Liz Truss's social media platform might work
How does a social media platform go mainstream in the 2020s? For the last several years, tech companies have tried to launch supposedly cutting-edge platforms – ones they tell us will shake up our digital consumption – which have overwhelmingly, if not universally, failed. There was BeReal, the anti-Instagram that got you to take a picture of yourself and your surroundings at a randomly prompted moment, which burned out after brief popularity in 2022; Threads, Meta's Twitter alternative hoping to capitalise on Elon Musk backlash, has been more or less in freefall since it launched in 2023.
The biggest failures, though, have come from apps pitching a dedicated political space, such as Parler, the now-shut down 'free speech' microblogging site, once nearly owned by Kanye West, and Truth Social, Donald Trump's own Twitter alternative built after he was banned from the platform in 2021, which is less of a social network than a Trump press release forum and lost over $400 million last year. This graveyard of failed apps has made new social platforms some of the riskiest, most guaranteed failures in tech.
But recently things have begun to shift. Sites like BlueSky (a less hateful version of Twitter) and Rumble (a more hateful version of YouTube) are succeeding by offering something explicitly narrow: a place where getting to exist in a small political bubble is the USP.
We are seeing a changing social media landscape where users are now seeking platforms promising the opposite kind of audience social media has traditionally sought to have: niche, dedicated markets rather than something akin to a digital, global town square. It is likely with this in mind that, last week, the former UK prime minister Liz Truss announced that she would be testing the popularity of niche: by launching her own free speech-focused social media site.
Speaking at a cryptocurrency conference in Bedford, Truss said that 'the elite' had 'cut [me] off at the knees' when she became PM. 'What I'm now thinking is we need a media network to be able to communicate to people, to be able to have a grassroots movement that is actually really demanding change of our leaders,' she said, adding that she felt certain political topics were 'suppressed or promoted' by the media. 'This needs to be actively fought and what I am doing is establishing a new free speech network, which will be uncensored and uncancellable, to actually talk about the issues people don't want to talk about.'
This is yet another attempt by Truss to enter the American political sphere, having spent the last few years trying desperately to align herself to Trump and the American right to no real avail. (She is of course also not the first UK political figure to launch their own social media platform: former health minister Matt Hancock created an app for his constituents called Matt Hancock MP in 2018, which has since shut down.)
Whatever platform Truss is cooking up is not going to be the future of any faction's online diet, but it's wrong to think that fractured, politically-specific platforms can't work in 2025. Now, in our increasingly polarised political environment, actual echo chambers are beginning to look more appealing to consumers who are no longer looking to rub shoulders with every kind of person online.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
Rather than to become the next TikTok, Instagram or even Twitter, tech companies are realising there's money to be made by courting smaller, ideologically-motivated audiences who are so committed to their politics – and certain political figures – that they will use and even pay for dedicated social media sites. Many of these sites, like Rumble, have even explicitly shifted their branding to appear more boutique, moving from describing themselves as a YouTube alternative to instead pitching themselves as a free speech vertical. Platforms no longer need to be the place where everyone is, but simply a place where you will instead only find specific people – and only those you already agree with.
We may be at the start of a new era of social media defined by a fractured, mosaic landscape, where we are offered an enormous amount of content that validates our pre-existing beliefs. But it feels more likely that, whether or not we continue to have a few big platforms or a spread of tiny, specific ones, the era we are entering will be remembered as narrow; as reactionary.
[See more: Nigel Farage's mayday alert]
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
38 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump's Washington takeover begins as National Guard troops arrive
The influx came the morning after Mr Trump announced he would be activating the guard members and taking over the department. The US president's bid to take over public safety in Washington reflects an escalation of his aggressive approach to law enforcement (Alex Brandon/AP) He cited a crime emergency — but referred to the same crime that city officials stress is already falling noticeably. The president holds the legal right to make such moves for at least a month. Mayor Muriel Bowser pledged to work alongside the federal officials Mr Trump has tasked with overseeing the city's law enforcement, while insisting the police chief remained in charge of the department and its officers. 'How we got here or what we think about the circumstances — right now we have more police, and we want to make sure we use them,' she told reporters. It is unclear how visible and aggressive the federal presence in Washington could be (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP) The tone was a shift from the day before, when Ms Bowser said Mr Trump's plan to take over the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and call in the National Guard was not a productive step and argued his perceived state of emergency simply did not match the declining crime numbers. Still, the law gives the federal government more sway over the capital city than in US states, and Ms Bowser said her administration's ability to push back was limited. Meanwhile, attorney general Pam Bondi called the Tuesday morning meeting productive in a social media post and said the justice department would 'work closely with the DC city government' to 'make Washington, DC, safe again.' While Mr Trump invokes his plan by saying that 'we're going to take our capital back', Ms Bowser and the MPD maintain that violent crime overall in Washington has decreased to a 30-year low after a sharp rise in 2023. Carjackings, for example, dropped about 50% in 2024 and are down again this year. Ms Bowser, a Democrat, spent much of Mr Trump's first term in office openly sparring with the Republican president. Washington mayor Muriel Bowser said crime in the city had been dropping steadily (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP) She fended off his initial plans for a military parade through the streets and stood in public opposition when he called in a multi-agency flood of federal law enforcement to confront anti-police brutality protesters in summer 2020. She later had the words 'Black Lives Matter' painted in giant yellow letters on the street about a block from the White House. In Mr Trump's second term, backed by Republican control of both houses of Congress, Ms Bowser has walked a public tightrope for months, emphasising common ground with the Trump administration on issues such as the successful effort to bring the NFL's Washington Commanders back to the District of Columbia. She watched with open concern for the city streets as Mr Trump finally got his military parade this summer. Her decision to dismantle Black Lives Matter Plaza earlier this year served as a neat metaphor for just how much the power dynamics between the two executives has evolved. Now that fraught relationship enters uncharted territory as Mr Trump has followed through on months of what many DC officials had quietly hoped were empty threats. The new standoff has cast Ms Bowser in a sympathetic light, even among her long-time critics. 'It's a power play and we're an easy target,' Clinique Chapman, chief executive of the DC Justice Lab, said. A frequent critic of Ms Bowser, whom she accuses of 'over policing our youth' with the recent expansions of Washington's youth curfew, Ms Chapman said Mr Trump's latest move 'is not about creating a safer DC. It's just about power'. Ms Bowser contends that all the power resides with Mr Trump and that her administration can do little other than comply and make the best of it. For Mr Trump, the effort to take over public safety in Washington reflects an escalation of his aggressive approach to law enforcement. Protesters demonstrate against Mr Trump's planned use of federal law enforcement and National Guard troops in Washington (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP) The District of Columbia's status as a congressionally established federal district gives him a unique opportunity to push his tough-on-crime agenda, though he has not proposed solutions to the root causes of homelessness or crime. 'Let me be crystal clear,' attorney general Pam Bondi said during Mr Trump's announcement news conference. 'Crime in DC is ending and ending today.' Mr Trump's declaration of a state of emergency fits the general pattern of his second term in office: He has declared states of emergency on issues ranging from border protection to economic tariffs, enabling him to essentially rule via executive order. In many cases, he has moved forward while the courts sorted them out.
Rhyl Journal
43 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Trump's Washington takeover begins as National Guard troops arrive
It comes after the White House ordered federal forces to take over the city's police department and reduce crime in what the president called — without substantiation — a lawless city. The influx came the morning after Mr Trump announced he would be activating the guard members and taking over the department. He cited a crime emergency — but referred to the same crime that city officials stress is already falling noticeably. The president holds the legal right to make such moves for at least a month. Mayor Muriel Bowser pledged to work alongside the federal officials Mr Trump has tasked with overseeing the city's law enforcement, while insisting the police chief remained in charge of the department and its officers. 'How we got here or what we think about the circumstances — right now we have more police, and we want to make sure we use them,' she told reporters. The tone was a shift from the day before, when Ms Bowser said Mr Trump's plan to take over the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and call in the National Guard was not a productive step and argued his perceived state of emergency simply did not match the declining crime numbers. Still, the law gives the federal government more sway over the capital city than in US states, and Ms Bowser said her administration's ability to push back was limited. Meanwhile, attorney general Pam Bondi called the Tuesday morning meeting productive in a social media post and said the justice department would 'work closely with the DC city government' to 'make Washington, DC, safe again.' While Mr Trump invokes his plan by saying that 'we're going to take our capital back', Ms Bowser and the MPD maintain that violent crime overall in Washington has decreased to a 30-year low after a sharp rise in 2023. Carjackings, for example, dropped about 50% in 2024 and are down again this year. Ms Bowser, a Democrat, spent much of Mr Trump's first term in office openly sparring with the Republican president. She fended off his initial plans for a military parade through the streets and stood in public opposition when he called in a multi-agency flood of federal law enforcement to confront anti-police brutality protesters in summer 2020. She later had the words 'Black Lives Matter' painted in giant yellow letters on the street about a block from the White House. In Mr Trump's second term, backed by Republican control of both houses of Congress, Ms Bowser has walked a public tightrope for months, emphasising common ground with the Trump administration on issues such as the successful effort to bring the NFL's Washington Commanders back to the District of Columbia. She watched with open concern for the city streets as Mr Trump finally got his military parade this summer. Her decision to dismantle Black Lives Matter Plaza earlier this year served as a neat metaphor for just how much the power dynamics between the two executives has evolved. Now that fraught relationship enters uncharted territory as Mr Trump has followed through on months of what many DC officials had quietly hoped were empty threats. The new standoff has cast Ms Bowser in a sympathetic light, even among her long-time critics. 'It's a power play and we're an easy target,' Clinique Chapman, chief executive of the DC Justice Lab, said. A frequent critic of Ms Bowser, whom she accuses of 'over policing our youth' with the recent expansions of Washington's youth curfew, Ms Chapman said Mr Trump's latest move 'is not about creating a safer DC. It's just about power'. Ms Bowser contends that all the power resides with Mr Trump and that her administration can do little other than comply and make the best of it. For Mr Trump, the effort to take over public safety in Washington reflects an escalation of his aggressive approach to law enforcement. The District of Columbia's status as a congressionally established federal district gives him a unique opportunity to push his tough-on-crime agenda, though he has not proposed solutions to the root causes of homelessness or crime. 'Let me be crystal clear,' attorney general Pam Bondi said during Mr Trump's announcement news conference. 'Crime in DC is ending and ending today.' Mr Trump's declaration of a state of emergency fits the general pattern of his second term in office: He has declared states of emergency on issues ranging from border protection to economic tariffs, enabling him to essentially rule via executive order. In many cases, he has moved forward while the courts sorted them out.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
First National Guard troops arrive in Washington DC as Trump begins his takeover of capital to bring quick end to crime
THE National Guard has officially arrived at Washington, DC, after Trump called them in to 'take our capital back.' The president called the National Guard in on Monday as a way to control crime in the nation's capital. 3 3 3 National Guard members were seen heading into the District of Columbia National Guard Headquarters on Tuesday morning. Several guards were photographed lugging their bags as they headed into the building. The president confirmed this week that the DC police department will now be under federal control, as he sent 800 National Guard members to the capital. "This is Liberation Day in DC, and we're going to take our capital back," Trump said during a press conference. "I'm announcing a historic action to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse." Trump said that the capital had been "taken over by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals" as well as "drugged out maniacs and homeless people". The president called upon Attorney General Pam Bondi to manage the National Guard's takeover of the police department. Trump argued that DC has worse crime rates than notoriously crime-heavy cities such as Baghdad, Brasilia, San Jose, Colombia, Mexico City, and Lima, Peru. During his press conference, the president presented a chart that showed each of those cities with lower murder rates than DC. However, data from the DC police show that violent crime in DC is down 26% compared with last year. Donald Trump 'readies 1,000 National Guard to go into DC' in new crime crackdown and blasts we 'want our capital back' The president also threatened to bring in the military to control crime, not just in DC but also in New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago. "We will bring in the military if it's needed. By the way, we're going to have National Guard, we will bring in the military if needed," he said. US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegeseth said they will follow all necessary steps to ensure the safety of the city. "This city is beautiful, and as I always say about President Trump, to the troops, he has their back,' he said. Trump Brings National Guard to DC How Does Federalizing a City's Police Force Work? The president can take control if local order breaks down or with city approval. In DC, federal law allows Congress and the president to oversee police under certain rules. A federal official can be put in charge of the local police temporarily. How Do Federal Police and the National Guard Work Together? Federal agents (FBI, DEA, Secret Service) can assist or lead law enforcement efforts. The National Guard can be called in by the president to support or restore order. When federalized, the Guard works under federal command but usually does not handle regular policing. All forces must coordinate closely to avoid overlap and work effectively. 'And my message to the National Guard and federal law enforcement in Washington is we have your back as well. 'Be tough. Be strong. We're right behind you.' NATIONAL GUARD DEPLOYED This isn't the first time the National Guard has been deployed to DC. The guard was called into the nation's capital during President Biden's inauguration in January 2021. The inauguration followed the infamous Capitol riots on January 6, 2021, when violent protestors broke into the Capitol Building. During Biden's inauguration, over 25,000 National Guardmen were stationed across DC to ensure the safe transition of power, Fox affiliate WDCA reported. Around 2,000 guardsmen remained in the capital until May to keep the peace of the city.
