logo
National security, judicial appointments discussed at Conference of Rulers meeting

National security, judicial appointments discussed at Conference of Rulers meeting

The Star16-07-2025
KUALA LUMPUR: Issues concerning national security, judicial appointments, and the proposed ban on vape were among the key topics discussed at the 269th Conference of Rulers meeting held at Istana Negara on Wednesday (July 16).
The Keeper of the Rulers' Seal, Tan Sri Syed Danial Syed Ahmad, in a statement, said the meeting was presided over by the Sultan of Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah.
"Today, the Conference received the latest briefings on national security from the Inspector-General of Police, Datuk Seri Mohd Khalid Ismail, and on national defence from the Chief of Defence Forces, General Tan Sri Mohd Nizam Jaffar,' he said.
Syed Danial said that the meeting also deliberated on appointments of judges, including those to the Federal Court, Court of Appeal, and High Courts, as well as on appointments of the Chief Judges of Sabah and Sarawak High Courts, President of the Court of Appeal, and the Chief Justice of Malaysia.
"The Conference also took note of the proposal to impose a complete ban on the sale and use of vape or electronic cigarettes in the country.
"Also tabled at the meeting were legal opinions from the 126th and 127th Meetings of the National Council for Islamic Religious Affairs (MKI) Muzakarah Committee, along with resolutions from the 2025 Special Meeting of the Muzakarah Committee,' he said.
Additionally, Syed Danial said the Conference was further briefed on the need for registration of marriages involving refugees and asylum seekers in Malaysia, as well as the Cabinet Paper regarding a centralised policy on the management of seized and forfeited assets.
Present at the meeting were Raja of Perlis Tuanku Syed Sirajuddin Jamalullail, Sultan of Perak Sultan Nazrin Shah, Sultan of Kedah Al-Aminul Karim Sultan Sallehuddin Sultan Badlishah and the Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negri Sembilan Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir.
Also in attendance were Tengku Mahkota of Kelantan Tengku Muhammad Fakhry Petra, Tunku Temenggong Johor Tunku Idris Iskandar Sultan Ibrahim, and Tengku Arif Bendahara Pahang Tengku Muhammad Iskandar Ri'ayatuddin Shah.
Governors Tun Dr Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar of Sarawak, Tun Dr Mohd Ali Rustam (Melaka), Tun Musa Aman (Sabah) and Tun Ramli Ngah Talib (Penang) also attended the meeting.
Also present were Chief Ministers and Mentris Besar, including the representative of the Sarawak Premier.
His Majesty Sultan Ibrahim, King of Malaysia, graced the pre-council meeting held yesterday, also at Istana Negara.
The last Conference of Rulers meeting was held on Feb 5, presided over by the Sultan of Kedah. - Bernama
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ex-soldier loses appeal over dismissal for refusing Covid-19 jab
Ex-soldier loses appeal over dismissal for refusing Covid-19 jab

New Straits Times

time8 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

Ex-soldier loses appeal over dismissal for refusing Covid-19 jab

PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal today dismissed a former soldier's appeal against his termination from the Malaysian Armed Forces for refusing the Covid-19 vaccination. The three-member bench led by Justice Datuk Azimah Omar ruled that there was no illegality or procedural impropriety on the part of the respondents in dismissing Wan Ramli Wan Seman from service. "The court is of the view that the appeal is without merit and therefore, dismissed," she said. No order as to costs was made. Sitting with her were Justices Datuk Wong Kian Kheong and Datuk Ismail Brahim. Wan Ramli, 43, was appealing against the High Court's 2023 dismissal of his judicial review challenging the decision of the respondents. In his judicial review, Wan Ramli had named Lt-Col Sharull Hesham Md Yasin, Lt Mohamad Azammunir Mohd Ashri, Army Chief General Tan Sri Zamrose Mohd Zain, the Malaysian Armed Forces, and the Malaysian Government as respondents. He sought a certiorari order to quash the termination letter dated Aug 4, 2021, which discharged him from service, and a declaration that the discharge letter was null and void. He claimed that the dishonourable discharge had caused him to lose his right to a pension under Article 147 of the Federal Constitution. Wan Ramli also argued that his dismissal was invalid as it was disproportionate in the circumstances, oppressive, irrational, unreasonable, amounted to unlawful discrimination, and took into account irrelevant considerations. Then High Court judge Datuk Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid (now a Court of Appeal judge) had ruled that the decision to discharge Wan Ramli was lawful and not tainted with illegality, irrationality, or procedural impropriety. At today's hearing, Wan Ramli was represented by lawyer Hafiz Norkhan, while senior federal counsel Nurhafizza Azizan and federal counsel Solehheen Mohammad Zaki appeared for the respondents.

Court of Appeal dismisses ex-soldier's challenge over COVID-19 vaccine refusal
Court of Appeal dismisses ex-soldier's challenge over COVID-19 vaccine refusal

The Sun

time14 hours ago

  • The Sun

Court of Appeal dismisses ex-soldier's challenge over COVID-19 vaccine refusal

PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal today rejected a former soldier's bid to challenge his discharge from the Malaysian Armed Forces for refusing the COVID-19 vaccination. A three-judge panel, led by Justice Datuk Azimah Omar, ruled that the termination was lawful and free from procedural flaws. Justice Azimah stated, 'The court is of the view that the appeal is without merit and therefore, dismissed.' No costs were awarded. The bench included Justices Datuk Wong Kian Kheong and Datuk Ismail Brahim. Wan Ramli Wan Seman, 43, had filed a judicial review against his 2021 termination, naming military officials and the government as respondents. He sought to nullify his discharge letter, arguing it deprived him of pension rights under the Federal Constitution. The High Court previously ruled that the termination followed legal procedures and was not irrational or discriminatory. Wan Ramli's lawyer, Hafiz Norkhan, represented him in the appeal, while federal counsel defended the respondents. – Bernama

Court of Appeal dismisses ex-soldier's bid to challenge discharge over Covid-19 vaccine refusal
Court of Appeal dismisses ex-soldier's bid to challenge discharge over Covid-19 vaccine refusal

Sinar Daily

time14 hours ago

  • Sinar Daily

Court of Appeal dismisses ex-soldier's bid to challenge discharge over Covid-19 vaccine refusal

The three-man bench said there was no illegality or procedural impropriety on the part of the respondents when dismissing Wan Ramli Wan Seman from service. 29 Jul 2025 04:21pm The Court of Appeal today dismissed a former soldier's appeal to challenge his termination of service from the Malaysian Armed Forces for refusing the Covid-19 vaccination. PUTRAJAYA - The Court of Appeal today dismissed a former soldier's appeal to challenge his termination of service from the Malaysian Armed Forces for refusing the Covid-19 vaccination. The three-man bench led by Justice Datuk Azimah Omar said there was no illegality or procedural impropriety on the part of the respondents when dismissing Wan Ramli Wan Seman from service. "The court is of the view that the appeal is without merit and therefore, dismissed,' she said. No order as to costs was made. Sitting with her were Justices Datuk Wong Kian Kheong and Datuk Ismail Brahim. Wan Ramli, 43, is appealing against the 2023 High Court's dismissal of his judicial review to challenge the decision of the respondents. In his judicial review, Wan Ramli had named Lt-Col Sharull Hesham Md Yasin, Lt Mohamad Azammunir Mohd Ashri, Army Chief General Tan Sri Zamrose Mohd Zain, the Malaysian Armed Forces and the Malaysian Government as respondents. Wan Ramli sought a certiorari order to quash the termination letter dated Aug 4, 2021, discharging him from service, and a declaration that the letter of his discharge was null and void. He claimed that due to the dishonourable discharge from service, he has lost his right to pension under Article 147 of the Federal Constitution. The former soldier said his discharge was invalid on the grounds that the action by the respondents was disproportionate in all circumstances of the case, oppressive, irrational, unreasonable, amounted to unlawful discrimination, and took into account irrelevant considerations. The then High Court judge Datuk Ahmad Kamal Md. Shahid (now Court of Appeal judge) held that the decision made to discharge Wan Ramli was in accordance with the law and was not tainted with illegality, irrationality or procedural impropriety. In the proceeding before the Court of Appeal today, Wan Ramli was represented by lawyer Hafiz Norkhan while senior federal counsel Nurhafizza Azizan and Federal Counsel Solehheen Mohammad Zaki appeared for the respondents. - BERNAMA More Like This

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store