logo
‘Page not found': Brooke Shields podcast interview slamming ‘precious' Meghan Markle mysteriously vanishes

‘Page not found': Brooke Shields podcast interview slamming ‘precious' Meghan Markle mysteriously vanishes

Sky News AU11-06-2025
Brooke Shields' recent podcast interview in which she vented about Meghan Markle's 'precious' behavior has been deleted by podcast host India Hicks, it can be revealed.
Shields went viral last week after revealing her candid thoughts about the ex-working royal during an episode of Hicks' podcast 'An Unexpected Journey' that was published via Substack.
In the now-deleted episode, Shields recalled the time she cut off one of Markle's favourite anecdotes while appearing on stage with the Duchess.
The Duchess of Sussex and the Blue Lagoon star were both tapped to sit on a panel marking International Woman's Day at the prestigious South by Southwest Festival last year.
During the notorious appearance, Markle referenced the time she wrote a letter to Procter and Gamble as a child asking them to gender-neutralise a dishwashing soap commercial.
The story has been repeated multiple times, including during Meghan Markle's Vanity Fair cover story she negotiated after she began dating Prince Harry.
'Meghan said, 'I didn't think only women wash dishes,'' Shields recalled.
'It wasn't fair. So I wrote to the company. And when I was 11, I wrote my first letter and when I was 11...' and she kept saying she was 11!"
The entertainment industry veteran sensed that Markle's oft-repeated story about writing letters to a detergent company was hardly riveting for the audience.
"It was just too precious," Shields explained to as to why she decided to chime in.
"And I was like, they're not going to want to sit here for 45 minutes and listen to anybody be precious or serious.'
The Endless Love star explained that she did not intend to be 'rude' to the ex-working royal but wanted to lighten the mood after Markle's earnest story.
"Excuse me, I'm so sorry. I've got to interrupt you there for one minute,' she said.
"I was trying not to be rude, but I wanted to be funny because it was so serious.
"I just want to give everybody here a context as to how we're different," she told the crowd.'
The actress then pointed out to Markle how when she was the same age she was playing a prostitute - referring to her controversial role in the 1978 film, Pretty Baby - which drew immediate laughter from the audience.
"The place went insane. And then luckily, it was more relaxed after that," Shields said.
As of Wednesday, all traces of the podcast have disappeared from Hicks' Substack page, with the previous link now returning a 'page not found' message.
The Sussexes employ an extensive team of in-house media advisors who regularly reach out to news outlets and mastheads to respond to publicity about the Duke and Duchess.
Among the team, Harry and Meghan employ both Los Angeles and London-based communications executives to handle their media relations in North America and Europe, respectively.
The Sussexes recently hired a chief communications officer and a separate director of communications to help manage their public images.
Last month, Forbes reported that the Sussexes have beefed up their media team even further and added external firm Method Communications to the line up.
SkyNews.com.au is not suggesting that Markle or her team pressured Hicks or Shields to remove the podcast episode, only that the episode has been removed from Hicks' Substack.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prince Harry denies explosive claims he ‘punched' Prince Andrew at a royal family gathering
Prince Harry denies explosive claims he ‘punched' Prince Andrew at a royal family gathering

7NEWS

time8 hours ago

  • 7NEWS

Prince Harry denies explosive claims he ‘punched' Prince Andrew at a royal family gathering

Prince Harry has strongly denied a shocking new claim from a forthcoming book that he once got into a physical altercation with his uncle, Prince Andrew. The allegation appears in the first joint biography of Andrew and his former wife, Sarah Ferguson, written by acclaimed royal biographer Andrew Lownie. According to Lownie, a 'heated argument' erupted between Harry and Andrew during a family gathering in 2013, triggered by 'something Andrew said behind Harry's back.' The confrontation allegedly escalated to the point where 'punches were thrown,' leaving Andrew with a bloody nose. Lownie also claims that Andrew, behind closed doors, voiced scepticism about Harry's relationship with actress Meghan Markle, allegedly calling her an 'opportunist' and predicting that the marriage wouldn't last. Harry has firmly shut down these explosive claims. 'I can confirm neither of those things are true,' a spokesperson for the Duke of Sussex told People. 'Prince Harry and Prince Andrew have never had a physical fight, nor did Prince Andrew ever make those comments about the Duchess of Sussex to Prince Harry.' In the biography, which portrays Andrew as a divisive figure and examines his ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Lownie also claims that Prince William has privately expressed strong disapproval of the disgraced royal. It is understood that the heir to the throne has been quietly working on removing the Duke of York from the Royal Lodge, the Windsor estate he still occupies. However, Andrew reportedly presented King Charles with documentation showing he is legally entitled to stay in the property, effectively ending the push to evict him. The new claims follow speculation that Harry is making fresh overtures to his estranged family, with some describing his latest actions as the clearest sign yet that the Duke of Sussex wants back in. In what royal insiders say is a bid to ease tensions, Harry has quietly offered to share his official diary with Buckingham Palace. The proposed transparency move is intended to avoid scheduling conflicts with the royal family and stamp out claims that the Sussexes are competing for attention. Some palace watchers see it as a genuine attempt at diplomacy. The Duke and King last met in February, shortly after King Charles' diagnosis. If Prince Harry's calendar-sharing strategy works, the next meeting could be on friendlier terms.

Prince Harry denies ‘physical fight' with Prince Andrew
Prince Harry denies ‘physical fight' with Prince Andrew

Perth Now

time9 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Prince Harry denies ‘physical fight' with Prince Andrew

Prince Harry has strongly denied a shocking new claim from a forthcoming book that he once got into a physical altercation with his uncle, Prince Andrew. The allegation appears in the first joint biography of Andrew and his former wife, Sarah Ferguson, written by acclaimed royal biographer Andrew Lownie. According to Lownie, a 'heated argument' erupted between Harry and Andrew during a family gathering in 2013, triggered by 'something Andrew said behind Harry's back.' The confrontation allegedly escalated to the point where 'punches were thrown,' leaving Andrew with a bloody nose. Lownie also claims that Andrew, behind closed doors, voiced scepticism about Harry's relationship with actress Meghan Markle, allegedly calling her an 'opportunist' and predicting that the marriage wouldn't last. Harry has firmly shut down these explosive claims. 'I can confirm neither of those things are true,' a spokesperson for the Duke of Sussex told People. 'Prince Harry and Prince Andrew have never had a physical fight, nor did Prince Andrew ever make those comments about the Duchess of Sussex to Prince Harry.' In the biography, which portrays Andrew as a divisive figure and examines his ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Lownie also claims that Prince William has privately expressed strong disapproval of the disgraced royal. It is understood that the heir to the throne has been quietly working on removing the Duke of York from the Royal Lodge, the Windsor estate he still occupies. However, Andrew reportedly presented King Charles with documentation showing he is legally entitled to stay in the property, effectively ending the push to evict him. The new claims follow speculation that Harry is making fresh overtures to his estranged family, with some describing his latest actions as the clearest sign yet that the Duke of Sussex wants back in. In what royal insiders say is a bid to ease tensions, Harry has quietly offered to share his official diary with Buckingham Palace. The proposed transparency move is intended to avoid scheduling conflicts with the royal family and stamp out claims that the Sussexes are competing for attention. Some palace watchers see it as a genuine attempt at diplomacy. The Duke and King last met in February, shortly after King Charles' diagnosis. If Prince Harry's calendar-sharing strategy works, the next meeting could be on friendlier terms.

Meghan Markle needs a royal reconciliation for her ‘big plans'
Meghan Markle needs a royal reconciliation for her ‘big plans'

Sky News AU

time2 days ago

  • Sky News AU

Meghan Markle needs a royal reconciliation for her ‘big plans'

Lifestyle Reporter Reilly Sullivan discusses reports that Meghan Markle has given her 'blessing' towards a reconciliation with the Royal Family. 'In recent weeks, we've been talking about the Sussexes possibly having a bit of a peace summit, a reconciliation with the Royal Family … I thought, well hang on, what's Meghan's role in this?' Mr Sullivan told Sky News Digital Presenter Gabriella Power. 'A reporter who spoke to the Daily Mail said that she [Meghan Markle] is giving it her blessing, she does want to move forward with this reconciliation because she has big plans. 'I think that she's smoothing the way a bit with the Royal Family because she knows that in 2027, she wants all eyes on her, she wants the Royal Family to be at the Invictus Games.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store