that were carrying them to be turned around. The Trump administration has argued that it is powerless to return the men, noting that they are beyond the reach of US courts and no longer have access to due process rights or other US constitutional guarantees. But lawyers for the migrants said the UN report shows otherwise. 'El Salvador has confirmed what we and everyone else understood: it is the US that controls what happens to the Venezuelans languishing at CECOT. Remarkably, the US government didn't provide this information to us or the court,' American Civil Liberties Union lawyer Lee Gelerent said in an email. Skye Perryman, CEO and president of Democracy Forward, said the documents show that the administration has not been honest with the court or the American people. The ACLU and Democracy Forward are both representing the migrants. The administration in March agreed to pay $6 million for El Salvador to house 300 migrants. The deal sparked immediate controversy when Trump invoked an 18th-century wartime law–the Alien Enemies Act–to quickly remove men it has accused of being members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. In a related case, the administration mistakenly sent Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the same prison despite a judge's order prohibiting the Maryland man from being sent to El Salvador. The administration initially resisted court orders to bring him back to the US, saying he was no longer in American custody. Eventually, Abrego Garcia was returned to the US, where he now faces criminal charges of human smuggling while legal battles continue. Last month, a coalition of immigrant rights groups sued to invalidate the prison deal with El Salvador, arguing that the arrangement to move migrant detainees outside the reach of US courts violates the Constitution.

Ending war in Gaza is ‘Trump's utmost priority'
Ending war in Gaza is ‘Trump's utmost priority'

Arab News

timean hour ago

  • Arab News

Ending war in Gaza is ‘Trump's utmost priority'

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump's 'utmost priority' is to end the war in Gaza and free hostages held by Hamas, the White House said on Monday before a crucial meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff will this week travel to Qatar, where Israel and Hamas are holding indirect talks. Israel's refusal to allow the free and safe entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza remains the main obstacle to progress in the ceasefire talks in Doha, Palestinian sources said. Mediators hosted two more rounds of discussions on Monday. The US-backed proposal for a 60-day ceasefire envisages a phased release of hostages, Israeli troop withdrawals from parts of Gaza and discussions on ending the war entirely. Hamas has long demanded a final end to the war before it would free remaining hostages, but Israel will not halt fighting until all hostages are free and Hamas dismantled. Trump said last week that he would be 'very firm' with Netanyahu on the need for a speedy Gaza deal. However, Israel has intensified its military campaign in Gaza and sharply restricted food distribution. 'God willing, a truce will take place,' Mohammed Al-Sawalheh, 30, from Jabaliya in northern Gaza, said on Monday after another Israeli air strike. 'We cannot see a truce while people are dying. We want a truce that will stop this bloodshed.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store