IHC hears petitions against PECA Amendment Act 2025
Justice Inam Amin Minhas of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday heard multiple petitions seeking the annulment of the controversial Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) Amendment Act 2025.
The petitions were filed by the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ), prominent TV anchors, and the Islamabad High Court (IHC) Journalists Association.
The federal government has submitted its written response to the court.
A government lawyer stated that provincial governments have also been made respondents in the case. Lawyer Imran Shafiq told the court that an initial objection raised by the Registrar's Office had been resolved.
During the hearing, IHC directed the petitioners' lawyers to begin presenting their arguments. PFUJ counsel Dr Yasir Aman Khan opened the arguments by giving historical context as the judge asked to first provide the background so the court can understand the case.
Read: Back to the cave: Where does PECA take us?
"The PECA Act was introduced in 2016," said Dr Yasir, adding that the 2025 Amendment removed several provisions from the original act and added new ones.
He noted that the amendment also establishes a Social Media Complaint Council, expanding the law's scope.
Justice Inam Amin Minhas instructed the petitioners to clarify the changes in the Code of Conduct, highlighting what it previously entailed and what has now been altered.
PECA amendment
Earlier this year, the National Assembly passed a set of amendments to the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) under a supplementary agenda, significantly expanding the government's authority to regulate online content and penalise digital offences.
PECA (Amendment) Act 2025 included provisions for the formation of a Digital Rights Protection Authority (DRPA), which will be empowered to remove online content, restrict access to prohibited material, and impose penalties on individuals who share such content.
The amendments also broadened the definition of 'social media platforms' to encompass tools and software used to access these platforms.
The revised law now extends its jurisdiction to include websites, applications and various communication channels. As part of the legislative changes, the FIA Cybercrime Wing is to be disbanded and replaced with a stricter framework of enforcement.
Under the new rules, individuals sharing expunged material from parliamentary or provincial assemblies on social media could face imprisonment of up to three years along with a fine of Rs2 million.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
8 hours ago
- Express Tribune
IHC hears petitions against PECA Amendment Act 2025
Listen to article Justice Inam Amin Minhas of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday heard multiple petitions seeking the annulment of the controversial Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) Amendment Act 2025. The petitions were filed by the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ), prominent TV anchors, and the Islamabad High Court (IHC) Journalists Association. The federal government has submitted its written response to the court. A government lawyer stated that provincial governments have also been made respondents in the case. Lawyer Imran Shafiq told the court that an initial objection raised by the Registrar's Office had been resolved. During the hearing, IHC directed the petitioners' lawyers to begin presenting their arguments. PFUJ counsel Dr Yasir Aman Khan opened the arguments by giving historical context as the judge asked to first provide the background so the court can understand the case. Read: Back to the cave: Where does PECA take us? "The PECA Act was introduced in 2016," said Dr Yasir, adding that the 2025 Amendment removed several provisions from the original act and added new ones. He noted that the amendment also establishes a Social Media Complaint Council, expanding the law's scope. Justice Inam Amin Minhas instructed the petitioners to clarify the changes in the Code of Conduct, highlighting what it previously entailed and what has now been altered. PECA amendment Earlier this year, the National Assembly passed a set of amendments to the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) under a supplementary agenda, significantly expanding the government's authority to regulate online content and penalise digital offences. PECA (Amendment) Act 2025 included provisions for the formation of a Digital Rights Protection Authority (DRPA), which will be empowered to remove online content, restrict access to prohibited material, and impose penalties on individuals who share such content. The amendments also broadened the definition of 'social media platforms' to encompass tools and software used to access these platforms. The revised law now extends its jurisdiction to include websites, applications and various communication channels. As part of the legislative changes, the FIA Cybercrime Wing is to be disbanded and replaced with a stricter framework of enforcement. Under the new rules, individuals sharing expunged material from parliamentary or provincial assemblies on social media could face imprisonment of up to three years along with a fine of Rs2 million.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Civil servants required to declare assets
Any person who files tax return after the end of due dates would be treated as a late filer and separate rates on the purchase or disposal of immovable property would apply to him. photo: AFP The federal government has fulfilled another key condition of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) by making the assets of public officials public. Now government officers from Grade 17 and above will be required to file their own and their family's assets digitally. With the president's approval, the Civil Servants (Amendment) Act 2025 has been issued via gazette notification. The Establishment Division has also forwarded the notification to all federal ministries and divisions. A new Section 15-A has been added to the Civil Servants Act 1973, which states that the details of government officials' assets will be made public through the Federal Board of Revenue. Officers will be required to disclose their domestic and foreign assets as well as their financial standing. The confidentiality of any officer's personal information will be maintained. Earlier this week, the government imposed new taxes on the public in line with IMF conditions. It has introduced a petroleum climate support levy with an additional climate levy of Rs2.50 per liter on petrol, diesel, and kerosene.
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
Civil appeals: Justice Ejaz questions IHC DB ruling
ISLAMABAD: Justice Ejaz Ishaq Khan, a judge of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) raised questions over the decision of a IHC division bench order that after the Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2025, now the district judges would hear the civil appeals instead of the High Court. A division bench of IHC comprising Justice Muhammad Azam Khan and Justice Inaam Amin Minhas had declared it in a civil reference titled, 'The Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2025 and Transfer of Appeals from Islamabad High Court to District Judges (East) & (West), Islamabad, in pursuance thereof.' During the hearing, Justice Ishaq summoned the additional registrar and remarked that a bench of two junior judges was formed and all cases were sent back to the district courts. He added that this decision should have been made in a full court meeting to determine whether the cases were to be heard by the High Court or sent to the district courts. Justice Ishaq maintained that even the opinions of the judges hearing the appeals were not sought. He remarked that the cases have been heard for four years, many were 80 per cent completed and now they have been abruptly sent to the district courts by the judges who had joined the IHC three months ago. He further said that now, the district courts will start rehearing the cases, which will cause difficulties for the litigants and they will have to pay fees again. In this matter, the IHC Office moved the instant reference and attached a list of cases pertaining to Regular First Appeals filed against the decrees or orders passed by learned Civil Judges working under the administrative control of the IHC. The list contained 1594 RFAs, which is stated to be tentative. The questions formulated in the reference were included whether amendment made in Section 18 is a matter of procedure and had retrospective effect? and whether High Court can transfer pending appeals to the District Judges on its own motion without notice to the parties to the list?. Justice Azam, who authored the judgment, said that the power of High Court delegated under Section 24, CPC, is further fortified in the judgment passed in Khan Muhammad and others Vs Ishtiaq Hussain reported as 1987 SCMR 1482. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
