
Maine's chief justice says courts are overwhelmed and underfunded
In her annual State of the Judiciary speech at the Maine State House on Tuesday, Chief Justice Valerie Stanfill described an agency that's trying to keep its head above water after years of underfunding.
Criminal cases and family matters are more complicated than ever before and are taking longer to resolve, she said. Judges and other court employees are paid less in Maine than other states. The judicial branch is struggling with vacancies, including a spot on the high court that has been open for more than a year. (A spokesperson for Gov. Janet Mills said Tuesday she "intends to proceed with an appointment as soon as possible.") And under the current two-year budget proposal, the judiciary faces a $1.8 million annual shortfall due to a recent decline in surcharges on fines.
Many of these are the same concerns Stanfill highlighted in her speech to lawmakers last year. But now, she says the judiciary is tackling all of that while facing a national decline in trust in public institutions — including the courts. A Gallup poll late last year found that Americans' trust in the judicial system had reached an all-time low.
"I don't think it's specific, in some ways, to the court, but I do think there has been an undermining of the respect for institutions," Stanfill told reporters after her speech. She referenced threats against court employees and increased confrontations in the courtroom that have required court marshals to intervene.
"I think it's important that all people — whether it's the Legislature, whether it's the executive, whether it's all of you — we can disagree," she said. "We can disagree with a court order. But we have to have a certain respect for the way things work. ... If you want society to function, it does take a certain level of respect for the institutions and what their functions are."
Stanfill declined to weigh in on the Trump administration and its executive orders that are being challenged in court. Some legal experts fear what could happen if he ignores court orders.
In her speech Tuesday, she made references to the country's values of "justice, equality and fairness for all people," saying "these aren't liberal or conservative sentiments. They are the ideals upon which this country was founded."
PUBLIC DEFENSE
To help address Maine's public defense crisis, Stanfill urged lawmakers to pass a bill that will allow judges to appoint any lawyer to represent indigent clients, regardless of whether or not they're rostered by Maine's public defense agency. Stanfill said judges have the ability to do this already, but the three-year emergency legislation would ensure lawyers get paid when they're appointed.
Some in the defense bar have been resistant to the idea out of fear they'll be overwhelmed with work that they didn't sign up for. The executive director of the Maine Commission on Public Defense Services recently said that he doubts there is a "tidal wave" of lawyers available to take court-appointed work who aren't already doing so.
Stanfill seemed to disagree, telling lawmakers "there are people out there who are able and capable of taking these cases who are not on the rosters." She said the unavailability of attorneys in cases "where significant rights are at stake" is making cases take longer, and it's not helping address a backlog.
She distanced herself from the commission's requests to the Legislature, because it is a separate quasi-state agency charged with finding lawyers for those who cannot afford their own. A court-maintained list of people who need lawyers has declined in recent weeks, from more than 900 criminal cases at the end of last year to under 600 cases as of Monday.
Still, Stanfill said it's the judicial branch that regulates attorneys and is intent on making it easier for people to practice, including students and attorneys licensed in other states.
"Cases have simply gotten more complicated," Stanfill said. "People expect more from the courts. They expect us to solve their problems and their parenting problems — not just to grant the divorce."
TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS
The justice also spoke about Maine's slow effort to move its paper court records online.
For more than a decade, the state has been working with Tyler Technologies to digitize court records. So far, they've moved only civil and family cases online in Penobscot and Androscoggin counties.
They're slowly working on criminal cases now — but that also involves dealing with law enforcement agencies' record-keeping systems, Stanfill said.
While the state was able to pay for initial investments in 2013 with bonds, those don't cover all of their annual fees and repairs. Now, the courts are struggling to continue to afford all the technology they need to stream remote hearings and broadcast digital evidence.
The courts have been relying some on added surcharges to fines and fees, including those for traffic violations, but they're receiving less every year as prices continue to rise, Stanfill said.
"This has to be part of just how we do this," she said. "Trying to pay for this technology, through surcharges on fines and fees, is not a sound plan. ... Those surcharges, of course, are often imposed on those least able to pay."
Copy the Story Link

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Conservatives mock Comey over Taylor Swift video
Conservatives are mocking former FBI Director James Comey over a post he made on his Substack on Sunday in which he discussed his admiration for pop superstar Taylor Swift. The post features a video of Comey calling Swift 'a truly inspirational public figure' and noting her recent appearance on NFL stars' Jason and Travis Kelce's podcast 'New Heights.' 'Taylor Swift and I go way back. I went to my first concert of hers 15 years ago. I've been to a second and I have helped financially support the attendance of a lot of family members and others. I'm in a family's Swiftie group chat. I know all her music, and I listen to it in my headphones when I cut the grass,' Comey said in the video. In response to Comey's video, conservative personality Benny Johnson said that 'A new James Comey hostage video just dropped.' 'This time he calls himself a 'Swiftie' and says Taylor Swift helps him cope with Donald Trump. You really can't make this up,' Johnson added in a Sunday post on the social platform X. In the Comey video, the former FBI director also states that 'we need to stand up to jerks and defend what matters, but I think we have to try to do that without becoming like them, which is what makes me think about Taylor Swift.' 'She's made clear that she sees Donald Trump for what he is, and last year, she urged Americans not to make the serious mistake of electing him,' Comey added. 'Of course, we're now living with the consequences of that mistake, but while our elderly makeup- covered president is posting about whether Taylor Swift is still hot and declaring that he can't stand her, what's she doing? Living her best life.' Conservative commentator Dinesh D'Souza also said on X Sunday that Comey was attempting 'now to come across as a normal guy, a Taylor Swift fan, and a champion of civility and decorum' in the wake of 'using his power for years to entrap Trump, Flynn and others.' The Hill has reached out to a representative for Comey and the White House for comment. Comey was fired as FBI director by Trump during his first term, and the two have feuded for years. Earlier this year, Comey made waves when he posted an image of shells on a seashore spelling out '86 47.' He deleted the post after criticism, saying he did not recognize it as something that could be seen as promoting violence toward the president. Comey's daughter, Maureen Comey, was fired in July from her job as a prosecutor for the U.S. attorney's office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The firing was largely seen as politically motivated given Trump's feelings for Comey and his desire for loyalists throughout his administration.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Are we getting a $5000 DOGE dividend or $600 rebate? Fourth stimulus check eligibility
If you're wondering about a fourth stimulus check in 2025 from President Donald Trump or the IRS, here's what to know about eligibility and the reality of it happening. On July 25, Trump floated the idea of a tariff rebate check for American taxpayers in response to questions about all the new tariff revenue being generated, "We have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate. But the big thing we want to do is pay down debt. But we're thinking about a rebate." A few days after the president's tariff rebate comments, Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley announced the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025 aimed at sending checks to Americans. Note that a few months back, in February, Trump also said he would consider a plan to pay out a portion of the savings identified by the Department of Government Efficiency in the form of a $5000 dividend check as payback to taxpayers. The DOGE dividend proposal, authored by Azoria investment firm CEO James Fishback, was meant to give back or refund taxpayers a savings from Elon Musk's DOGE related cuts and reductions in government spending. Here's what to know about Trump's two proposals this year, what the amounts would be, qualifications and status. Are we getting a fourth stimulus check in 2025? While speculation about a of $2,000 has surfaced on social media and unverified websites, there has been no official confirmation of any additional economic relief package in 2025 from Congress or the IRS to support this claim. Any such news should be taken with caution as it could be misinformation or attempted fraud. Either of Trump's ideas for a tariff rebate or DOGE dividend this year would be similar to a fourth stimulus check, if approved. Albeit, there are differences between a stimulus check versus a dividend, refund or rebate. By definition, a dividend is a distribution of profits by a corporation to its shareholders and refund is a payment made back to a user that previously paid for something. While a rebate is a partial refund of the purchase price that a consumer paid, often upon meeting certain conditions — more like a discount that is refunded after the purchase versus a discount that is applied at the point of sale. A stimulus check on the other hand, is a direct payment to encourage spending and stimulate the economy by putting money directly into the consumers' hand. Also similar to the stimulus checks sent during the pandemic, these proposals would require congressional approval. What is the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025? Hawley's bill, called the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025, would provide a minimum of $600 per adult and dependent child, or $2,400 for a family of four, according to news officials. The benefit would be reduced by 5% for joint filers with an adusted gross income above $150,000 or single filers earning more than $75,000 individually. According to an analysis from the Budget Lab at Yale released July 28, Trump's tariffs could cost U.S. households an average of $2,400 in 2025 through higher prices passed on from companies paying higher tariff taxes. The Treasury Department said on July 25 that the U.S. government posted a $27 billion surplus in June, following a $316 billion deficit in May. Customs duties totaled approximately $27 billion for the month, up from $23 billion in May and 301% higher than in June 2024. On an annual basis, tariff collections have totaled $113 billion, or 86% more than a year ago. The bill would allow for a larger rebate if the tariff revenue exceeds projections. What is the status of the DOGE dividend check proposal? Fishback announced that he was stepping away from the DOGE dividend check movement after Musk lashed out at the president in June, although he also said he would continue working with the administration "to return savings to taxpayers." The latest update on DOGE dividend came from Fishbacks tweet on June 6, "I believed in Elon Musk's vision to shrink government and make it work better for Americans. I'm proud of the DOGE Dividend proposal I developed and will keep working with the administration to return savings to taxpayers." He added, "The truth is that Elon set expectations that he relayed to the President, me, and the country that he did not come close to fulfilling. That's disappointing, but okay." According to Fishback's proposal, the DOGE dividend check was described as tax refund check to be sent to every taxpaying household, funded exclusively with a portion of the total savings delivered by DOGE. The potential refund would be sent only to households that are net-income taxpayers — people who pay more in taxes than they get back — with lower-income Americans not qualifying for the return, according to news reports. The Pew Research Center cites most Americans who have an adjusted gross income of under $40,000 pay effectively no federal income tax. According to the DOGE website, it cites an estimated $205 billion — approximately $1,273 per individual federal taxpayer — in savings and proof in their "Wall of Receipts." Albeit, only half the amount is itemized thus far, raising doubts about accuracy. Amy Gleason is the acting administrator and head of DOGE. Musk's departure from the federal government will likely do little to change DOGE's work carrying out Trump's vision of downsizing the federal government or eliminating the 'fraud and waste.' Maria Francis is a Pennsylvania-based journalist with the Mid-Atlantic Connect Team. This article originally appeared on Asbury Park Press: How to check your stimulus check status? Trump $600 - $2400 rebate Solve the daily Crossword


New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Mayor Eric Adams deserves credit for his stunning housing wins
It's odd how little credit Mayor Eric Adams gets for his relentless, steady and successful drive to get more housing, including more affordable homes, built in New York City. In under four years, he's arguably done more than his predecessors achieved in the previous two decades, winning changes that will make a huge difference in the long term rather than offering empty promises of instant miracles. The latest: The City Council just OK'd Adams' plan to rezone Midtown South, opening the door for nearly 10,000 new housing units, 2,800 of them affordable, in an area that was largely zoned for (outdated) industrial uses. Advertisement Some of those units will come from converting commercial space to residential, an obvious next step for older, vacant office buildings. All told, Adams' rezoning push starting in 2021 has cleared the way for 100,000 new units to be built across the city, with 30,000 more on the way if the City Council approves his plans for Jamaica and Long Island City. Advertisement That's more housing gained via zoning changes than added in the Bloomberg and de Blasio years combined. Another unheralded gain, from years of steady effort and deft alliances: getting the Legislature to lift the floor-area-ratio cap of 12, which arbitrarily restricted the height of residential buildings. Between the mayor's massive City of Yes package, which the council approved last year, and other efforts, including the preservation of about 134,700 existing units, City Hall counts the number of units added to or kept in the Big Apple's housing supply under Adams at about 426,000. Yes, that includes the totals from proposals that still need to go through the approval process — and a good chunk, like those enabled through rezoning, won't be fully realized for years. Advertisement It doesn't help when lefty ideologues sabotage projects like the Brooklyn Marine Terminal, which would offer 6,000 new units, because they'd rather have no new housing than let any market-rate apartments get built on public land. But the mayor's full-court press means he's already changed the city's long-term housing landscape for the better even if some plans fall through — and he could do even more in a second term. We know: 'Methodical' doesn't match the Adams' image, but perhaps that's because so little of the local media pays attention to day-in-day-out reality; it's so much easier to fawn over, say, Zohran Mamdani's flashy promises to freeze rents. Advertisement Even though the mayor's strategy, unlike Mamdani's, works. Freezing rent on rent-regulated apartments would force more landlords to abandon their buildings altogether or allow units to fall into disrepair, making the city's housing situation worse. Meanwhile, Adams is dramatically boosting supply, which will organically push rents lower over time. In a city where hysterically anti-development progressives constantly do their best to thwart common-sense housing fixes, Adams' success in ushering in lasting change is stunning. And though the fruits of his labor will take time to fully appear, generations of New Yorkers will benefit. As the mayoral race exits the summer 'silly season,' perhaps voters will start to realize who's actually delivering the housing solutions New York needs.