logo
Tata Sons' FY25 revenue is likely to be lower despite record dividends

Tata Sons' FY25 revenue is likely to be lower despite record dividends

Mint10-06-2025
MUMBAI
:
Tata Sons, the privately held parent company of the Tata group, will likely see its revenues shrink in 2024-25 despite receiving record dividend income from the group companies.
The reason: Last fiscal's one-off income from the sale of Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) Ltd shares.
The company's dividend income from 11 listed companies surpassed the ₹35,000-crore mark in 2024-25, which is the highest ever, showed data compiled by Mint.
However, since Tata Sons sold TCS shares worth approximately ₹9,000 crore in the open market in 2023-24, its income is likely to see a decline in the latest fiscal.
Also Read: Borrowed time: Investors bullish on near-term upside increase leveraged bets on Tata Motors, SBI, HAL, Jio Financial
Dividends and share buybacks from group companies account for nearly all of Tata Sons' top line. While the conglomerate has 26 listed companies, the 11 companies used in this analysis account for over 95% of dividend income of the holding firm.
The company received a dividend income of ₹21,529 crore in 2023-24, according to its annual report. In addition, it received ₹10,548 crore from a TCS share buyback, taking its total payout from group companies to ₹32,077 crore.
Adding revenue from other sources like Tata brand usage feeds and the sale of TCS shares took Tata Sons' 2023-24 revenue to ₹43,893 crore.
Tata Sons did not respond to Mint's queries.
Reaping dividends
TCS, where Tata Sons holds a 71.74% stake, led the pack with a dividend of ₹32,184 crore in 2024-25. In fact, a 12% increase in the payout from TCS is the reason why the dividend income of Tata Sons has hit a fresh record in 2024-25 despite a dip in dividends from three other companies.
Tata Steel and Tata Motors were the next two highest dividend returning units of Tata Sons, with a payout of ₹1,427 crore and ₹947 crore.
Also Read: N. Chandrasekaran changed Tata Capital. Now, the company is prepping for an IPO
'The reason for growth in dividends is because of the improving profitability of most large Tata group companies and likely the lack of suitable reinvestment opportunities for those companies," said Shriram Subramanian, the managing director of proxy advisory firm InGovern Research Services.
For instance, TCS generates the highest free cash flow within the group. The company will need to payout the cash as dividends due to a slowdown in the IT services sector leaving it with few investment opportunities, Subramanian added.
Tata Sons also needs these dividends as the company has to invest in fledgling businesses like Air India and Tata Electronics, which take up a lot of capital, he added.
Air India is the privately held aviation business of the Tata group while Tata Electronics, which is also private, assembles iPhones for Apple Inc. on a contract basis and is setting up semiconductor manufacturing fabs.
The Chandra factor
The dividend income of Tata Sons has surged sharply during the tenure of chairman N. Chandrasekaran who took over the reins on 21 February 2017.
The 2024-25 dividend income is up five-fold since 2016-17. Seven of the 11 listed Tata group companies analyzed returned dividend in excess of ₹100 crore to Tata Sons. Only three of these companies had paid the parent over ₹100 crore dividend in 2016-17.
'The Tata group of companies is a very large group, and one person alone cannot be responsible for its performance or the lack of it," Subramanian said.
Also Read: Tata Motors, JLR flag EV supply chain as a separate business risk. They don't name China, but its imprint is all over.
'However, Mr. Chandrasekaran has, in the past eight years, brought some dynamism and tried to consolidate businesses," he added.
Chandrasekaran joined the board of Tata Sons in October 2016 and took over as the chairman in February 2017.
He also chairs the boards of Tata Steel Ltd, Tata Motors Ltd, Tata Power Co. Ltd, Air India Ltd, TCS and several group operating companies. He worked in TCS for 30 years, including eight years as its chief executive until 2017.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

To survive AI and global geopolitics, India should become a hub of knowledge creation, not just knowledge processing
To survive AI and global geopolitics, India should become a hub of knowledge creation, not just knowledge processing

The Hindu

time12 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

To survive AI and global geopolitics, India should become a hub of knowledge creation, not just knowledge processing

Earlier this month, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), India's largest IT services firm, confirmed it will lay off 12,000 employees. For decades, companies such as TCS symbolised India's prowess in IT-enabled services — a low-cost, high-scale model that rode the wave of globalisation. But that model is now under existential strain. The era of labour arbitrage is drawing to a close, and the age of artificial intelligence (AI) is rewriting the rules of economic competitiveness. Generative AI, machine learning, and automation are fast replacing the very tasks that once gave India its edge: coding, data entry, support services, and even parts of analytics. The decline in headcount is not a blip; India's core export, white-collar digital labour, is being disrupted. And the country does not seem prepared as we see problems in absorbing science and engineering talent newly entering the job market. Simultaneously, the manufacturing-led catch-up route is narrowing. For years, economists argued India could do what China did in the 1990s — turn industrial policy and export-led manufacturing into mass employment and structural transformation. But that ship has largely sailed. Countries such as Vietnam and Bangladesh have already captured the low-cost manufacturing space. Add to that rising automation and India's own infrastructure bottlenecks, the feasibility of China-style manufacturing resurgence diminishes rapidly. What, then, is India's pathway to sustained economic relevance? The answer lies upstream — in innovation, discovery science, and a smart, coordinated science, technology, and innovation (STI) policy. If India wants to be a rule-maker rather than a rule-taker in the AI-driven global economy, it must invest urgently in becoming a hub of knowledge creation, not just knowledge processing. This will only be achievable with a new national compact that starts from STEM but goes above and beyond embracing STEPS — an integration of STEM with policy and society. This means building a generation of technologists who understand not just how to build systems, but how those systems affect entrepreneurship, business model and scaling, ethics, governance, and inclusion. It also means reforming curricula to include data governance, AI ethics, climate-tech, innovation economics, and intellectual property policy. Finally, it also means urgent, mission mode requirement of an integrated, State-agnostic approach where we will see not just southern India having a head start in STEM and STEPS. The New Education Policy (NEP), 2020 provides some groundwork, but implementation must go further and deeper. From IITs to State universities, India will need a deliberate shift toward interdisciplinary innovation and doctoral-level research capacity. India's innovation-to-education pipeline is currently too weak to sustain a 21st century knowledge economy. And sadly in this, as noted above, manufacturing likely will not save India any more. The dream of becoming the 'next China' in manufacturing is now largely unrealistic. India's manufacturing sector contributes just 14-16% of the GDP — a figure that has barely budged in a decade. More worryingly, global manufacturing is undergoing its own AI-led transformation: smart factories, predictive maintenance, and robotic assembly lines are shrinking the need for cheap labour. Competing on cost is now a losing battle. Moreover, global supply chains are also realigning around strategic resilience and digital integration, not just wage arbitrage. India's challenge is not to attract the next garment factory but to build the next quantum computing lab or climate-resilient agri-tech platform. Which brings us to the question of how a Triple Helix approach might be India's best shot at future-readiness. To get there, India will need a clear National Science and Innovation Strategy underpinned by deep collaboration between government, industry, and academia. No single actor can deliver the transformation needed and increasingly the need of the hour will be science-based entrepreneurship and scientist entrepreneurs. It has been done before like by Vijay Chandru, inventor of Simputer and founder of Strand Genomics, also a former IISc Professor, but one Vijay Chandru is hardly enough for a country of 1.3 billion. Blue-sky science Government also must invest in blue-sky science, reform its R&D funding structures, and design enabling regulatory frameworks for frontier tech (AI, biotech, semiconductors, and so on). Universities must evolve into innovation hubs, not just exam factories. They must work closely with industry, build tech transfer offices, and reward risk-taking. Industry also must move beyond short-term returns and co-invest in long-horizon research, from chip design to synthetic biology refusing to accept modest productivity gains with a middling equilibrium mindset. Global lessons abound. The U.S.'s DARPA ecosystem, Germany's Fraunhofer Institutes, and Israel's Start-Up Nation playbook all demonstrate how strategic state support and institutional coordination can turn ideas into global advantage. India can build from their lessons, leverage on the current global geopolitical headwinds and create a national consciousness around science and innovation. It is not just investment in science that will matter, but investment in the science of innovation itself brings in a critical evaluation mindset for upgrading based on evidence. India lacks a coherent framework to measure what works: which R&D models yield translational success? How do tech incubators perform over time? Where does research funding leak or stagnate? A National Science of Science and Innovation Policy (NSIP) platform — a cross-ministerial, data-driven approach to governing the innovation ecosystem — could be a way forward. NITI Aayog's AI strategy and the recent National Research Foundation are steps in the right direction, but coordination and scale remain insufficient. This effort must include dedicated funding for AI safety, public interest technologies, twin transition policies and sovereign computational infrastructure. The stakes are high: if India does not develop its own AI stack, algorithms, chips, cloud, data protocol, it will remain captive to technological colonialism. Stagnation, inequality The fallout from the AI transition is not hypothetical as we see in the TCS situation mentioned above. If India does not invest in science, technology, and evidence-based policy today, it will face economic stagnation, rising inequality, and geopolitical irrelevance tomorrow. The global economy will not wait for India to catch up and in fact, catching-up economies are looking for the country's leadership in these areas. This is particularly concerning since already, a handful of countries — mostly in West and East Asia — are monopolising AI patents, funding, and talent. Without a deliberate national push, India will continue to supply coders to other nations' AI empires rather than building its own. The good news is that India has the ingredients: a young demographic, a robust start-up ecosystem, and scientific institutions with proven excellence. What we need now is leadership, vision, and a strategic shift in mindset — from cost to creativity, from services to science, from political populism to real performance. India can still leapfrog into the global innovation vanguard. But only if it recognises that science, technology, and smart policy are not luxuries — they are our last, best bet in the age of AI. The dragon is roaring already, will the elephant wake up? Chirantan Chatterjee is a Professor of Development Economics, Innovation and Global Health at the University of Sussex

Nifty IT is 2025's worst-performing sector, down 20%; seven index stocks plunge 20–35% from recent peaks
Nifty IT is 2025's worst-performing sector, down 20%; seven index stocks plunge 20–35% from recent peaks

Mint

time4 hours ago

  • Mint

Nifty IT is 2025's worst-performing sector, down 20%; seven index stocks plunge 20–35% from recent peaks

Domestic tech stocks have emerged as the worst performers in 2025 so far, with persistent selling across the board leading to a sharp erosion in value and pushing them to multi-month lows. Lackluster earnings, tariff concerns, and a weak demand outlook have dampened investor sentiment toward the sector, triggering a rapid exodus from these stocks. As a result, the Nifty IT index has crashed 20% year to date. If the pressure on tech stocks persists through the end of the year, it would mark the index's first annual decline since 2022. Moreover, a loss of over 26% in value would make it the steepest yearly drop since 2008. Among its constituents, seven out of ten are in bear market territory, trading more than 20% below their recent peaks. Oracle Financial Services has plunged 35% to ₹ 8,594 from its December peak of ₹ 13,220, while TCS shares have slumped 33.8% from their August highs to ₹ 3,036, erasing over ₹ 5 lakh crore from the company's market capitalization. Other tech majors such as Infosys, HCL Technologies, and Wipro have fallen 29%, 25.5%, and 25.4%, respectively. In fact, 7 out of ten constituents of the index are now down more than 20% from their recent record highs. Foreign institutional investors (FIIs) reduced their stakes in nine of the 10 Nifty IT index constituents amid weak demand concerns. In TCS, FII holdings fell to 11.5% from 12% in the March quarter, while Infosys saw a decline to 31.9% from 32.9%. HCL Technologies FIIs shareholding dropped sharply to 18.6% from 19.2%, LTIMindtree fell to 6.6%, Coforge slipped to 37.4% from 40.2%, and MphasiS declined to 19% from 20.6%. Wipro and Oracle Financial Services Software registered marginal drops of 100 basis points each, to 8.2% and 8.6%, respectively, while Persistent Systems FIIs holdings eased to 24.2% from 24.4%. Tech Mahindra was the only exception, with overseas holdings rising slightly to 23.3% from 23%. The demand outlook for India's $283-billion IT sector remains uncertain due to US tariff risks and broader geopolitical factors. Indian tech giants started the year with high hopes for pro-growth policies from the Trump administration. However, a series of tariff-related announcements soon dampened investor sentiment, raising fears that a potential US economic slowdown triggered by trade wars could lead to fewer IT deals. The slowdown in new deals has already fed into companies' performance in the June quarter, with the country's top tech firms posting muted results, reporting a single-digit top-line growth ranging from 0.8% to 8.1%. Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.

Mahindra to showcase four new SUV platforms tomorrow. Here's what to expect
Mahindra to showcase four new SUV platforms tomorrow. Here's what to expect

Hindustan Times

time5 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Mahindra to showcase four new SUV platforms tomorrow. Here's what to expect

Mahindra & Mahindra is gearing up for a high-stakes Independence Day reveal on August 15, 2025, when it will introduce four new Vision SUV concepts—Vision T, Vision S, Vision SXT and Vision X—under its awaited Freedom NU platform. This monocoque design, also referred to internally as the New Flexible Architecture (NFA), is designed to support petrol, diesel, hybrid, and electric powertrain models, marking a strategic drive towards multi-energy mobility. The platform will be produced at the Chakan facility, with planned annual capacity of up to 1.2 lakh units. Mahindra's teaser campaign, running under the hashtag Freedom_NU, has offered brief but telling glimpses of the four concepts. SUV concepts: A glimpse into the future Mahindra's teaser campaign, running under the hashtag Freedom_NU, has offered brief but telling glimpses of the four concepts. The Vision.T is defined by its angular bonnet, untamed wheel arches, bonnet latches, and upright stance—features that clearly inherit from the Thar's DNA and might indicate a more developed Thar.e inspired model. The Vision.S, with its upright linearity, bonnet scoops, and muscular build, looks set in the lineage of the Scorpio, suggesting a potential electric variant of the bestselling SUV. Also check these Cars Find more Cars UPCOMING Mahindra XUV500 2025 2179 cc 2179 cc Diesel Diesel ₹ 12 Lakhs Alert Me When Launched UPCOMING Mahindra e20 NXT 15 kWh 15 kWh 140 km 140 km ₹ 6 - 8 Lakhs Alert Me When Launched UPCOMING Mahindra Thar E 75 kWh 75 kWh 400 km 400 km ₹ 25 Lakhs Alert Me When Launched Mahindra XUV700 2184 cc 2184 cc Multiple Multiple ₹ 14.49 Lakhs Compare View Offers Mahindra Thar 2184 cc 2184 cc Multiple Multiple ₹ 11.50 Lakhs Compare View Offers Mahindra Thar ROXX 2184 cc 2184 cc Multiple Multiple ₹ 12.99 Lakhs Compare View Offers Also Read : Mahindra XEV 9e Pack Two vs Pack Three Select: Price, range, features and specs Meanwhile, the blends utility with off-road readiness, showing the design cues of a pickup-style SUV—perhaps a production-bound evolution of the Global Pik-Up concept. The Vision.X breaks from the rugged mould, adopting a sleeker, more compact, and urban-friendly design, suggesting it could be an electrified or hybrid member of the XUV family. Expected features Though still under wraps, these Vision concepts are expected to flaunt modern design trends—think connected dashboards, ADAS features, digital displays, and premium materials. If Vision X is indeed a compact family SUV or urban EV, it could rival the likes of Tata's Punch EV or Maruti's EV-based offerings, bringing Mahindra into new customer segments. The rugged Vision T and S will likely target segments where Ford Endevour and Toyota Fortuner compete, but with added electrification potential. The Freedom NU platform is further expected to elevate Mahindra's flexibility over competitors by accommodating multiple powertrains in a single architecture—something not readily seen in the ladder-frame SUVs that define its traditional rivals. Also Read : New Mahindra Bolero Neo spotted ahead of launch Expected specs Unlike a standard product launch, this reveal is centred around a platform-first strategy. The Freedom NU platform is being positioned as a highly adaptable base capable of supporting multiple fuel types, including the possibility of plug-in hybrid systems. Its engineering facilitates a shared architecture to support both ICE and EV variants, as shown by the combination of badges in teaser images. This strategy provides Mahindra with cost savings and shorter development cycles, while presenting a consistent brand experience across its SUV portfolio. In addition to the four concept SUVs, Mahindra will also bring the facelifted Bolero Neo, and that could be one of the first production cars to be based on the platform's underpinnings. What it all means Mahindra's August 15 launch is expected to mark the brand's shift to future-proof SUVs that go beyond fuel types. For current customers, that translates to potential added choice and technology-laden options in the near term. For Mahindra, it's a transition to maintain rough-around-the-edges DNA while welcoming electrification and refinement. The monocoque architecture may further help improve drive comfort —areas where rivals often edge ahead. Check out Upcoming Cars in India 2025, Best SUVs in India. First Published Date:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store