The Four Pillars Essential To Work After Retirement
The colonnade and arches on the Stamford University campus, a 19th century building, Stanford ... More University, California, 1943. (Photo by Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images)
It is hard for many people to know when to retire. While I believe there is a shelf life for leaders, most of us struggle with letting go. Unless there is an early retirement incentive package with a deadline, there is often not a definite date to retire.
For my monthly podcast 'Becoming a Sage,' I interviewed Dave Ulrich, the Rensis Likert Professor at the Ross School of Business, University of Michigan. He is the author of The Why of Work. We talked about how retirees miss the social aspect of working. His experience has informed him that 'retirees miss the people more than the work.'
Yet even if we don't miss our day jobs, retirement can be uncomfortable because we often don't know what to do next. Ulrich described it this way: 'We thought the 60s and 70s would be an age of certainty, but it is an age of absolute uncertainty. The 20s are more certainty because you have a pattern of college, work, and life patterns.' He continued, 'Most [retired]
The key is to be pulled into something meaningful rather than feel pushed out.
The question becomes: What are we being pulled into? Since retirement and how we spend our time is personalized, it takes time and intentional thought to figure out what's next.
In The Why of Work, Urich describes four Bs or pillars of why people work. Retirees, he argues, would be smart to know these pillars so they can replace them outside of work.
We are not retiring from life, but we are moving onto something else. After you leave your career, you must go somewhere, but where are you going? Where will you belong, and what will you believe? Through my work, I've learned that fulfilling the next phase of life is not about being smart or having a lot of money. It is about being intentional with how you allocate your resources of time, energy, and money. And the most precious resource is time and where we put our attention.
Several tools have helped me decide how to spend my time and attention. First, I evaluated my values to help me create a personal mission statement which I use as a sieve. When I am asked to do something that requires my time and attention, I drop the ideas into my 'sieve.' If they fit my values and mission statement, I am likely to agree to do them. If not, the sieve is there to block them. Second, I look for role models. I seek out people who are living a life in ways that is attractive to me. Then I ask myself, 'What is it about how they are spending their resources that interests me?' I may or may not know these role models, but I can learn a lot through observation.
Urich said he has learned to stop chasing the uncertainty to focus on about what he is certain. He is certain, for instance, that he is 'committed to learning to grow.' His personal mission statement is: 'Learning that creates value for others.' He does this through his consulting, teaching, and writing.
Then he asked me about what I was certain. I told him we were soul mates as my personal mission statement is: Continue to learn and share what I am learning with others. I do this through writing, a monthly podcast and newsletter, teaching, workshops, speaking, and coaching. I am certain about continuing to learn and grow. This requires me to be curious, proactive, and engaged. At heart, I am a seeker who learns by asking questions of others. For most of my life, I've been fortunate to have mentors and Sages from whom I have learned and I want to continue this pattern.
When I asked Ulrich for his definition of legacy, he responded, 'Legacy is about certainty. Find certainty for yourself. Help people discover their certainty.'
After people leave their jobs, Urich advises them to: Be safe. Become. Belong. Believe. In every presentation, he ends with this question: What is the best year of your life? His answer: If you follow the four Bs, the next 12 months will be the best.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
23 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Pentagon Pizza Index: The theory that surging pizza orders signal global crises
A different kind of pie chart is being used to predict global crises. A surge in takeout deliveries to the Pentagon has become a surprisingly accurate predictor of major geopolitical events, dubbed the 'Pentagon Pizza Index.' Tracking activity at local pizza joints in Arlington County, the X account Pentagon Pizza Report noted an uptick in Google Maps activity from four pizza places near the Pentagon on June 12. We, The Pizza, District Pizza Palace, Domino's, and Extreme Pizza all reportedly saw higher-than-usual order volumes around 7 p.m. ET. 'As of 6:59 p.m. ET nearly all pizza establishments nearby the Pentagon have experienced a HUGE surge in activity,' the X account posted. The timing? Just hours before news broke of Israel's major attack on Iran. The U.S. announced it was not involved in the attacks. 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran, and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement released by the White House on June 12. However, as the theory goes, the surge in traffic at local pizza joints close to government buildings may have signaled hungry military leadership hunkering down to monitor unfolding events. 'The kind of analytics we love,' read one comment on X. 'Google Maps research beats some spy agencies around the world,' another user reacted. The predictive power of pizza isn't a new theory. As Alex Selby-Boothroyd, The Economist 's head of data journalism, wrote on LinkedIn: 'The Pentagon Pizza Index has been a surprisingly reliable predictor of seismic global events—from coups to wars—since the 1980s.' During the Cold War, Soviet operatives reportedly monitored pizza delivery activity in Washington, believing a sudden uptick in late-night orders signaled military personnel working overtime. They even gave it a code name: 'Pizzint,' short for pizza intelligence. In January 1991, Frank Meeks, who then owned 43 Domino's outlets in the Washington area, told the Los Angeles Times: 'The news media doesn't always know when something big is going to happen because they're in bed, but [pizza] deliverers are out there at 2 in the morning.' He added that on the night of August 1, 1990, the CIA ordered a record number of pizzas in a single night—21 pies. A few hours later, Iraqi forces invaded Kuwait, marking the beginning of the Gulf War. As CNN's then-Pentagon correspondent Wolf Blitzer reportedly said in 1990: 'Bottom line for journalists: Always monitor the pizzas.' Of course, a correlation between pizza delivery and global crises is not a verified method of tracking world events. In a statement to Newsweek, the Pentagon dismissed the theory, noting they have plenty of pizza options inside the building, along with sushi, sandwiches, and donuts. They also disputed the timeline suggested by the Pentagon Pizza Report, saying it did 'not align with the events.'
Forbes
29 minutes ago
- Forbes
2025 Forbes Iconoclast Summit: The Boardroom Psyche: Corporate America's Response to the Economic Landscape
| Jun 16, 2025, 01:31PM EDT What steps are companies taking to futureproof their businesses and adapt to the current period of unrest and uncertainty? With corporate leaders thinking differently about supply chains, partnerships and investments, what can we expect on the dealmaking front and when are they expecting business conditions to stabilize? Gain insights from the boardroom and beyond as experts dissect the corporate playbook for today's economic landscape. Forbes CEO Sherry Phillips is joined by Mizuho Americas Head of Investment & Corporate Banking Michal Katz, Member of the UK's House of Lords and Co-Principal of Versaca Baroness Dambisa Moyo, and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP Partner Alex Spiro at the 2025 Forbes Iconoclast Summit in New York City.
Associated Press
30 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Mining project near the Okefenokee Swamp has stalled over a $2M permit requirement
SAVANNAH, Ga. (AP) — A company that has spent years battling conservationists as it seeks a permit to mine outside the Okefenokee Swamp and its federally protected wildlife refuge needs to do just one thing before regulators make a final decision: set aside $2 million for future restoration of the mining site. Sixteen months after being notified of the requirement, Twin Pines Minerals still hasn't submitted a surety bond or equivalent financial assurance to show the Georgia Environmental Protection Division that it has access to that amount of cash or credit. That's brought an unexpected halt to a project that appeared on the cusp of winning final approval early last year. Georgia regulators issued draft permits in February 2024 despite warnings from scientists that mining so close to the Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge could irreparably harm a national treasure. Twin Pines of Birmingham, Alabama, has worked since 2019 to obtain permits to mine titanium dioxide, a pigment used to whiten products from paint to toothpaste, less than 3 miles (5 kilometers) from the southeastern boundary of the Okefenokee refuge near the Georgia-Florida line. Within days of the draft permits being approved, Georgia regulators informed Twin Pines in a letter that it needed to submit a $2 million bond, cash or letter of credit that can be used as needed to pay for restoration of the 820-acre (332-hectare) site. Regulators have finished reviewing thousands of public comments that poured in a year ago regarding the mining project in Georgia's Charlton County, said Environmental Protection Division spokeswoman Sara Lips. Now they're waiting on Twin Pines before moving forward. 'The financial assurance is the last piece of the permit package that will then get routed to our staff, up to the director, to make a final decision,' Lips told The Associated Press. She said Twin Pines faces no deadline to put up the money. Twin Pines President Steve Ingle declined to comment through a company spokesman. Ingle has insisted Twin Pines can mine without harming the Okefenokee. State regulators have agreed, concluding last year that mining should have a 'minimal impact' on the refuge. The mining company's failure to set aside the $2 million after well over a year has opponents questioning whether it has the resources to mine responsibly in an ecologically sensitive area. 'When we're talking about the potential damage of this mine, it goes way beyond $2 million,' said Peter Slag, an attorney for the Southern Environmental Law Center. 'It's sort of an alarm bell that they probably don't have the money to do other sorts of compliance and capital investment.' The Okefenokee is the largest U.S. refuge east of the Mississippi River, covering nearly 630 square miles (1,630 square kilometers) in southeast Georgia. It is home to abundant alligators, stilt-legged wood storks and more than 400 other animal species. Scientists have warned that mining near the Okefenokee's bowl-like rim could damage the swamp's ability to hold water and increase the frequency of withering droughts. There are other signs Twin Pines may be struggling financially. Danish shipping company Lauritzen Bulkers sued Twin Pines in federal court in Colorado last October, saying it's owed $9.3 million after contracting with Twin Pines in 2022 to transport minerals to Asia. A judge paused the case in April, at the shipper's request, amid arbitration proceedings. Twin Pines' attorney in that case, Joseph Martinez, did not immediately return email messages seeking comment. In March, a second company sued Twin Pines in a California state court. M&L Commodities says Twin Pines owes it $5.6 million stemming from a 2021 contract for M&L to store minerals for the mining company. Twin Pines denies wrongdoing in legal responses filed in court.
