£2 coin minted in 1996 worth more than £1,500
A £2 coin minted in the 90s has been valued at more than £1,500 - so it could be worth checking your loose change. The gold coin was issued by the Royal Mint in 1996 to celebrate the 10th European football championship, Euro '96, hosted in England.
The tournament featured matches in eight major cities: Birmingham, Leeds, Liverpool, London, Manchester, Newcastle, Nottingham, and Sheffield. Although hosting, England's journey ended in the semi-finals. Meanwhile, Germany clinched the title with a 2-1 win over the Czech Republic at Wembley, in a gripping final.
Almost 30 years later, it is estimated there are still thousand of these commemorative £2 coins around. Experts at Bullion By Post explain: "The 1996 £2 proof gold coin was produced by the Royal Mint to mark the European Football Championships that year. It was the first time England had hosted a major tournament since 1966 when they won their one and only World Cup trophy.
"The two pound gold coin - sometimes referred to as the Double Sovereign - contains 14.63 grams of gold. 2,098 of these coins were produced by the Royal Mint."
Sculptor John Wills is the artist behind these distinctive coins, which prominently display a football motif and the year '1996' at their centre. The reverse features a youthful portrait of the late Queen Elizabeth II.
Coin fans can now obtain one of these highly desirable pieces from dealer Chards for £1,523.94. However, certain variations have previously been listed on eBay, selling for as much as £1,996 and £2,990, according to the Mirror.
There are many other coins that fetch much more than their face value, too. Take, for instance, a rare 1933 piece that recently sold for £140,000. Only seven are known to exist worldwide. However, keep in mind that a coin's worth varies depending on its condition.
Chris Yang, Co-founder of Coins Value, previously told The Star: "In sum, scrutinise your coins, have them identified and graded professionally, and work with experienced numismatists to determine the real value of your coins so that you can sell them for the best price.
"Remember, the thrill of coin collecting isn't always about striking gold; it's about connecting with history and uncovering hidden treasures. Your old coin jar might hold more than just spare change – it could be a portal to a fascinating past."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
13 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Rare coin collector issues stark warning to people over 'penny worth £5million'
You might have seen some valuable rare coins online, but according to a collector you should be vigilant as it's not what it seems. Now have you got this penny? Checking your loose change for rare coins is crucial in this day of age. Recently one avid collector informed people how to spot a 50p coin which was listed for £15,000 online. Known as the @CoinCollectingWizard on social media, the user boasts a whopping 30,100 followers on Instagram where he shares important information on your coin collection. And while he usually delights fans with good news, his latest post on social media is a warning as many people are falling victim to scams. He discussed a 1971 penny which collectors believe is worth an eye-watering £5million, but it's not the case. He said: "1971 penny worth £5million! "You've probably seen the viral posts claiming that a 1971 1p coin is worth £5 million... but let's get one thing straight: "It's NOT true. It's NOT rare. It's NOT valuable." According to the popular coin collector, around a million of these coins were minted because it was the first year of decimalisation in the UK. He revealed: "These coins are incredibly common and are worth exactly what it says on the tin: 1p." Urging his legion of followers to be careful, the coin collector concluded: "There are scammers and fake posts circulating online, especially on social media and dodgy websites, trying to convince people they've got a fortune in their pocket. "These are designed to trick you, either into handing over money, personal info, or just chasing fake dreams. "Always double-check with reliable sources. If it sounds too good to be true... it probably is." The Royal Mint claims a total of 1.5million of these coins were issued that year to replace the old 'pre-decimal' coinage which was being withdrawn. According to Britannia Coin Company, this is by far the highest annual mintage for 1p coins since decimalisation. Before this point, all early decimal pennies feature the words 'NEW PENNY' on the reverse, including 1971-dated coins. Meanwhile, this was changed to 'ONE PENNY' from 1982 onwards. While it is still possible to find portcullis pennies in your change, they are becoming less common. The reason for this is because The Royal Mint withdraws old, worn coinage in favour of newly struck pieces. So in other words, you'll be very lucky to find a 1971 dated penny coin.
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump breaks silence on major Putin summit with three-word review
Donald Trump has finally addressed the possibility of a face-to-face meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, hours after reports of a summit started to circulate Donald Trump has finally spoken out about the buzz surrounding a potential summit with Vladimir Putin, mere hours after speculation about such a meeting began to make headlines. During a press conference at the White House on Wednesday evening, Trump indicated that there is a "very good prospect" for what could be a momentous one-on-one with Putin. While the press conference in the Oval Office was primarily about Apple's multi-billion-dollar investment in the US, the topic shifted when Trump was probed by journalists regarding the rumours of a summit with Putin. He responded: "There is a very good prospect that we will [meet]." This development unfolds as Trump dealt Russia two significant setbacks within hours earlier today, despite suggestions that he might be willing to engage with Putin as early as next week. The White House reaffirmed on Wednesday its commitment to imposing secondary sanctions on Moscow, with this Friday, August 8, marking the deadline set by Trump for Putin to cease hostilities in Ukraine. Washington had already issued a stark warning that it would severely impact the Russian economy if Moscow did not actively seek peace in Ukraine. Today, the White House doubled down on its commitment to implement regulations that will bar third parties from engaging in trade with entities under Russian sanctions—a policy set to take effect in a mere 48 hours, reports the Express. This firm stance was maintained despite President Trump's remarks that his special envoy Steve Witkoff's recent dialogue with Putin "went well". Taking to Truth Social this afternoon, President Trump posted: "My Special Envoy, Steve Witkoff, just had a highly productive meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. "Great progress was made! Afterwards, I updated some of our European Allies. Everyone agrees this war must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come. Thank you for your attention to this matter!". Earlier in the day, President Trump had branded Russia as an "extraordinary threat" to US national security and foreign policy. He announced this as he enacted an executive order to slap an additional 25% tariff on Indian imports of Russian oil. President Trump clarified his position, stating: "I determine that it is necessary and appropriate to impose an additional ad valorem duty on imports of articles of India, which is directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil." The US administration is aiming to cut off a significant source of revenue for the Kremlin by targeting Russian oil sales, thereby crippling their ability to fund the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Telegraph
There are questions Beijing must answer about its Embassy plans
The saga of the new Chinese Embassy in London has reached its climax. Having bought the Royal Mint, a huge and historic site of more than five acres opposite the Tower of London, for £255m in 2018, Beijing is now developing it. Much of this building would be used for normal cultural and diplomatic purposes. But the plans include a vast basement with no obvious function. More concerningly, details of these plans have been redacted in Beijing's application. There are justifiable fears that the basement could become a high-tech centre for espionage, surveillance and monitoring of Chinese nationals. The basement might even include facilities where pro-democracy activists from Hong Kong could be interrogated. Lawyers for the Chinese are already exploring legal loopholes to extradite its opponents and rewards are offered to those who turn them in. The decision on granting planning permission now rests with the Housing Secretary. Angela Rayner is, of course, also the Deputy Prime Minister. As such she will be more concerned about global than local issues. Britain's economic dependence on China means that it seems most unlikely that Ms Rayner will refuse planning permission, apart from minor modifications. But it is welcome that she has at least asked for an explanation as to why the plans have been redacted. This is, however, an issue that transcends normal diplomatic relations. We cannot allow the largest embassy in Europe to be erected in such a strategic location in London without proper parliamentary and press scrutiny. Ms Rayner must elicit more information from the Chinese about what would go on inside their proposed basement. Until the Beijing authorities are more forthcoming about their intentions, the public is entitled to presume that they are sinister.
