2 accused in '03 gang-rape case acquitted 21 yrs later
Kolkata: A gang-rape case, reported in Amherst Street in May 2003, that came up for trial around 20 years later, in Jan 2025, led to the acquittal of two persons implicated by police.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The complainant, who appeared before the Kolkata trial judge on April 24, said that two decades later, she was unable to recollect "what happened" that day and who tortured her.
The trial court, in its May 23 order, while acquitting the two accused, also criticised the police for a shoddy investigation where none of the witnesses or evidence produced helped unravel the crime. Additional District and Sessions Judge Rohan Sinha, in his judgment, said, "Not a single witness examined by the prosecution could throw any light over the incident alleged.
No doubt that it is a settled principle that conviction can very well be founded only over uncorroborated testimony of the victim.
Unfortunately, even the victim has turned turtle from her earlier statement."
The judge also pointed out three key lapses by the investigating officer (IO) which led to the acquittal. The judge said, "The victim could not identify the wrongdoers, but, curiously, the IO did not try to get the accused persons to face any Test Identification Parade for their identification."
The judge also noted that despite the fact that the victim gave an in-camera testimony to a judicial magistrate, her 164 CrPC statement was not produced in court. Lastly, the Amherst Street OC did not bother to "sign or endorse" the victim's statement saying that she was gang-raped, which led to the FIR.
The trial court also could not rely solely on the victim's testimony because she filed a formal application not to proceed with the same.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The judge, in his order, recorded that the victim "firmly deposed that due to the passage of time of more than 20 years, she could not recollect exactly what happened to her on the fateful day. She also failed to disclose the identity of the accused, nor could she identify the accused persons".
According to the case details, the victim was engaged as a casual labourer to work in an under-construction Rajarhat home by one of the accused.
According to the FIR, which was also corroborated in the police charge sheet filed in 2004, on May 13, 2003, she was working when she was gang-raped by two persons, including the one who engaged her for work. Before this incident, the victim had asked the accused to clear her week's pending dues.
Police, 20 years ago, got the victim medically examined, recorded her statement before a magistrate, and charge-sheeted four persons.
Two among those named in the charge sheet were arrested, while the remaining two are still absconding.
The judge, in his order, said, "A careful reading of the testimonies of the witnesses examined by this Court firmly opines that the prosecution has miserably failed to direct the needle of suspicion for the commission of the alleged offence against the accused persons, far less to prove their guilt."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 days ago
- Indian Express
Story of murder ‘fabricated': In a first, Gujarat special court under Disabilities Act acquits hearing and speech impaired accused
In a first of its kind trial in Gujarat by a special designated court under the Disabilities Act, 2016, a 35-year-old hearing and speech impaired accused was acquitted in connection with a 2023 murder case of a 40-year-old woman, after appointing special officers for sign language and Tamil translations to assist the court in explaining the procedure to the accused. Acquitting the accused, Shivachandra Tamil, the court held that the prosecution case that the accused — a vagabond had allegedly murdered the victim after she refused to give in to his advances — was a 'fabricated and baseless' story. As per the prosecution's case, the decomposed body of an unidentified woman was found near the railway track of Sabarmati Railway station on May 31, 2023. The Ahmedabad railway police picked up the accused on June 2, 2023 and his confessional statement was recorded in the form of a discovery panchnama of the alleged murder weapon, dug beside where he used to sleep. The prosecution sought to examine 18 witnesses to prove the case based on the charge that the accused had demanded a physical relation with the victim — also deaf and mute — on the night of the alleged crime and when the victim denied, the accused allegedly attacked her, inflicted brutal blows on her abdomen with a knife and killed her. Observing that the deposition of the sign language expert and mediator, Ashwin Vegda, taken on by the Ahmedabad Railway police to question the accused 'was contradictory' to the claims made by the investigating officer in his testimony, the court order stated that 'it appears that in order to detect a crime in his jurisdiction, (the investigating officer) erected haphazard evidences against the accused.' Noting that the accused was not conversant with Gujarati language, in which the legal procedures had been initiated, the court order, delivered on June 6 stated, 'The IO did not investigate if the interpreter Ashwin Vegda was conversant with Tamil language. There is no mention in the panchnama of what kind of questions did Vegda ask the accused while speaking to him in sign language as well as details of the sign language used by Vegda and the accused while replying to his questions… It is a fact that the IO did not question the accused on his own; he has placed on record that the accused was interrogated only through Vegda'. 'Whatever information the IO has obtained is through Vegda. In his own deposition Vegda has not mentioned any such fact that the accused had demanded a physical relationship with the deceased on the night of the crime and therefore murdered her as she rejected his advances. There is no clarity on where did the IO get this information from…'stated the order. Questioning the prosecution's theory for murder, the court in its order stated, 'The IO himself does not know sign language or Tamil language and therefore it does not appear that the IO possibly questioned the accused on his own. The IO has also not come across any eye witness. Since the IO has admitted that he does not have sufficient evidence to prove that the accused murdered the victim as she allegedly rejected his advances, the accusation made by the IO appears to be concocted and baseless, therefore the entire investigation appears to be doubtful and contaminated…' Observing that the IO had admitted in his testimony that he 'did not follow the recommendations of the FSL' and that 'no videography or photography of the crime scene or the questioning of the accused by sign language' had been made, the court also questioned the manner in which the IO had described the recovery of the alleged murder weapon — a knife — from a pit near the crime scene in the railway yard. The court said, 'Although the IO has claimed that he has confiscated the weapon used in the crime as shown by the accused, he does not specify how he came across this information because as per Vegda's deposition, the accused did not lead the police to the weapon in the presence of the interpreter. It is sufficiently proved that the story presented in the chargesheet about the recovery of the weapon is a fabricated one….' The court noted that the discovery panchnama (of the murder weapon) does not specify who found the knife and from which spot of the crime scene. 'In his testimony, Vegda contradicted the police statement and said that the police had already recovered the knife before he could speak to the accused… The police claim that the accused concealed the knife in a pit dug around the scene of crime is a laughable claim… why would an accused with common sense dig up a pit and hide the knife near the crime scene… Therefore it appears that to detect a crime that occurred in his jurisdiction the IO has linked the accused to the crime without any basis…' the court order said. Considering that forensic evidence collected from the accused had no traces of human fluids or blood stains, the court further said, 'From the above discussions it is clear that the evidence gathered against the accused has been done in a slipshod manner. Had the interrogation of the accused with the help of the interpreter been videographed, the court could have looked into what kind of sign language questions were asked and answers were given by the accused. It would not be prudent to assume the accused to be guilty based on a deposition of the investigating officer whose statements cannot be considered as being proven beyond doubt…' Stating that it was 'in the interest of justice', the court acquitted the accused while also expressing gratitude to the officers of the court and the legal aid services, who joined the court proceedings to help interpret sign language in Tamil for the ease of the accused. '… In order to ensure that the accused was able to follow the process of law, G Suresh, a special educator from Madurai joined the court proceedings via conferencing along with Assistant Legal and Defence counsel M Gokul Krishnan from Madurai. Defence advocate Ajay Kumar Choksi, who appeared pro bono on behalf of the accused as well as Dr Elizabeth Christian, a Tamil to English translator, also assisted the court in the case…' On the behalf of the accused, Advocate Aditya Choksi told The Indian Express, 'It was the first case in Gujarat tried by the Special court under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016. Although the case came to me for a bail plea, it led to a pro bono petition in the Supreme Court when the Gujarat High Court said it was a fit case for trial…' 'As per the directions of the Supreme Court, the trial was expedited. The special designated court framed the charges in January this year… and within 5 months and 15 days, the trial was concluded. The charges were read over to the accused only after they were translated to Tamil by a translator of sign language, Dr Christian… Special Educator G Suresh translated the charges in Tamil sign language to help the accused. In the absence of specific guidelines to try the accused with disabilities, the procedure adopted by the court was first of its kind to accord access to justice to all,' he said. Advocate Choksi added that the victim woman had not been identified nor was her family traced by the investigator until the conclusion of the trial.
Indian Express
6 days ago
- Indian Express
Witness in murder of journalist Gauri Lankesh complains of receiving threat call ahead of court appearance
A panchnama witness involved in the identification of a house in the Belagavi region of Karnataka that was allegedly used to finalise the conspiracy to kill the journalist Gauri Lankesh has complained of receiving a threat ahead of his visit to a special court in Bengaluru to testify in the trial of 17 persons arrested for the September 5, 2017, murder of the journalist. The witness who ran a business in Belagavi had rented the house, which had been used by members of a right-wing crime syndicate involved in the murder of Gauri Lankesh. He was made a panchnama witness when three accused persons in the case – Sharad (Kalaskar), Ganesh (Miskin), and Amit (Baddi) – identified the house. The 55-year-old witness, who was summoned to the witness box last week, complained to the state public prosecutor (SPP) of receiving a threatening phone call ahead of his visit, and based on the complaint, the SPP filed a memo in the special court during the trial on May 28. 'Learned Spl. P.P. has filed a memo along with a requisition of CW (court witness)… Copy of the requisition is served on learned counsel for the accused,' the court noted. 'Despite the threats, the witness stuck to his statement in court,' a prosecution source said. During the trial, the witness said that he had rented a house in Belagavi, and police officials brought two suspects in the murder case – Ganesh (Miskin) and Amit (Baddi) – to the house in August 2018. In September 2018, they brought a third accused identified as Sharad (Kalaskar). A fourth accused was also brought, but the witness claimed to have forgotten his name. In the court, the witness identified Amit (Baddi), Shrikant (Pangarkar), and Sharad (Kalaskar) among the accused persons who were brought to the house where the alleged conspiracy occurred, but said he could not identify the fourth person due to the passage of time. During the trial of the murder case last week, one of the prosecution witnesses turned hostile. The witness had earlier given a detailed statement to a magistrate about his participation in multiple training camps for the use of guns and explosives conducted by a Hindutva syndicate, which is implicated in the murder of Gauri Lankesh. The 37-year-old prosecution witness, who is involved in grassroots politics in the Belagavi region of Karnataka, was declared hostile by the state special public prosecutor on Wednesday after he denied all the statements he had earlier made before a magistrate in September 2018 under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The witness who had identified several persons arrested for the murder of Gauri Lankesh as participants in the training camps also rejected the Test Identification Parade he had participated in at the Bengaluru prison in November 2018 and claimed that he had identified the accused persons under police duress. During a cross-examination in the court after being declared hostile by the prosecution, the witness denied the charge that he was deviating from his earlier statements due to pressure from the accused persons – most of whom were granted bail last year. Gauri Lankesh died after four bullets were fired at her by a man now identified by the SIT as Parashuram Waghmore, a former activist of the right-wing Sri Rama Sene outfit. A forensic analysis of the four empty cartridges and the four bullets fired to kill Lankesh showed that the markings on the bullets and cartridges were the same as markings found on bullets and cartridges seized from the site of the killing of Kannada scholar and researcher M M Kalburgi in the northern Karnataka town of Dharwad on August 30, 2015. Findings from the comparison of ballistic evidence from the Lankesh and Kalburgi cases also revealed that the 7.65 mm country-made gun used in the two murders in Karnataka had also been used in the shooting of the Leftist thinker Govind Pansare, 81, in Maharashtra's Kolhapur on February 16, 2015. The ballistic evidence indicated that one of the two guns used in the Pansare murder was used to kill the rationalist Narendra Dabholkar, 69, in Pune on August 20, 2013. The Karnataka Special Investigation Team (SIT) has named 17 people from right-wing fringe outfits for the conspiracy and murder of Gauri Lankesh. The accused have been charged with murder and involvement in an organised crime activity under the Karnataka Control of Organized Crimes Act, (KCOCA) 2000. 'The members of this organisation targeted persons whom they identified to be inimical to their belief and ideology. The members strictly followed the guidelines and principles mentioned in 'Kshatra Dharma Sadhana', a book published by Sanatan Sanstha,' the SIT said after it filed a 9,235-page chargesheet on November 23, 2018.
Time of India
28-05-2025
- Time of India
Dahod court grants bail to minister's sons in MNREGA scam
Vadodara: The Dahod chief judicial magistrate's court on Wednesday granted bail to Balwant Khabad and Kiran Khabad, sons of minister of state for agriculture and panchayat Bachu Khabad, in connection with the ongoing MNREGA scam. However, the court is expected to deliver the final verdict on Thursday after considering additional material presented by the investigating officer (IO). Balwant and Kiran, linked to two firms that supplied materials for MNREGA works without securing official contracts, were arrested on May 17 and May 19 respectively. Both were remanded to judicial custody before filing their bail applications last week. While the court granted bail on Wednesday, the IO requested more time to submit further evidence. The hearing will continue on Thursday before the court issues its final decision. The scam, unearthed in a probe by District Rural Development Authority (DRDA), involved illegible firms being given orders for the supply of materials for MNREGA works.
