logo
India has size, but Pakistan's military capabilities are closely matched

India has size, but Pakistan's military capabilities are closely matched

India and Pakistan have significantly upgraded their military capabilities since the South Asian neighbours faced off in a military confrontation in 2019.
Both sides have acquired more sophisticated aircraft, missiles and drones.
And they have stockpiles of nuclear warheads, but defence experts stress it is unlikely either side will consider using them.
But with both boasting powerful conventional weapons, even a limited conflict would carry high risks of escalation.
India has been building up its military might, largely due to increased Western support.
Pakistan gets 81 per cent of its weapons from China, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
The two countries are roughly balanced in terms of their military capabilities, but they differ substantially in numbers.
India has the world's second-largest military behind China, according to World Factbook data.
The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute reported that India's military expenditure in 2024 was $US86.1 billion ($133.7 billion), making it the fifth-largest military spender globally.
India's far greater resources would come into play over a longer period.
Indian and Pakistan have fought three wars — in 1948, 1965 and 1971 — and clashed countless times, mostly over the Kashmir region which they both claim.
Kashmir is considered one of the most dangerous flashpoints in the world.
Pakistan's leader vowed his country would deliver a robust response after India launched missiles into Pakistani territory on Wednesday.
India said it was targeting "terrorist infrastructure" in Pakistan after 26 tourists were gunned down in India-controlled Kashmir.
The countries have since accused each other of launching missile and drone strikes.
The 2019 skirmish almost spiralled out of control, with multiple missile strikes threatened before US intervention calmed the situation down.
Muhammad Faisal, a South Asia security researcher based at the University of Technology Sydney, said a conflict today would likely involve more advanced weapons.
"Each side will think they are in a better position than last time," he said.
According to data from the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies, India has about 730 combat-capable aircraft.
India believed it was at a disadvantage in 2019 because it had to rely mainly on aging Russian jets.
It has since acquired 36 French-made Rafale fighter jets, a top Western aircraft, with more on order for its navy.
"For India, there is the dilemma of how many air squadrons to commit to the Pakistan front, as it must also guard against China," Mr Faisal told the ABC.
The Pakistani prime minister's office said on Wednesday that five Indian fighter jets and drones had been shot down by Chinese-made J-10C jets, although this was not confirmed by India.
An anonymous US official told Reuters at least one Indian jet that was shot down was a French-made Rafale fighter aircraft.
The Indian embassy in Beijing called reports of fighter jets downed by Pakistan "disinformation".
Pakistan's aerial fleet is much smaller, at about 450 aircraft.
Since 2022, Pakistan has acquired at least 20 Chinese-made J-10C jets, one of the country's most advanced fighter aircraft.
India's Rafales are armed with Meteor air-to-air missiles.
The Meteor's range has not been officially published.
The J-10 is equipped with the comparable PL-15 missile, a Pakistani security official told Reuters.
The Chinese plane and its PL-15 missiles have never been tested in combat.
The PL-15 missile is reported to have an estimated range of 200 km.
Mr Faisal said fighter jets would likely continue to feature in a prolonged stand-off.
They allow each side to strike at long-range targets from their own territory.
"Jets allow you to send missiles simultaneously across the border and overwhelm air defences," he said.
To plug the gaps in air defences exposed on both sides in the 2019 conflict, India secured Russia's battle-tested S-400, a mobile anti-aircraft missile system.
Pakistan obtained the HQ-9 from China, which is based on Russia's S-300, one notch down.
India's S-400 could also be integrated into its navy.
Mr Faisal said India had ambitions beyond defending itself against Pakistan.
He said it also had to consider risks from China, and was investing in its naval forces to have a footprint across the Indo-Pacific.
Border skirmishes between the two countries are common.
There have been reports of Indian and Pakistani troops engaging in post-to-post small arms firing along the Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir since last month's deadly terrorist attack in the area.
Sushant Singh, a lecturer at Yale University and a former Indian army officer, said fighting along the Line of Control had reached new levels.
"We are seeing a very high intensity of firing, and a very different kind of weaponry … bigger weaponry, more powerful weaponry is being used by both sides," he told the ABC's Radio National Hour.
He said the border fighting was separate from any response he expected from Pakistan.
"It's very hard to predict the future, but my sense is that Pakistan will retaliate to the Indian operation," he said.
Both India and Pakistan have been heavily investing in drones.
India has turned to Israel for combat-capable drones, receiving Heron MK2s — long-endurance drones used for strategic missions.
It also has US Predator drones on order.
According to the Stimson Center, a US-based think tank, one of the most notable developments in India's drone program has been the deployment of swarm drones.
Pakistan's drone fleet includes Turkey's advanced Bayraktar TB2 — used by Ukraine in its war with Russia — and the Akinci, according to the Pakistani security official.
It also has long-endurance, Chinese-made Wing Loong I and II drones.
Pakistan said it shot down 12 drones from India that violated its airspace on Thursday.
India sent Israeli Harop drones to multiple locations, including the two largest cities of Karachi and Lahore, Pakistan military spokesperson Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry said.
India's defence ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
India also claimed to have neutralised Pakistani missile and drone strikes on military stations around the Kashmir region.
Mr Faisal said both countries had ballistic missiles that could cover each other's "whole territory".
Pakistan tested a surface-to-surface ballistic missile with a range of 450km last Saturday.
The country's military said it was to show its forces were ready to "safeguard national security against any aggression".
Marcus Hellyer from Strategic Analysis Australia said any full-scale conflict or use of nuclear weapons would be highly unlikely.
"While it's not complete parity, you don't have this huge imbalance of power, so that kind of limits the options," he told the ABC.
The countries have built up nuclear arsenals over the years.
India has 172 warheads and Pakistan boasts 170, according to data from the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies.
They are both signatories to a pact that bars them from attacking each other's nuclear facilities.
India also has a "no first use" policy. That means it will only retaliate with nuclear weapons if there is a nuclear attack on Indian forces or Indian territories.
Raji Pillai Rajagopalan from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute said the Indian and Pakistani political leadership had limits.
They "cannot escalate it to a nuclear level", she told ABC News Breakfast.
"Even after the two countries went nuclear in 1998, they have engaged in multiple conflicts but have always been limited in nature," she said.
"Every single attack has shown that there are these kind of red lines that both sides draw."
ABC/wires
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Shinawatra family has dominated Thai politics for decades. Three legal cases could change that
The Shinawatra family has dominated Thai politics for decades. Three legal cases could change that

ABC News

time6 hours ago

  • ABC News

The Shinawatra family has dominated Thai politics for decades. Three legal cases could change that

Thailand's billionaire Shinawatra family are undoubtedly political survivors. Over two decades, they have survived two military coups and three court rulings that collectively toppled three of their governments and five prime ministers. But the imminent findings of multiple court cases could reshape the family dynasty and the political landscape of Thailand. Here's what we know about the cases faced by suspended Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra and her influential but controversial father, Thaksin Shinawatra. Thailand's suspended prime minister is accused of failing in her duties by not standing up for the country properly. The central issue is what she said in a leaked phone call with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen. The call focused on the then-brewing border dispute between the neighbouring countries. In the call, Ms Shinawatra addressed Hun Sen as "uncle" and referred to a Thai military commander as her "opponent", sparking a furious reaction in Thailand. Conservative politicians accused her of kowtowing to Cambodia and undermining Thailand's military. The backlash was almost immediate, with the main party in the country's ruling coalition walking out in protest over her conduct on the call — a move that almost collapsed her government. A group of senators filed a petition with the Constitutional Court arguing she should be removed from office for breaching constitutional provisions that require "evident integrity" and "ethical standards" among ministers. She has always denied any wrongdoing. As well as sparking a domestic political crisis, the phone call plunged relations between Thailand and Cambodia to new lows. The border row later erupted into the deadliest military clash between the two countries in decades, with more than 40 people killed and 300,000 forced to flee their homes along the border. On Thursday, her 39th birthday, she testified in front of Thailand's Constitutional Court for about an hour and a half. A court ruling has banned any reporting of what she said. She was flanked by a senior advisor and waved at a crowd of supporters as she left. The court will rule next Friday on whether she should be permanently removed from office. She has received support from Thailand's acting prime minister, Phumtham Wechayachai. "I believe there was nothing that affected the country's security, and I trust her intention to keep Thailand out of conflict," he told reporters. Legal advisor and former special counsel to the deputy prime minister of Thailand, Verapat Pariyawong, told ABC's The World the case was a "very murky area between law and politics". "If the prime minister shot someone, or committed a crime, or committed bribery, then it's quite a straightforward question of facts and law," Mr Pariyawong said. "But we are talking about a prime minister in a private call with another former leader of a neighbouring country, trying to secure a peace deal, so to say. So whether one could judge that her attempt to prevent bloodshed, to prevent military escalation, was done in good faith is, in my view, a political question." He said it remained to be seen how the court would address the issue. Thailand's former leader is charged with allegedly insulting the country's royal family. The case stems from an interview he gave to journalists in South Korea in 2015. A complaint was later lodged by the royalist military that ousted the government of his sister, Yingluck Shinawatra. Insulting or defaming Thailand's royal family is illegal under the country's laws, known as lèse-majesté, which are some of the strictest in the world. The law states that it is illegal to "defame, insult or threaten the king, the queen, the heir-apparent or the regent", but there is no definition of what constitutes an insult to the monarchy. If he is found guilty, he faces up to 15 years behind bars. He has always denied any wrongdoing. Verapat Pariyawong said that the opinion of most in Thai legal circles was that he should be acquitted "simply because the evidence is quite thin". "The remarks that we found did not point to the monarchy, the monarch or the king at the time," Mr Pariyawong said. "It points to the so-called palace circles or other officials surrounding the palace. So I think that would be the turning point for the court to consider." The court will hand down its verdict on Friday, but it is not the only case of concern for Mr Shinawatra. He was previously convicted of conflict of interest and abuse of power, but avoided prison time by fleeing abroad in 2008. Upon his return to Thailand in 2023, he served a brief sentence in a comfortable hospital suite before being paroled and pardoned. A separate court will decide next month if that detention meant his sentence was not fully served. If the Constitutional Court rules that she should be removed from office, Paetongtarn Shinawatra will become the third member of her family to be ousted from the role. Her father and aunt were both ousted in military coups. Despite being ousted, Thaksin Shinawatra has remained a powerful backroom driver of the government and Pheu Thai Party. Law professor at Thammasat University Prinya Thaewanarumitkul said unfavourable verdicts would likely reduce the family's bargaining power and lead to an earlier-than-scheduled election. "A new election will definitely take place by mid-2026 or maybe sooner," Professor Thaewanarumitkul said. "The chances of Pheu Thai regaining the popular vote in the next election are very unlikely." A spokesperson for the Pheu Thai-led government declined to comment on the upcoming court rulings. Political science expert at Burapha University, Olarn Thinbangtieo, said Mr Thaksin would still have the support of the conservative establishment, even if he did receive unfavourable verdicts. He said that would be because the group wanted to keep the progressive opposition at bay. ABC/wires

Can the US become a force in lithium?
Can the US become a force in lithium?

News.com.au

time20 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Can the US become a force in lithium?

The focus of the US' critical minerals push has largely been rare earths Yet the country is a tiny producer of lithium and is import-dependent While weak pricing has slowed development, the situation is likely to change in the coming years The US is not currently a major player in the lithium market. But with rising demand and a friendly permitting environment, that will likely change. Albemarle Corporation's Silver Peak lithium mine in Nevada is currently the US' only lithium producer. S&P Global Commodity Insights principal analyst, future energy metals research Alice Yu told a recent webinar that around 90% of the US' lithium needs, including finished or semi-finished goods, were met through indirect imports last year. China only accounts for around 1.2% of US lithium imports, with battery cathodes and precursors largely imported from South Korea and Japan, which are largely produced using refined lithium from China. While the US and Japan have signed a trade deal, Yu pointed out that tariffs were still higher than under the previous administration. 'Some players are looking at investing in US-based production capacity for precursors, cathodes and batteries, but some of those investments are currently parked because of concerns around downgrades to (the) US EV outlook,' she said. 'And if they were to slow, then there's less of an urgency or the need to shift capacities to the US.' Chariot Corporation (ASX:CC9) managing director Shanthar Pathmanathan, whose company has both hard rock and clay-hosted projects in the US, told Stockhead the impetus to produce more lithium domestically would ramp up once planned battery capacity in the US was operational. 'Because it doesn't produce a single battery, there's no palpable need for lithium in-country,' he said. 'But soon as those batteries start rolling off the production line, people are going to go, 'hang on, these guys are shipping the lithium in from China. Why don't we build a refinery?' And Tesla's actually building that refinery right now. 'I think until the production of lithium batteries happens, then people won't have that same urgency in their head.' EV sales slowing but still growing 'The concern over US EV demand is very real,' Yu said. According to Rho Motion, the North American EV market has grown by just 2% so far this year, lagging Europe, which has grown by 30%. While US President Donald Trump has been keen to boost domestic minerals production, a large focus of that push has been rare earths. 'Defence and security-led priorities are now what's driving US critical minerals policies, and that's a marked shift from the previous energy transition priorities,' Yu said. 'The latest budget bill has slashed federal support for EVs and the support for the production of batteries and critical minerals will also end earlier than before. 'We expect US EV demand to drop because of higher cost from the end of the tax credits by September at a time when consumers are still highly sensitive to the support and as the US EV industry is still scaling up. 'US EV costs will also rise on higher cost of imported EVs, battery components and likely critical minerals that go into them.' Last week, the US Department of Energy (DOE) announced its intent to issue notices of funding opportunities totalling nearly US$1 billion to advance and scale mining, processing, and manufacturing technologies across key stages of the critical minerals and materials supply chains. While several of the funding initiatives are focused on rare earths, there was up to US$500 million to expand US critical mineral and materials processing, including lithium, and derivative battery manufacturing and recycling. There was also up to US$50 million of funding for technology, including direct lithium extraction and separation. Asian players keen to invest Chariot is in talks with potential Chinese partners, both for its projects in Nigeria and the US. 'One company that we are talking to is developing, through a subsidiary, a battery plant in America,' Pathmanathan said. 'I think what people are going to find is that these US-China trade talks are going to emanate into something a bit different than what was initially quite hostile, where the Chinese won't give up any technology. 'However, because it's a big business opportunity, they will look to build manufacturing capacity in America. 'I think that solves two problems. It gets around the tariff, and secondly, it's still consistent with China's concept that they're off to a lead in the race, and they don't want to give up that lead by sharing the technology, but they can just go and set up factories there.' Last month, Anson Resources (ASX:ASN) announced a memorandum of understanding with South Korea's POSCO to develop a DLE demonstration plant at its Green River project in Utah. Anson executive chairman Bruce Richardson said the company first met POSCO in 2018 and reconnected last year. 'They had to find new sources of material in the United States, or at least, something that didn't involve going through China,' he said in an interview last month. POSCO is conducting test work on a sample from Green River with a view to make a decision on whether to proceed by the end of the year. Projects advancing Yu said the weak pricing in lithium had slowed the development of US mines and the broader battery supply chain. 'The government needs to add more incentives to boost investment for critical minerals where prices are low and where market fundamentals are weak,' she said. Earlier this week, spodumene prices hit US$1000 per tonne, a 2025 high, as the market continues to digest the fallout of mine suspensions in China. The US has two permitted lithium projects, both in Nevada. Lithium Americas' Thacker Pass, in which US carmaker GM holds a minority share, is under construction though it won't achieve first production until late 2027 at the earliest. The other project to be permitted is Ioneer's (ASX:INR) Rhyolite Ridge, which is subject to a partnering process before a final investment decision is made. In addition, a number of lithium projects, including Jindalee Lithium's (ASX:JLL) McDermitt project in Oregon, have been designated as FAST-41 Transparency Projects, which can speed up permitting. Piedmont Lithium, which is working towards a merger with Sayona Mining, is advancing its fully integrated Carolina mine and hydroxide facility in North Carolina. In the DLE space, Albemarle, Standard Lithium, Equinor, ExxonMobil and EnergyX, which recently acquired Pantera Lithium's (ASX:PFE) Smackover project, are active in Arkansas. Anson raised $5 million this week to continue to advance Green River and is working towards a final investment decision next year. Exploration increasing Pathmanathan believes with the improving regulatory environment in the US, exploration will increase and resources will grow. 'If you look at Thacker Pass, if you look at Jindalee, and if you look at our property in the McDermott Caldera, that's probably the number one area to focus on – that, to me, is the Saudi Arabia of lithium sitting in the US,' he said. He added that the improvements in permitting in the US were a positive for the company and it was keen to engage with the government. 'To get these projects permitted is a high priority, and then advancing exploration at each of these projects is also high priority,' he said. Meanwhile, Astute Metals (ASX:ASE) is advancing its Red Mountain lithium project in Nevada and kicked off a drilling campaign on Monday, which will feed into a maiden resource to be released before the end of the year. Despite its lack of production, the US already has the fifth-largest reserves of lithium globally and the third-largest measured and indicated resources, according to the US Geological Survey. 'Last year, US exploration spending in lithium ranked the third highest globally, and that's well ahead of bigger producers today like Argentina, Brazil and Chile,' Yu said. 'We know that exploration takes place years and decades before production, so the very strong US exploration in lithium in 2024 will bode very well for the outlook.'

Israel prepares to take over Gaza City, what does this mean?
Israel prepares to take over Gaza City, what does this mean?

ABC News

time20 hours ago

  • ABC News

Israel prepares to take over Gaza City, what does this mean?

Israel is calling up tens of thousands of extra reservists as it prepares to conquer Gaza City. The Israeli military said the first stage of its planned assault was already underway, with IDF troops moving into the outskirts of the city, which is home to more than 1 million people. Israel describes the city as a Hamas stronghold, but it is also one of the last places of refuge of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians already displaced in almost two years of war. Israel's military announced the first steps of its operation to take over Gaza City on Wednesday and called up tens of thousands of reservists. Initially, a military official briefing reporters earlier on Wednesday said reserve soldiers would not report for duty until September. But after Israeli troops clashed with Hamas fighters in Gaza that same day, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said the Israeli leader sped up the timeline for taking control of Hamas strongholds. "We will deepen the attack on Hamas in Gaza City, a stronghold of governmental and military terror for the terrorist organisation," the spokesperson said. The IDF said troops had already begun circling the outskirts of Gaza City and Hamas was now a "battered and bruised" guerilla force. Hamas was quick to react to the latest fighting in Gaza City. "Today's announcement by the terrorist occupation army of the start of an operation against Gaza City and its nearly 1 million residents and displaced persons … demonstrates … a blatant disregard for the efforts made by the mediators," it said in a statement. Operation Gideon's Chariots is the name the IDF has given to its plans to occupy Gaza City. It could potentially see thousands of Israeli troops, some of them reservists, being sent into built-up areas where they have not previously operated. The move into the city is the first step of a larger Israeli operation that aims to eventually expand to built-up refugee camps in central Gaza, as well as to Muwasi, a sprawling displacement camp along the coast. Those areas, along with the central city of Deir al-Balah, are the only parts of Gaza that have not been almost completely destroyed in previous Israeli operations. The takeover plans in Gaza also include areas where Hamas may be holding hostages in tunnels or other secret locations, Israel says. Gaza City is located on the Mediterranean coast, just over 75 kilometres south-west of Jerusalem, and is the largest city in the Gaza Strip. Before the war, Gaza City was home to around 700,000 people. But now, Israeli media reports the number of people there has swelled to about 1.2 million. The majority of people who live in Gaza City are Palestinian refugees or descendants of refugees. The serious escalation into Gaza City could displace hundreds of thousands of people, many of whom have been uprooted multiple times during the war. Fearing an imminent Israeli ground offensive, thousands of Palestinians have left their homes in eastern areas of Gaza City, now under constant Israeli bombardment, for points to the west and south in the shattered territory. Israel currently holds about 75 per cent of the Gaza Strip. The Israeli statements on Wednesday signalled Israel was pressing ahead with its plan to seize Gaza's biggest urban centre despite international criticism. Israel's actions in Gaza have been condemned by the UN and more than 28 Western-aligned nations. "It's pretty obvious that it will just create another mass displacement of people who have been displaced repeatedly since this phase of the conflict started," United Nations spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said. Last month Western-aligned nations including Australia, Britain and Canada issued a joint statement condemning Israel's actions and saying the war "must end now". The statement said "the suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths" and added that "the Israeli government's denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable". US President Donald Trump restated his support for Israel in a post on his Truth Social website earlier this week. "We will only see the return of the remaining hostages when Hamas is confronted and destroyed!!! The sooner this takes place, the better the chances of success will be," he wrote. "Play to WIN, or don't play at all!" Mr Trump said. On Monday, Hamas agreed to a ceasefire proposed by Qatar and Egypt. Whilst Israel has not yet responded, it continues to say it is committed to fully defeating Hamas. The most recent proposals make slight modifications to an earlier ceasefire proposal advanced by the US and accepted by Israel. The specific details of the latest proposal have not been made public, but Egyptian and Hamas officials have described the broad outlines: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that while he will halt the fighting temporarily to facilitate the release of hostages, he will not end the war until Hamas has been defeated and disarmed. Even then, he says Israel will maintain security control over Gaza and facilitate the relocation of much of its population to other countries through what he describes as voluntary emigration. ABC/wires

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store