logo
Germany concludes humanitarian support for Iraq, shifts focus to development

Germany concludes humanitarian support for Iraq, shifts focus to development

Rudaw Neta day ago
Also in World
Seven Kurdish candidates competing in Norway's 2025 parliamentary vote
Dutch-Kurdish director draws on father's legacy with new film Jamal
US says Syria at a crossroads as 'terror' sponsor status under review
US reviewing removal of Syria's 'Sponsor of Terrorism' status
A+ A-
ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - Germany has ended its humanitarian aid to Iraq as of 2023, citing the country's improved economic conditions and increased revenue from natural resources, the German foreign ministry told Rudaw on Thursday.
According to the ministry, between 2014 and 2022, Germany provided €800 million ($933 million) in humanitarian aid and €2.6 billion ($3 billion) for stabilization efforts, particularly in the aftermath of the conflict with the Islamic State (ISIS).
'Following the fall of ISIS, Germany provided extensive support to Iraq and the Kurdistan Region through humanitarian, development, and stabilization measures,' the ministry said. This included psychosocial services and rehabilitation programs for survivors of ISIS atrocities.
With the situation in Iraq now considered 'improved,' Berlin no longer sees a need for continued humanitarian assistance. However, Germany remains a 'close partner' to Iraq and the Kurdistan Region and will continue cooperation in key sectors such as economy and energy, the ministry asserted.
'Germany is currently supporting Iraq in the area of development and is pushing forward with civilian projects. We want to accelerate the pace of economic development and ensure energy security,' the ministry stated.
Moreover, the German government has identified climate change as a growing threat to Iraq and is working with Iraqi authorities to help the country adapt to its consequences. 'We are supporting Iraq to adapt to the consequences of climate change,' the ministry noted.
According to the ministry, Berlin's current approach now centers on transitioning from emergency humanitarian support to long-term development, with the aim of 'giving more responsibility to Iraqi parties,' the ministry concluded.
Key German institutions such as the German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ) and the Kreditanstalt fur Wiederaufbau (KfW) development bank will continue to operate in Iraq to support this transition.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government response to Diyarbakir wildfire ‘insufficient,' says pro-Kurdish party
Government response to Diyarbakir wildfire ‘insufficient,' says pro-Kurdish party

Rudaw Net

time6 hours ago

  • Rudaw Net

Government response to Diyarbakir wildfire ‘insufficient,' says pro-Kurdish party

Also in Turkey Istanbul district mayor arrested on corruption charges Ankara-PKK talks a chance to avoid past mistakes: DEM Party Magnitude 6.1 earthquake hits northwestern Turkey, no fatalities reported Ankara-PKK peace process to finish by end of 2025: Bahceli A+ A- ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - The government's response to a fire that has raged across several villages in the predominantly Kurdish province of Diyarbakir (Amed) in southeast Turkey is 'insufficient,' a pro-Kurdish party said on Friday, calling for the deployment of helicopters. The fire has been burning since 10 am and is threatening several villages, according to Abdulselam Akinci, Rudaw's reporter on the ground. The rugged terrain and winds have made it difficult for firefighters to bring it under control. Diyarbakir municipality said their teams were trying to put out the blaze, but that the terrain and conditions have made it "impossible" to intervene. The local government is led by the pro-Kurdish Peoples' Equality and Democracy Party (DEM Party), which said in a statement that the fire is growing fast and the ground intervention has proven 'insufficient.' The party called on the government to "immediately" deploy helicopters. 'Silence is unacceptable while our forests, agricultural lands, and villages are burning. This negligence is costing the lives, nature, and livelihoods of the people!' it said. The fire spread to the neighboring Adiyaman (Semsur) province but local authorities there said they had been able to bring it under control. No casualties have been reported. Turkey has recently faced a series of devastating wildfires, driven by record-breaking heatwaves and strong winds. The blazes have forced mass evacuations and resulted in multiple casualties.

Iraq's oil fortune: The two-decade grip of a US 'fortress'
Iraq's oil fortune: The two-decade grip of a US 'fortress'

Shafaq News

time8 hours ago

  • Shafaq News

Iraq's oil fortune: The two-decade grip of a US 'fortress'

Shafaq News Before dawn in Basra, giant oil tankers edge into the jetties, loading arms glinting under floodlights as millions of barrels of crude stream aboard for export. Yet most of the proceeds from this trade never pass through Baghdad's vaults. Instead, they cross the Atlantic to a heavily fortified building in Manhattan — the US Federal Reserve Bank of New York — where they remain under strict American oversight. What began in 2003 as a 'temporary safeguard' after the invasion and the fall of Saddam Hussein has endured for 22 years, outliving its original UN mandate and embedding itself in Iraq's financial system — and in the debate over whether such oversight protects or undermines the country's economic sovereignty. From Mandate to Custody In May 2003, UN Security Council Resolution 1483 required Iraq to deposit all oil and gas revenues into a Federal Reserve account under UN monitoring, with 5% deducted for reparations to Kuwait. That same month, then-US President George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13303, granting the account full legal immunity from seizure. For nearly two decades, Iraq sent steady payments to Kuwait — $52.4B in total — until the last $44M cleared in late 2021, closing the file. Iraqi lawmakers hailed it as 'a new beginning,' yet the financial mechanism remained. UN Security Council Resolution 1956, adopted on December 15, 2010, ended the UN-supervised arrangements for the Development Fund for Iraq (DFI) as of June 30, 2011. Yet Washington has renewed the executive order every year since — most recently in May 2025. In US policy circles, the arrangement has shifted from a post-war safeguard to a permanent instrument — one that, according to American officials, helps stabilize Iraq's fragile economy and monitor dollar flows. Supporters point to improved investor confidence and reduced risk from oil market volatility, while critics see a foreign power keeping a hand on Iraq's wealth. Billions in New York Central Bank of Iraq (CBI) officials told Shafaq News, in condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter, that the US Federal Reserve currently holds between $80B and $85B of Iraq's reserves. These funds pay for imports, settle foreign obligations, stabilize the dinar, and help curb inflation — making uninterrupted access critical to Iraq's economy. However, that dependence has given US regulators leverage; after, what it alleged, tracing dollar transfers to sanctioned states such as Iran and Syria, the US Treasury barred 35 of Iraq's 72 licensed banks from dollar transactions. Iraqi officials note that banks can be reinstated if they meet compliance standards, but until then, access to dollars remains restricted. With fewer dollars in circulation, the parallel exchange rate climbed from about 1,470 dinars per dollar in 2022 to peaks of 1,600 in 2024. Higher import costs rippled through markets, straining traders, raising consumer prices, and fueling public frustration. Washington has also considered limits on foreign electronic payments, potentially affecting the use of international cards — a reminder that decisions made in New York can directly influence transactions in Baghdad's shops and markets. Old Debt, New Risks To some, this Fed account is a vital shield, including Washington-based economist and policy adviser Dr. Frank Masmar, who described it to Shafaq News as 'a safe haven for revenues in volatile oil markets' that also facilitates debt servicing and trade finance. He warned, however, that 'the United States can, if it chooses, use these funds as political leverage.' Others in Baghdad, such as Prime Minister's economic adviser Mudhir Muhammad Salih, call it a 'legal safety net' that has allowed Iraq to diversify reserves into other protected central banks. He stressed that while the US does not directly control oil inflows, the dominance of the dollar means transactions are inevitably subject to American oversight. Meanwhile, Economist Nabil al-Tamimi warned that Saddam-era claims could still be used to target Iraqi assets if they lose the Fed's legal protection, noting that gaps left since 2003 could be exploited by foreign creditors. Former senior banker Mahmoud Dagher agrees, arguing that with outstanding cases against the Ministry of Finance, moving the reserves would be 'a strategic mistake.' Both see the same hazard: without immunity, Iraq's wealth could become entangled in court battles abroad. A Delicate Balance Oil revenues fund more than 90% of Iraq's budget; any delay in accessing them would disrupt salaries, stall public services, and unsettle markets. Altering the arrangement could also raise borrowing costs, hurt credit ratings, and weaken the dinar — risks Baghdad cannot afford to ignore. Iraq's choices are few: keep the system, renegotiate it, or cut the tie entirely. Each path carries consequences beyond accounting and deep into the question of sovereignty. As some analysts put it, relying on the Federal Reserve is like walking a tightrope — it offers security, but it can become a pressure point the moment "Washington's political calculus shifts." Two decades after the first oil dollars landed in New York, Iraq's economic lifeline shall continue running through a foreign vault for the foreseeable future — a reminder that in global finance, the lines between protection and control can be dangerously thin.

PUK, Arabs disagree on rotating Kirkuk governorship
PUK, Arabs disagree on rotating Kirkuk governorship

Rudaw Net

time8 hours ago

  • Rudaw Net

PUK, Arabs disagree on rotating Kirkuk governorship

Also in Iraq Conditions at Makhmour camp not eased despite PKK peace talks, say residents Kurds underrepresented in Kirkuk institutions despite half the population: MP Iraq drew over $100 billion foreign investment in two years: PM US senator warns PMF bill grants Iran 'backdoor' into Iraq A+ A- ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - The tenure of Kirkuk's Kurdish governor will expire at the end of this year, a senior member of one of Iraq's main Sunni parties said on Friday as debate heats up about whether or not governorship of the disputed province will rotate between Kurdish and Arab factions. The 'term of Mr. Rebwar Taha, the governor of Kirkuk from the [Patriotic Union of Kurdistan PUK] party, ends on the night of December 31, 2025,' Mohammed al-Jabouri, Iraq's planning minister and member of the Taqadum party, said in a Facebook post. Jabouri said this deal on Kirkuk's governance reached last summer stipulates that key posts will rotate between the province's components. A member of the PUK has denied that such a provision exists. The debate began when Taqadum leader Mohammed al-Halbousi visited Kirkuk earlier this week for a rally ahead of Iraq's November parliamentary election. He told supporters that their agreement with the PUK includes a provision that the post of governor will be shared. Ahmed Kirkuki, a PUK member in the provincial council, denied that there is such an agreement. 'Mohammed al-Halbousi's visit to Kirkuk was for the purpose of an electoral campaign. Due to public pressure, he mentioned that they have an agreement with the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan to hand over the position of Kirkuk governor to an Arab after two years. Otherwise, there is no evidence that such an agreement has been made,' Kirkuki told Rudaw on Thursday. He declined to discuss the contents of their governance deal. Two members of the Kirkuk provincial council from Halbousi's party censured Kirkuki's comments on Friday. Dhaher al-Assi and Raad Salih said in a joint statement that their agreement with the PUK includes rotating the post of governor between Kurds, Arabs and Turkmens and that Kirkuki himself is one of the signatories of the deal. They urged all the signing parties and guarantors to 'uphold their responsibilities towards the people' and called on the PUK to clarify if Kirkuki's remarks represent the party's stance on the matter. Kirkuk is an ethnically diverse province. Representation of its Kurdish, Arab, and Turkmen populations in government is a frequent source of disagreement. Taha was controversially appointed governor in a meeting held in Baghdad in August last year after months of talks. Nine council members attended - five from the PUK, three Arabs, and the Christian quota member. Salih and Assi were part of the coalition that made the agreement. The KDP, Turkmen Front, and Sunni Arab Alliance boycotted the session, calling it illegal and later challenging it in court, though the judiciary upheld the appointment. Salih and Assi announced their withdrawal from the coalition with the PUK in May, saying key terms of the deal had not been implemented.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store