logo
'Steadiest ship in a brewing macro storm': Why Wall Street is bullish on Meta ahead of first-quarter earnings

'Steadiest ship in a brewing macro storm': Why Wall Street is bullish on Meta ahead of first-quarter earnings

Meta Platforms is set to report its first-quarter earnings on Wednesday in a much-anticipated report for Wall Street.
The social media giant will explain how the macroeconomic uncertainty related to President Donald Trump's trade policy is affecting its business.
Meta will also likely face questioning from analysts related to ongoing litigation from the US government, which claims the company operates as an illegal monopoly.
Shares of Meta are down 26% from its record high reached in mid-February.
Here's what Wall Street expects when Meta reports earnings later this week.
Wells Fargo: 'Steadiest ship in a brewing macro storm'
Wells Fargo said it expects Meta to be the "steadiest ship in a brewing macro storm," arguing that its dominance relative to other advertising platforms should shield it from some of the macroeconomic pain.
"Checks indicate ad spend growth on Meta moderated throughout the qtr, but likely more resilient vs. other ad platforms against softer macro backdrop given minimal brand exposure," Wells Fargo said.
The bank said Meta's Reels platform, which directly competes against TikTok, should have benefited from the uncertainty surrounding a potential TikTok ban earlier this year.
"Checks suggest ad spend on TikTok shifted to Meta during the heightened uncertainty in Jan, with some budgets permanently moving to Reels," the bank said.
Wells Fargo rates Meta Platforms at "Overweight" with a $752 price target.
JPMorgan: 'Strong execution and growing AI monetization'
Despite macroeconomic concerns, JPMorgan said that Meta's strong execution and AI opportunities should help the company perform well when it reports results.
"We believe META remains well-owned driven by strong execution & growing AI monetization," JPMorgan said. "We're bullish on AI-driven Ad improvements, video unification, WhatsApp Ads, Llama, & Meta AI."
The bank said it believes investors expect Meta Platforms' revenue to grow by about 13% year over year. Meeting or beating those expectations would likely benefit the stock.
"Macro remains a concern though META's DR skew (~80% of ad revs) & base of tens of millions of advertisers should prove relative insulation," the bank said.
On the capex side, JPMorgan expects the company to maintain its aggressive investment philosophy to capture the AI opportunity.
"Our $108B 2025 GAAP expenses is below Meta's $114B-$119B guide as we expect META to rationalize expenses against lower growth," JPMorgan said.
JPMorgan rates Meta Platforms at "Overweight" with a $610 price target.
Bank of America: Expect a modest beat on revenue and profits
Bank of America is leaning bullish on Meta heading into its coming earnings release.
The bank said takeaways from Alphabet's comments on YouTube and its advertising checks should fuel a "modest beat" for Meta.
Meta's workforce reductions in February and recent layoff announcements related to its Reality Labs division suggest that management is laser-focused on controlling operating expenses.
"For expense guide, we would expect a trajectory toward the low end of the current $114-$119bn 2025 range," Bank of America said.
The bank is also bullish on Meta's growing AI capabilities and its potential to unlock more advertising spending.
"We think Meta's Al driven ad improvements still have several quarters to play out and for 2025 we see strong drivers of growth, including: 1) Expanding AI/ML ad capabilities, 2) Growing SFV usage aided by AI suggestions, 3) Growing messaging revenues, & 4) Monetization of untapped surfaces (Threads, Meta Al, Marketplace)," the bank said. SFV refers to "short form video."
Bank of America rates Meta Platforms at "Buy" with a $640 price target.
Goldman Sachs: Reels can drive more growth
Analysts at Goldman Sachs said Meta's Reels platform has the potential to drive significant growth for the company.
"We still see a sizable opportunity for Reels to remain a key revenue growth tailwind for META in the coming years as the CPM gap closes further and as Reels continues to increase as a % of total ad impressions," Goldman Sachs said.
On the spending front, the bank expects Meta to "somewhat pull back" on its planned investments due to macroeconomic headwinds.
Goldman expects 2025 total GAAP expenses of about $110.5 billion, slightly below the company's guidance range of $114 billion to $119 billion.
Meta Platform's capex guidance will be the key debate for investors as worries mount about an economic slowdown.
"For META, we see the key debates being how the company indicates a framework of balance between long-term investments and annualized operating costs if the macroeconomic environment impacts the business in the coming quarters," Goldman Sachs said.
Goldman Sachs rates Meta Platforms at "Buy" with a $685 price target.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A familiar metric: White House says to expect Iran decision within ‘two weeks'
A familiar metric: White House says to expect Iran decision within ‘two weeks'

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A familiar metric: White House says to expect Iran decision within ‘two weeks'

When it comes to a possible U.S. military strike in Iran, Donald Trump has raised more questions than he's answered. Last week, the president and his team went out of their way to say that the United States had 'nothing to do with' Israel's attack on Iran. This week, Trump declared, 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' before demanding the country's 'unconditional surrender.' No one seems able to say with confidence what the Republican intends to do, why he'd do it, or even when we might learn of his decision. I've found myself periodically checking his social media platform, looking for some kind of poorly written 'Bombs Away' message, followed by an unhealthy number of exclamation points. Evidently, I can stop hitting refresh — for two weeks. At her latest briefing, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt acknowledged the 'speculation' about the White House's policy, which led her to read a prepared statement from the president. It read, 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.' It's difficult to say with confidence whether these negotiations exist or whether they'll succeed, but the fact that Trump and his team has rolled out another 'two week' timeline represents a remarkable failure of self-awareness. Last week for example, the president said U.S. trading partners should expect letters on unilateral tariff rates in 'two weeks.' Shortly before that, the president was asked about Vladimir Putin's alleged interest in 'peace.' He replied, 'I can't tell you that, but I'll let you know in about two weeks.' Last month, Trump was asked about tariff rates on pharmaceutical products. 'I'll know in the next two weeks,' he said. Alas, we can keep going. Where's Trump's health care plan? It'll be ready in 'two weeks.' What about a possible minimum-wage increase? That, too, will be unveiled in 'two weeks.' On everything from tax policy to infrastructure, immigration to reproductive health, the president's detailed solutions are always just 'two weeks' away. By now, most observers are probably familiar with how the game is played: The Republican is asked for his position on an issue; he dodges the question by saying he'll make an announcement 'in two weeks'; and then he waits for everyone to forget about his self-imposed deadline. Except, we don't forget. Instead, we shake our heads in exasperation because of the cynical assumptions at the heart of this unfortunate rhetorical trick, which no one falls for anymore. In this latest example, a reporter felt compelled to remind Leavitt of the familiarity of the administration's latest timeline. If recent history is any guide, she and Trump will keep using it anyway, indifferent to the embarrassment. This post updates our related earlier coverage. This article was originally published on

Here's How Much a $1,000 Investment for a Newborn Could Grow to by the Time They Retire
Here's How Much a $1,000 Investment for a Newborn Could Grow to by the Time They Retire

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Here's How Much a $1,000 Investment for a Newborn Could Grow to by the Time They Retire

Babies have a big advantage as investors: time. Over a period of 65 years, an investment could grow to around 500 times its original value, assuming the market produces average returns. A $1,000 investment for a newborn today could result in hundreds of thousands of dollars for them by the time they are 65. 10 stocks we like better than SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust › President Donald Trump is pushing legislation that would provide newborns with $1,000 in a savings accounts. It's an intriguing idea, and when you consider the effects of compounding and long-term investing, it's not hard to see how such an account could grow significantly in the long run if it's invested in the right way. The big benefit newborns have is time. Unlike most investors, who may have 20, 30, or even over 40 years until they retire, newborns have even longer. Below, I'll look at how much a $1,000 investment over a period of 50-plus years could grow. When you're looking at investing for the very long haul, an exchange-traded fund (ETF) makes a lot of sense. As great of an investment as a stock like Nvidia has been recently, it's impossible to forecast how it may perform over the next 50 years. The benefit of ETFs -- which owns shares in lots of stocks -- is that they will rebalance over time and adjust according to which stocks are doing well and which ones aren't. ETFs that track the S&P 500 stock index can be particularly attractive. The S&P 500 is a collection of the top 500 stocks that are listed on U.S. exchanges. The index has averaged an annual return of 10% over the long term, though that includes years when it went up and years when it went down, as well as lots of nerve-wracking volatility along the way. Yet investing is enticing. Consider that an investment today would grow to more than 490 times its original value after 65 years of compounding, assuming a 10% annual growth rate. That means investing just $2,041 today would be enough to end up with a portfolio worth at least $1 million after such a long time frame, in this optimal scenario. There are never guarantees when it comes to future returns, however. The growth rate may slow down, and your investment could be down when you need it. But oftentimes, investors are better off simply investing in the broad index than trying to pick individual stocks. It may not be as exciting as picking stocks yourself, but it's a simple way for you to grow your wealth. One fund that you can invest in that tracks the index is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: SPY). Investing $1,000 and just letting it sit in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF can be a no-nonsense way to grow your portfolio's value over the years. Since that is a small balance, it could, however, take a while for it to reach a significant value (e.g. six figures). But once it does, then the benefits of compounding become far greater. In the table below, you can see the significant change in a portfolio balance from year 50 to 65, which is a difference of hundreds of thousands of dollars -- simply from leaving the money invested for those years. Year 9% Growth 10% Growth 11% Growth 50 $74,358 $117,391 $184,565 55 $114,408 $189,059 $311,002 60 $176,031 $304,482 $524,057 65 $270,846 $490,371 $883,067 Calculations by author. The downside is that over the course of 50 years, inflation will also significantly chip away at the purchasing power of all this money. But it's a great example of how a modestly sized investment today could grow to be worth much more over the very long haul. And by putting the money into a low-risk ETF, you don't have to track any stocks or worry about making any changes along the way. It's an easy way to invest in the stock market and benefit from its long-term growth. Even if you're not planning for your child's retirement and the $1,000 from the government doesn't come through for your baby, investing in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF can be a great way to help them later on in life. Before you buy stock in SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $660,821!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $886,880!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 791% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Here's How Much a $1,000 Investment for a Newborn Could Grow to by the Time They Retire was originally published by The Motley Fool

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Dives 4% After Losing US Steel Bet
Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Dives 4% After Losing US Steel Bet

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Dives 4% After Losing US Steel Bet

We recently published a list of 10 Stocks Take A Shocking Nosedive. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF) is one of the worst-performing stocks on Thursday. Cleveland-Cliffs dropped its share prices by 4.43 percent on Wednesday to end at $7.33 apiece as investors sold off positions following Nippon Steel's successful acquisition of US Steel Corp. It can be recalled that Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF) repeatedly attempted to acquire US Steel since 2023 after former president Joe Biden blocked Nippon Steel's purchase plan over national security issues. However, even its proposal had been repeatedly rejected. President Donald Trump officially gave his green light for Nippon Steel's acquisition on condition that it will sign a national security agreement with the US government. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF) is a US-based steel and iron ore manufacturer based in Cleveland, Ohio, and which strongly supported Trump's imposition of tariffs on steel imports. A welder in a hardhat soldering steel plates to a blueprint plan. Duties on imported steel and aluminum products make domestic manufacturers such as Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF) more appealing to customers as it may bolster demand for their products, support competitive pricing for locally-produced goods, and further reduce competition with international producers. While we acknowledge the potential of CLF as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store